RESUMEN
Pain, fatigue, and depression are a common cluster of symptoms among cancer patients that impair quality of life and daily activities. We aimed to evaluate the burden of cancer rehabilitation and return-to-work (RTW) rates. Tumor characteristics, lifestyle and household details, treatment data, the use of in-house social services and post-treatment inpatient rehabilitation, and RTW were assessed for 424 women, diagnosed with cervical, uterine, or vaginal/vulvar cancer, receiving curative radio(chemo)therapy. Progression-free RTW rate at 3 months was 32.3%, and increased to 58.1% and 63.2% at 12 and 18 months, respectively. Patients with advanced FIGO stages and intensified treatments significantly suffered more from acute pain and fatigue. A higher Charlson-Comorbidity-Index reliably predicted patients associated with a higher risk of acute fatigue during RT. Aside from the presence of children, no other household or lifestyle factor was correlated with increased fatigue rates. Women aged ≤ 45 years had a significantly higher risk of developing depression requiring treatment during follow-up. Post-treatment inpatient cancer rehabilitation, including exercise and nutrition counseling, significantly relieved fatigue symptoms. The burdens for recovery from cancer therapy remain multi-factorial. Special focus needs to be placed on identifying high-risk groups experiencing fatigue or pain. Specialized post-treatment inpatient cancer rehabilitation can improve RTW rates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is extensive evidence that patients with cancer and cancer survivors have a strong need for expert support in relation to the psychological and social consequences of the disease. The requirements set out in the German Cancer Society's cancer center certification system include the routine provision of psycho-oncologic care (POC) and social service counseling for every patient. The current study investigated which organizational and structural characteristics in hospitals account for variations in psychosocial care provision in these centers. METHODS: Data routinely collected during the certification process regarding the percentages of psychosocial care provision and characteristics of center sites and hospitals were matched with data with regard to size of the municipality, teaching hospital status, and institutional ownership. Linear multilevel regression analyses were performed to identify the characteristics of hospitals and center sites that were related to psychosocial care provision. RESULTS: Substantial differences were found for different types of cancer (eg, a greater provision of psychosocial care in centers specializing in breast rather than prostate cancer). There was more POC provision in longer-certified centers and less in rural areas and university hospitals. Much of the variation between hospitals remains unexplained. CONCLUSIONS: Although the implementation of mandatory psychosocial services generally provides patients with access to POC and social service counseling, the wide differences in the provision of counseling indicate that additional measures are needed to avoid inequalities resulting from the center at which a patient receives cancer treatment. Cancer 2016;122:3538-3545. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
RESUMEN
Social workers are an integral part of care provided in cancer centers that are certified according to the requirements of the German Cancer Society. This article reports on the tasks of social workers in German cancer care and on the proportion of patients that receives social service counseling (SSC) in breast, lung, colorectal, skin, gynecological, prostate, pancreas, neurological, and head and neck cancer centers based on data from 367,297 patients treated between 2009 and 2012. The highest proportions of patients (median >75%) are provided with SSC in breast and colorectal cancer centers, whereas the median is below 30% in skin cancer centers. Variation between centers and center types is high.
