Improved restoration of biomechanical factors using a narrow-box shape reconstruction compared to a wide one in superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears. A biomechanical study using a static shoulder simulator.

PURPOSE: To biomechanically compare superior glenohumeral translation, subacromial contact pressures and area in a box-shape reconstruction using the long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) in an irreparable supraspinatus tendon tear model. METHODS: Seven cadaveric shoulders (mean age 61 years; range 32-84 years; SD 22.3) were tested with a custom testing rig used to evaluate superior translation, subacromial contact pressures and areas at 0°, 30° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Conditions tested included the native state, a complete tear of the supraspinatus tendon, a wide box-shaped, double-bundle LHBT superior capsular reconstruction (wide BS-SCR), and a narrow box-shaped, double-bundle LHBT superior capsular reconstruction (narrow BS-SCR). RESULTS: Compared to the wide box-shape SCR, the narrow box-shape SCR had statistically significant lower median contact pressure at 30° and 60°. The subacromial contact area showed a statistically significant difference at 0° (p=0.001) and 30° (p=0.004) for the narrow compared to wide box-shape SCR. At an abduction angle of 0°, the narrow SCR could restore superior translation statistically significant better compared to the wide construct. For all angles, the wide and narrow box-shaped SCR increased the median subacromial distance statistically significantly. The contact areas in 30° and 60° of abduction were higher for all scenarios, both peaking in the intact state in 30° with approximately 600 mm2. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to a wide box-shape, a narrow box-shape SCR using the LHBT has biomechanical advantages in regard of subacromial contact pressures, the subacromial contact areas as well as the acromiohumeral distance. The width of the reconstruction therefore has direct influence in the success of the technique.

Early range of motion results in good elbow function following conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the range of motion (ROM), elbow function and predictors for good elbow function after conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with non-displaced radial head fractures (displacement < 2 mm), that were diagnosed between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021 in a level I trauma center, were included in this retrospective case series and the charts were evaluated for ROM and elbow function. Elbow function was categorized as "good" or "bad" depending on the ROM measured defined by Morrey et al. Overall, 73 patients (33 male, 40 female) with an average age of 38 years (+/- 13 years) could be included. RESULTS: Conservative treatment had good clinical results for ROM and elbow function. After 6 weeks mean flexion was 131° (SD 13°), extension 8° (SD 7°), Pronation 83° (SD 11°) and Supination 83° (SD 13). Patients with a good elbow function after one week showed a good elbow function after completing the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical assessment after one week should always be performed and the study showed that it is a good predictor for good elbow function. In cases of bad elbow function further controls should be considered.

[Follow-up treatment concepts for elbow injuries]. / Nachbehandlungskonzepte bei Ellenbogenverletzungen.

So far there are no clear recommendations for postoperative follow-up treatment of elbow injuries and individual concepts are often chosen. Due to the susceptibility for posttraumatic or postoperative impaired movement up to stiffness of the elbow joint, early mobilization plays a crucial role. Therefore, mid-term to long-term immobilization should be avoided. In addition to the necessary cryotherapy and compression therapy for swelling and pain control in the initial period, early actively assisted mobilization now has an important role. Additionally, active flexion and extension in an overhead position, so-called overhead motion, was recently established. After a short initial immobilization in a cast, mostly 3-5 days, the cast is changed to a dynamic movement orthosis, which when possible enables a free range of motion. Care is taken that varus and valgus loading is avoided. In general loading is avoided for the first 6 weeks, followed by a stepwise increase of loading up to maximum loading. In most cases return to sport is possible after 3 months. After implantation of an elbow prosthesis a maximum loading of 5 kg for single loading and 1 kg for repetitive loading are recommended.

Anatomic evaluation of the triceps tendon insertion at the proximal olecranon regarding placement of fracture fixation devices.

PURPOSE: Olecranon fractures, especially with a small proximal fragment, remain a surgical challenge. Soft tissue irritation and affection of the triceps muscle bear a risk of complications. In order to find an area for a soft-tissue sparing placement of implants in the treatment of olecranon fractures, we aimed to define and measure the segments of the proximal olecranon and evaluate them regarding possible plate placement. METHODS: We investigated 82 elbow joints. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee, After positioning in an arm holder and a posterior approach we described the morphology of the triceps footprint, evaluated and measured the surface area of the triceps and posterior capsule and correlated the results to easily measurable anatomical landmarks. RESULTS: We found a bipartite insertional footprint with a superficial tendinous triceps insertion of 218.2 mm2 (± 41.2, range 124.7-343.2), a capsular insertion of 159.3 mm2 (± 30.2, range 99.0-232.1) and a deep, muscular triceps insertion area of 138.1 mm2 (± 30.2, range 79.9-227.5). Olecranon height was 26.7 mm (± 2.3, range 20.5-32.2), and olecranon width was 25.3 mm (± 2.4, range 20.9-30.4). Average correlation between the size of the deep insertion and ulnar (r = 0.314) and radial length (r = 0.298) was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the bipartite morphology of the distal triceps footprint and that the deep muscular triceps insertion area by its measured size could be a possible site for the placement of fracture fixations devices. The size correlates with ulnar and radial length.

The radial head size in relation to osseous landmarks of the forearm.

PURPOSE: Radial head fractures are regularly treated with radial head arthroplasty. To prevent limited motion or pain, the implant's size should match its normal anatomy. Preoperative estimation of the radial head size helps in finding the correct head component. The aim of this study was to measure bony landmarks in proximity to the radial head to estimate the required size of a prosthesis preoperatively. METHODS: Anatomical landmarks on 82 elbows from 41 embalmed specimens (19 male, 22 female) were measured using a digital caliper after removal of the specimens' tissue: the largest and smallest radial head diameter, length of the radius (styloid tip to radial head articular surface), and the length of the ulna (styloid tip to coronoid base). Additionally, cranio-caudal and antero-posterior diameters of the capitulum on scaled lateral elbow X-ray images were measured. RESULTS: The mean largest and smallest radial head diameters were 24.2 mm (± 2.2, range 19.9-30.3; ICC = 0.992) and 22.5 mm (± 2.0, range 18.9-27.5; ICC = 0.985). The mean radius length was 23.8 cm (± 1.6, range 20.1-27.1; ICC = 0.986), and the mean ulna length was 23.1 cm (± 1.6, range 19.3-26.3; ICC = 0.969). The mean antero-posterior capitulum diameter was 16.2 mm (± 2.4, range 10.4-21.0; ICC = 0.506), and the mean cranio-caudal diameter was 17.0 mm (± 3.3, range 10.0-23.9; ICC = 0.529). The highest correlation to radial head diameters could be shown for diameters of the contralateral radial head and the radius length. CONCLUSIONS: For preoperative estimation of the radial head, the diameters of the contralateral radial head or the radius length are the most accurate.

Insertional anatomy of the anterior medial collateral ligament on the sublime tubercle of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Acute injuries to the anterior medial collateral ligament (AMCL) can occur due to valgus trauma or during other dislocating events to the elbow. AMCL lesions are often associated with bony lesions, such as radial head fractures or fractures of the coronoid process. We analyzed the insertion of the AMCL on the sublime tubercle in relation to surrounding osseous structures. We aimed to increase the understanding of the involvement of the AMCL in bony lesions to the sublime tubercle. METHODS: We investigated 86 elbows from 43 embalmed human specimens. We measured the most ventral extensions of the AMCL at the sublime tubercle in relation to a clearly defined and reproducible landmark. We used as our landmark a horizontal line (baseline) originating on the lesser sigmoid notch in a right angle to the ulnar ridge. RESULTS: The mean distance of the coronoid process tip to the baseline was 4.0 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.3 mm; range, 1.4-6.7 mm). The mean distance of the ventral extension of the AMCL to the horizontal line was 3.7 mm (SD, 2.6 mm; range: 9.4-2.2 mm). The mean horizontal distance between the ventral aspect of the AMCL and the coronoid tip was 13.7 mm (SD, 2.5 mm; range, 7.7-20.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: We present a detailed description of the insertional anatomy of the AMCL at the sublime tubercle. These values could be helpful for classifications of coronoid fractures and to estimate the involvement of the AMCL in fractures of the sublime tubercle.