Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 32(1): 72, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164765

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel must rapidly assess and transport patients with time-sensitive conditions to optimise patient outcomes. Serum lactate, a valuable in-hospital biomarker, has become more accessible in EMS settings through point-of-care (POC) testing. Although POC lactate levels are valuable in specific patient groups, its broader application in EMS remains unclear. This study assessed the additional predictive value of POC lactate levels in a general adult EMS population. METHODS: This prospective observational study (March 2018 to September 2019) involved two EMS organisations in Västra Götaland, Sweden. Patients were triaged using the Rapid Triage and Treatment System (RETTS). POC lactate levels were measured using StatStrip Xpress devices. Non-consecutive patients who received EMS and were aged 18 years and above were available for inclusion if triaged into RETTS levels: red, orange, yellow, or green if respiratory rate of ≥ 22 breaths/min. Outcomes were adverse outcomes, including a time-sensitive diagnosis, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 2, and 30-day mortality. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, imputation, and regression models to assess the impact of the addition of POC lactate levels to a base model (comprising patient age, sex, presence of past medical conditions, vital signs, pain, EMS response time, assessed triage condition, and triage level) and a RETTS triage model. RESULTS: Of 4,546 patients (median age 75 [57, 84] years; 49% male), 32.4% had time-sensitive conditions, 12.5% met the SOFA criteria, and 7.4% experienced 30-day mortality. The median POC lactate level was 1.7 (1.2, 2.5) mmol/L. Patients with time-sensitive conditions had higher lactate levels (1.9 mmol/L) than those with non-time-sensitive conditions (1.6 mmol/L). The probability of a time-sensitive condition increased with increasing lactate level. The addition of POC lactate marginally enhanced the predictive models, with a 1.5% and 4% increase for the base and RETTS triage models, respectively. POC lactate level as a sole predictor showed chance-only level predictive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital POC lactate assessment provided limited additional predictive value in a general adult EMS population. However, it may be beneficial in specific patient subgroups, emphasizing the need for its judicious use in prehospital settings.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Ácido Láctico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Triaje , Humanos , Suecia , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Triaje/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; : 1-6, 2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830199

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Pain is a common symptom in prehospital emergency care and pain treatment in this context can be challenging. While previous research has assessed the use of morphine and other synthetic opioids for pain management in this setting, the evaluation of alfentanil is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effect of intravenous alfentanil when administered by ambulance nurses in prehospital emergency care. METHODS: This retrospective observational study consecutively included patients suffering from pain, treated with alfentanil in a Swedish EMS service from September 2011 to 31 September 2022. Data regarding occurrence of adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE) - were used for safety evaluation and pain scores with a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after treatment were used for evaluation of pain treatment. These data were extracted from the electronic patients' medical records database for analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of AE following injection of alfentanil by nurses in prehospital emergency care. RESULTS: During the evaluation period 17,796 patients received pain relief with alfentanil. Adverse events affected 2.5% of the patients, while serious adverse events were identified in 25 cases (0.01%). Out of the 5970 patients with a complete VAS score for pain, the median VAS score was 8 (IQR 3) before treatment and 4 (IQR 3) after treatment. The mean reduction in pain measured by VAS was -4.1 ± 2.6 from the time before, to the evaluation after alfentanil administration. The administration frequency increased during the first year up to a steady level during the later part of the evaluation period. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes that alfentanil represents a safe and efficacious alternative for addressing urgent pain relief within the prehospital emergency context. Alfentanil demonstrates efficacy in alleviating pain across various conditions, with a relatively low risk of adverse events or serious adverse events when administered cautiously.

3.
Int Emerg Nurs ; 57: 101012, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34157586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older persons with a suspected hip fracture and suffering considerable pain are common patients in the emergency medical services (EMS). Pain treatment needs to be improved and fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) can be one option. The purpose of this paper was to analyse prehospital pain in patients with a suspected hip fracture under EMS care and to compare standard treatment and FICB. METHODS: An evaluation of a retrospective case-control study comprising 135 patients from a pilot project with FICB in an EMS organisation in Sweden. The control patients were matched with FICB patients. Pain was assessed on the arrival of the EMS and on arrival in hospital. RESULTS: In all, 27 patients received FICB and 108 had standard pain treatment. There was a significant reduction in pain in both groups. However, there was a more marked reduction in pain among patients who received FICB than in the control group. So, for static pain, 56% experienced a reduction in pain in the FICB group versus 30% among controls (p < 0.01). The corresponding values for dynamic pain were 85% and 59% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: FICB can be a good supplement to standard prehospital pain treatment in patients with suspected hip fractures.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Fracturas de Cadera , Bloqueo Nervioso , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fascia , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Int Emerg Nurs ; 56: 100999, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients who call 112 in Sweden do so because of pain. The purpose of this study was to compare three of the most common types of pain presented by the patients: chest pain, abdominal pain and hip injury, in terms of initial assessment, intensity, treatment and effect of treatment. The overall rationale was to evaluate whether the early assessment and treatment of pain in the pre-hospital setting is optimal or whether there is room for improvement. METHODS: Observational study during 2016 including 1234 patients triaged to chest pain, abdominal pain and hip injury by the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Gothenburg, Sweden. RESULTS: Severe pain on the arrival of the EMS was described by 39% of patients with a hip injury, 27% with abdominal pain and 15% with chest pain. Analgesics were given to 58% of patients with a hip injury, 35% with chest pain and 34% with abdominal pain. A lower intensity of pain at re-evaluation was observed in 80% of patients with a hip injury, 57% with chest pain and 43% with abdominal pain. Administration of analgesics increased with the duration of pre-hospital care time in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a hip injury had the most severe pain and they received most pain-relieving medication. Overall, a relatively small proportion of patients with pain received pain-relieving medication and there appears to be an extensive room for improvement.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Traumatismos Torácicos , Dolor Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales , Humanos , Triaje
5.
Epilepsia ; 62(2): 408-415, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417237

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the value of prehospital measurement of lactate level in blood for diagnosis of seizures in cases of transient loss of consciousness. METHODS: Between March 2018 and September 2019, prehospital lactate was measured with a point-of-care device by the emergency medical services in an area serving a population of 900 000. A total of 383 cases of transient loss of consciousness were identified and categorized as tonic-clonic seizure (TCS), other seizure, syncope, or other cause, according to the final diagnosis in the electronic medical records system. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify the optimal lactate cut-off. RESULTS: A total of 383 cases were included (135 TCS, 42 other seizure, 163 syncope, and 43 other causes). The median lactate level in TCS was 7.0 mmol/L, compared to a median of 2.0 mmol/L in all other cases (P < .001). The area under the curve (AUC) of TCS vs nonepileptic causes was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.91). The optimal cut-off (Youden index, 67.8%) was 4.75 mmol/L, with 79% sensitivity (95% CI 71-85) and 89% specificity (95% CI 85-93) for TCS. SIGNIFICANCE: Prehospital lactate can be a valuable tool for identifying seizures in transient loss of consciousness. For acceptable specificity, a higher cut-off than that previously demonstrated for hospital-based measurements must be used when values obtained close to the time of the event are interpreted.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Convulsiones/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/fisiopatología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Síncope/sangre , Síncope/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Inconsciencia/sangre , Inconsciencia/diagnóstico
6.
Int Emerg Nurs ; 49: 100825, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32029418

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain management needs to be comprehensively investigated in patients with hip fractures, as it represents a fast-growing challenge to emergency care. The purpose of this study was to describe reported pain in patients with suspected hip fractures in a prehospital setting. METHODS: In this observational study, 1,426 patients with a suspected hip fracture were included. Dynamic and static pain were assessed on the arrival of the emergency medical services (EMS) and on hospital admission using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), if feasible, and the Behaviour Rating Scale (BRS), if not. RESULTS: On EMS arrival, the median dynamic NRS pain score was eight and 84% of the patients had severe or moderate dynamic pain according to the BRS. On admission to hospital, the median dynamic NRS pain score was reduced to five and 45% of the patients had reduced dynamic pain according to the BRS. Among all patients, the NRS was judged to be feasible and was therefore used in 36%. Furthermore, there was an association between the decrease in pain and the increase in the number of administered medications, as well as the duration of prehospital care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with suspected hip fractures suffered substantial pain on EMS arrival. Only half experienced a reduction in pain on hospital admission and only 75% received pain-relieving medication.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/enfermería , Evaluación en Enfermería , Manejo del Dolor/enfermería , Dimensión del Dolor , Anciano , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
BMC Geriatr ; 19(1): 252, 2019 09 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31510918

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Impaired cognition is a major risk factor for perioperative delirium. It is essential to provide good pain control in patients with hip fractures and especially important in patients with severely impaired cognitive status, as they receive less pain medication, have poorer mobility, poorer quality of life and higher mortality than patients with intact cognition. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between preoperative pain management with nerve blocks and cognitive status in patients with hip fractures during the perioperative period. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients with hip fractures participating in a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial were included in this study. At hospital admission, a low-dose fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) was administered as a supplement to regular analgesia. Cognitive status was registered on arrival at hospital before FICB and on the first postoperative day using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. RESULTS: Changes in cognitive status from arrival at hospital to the first postoperative day showed a positive, albeit not significant, trend in favour of the intervention group. The results also showed that patients with no or a moderate cognitive impairment received 50% more prehospital pain medication than patients with a severe cognitive impairment. FICB was well tolerated in patients with hip fractures. CONCLUSION: Fascia iliaca compartment block given to patients with hip fractures did not affect cognitive status in this study. Patients with a cognitive impairment may receive inadequate pain relief after hip fracture and this discrimination needs to be addressed in further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2008-004303-59 date of registration: 2008-10-24.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgesia/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Cognición/fisiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/inducido químicamente , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Fascia/efectos de los fármacos , Fascia/inervación , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología
8.
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs ; 33: 35-43, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30876869

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pain management in patients with hip fractures is a major challenge for emergency care. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the supplementation of pre-operative analgesia with low-dose fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) compared with placebo would improve pain relief in patients with hip fractures. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted on 127 patients. At hospital admission, a low-dose FICB was administered to patients with hip fractures as a supplement to regular pre-operative analgesia. Patients with and without cognitive impairment were included. The instruments used were a visual analogue scale (VAS), a numerical rating scale and a tool for behavior related pain assessment. The primary endpoint was the change in reported pain on movement from hospital admission to two hours after FICB. RESULTS: The intervention group showed improved pain management by mean VAS score for pain on movement compared with the control group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of low-dose FICB as a pain-relieving adjuvant to other analgesics when administered to patients with a hip fracture.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Dolor/prevención & control , Anciano , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/enfermería , Humanos , Masculino , Bloqueo Nervioso , Enfermería Ortopédica , Dolor/enfermería , Dimensión del Dolor , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...