RESUMEN
PURPOSE: ChatGPT is a commonly used source of information by patients and clinicians. However, it can be prone to error and requires validation. We sought to assess the quality and accuracy of information regarding corneal transplantation and Fuchs dystrophy from 2 iterations of ChatGPT, and whether its answers improve over time. METHODS: A total of 10 corneal specialists collaborated to assess responses of the algorithm to 10 commonly asked questions related to endothelial keratoplasty and Fuchs dystrophy. These questions were asked from both ChatGPT-3.5 and its newer generation, GPT-4. Assessments tested quality, safety, accuracy, and bias of information. Chi-squared, Fisher exact tests, and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We analyzed 180 valid responses. On a 1 (A+) to 5 (F) scale, the average score given by all specialists across questions was 2.5 for ChatGPT-3.5 and 1.4 for GPT-4, a significant improvement (P < 0.0001). Most responses by both ChatGPT-3.5 (61%) and GPT-4 (89%) used correct facts, a proportion that significantly improved across iterations (P < 0.00001). Approximately a third (35%) of responses from ChatGPT-3.5 were considered against the scientific consensus, a notable rate of error that decreased to only 5% of answers from GPT-4 (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of responses in ChatGPT significantly improved between versions 3.5 and 4, and the odds of providing information against the scientific consensus decreased. However, the technology is still capable of producing inaccurate statements. Corneal specialists are uniquely positioned to assist users to discern the veracity and application of such information.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe a case of recalcitrant Acanthamoeba Keratitis (AK) complicated by medical non-compliance and medication intolerance that was successfully treated with photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL). OBSERVATIONS: A 31-year-old male presented with right eye pain and redness in the setting of fresh water exposure and scleral contact lens wear. He had lack of a response to treatment with antiviral therapy for 3 months by an outside provider. Cultures were found to be positive for Acanthamoeba and the patient was treated with an extended course of various anti-amoebic therapies with poor compliance due to pain and toxicity. He was eventually treated with intrastromal voriconazole and Miltefosine without improvement and eventually had PACK-CXL with resolution of his infection and pain. CONCLUSION: PACK-CXL was associated with a dramatic improvement in a case of recalcitrant Acanthamoeba keratitis unresponsive to both traditional and novel therapies and may be a viable alternative or adjunctive therapy for Acanthamoeba keratitis.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether eyedrops (phenylephrine, tropicamide, and fluorescein-proparacaine) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) have an effect on optical biometry measurements for preoperative cataract surgery workup. SETTING: George Washington University, Washington, DC. DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial. METHODS: Participants older than 18 years with no contraindications to eyedrops or tonometry were recruited. Optical biometry measurements were obtained on a single eye using the Lenstar LS900. One drop each of phenylephrine, tropicamide, and fluorescein-proparacaine was applied to the same eye, and measurements were repeated. GAT was performed, and measurements were repeated. For controls, the contralateral eye was also measured at each interval. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in mean predicted postoperative refraction (PPOR) keratometry (K) 1, K2, or axis postdrops and post-GAT 62 eyes (n = 62). After drops were applied, mean central corneal thickness increased from 540 to 542 µm (P = .0002), mean anterior chamber depth (ACD) increased from 3.68 to 3.70 mm (P < .0001), and lens thickness (LT) decreased from 3.66 to 3.65 (P = .001). After GAT, ACD increased to 3.76 mm (P < .0001), and LT increased to 3.60 mm (P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in PPOR or other parameters for the control eyes (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: GAT and phenylephrine, tropicamide, and fluorescein-proparacaine drops did not affect the primary outcome of PPOR. This suggests that cataract surgery candidates do not need to return for a separate preoperative visit for optical biometry.