Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Food Chem X ; 15: 100446, 2022 Oct 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36211761

RESUMEN

Currently, there is limited insight into the influence of the different binding sites of agonists and antagonists of the sweet taste receptor TAS1R2/TAS1R3 on temporal sensory properties of sweet tasting compounds. We investigated whether the binding site and a competitive or allosteric inhibition of TAS1R2/TAS1R3 influence the time-dependent sensory perception and in vitro TAS1R2/TAS1R3-activation profiles. We compared time-intensity ratings of cyclamate, NHDC, acesulfame K, and aspartame with and without lactisole with the corresponding TAS1R2/TAS1R3-activation in transfected HEK293 cells. In combination with lactisole, cyclamate and NHDC demonstrated a shift of the dose-response curve corresponding to a competitive inhibition by lactisole in the sensory and the cell experiments. Allosteric inhibition by lactisole for aspartame and acesulfame K was seen in the cell experiments, but not the sensory ratings. In conclusion, the data do not support a major impact of the binding site on the time-intensity profile of the tested sweeteners.

2.
Front Nutr ; 9: 831726, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35694162

RESUMEN

Emerging evidence points to a major role of salivary flow and viscoelastic properties in taste perception and mouthfeel. It has been proposed that sweet-tasting compounds influence salivary characteristics. However, whether perceived differences in the sensory properties of structurally diverse sweet-tasting compounds contribute to salivary flow and saliva viscoelasticity as part of mouthfeel and overall sweet taste perception remains to be clarified. In this study, we hypothesized that the sensory diversity of sweeteners would differentially change salivary characteristics in response to oral sweet taste stimulation. Therefore, we investigated salivary flow and saliva viscoelasticity from 21 healthy test subjects after orosensory stimulation with sucrose, rebaudioside M (RebM), sucralose, and neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC) in a crossover design and considered the basal level of selected influencing factors, including the basal oral microbiome. All test compounds enhanced the salivary flow rate by up to 1.51 ± 0.12 g/min for RebM compared to 1.10 ± 0.09 g/min for water within the 1st min after stimulation. The increase in flow rate was moderately correlated with the individually perceived sweet taste (r = 0.3, p < 0.01) but did not differ between the test compounds. The complex viscosity of saliva was not affected by the test compounds, but the analysis of covariance showed that it was associated (p < 0.05) with mucin 5B (Muc5B) concentration. The oral microbiome was of typical composition and diversity but was strongly individual-dependent (permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA): R 2 = 0.76, p < 0.001) and was not associated with changes in salivary characteristics. In conclusion, this study indicates an impact of individual sweet taste impressions on the flow rate without measurable changes in the complex viscosity of saliva, which may contribute to the overall taste perception and mouthfeel of sweet-tasting compounds.

3.
Food Chem X ; 7: 100100, 2020 Sep 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32904296

RESUMEN

A reduction in sugar consumption is desirable from a health point of view. However, the sensory profiles of alternative sweet tasting compounds differ from sucrose regarding their temporal profile and undesired side tastes, reducing consumers' acceptance. The present study describes a sensory characterization of a variety of sweet and sweet taste affecting compounds followed by a comparison of similarity to sucrose and a multivariate regression analysis to investigate structural determinants and possible interactions for the temporal profile of the sweetness and side-tastes. The results of the present study suggest a pivotal role for the number of ketones, aromatic rings, double bonds and the M LogP in the temporal profile of sweet and sweet taste affecting compounds. Furthermore, interactions between aggregated physicochemical descriptors demonstrate the complexity of the sensory response, which should be considered in future models to predict a comprehensive sensory profile of sweet and sweet taste affecting compounds.

4.
J Agric Food Chem ; 66(26): 6762-6771, 2018 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29879844

RESUMEN

Secretion of gastric acid, aimed at preventing bacterial growth and aiding the digestion of foods in the stomach, is chiefly stimulated by dietary intake of protein and amino acids (AAs). However, AAs' key structural determinants responsible for their effects on mechanisms regulating gastric acid secretion (GAS) have not been identified yet. In this study, AAs have been tested in the parietal cell model HGT-1 on GAS and on mRNA expression of genes regulating GAS. AAs' taste intensities from 0 (not bitter at all) to 10 (very bitter) were assessed in a sensory study, in which ARG (l: 6.42 ± 0.41; d: 4.62 ± 0.59) and ILE (l: 4.21 ± 0.43; d: 2.28 ± 0.33) were identified as bitter-tasting candidates in both isomeric forms. Pearson correlation showed that GAS in HGT-1 cells is directly associated with the bitter taste quality ( r: -0.654) in combination with the molecular weight of l-AA ( r: -0.685).


Asunto(s)
Aminoácidos/metabolismo , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Células Parietales Gástricas/metabolismo , Gusto , Adulto , Aminoácidos/química , Línea Celular Tumoral , Humanos , Peso Molecular , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA