Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Patterns (N Y) ; 3(5): 100483, 2022 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35607619

RESUMEN

The value of biomedical research-a $1.7 trillion annual investment-is ultimately determined by its downstream, real-world impact, whose predictability from simple citation metrics remains unquantified. Here we sought to determine the comparative predictability of future real-world translation-as indexed by inclusion in patents, guidelines, or policy documents-from complex models of title/abstract-level content versus citations and metadata alone. We quantify predictive performance out of sample, ahead of time, across major domains, using the entire corpus of biomedical research captured by Microsoft Academic Graph from 1990-2019, encompassing 43.3 million papers. We show that citations are only moderately predictive of translational impact. In contrast, high-dimensional models of titles, abstracts, and metadata exhibit high fidelity (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] > 0.9), generalize across time and domain, and transfer to recognizing papers of Nobel laureates. We argue that content-based impact models are superior to conventional, citation-based measures and sustain a stronger evidence-based claim to the objective measurement of translational potential.

2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 20(6): 562-6, 2002 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12369033

RESUMEN

To evaluate patients' perceptions and preferences concerning pain control during intravenous (IV) catheterization, a sample of 50 adult patients received subcutaneous lidocaine (0.2 mL 1%) by jet injector, or no anesthetic with a sham injection before IV catheterization. Visual analog scale (VAS), pain intensity score (PIS), and adverse reactions were recorded. A significant difference existed in the scores of patients who received lidocaine versus those who did not VAS (P <.001) PIS (P <.004). Patients' receiving lidocaine via jet-injector experienced more minor and potentially preventable adverse effects such as mild bruising and trauma to the veins. Patients in both groups (84% overall) preferred local anesthesia based on this experience. Using the jet-injector to provide local anesthesia before IV catheterization in the ED is effective, fast, and does not require sharps disposal and handling precautions.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo Periférico/tendencias , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones a Chorro/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Percepción , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...