Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 402, 2024 Aug 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095845

RESUMEN

Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are integral to managing patients with advanced cancer. They improve quality of survival by reducing skeletal-related events, treating hypercalcaemia and chemotherapy-induced bone loss (Coleman in Clin Cancer Res 12: 6243s-6249s, 2006), (Coleman in Ann Oncol 31: 1650-1663, 2020). Two decades ago, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) was first reported following BMA therapy (Marx in J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61: 1115-1117, 2003). The risk of MRONJ extends over a decade following BMA treatment with bisphosphonates, complicating dental care such as extractions. In addition, MRONJ has been reported following additional therapies such as antiangiogenic agents, cytotoxic agents, immunotherapy, and targeted agents. The use of BMAs in the curative and adjuvant cancer setting is increasing, consequently the implication of MRONJ is growing. Over the past 20 years, the literature has consolidated major risk factors for MRONJ, the pathophysiology and management strategies for MRONJ. Our review aims to document the development of MRONJ preventative and management strategies in cancer patients receiving a BMA. The authors advocate the incorporation of dental oncology strategies into contemporary cancer care, to optimise long-term quality of survival after cancer treatment.


Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Humanos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/terapia
2.
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs ; 27(1): 19-31, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34937483

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The year 2021 will be remembered as a transformational year in the management of both esophageal and gastric cancers. Decades of failed clinical trials had seen limited therapeutic advances beyond refinement of the traditional combined modality approach. Targeted strategies against specific molecular alterations did not - with the exception of Her2 - yield the desired breakthroughs, and it was unclear what immune-based approaches would bring to this group of cancers. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in esophagogastric cancer demonstrates that an endogenous immune response is already occurring and potentially amplifiable by immune checkpoint inhibition. Recent data have validated this with FDA approvals in both the locoregional (CheckMate 577) and metastatic disease (CheckMate 649, KeyNote 590 and KeyNote 811) setting which have altered the therapeutic landscape. AREAS COVERED: Here we discuss recent data and ongoing research efforts to better define the role of immune-based approaches and select the patient cohorts who might gain the most benefit from them. EXPERT OPINION: Immunotherapy, and specifically the incorporation of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) drug class, has altered the therapeutic paradigm of many cancers in recent years. Anti-PD-1 therapies are now the new standard of care for patients with local and advanced disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...