"I Don't Have to be Sick to Still Be Worthy": The Barriers Experienced by Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors in New Zealand.

Purpose: To identify the spectrum and nature of survivorship barriers experienced by New Zealand's adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivor population. In addition, we explore associations between survivorship barriers and sociodemographic characteristics, cancer type, and day-to-day happiness following the end of treatment. Methodology: Participants were recruited for the online survey from AYA cancer service patient databases. Eligibility criteria included: aged 12-24 years at diagnosis, diagnosed between 2010 and 2019, and completed treatment at least one year prior. The analysis focused on 11 barriers (domains, issues, or concerns) which respondents may have faced during survivorship. Results: Two hundred and eighteen AYA survivors participated in the study. The mean number of impactful survivorship barriers was 2.5 (standard deviation 1.7), with 13 respondents (6.0%) reporting no barriers of concern and 31 (14.2%) reporting 5 or more. A higher number of impactful barriers was associated with lower day-to-day happiness (r = -0.34, p ≤ 0.001). The most commonly identified impactful survivorship barriers were mental health (50.0% of respondents), physical health (43.1%), thinking and memory (33.0%), education and work (27.1%), social life (26.1%), and fertility (22.5%). Subgroup analysis identified significant differences according to gender, age at diagnosis, tumor group, ethnicity, and time since diagnosis. Poor access to health care and unmet needs were common themes. Positive impacts, particularly with regards to family relationships, were also identified. Conclusion: These results will inform initiatives to improve AYA survivorship care in New Zealand. Gaps in service delivery and funding will need to be overcome by utilizing innovative strategies and broad sector engagement.

Health professionals' self-identified knowledge, barriers and educational needs regarding identification and management of adolescent and young adult cancer in New Zealand.

AIM: To explore primary healthcare professionals' (PHPs') knowledge and educational needs regarding identification and referral of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with suspected cancer in New Zealand. METHOD: An anonymous online survey targeting PHPs was distributed through health networks during March-August 2019. The survey covered demographics, knowledge of AYA cancer and related topics and preferred sources of AYA cancer information, which includes professional development. RESULTS: Eighty-three respondents completed the survey. The most prominent education needs were identifying the possible symptoms of AYA cancer, the diagnostic pathways for AYA cancer and the services and supports available for AYAs. Respondents indicated that time was a significant barrier to both diagnosis and professional development regarding AYA cancer. Forty-five respondents (54%) reported that consultation time 'always' or 'most of the time' impacted their ability to explore vague symptoms, and 67% cited time as the biggest barrier to participating in AYA cancer education. CONCLUSION: PHPs are receptive to professional AYA cancer education, and their preference is for online learning. There is a significant self-identified knowledge gap for PHPs related to pre-diagnosis (symptoms and pathways), which could help structure effective and targeted professional education.

The burden of cancer in 25-29 year olds in New Zealand: a case for a wider adolescent and young adult age range?

AIMS: New Zealand currently defines the adolescent and young adult (AYA) group for cancer services as young people 12-24 years of age, while other countries favour a designation of 15-29 years. This study was undertaken to compare cancer incidence and survival among 25-29 year olds to New Zealand's younger AYA population and to assess survival for our 15-29 year population against international benchmarks. METHODS: Diagnostic and demographic information for cancer registrations between 2000 and 2009 for 25-29 year olds was obtained from the New Zealand Cancer Registry. Incidence rates (IR) and five-year relative survival estimates were calculated according to AYA diagnostic group/sub-group, sex and prioritised ethnicity. RESULTS: 1,541 new primary malignant cancers were diagnosed (IR: 588 per million). Five-year relative survival was 85%, but was significantly lower for Maori and Pacific peoples (both 77%) compared to non-Maori/non-Pacific peoples (88%). In the overall 15-29 year AYA cohort, disease-specific outcomes for bone tumours (46%) and breast cancer (64%) were inferior to international standards. CONCLUSION: New Zealand 25 to 29 year olds are at twice the risk of developing cancer as those 15-24 years. Given that the survival disparities identified were remarkably consistent with those for younger AYA, consideration should be given widening New Zealand's AYA age range.

Small Numbers, Big Challenges: Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Incidence and Survival in New Zealand.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine cancer survival and describe the unique spectrum of cancers diagnosed among New Zealand's adolescents and young adult (AYA) population. METHODS: Registrations for 1606 15-24 year olds diagnosed with a new primary malignant tumor between 2000 and 2009 were obtained from the New Zealand Cancer Registry and classified according to AYA diagnostic group and subgroup, age, sex, and prioritized ethnicity. Age-standardized incidence rates (IRs) per million person years and 5-year relative survival ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Cancer incidence was 228.6 per million for adolescents aged 15-19 years and 325.7 per million for young adults aged 20-24 years. Overall IRs were consistent across all ethnic groups but there were unique ethnic differences by tumor group including a higher incidence of bone tumors, carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract, and gonadal germ cell tumors among Maori, a higher incidence of leukemia among Pacific peoples, and a higher incidence of melanoma among non-Maori/non-Pacific peoples. Five-year relative survival for adolescents (75.1%) and AYA overall (80.6%) appeared poorer than had been achieved in other high-income countries. Maori (69.5%) and Pacific (71.3%) AYA had lower 5-year survival compared to non-Maori/non-Pacific peoples (84.2%). CONCLUSION: The survival disparities observed require further investigation to identify and address the causes of these inferior outcomes. The newly established AYA Cancer Network Aotearoa has been tasked with improving cancer survival and care and ensuring equality of access for New Zealand AYAs with cancer.