Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246864, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33577615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is an indicator of protective immunity for most viral infections. A newly developed surrogate viral neutralization assay (sVNT) offers the ability to detect total receptor binding domain-targeting NAbs in an isotype-independent manner, increasing the test sensitivity. Thus, specimens with low IgM/ IgG antibody levels showed strong neutralization activity in sVNT. METHODS: This study aimed to measure the %inhibition of NAbs measured by sVNT in PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients. The sensitivity of sVNT for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its kinetics were determined. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in this study. Majority of the patients were 21-40 years old (67%) and 63% had mild symptoms. The sensitivity of sVNT for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 99% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.4-100%) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI 98.3-100%). The negative predictive value of sVNT from the samples collected before and after 7 days of symptom onset was 99.5% (95% CI 97.4-100%) and 100% (95% CI 93.8-100%), respectively. The level of inhibition at days 8-14 were significantly higher than days 0-7 (p<0.001). The median %inhibition values by severity of COVID-19 symptoms were 79.9% (interquartile range (IQR) 49.7-91.8%); 89.0% (IQR 71.2-92.4%); and 86.6% (IQR 69.5-92.8%), for mild, moderate and severe/critical symptoms respectively. The median level of sVNT %inhibition of severe was significantly higher than the mild group (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The sVNT is a practical and robust serological test for SARS-CoV-2 infection and does not require specialized biosafety containment. It can be used clinically to aid diagnosis in both early and late infection especially in cases when the real-time RT-PCR results in weakly negative or weakly positive, and to determine the protective immune response from SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/aislamiento & purificación , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Neutralización/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Adulto , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/análisis , Anticuerpos Antivirales/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19/inmunología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Serológicas , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/química , Tailandia , Adulto Joven
2.
J Med Virol ; 92(10): 2193-2199, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32401343

RESUMEN

In the age of a pandemic, such as the ongoing one caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the world faces a limited supply of tests, personal protective equipment, and factories and supply chains are struggling to meet the growing demands. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of specimen pooling for testing of SARS-CoV-2 virus, to determine whether costs and resource savings could be achieved without impacting the sensitivity of the testing. Ten previously tested nasopharyngeal and throat swab specimens by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were pooled for testing, containing either one or two known positive specimens of varying viral concentrations. Specimen pooling did not affect the sensitivity of detecting SARS-CoV-2 when the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) of original specimen was lower than 35. In specimens with low viral load (Ct > 35), 2 of 15 pools (13.3%) were false negative. Pooling specimens to test for Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection in low prevalence (≤1%) areas or in low risk populations can dramatically decrease the resource burden on laboratory operations by up to 80%. This paves the way for large-scale population screening, allowing for assured policy decisions by governmental bodies to ease lockdown restrictions in areas with a low incidence of infection, or with lower-risk populations.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/virología , Prueba de COVID-19/economía , Notificación de Enfermedades/economía , Notificación de Enfermedades/métodos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Humanos , Límite de Detección , Nasofaringe/virología , Faringe/virología , Prevalencia , ARN Viral/genética , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Manejo de Especímenes/economía , Tailandia/epidemiología , Carga Viral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...