RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The implementation of early palliative care within a primary care setting is a recent academic topic. Recruiting General Practitioners (GPs) to participate in a palliative care study can be challenging. The pro-Spinoza project implemented a Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care in 5 areas in Belgium. During this project, the feasibility of the recruitment of GPs and palliative care patients was evaluated. METHODS: The recruitment process was recorded in detail via an electronic logbook combining quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative recordings included the contact types and the number of contacts with eligible GPs and were analysed descriptively. Qualitative recordings included field notes with feedback from the GPs and other stakeholders and were thematically analysed starting from the Grol and Wensing framework for professional behaviour change. RESULTS: Of 4065 eligible GPs working in 5 areas under research, 787 GPs (19%) were contacted individually, 398 GPs (9,8%) were contacted face-to-face and most of these 398 GPs showed high interest in the topic. 112 GPs (2,8%) signed the collaboration agreement, but finally only 65 GPs (1,6%) delivered at least a completed baseline-questionnaire. Despite the initial interest in participating, the unpredictable and busy daily workloads of the GPs, as well as inexperience with research protocols, impeded the ability of the GPs to fully engage in the study. This resulted in the high dropout rate. Participating GPs reported that they had underestimated the effort required to effectively participate in the project. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of GPs to palliative care research is challenging. Primary care is a vital service to engage in palliative care research however the practical limitations reduce the ability of the service to effectively engage in the research. More research is needed to determine how GPs might be better supported in research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02266069 , Registered 16th October 2014, retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Cuidados Paliativos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Investigadores , Investigación , Bélgica , Estudios de Factibilidad , HumanosRESUMEN
Diabetes in later life is associated with a range of factors increasing the complexity of glycaemic management. This position statement, developed from an extensive literature review of the subject area, represents a consensus opinion of primary care clinicians and diabetes specialists. It highlights many challenges facing older people living with type 2 diabetes and aims to support primary care clinicians in advocating a comprehensive, holistic approach. It emphasises the importance of the wishes of the individual and their carers when determining glycaemic goals, as well as the need to balance intended benefits of treatment against the risk of adverse treatment effects. Its ultimate aim is to promote consistent high-quality care for older people with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Modern health systems are increasingly faced with the challenge to provide effective, affordable and accessible health care for people with chronic conditions. As evidence on the specific unmet needs and their impact on health outcomes is limited, practical research is needed to tailor chronic care to individual needs of patients with diabetes. Qualitative approaches to describe professional and informal caregiving will support understanding the complexity of chronic care. Results are intended to provide practical recommendations to be used for systematic implementation of sustainable chronic care models. METHOD: A mixed method study was conducted. A standardised survey (n = 92) of experts in chronic care using mail responses to open-ended questions was conducted to analyse existing chronic care programs focusing on effective, problematic and missing components. An expert workshop (n = 22) of professionals and scientists of a European funded research project MANAGE CARE was used to define a limited number of unmet needs and priorities of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and comorbidities. This list was validated and ranked using a multilingual online survey (n = 650). Participants of the online survey included patients, health care professionals and other stakeholders from 56 countries. RESULTS: The survey indicated that current care models need to be improved in terms of financial support, case management and the consideration of social care. The expert workshop identified 150 patient needs which were summarised in 13 needs dimensions. The online survey of these pre-defined dimensions revealed that financial issues, education of both patients and professionals, availability of services as well as health promotion are the most important unmet needs for both patients and professionals. CONCLUSION: The study uncovered competing demands which are not limited to medical conditions. The findings emphasise that future care models need to focus stronger on individual patient needs and promote their active involvement in co-design and implementation. Future research is needed to develop new chronic care models providing evidence-based and practical implications for the regional care setting.
RESUMEN
We assessed the impact of a nation-wide ambulatory care complex intervention (the "care trajectory program") on quality of care in Belgium. We used the three-step public health triangulation method described in this paper and data from four different data sources: a national reimbursement database, an electronic patient record-based general practitioner network, the Belgian general practitioner sentinel network, and a new national registry for care trajectory patients. By applying our method and using the available evidence, we identified key findings that have been accepted by experts and stakeholders. We also produced timely recommendations for the decision-making process, four years after the start of the care trajectory program.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Bélgica/epidemiología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Minería de Datos/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Registro Médico Coordinado/métodosRESUMEN
AIMS: The second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study sought cross-national comparisons of perceptions on healthcare provision for benchmarking and sharing of clinical practices to improve diabetes care. METHODS: In total, 4785 healthcare professionals caring for people with diabetes across 17 countries participated in an online survey designed to assess diabetes healthcare provision, self-management and training. RESULTS: Between 61.4 and 92.9% of healthcare professionals felt that people with diabetes needed to improve various self-management activities; glucose monitoring (range, 29.3-92.1%) had the biggest country difference, with a between-country variance of 20%. The need for a major improvement in diabetes self-management education was reported by 60% (26.4-81.4%) of healthcare professionals, with a 12% between-country variance. Provision of diabetes services differed among countries, with many healthcare professionals indicating that major improvements were needed across a range of areas, including healthcare organization [30.6% (7.4-67.1%)], resources for diabetes prevention [78.8% (60.4-90.5%)], earlier diagnosis and treatment [67.9% (45.0-85.5%)], communication between team members and people with diabetes [56.1% (22.3-85.4%)], specialist nurse availability [63.8% (27.9-90.7%)] and psychological support [62.7% (40.6-79.6%)]. In some countries, up to one third of healthcare professionals reported not having received any formal diabetes training. Societal discrimination against people with diabetes was reported by 32.8% (11.4-79.6%) of participants. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has highlighted concerns of healthcare professionals relating to diabetes healthcare provision, self-management and training. Identifying between-country differences in several areas will allow benchmarking and sharing of clinical practices.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Costo de Enfermedad , Diabetes Mellitus/prevención & control , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/educación , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Nutricionistas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Médicos , Prejuicio , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Autocuidado , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIMS: The second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study examined the experiences of family members of people with diabetes for benchmarking and identifying unmet needs or areas for improvement to assist family members and those with diabetes to effectively self-manage. METHODS: In total, 2057 family members of people with diabetes participated in an online, telephone or in-person survey designed to assess the impact of diabetes on family life, family support for people with diabetes and educational and community support. RESULTS: Supporting a relative with diabetes was perceived as a burden by 35.3% (range across countries 10.6-61.7%) of respondents. Over half of respondents [51.4% (22.5-76.0%)] rated their quality of life as 'good' or 'very good'. However, distress about the person with diabetes was high, with 61.3% (31.5-86.4%) worried about hypoglycaemia. The impact of diabetes on aspects of life was felt by 51.8% (46.9-58.6%). The greatest negative effect was on emotional well-being [44.6% (31.8-63.0%)], although depression was less common [11.6% (4.2-20.0%)]. Many respondents did not know how to help the person with diabetes [37.1% (17.5-53.0%)] and wanted to be more involved in their care [39.4% (15.5-61.7%)]. Participation in diabetes educational programmes was low [23.1% (9.4-43.3%)], although most of those who participated found them helpful [72.1% (42.1-90.3%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes has a negative impact on family members of people with diabetes. DAWN2 provides benchmarking indicators of family members' psychosocial needs that will help identify the support required for, and from, them to improve the lives of people with diabetes and their families.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Familia/psicología , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Padres/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Autocuidado/psicología , Esposos/psicología , Estrés Psicológico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIMS: The second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study aimed to assess psychosocial outcomes in people with diabetes across countries for benchmarking. METHODS: Surveys included new and adapted questions from validated questionnaires that assess health-related quality of life, self-management, attitudes/beliefs, social support and priorities for improving diabetes care. Questionnaires were conducted online, by telephone or in person. RESULTS: Participants were 8596 adults with diabetes across 17 countries. There were significant between-country differences for all benchmarking indicators; no one country's outcomes were consistently better or worse than others. The proportion with likely depression [WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) score ≤ 28] was 13.8% (country range 6.5-24.1%). Diabetes-related distress [Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale 5 (PAID-5) score ≥ 40] was reported by 44.6% of participants (17.2-67.6%). Overall quality of life was rated 'poor' or 'very poor' by 12.2% of participants (7.6-26.1%). Diabetes had a negative impact on all aspects investigated, ranging from 20.5% on relationship with family/friends to 62.2% on physical health. Approximately 40% of participants (18.6-64.9%) reported that their medication interfered with their ability to live a normal life. The availability of person-centred chronic illness care and support for active involvement was rated as low. Following self-care advice for medication and diet was most common, and least common for glucose monitoring and foot examination, with marked country variation. Only 48.8% of respondents had participated in diabetes educational programmes/activities to help manage their diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-national benchmarking using psychometrically validated indicators can help identify areas for improvement and best practices to drive changes that improve outcomes for people with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Depresión/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Prioridades en Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Autocuidado , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Old age is a well-known risk factor for both depression and hypovitaminosis D, and an association between both conditions has been postulated. We document the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in nursing home residents, and we examine the link with self-reported depressive symptoms and pharmacotherapy for depression. DESIGN: Cross- sectional. SETTING: nursing homes in Antwerp, Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy elderly (n=589), with a mean age of 84 years. MEASUREMENTS: We detected depressive symptoms by means of SF-36, a validated quality of life assessment; we registered the use of antidepressants and anxiolytics, and we measured serum 25(OH)D concentrations in all participants. RESULTS: Almost our entire study population appeared to be vit D deficient. Comparison of the most severely and least deficient subgroups showed a consistent tendency towards more depressive symptoms and more use of antidepressants in the group with the lowest vit D level. CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents are particularly vulnerable to preventable vit D deficiency. The relevance of the association with depressive symptoms and the possibilities for treatment are critically reviewed in the discussion.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Luz Solar , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología , Vitamina D/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Bélgica/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pharmacists are now adopting a crucial role in the management of chronic illness in primary care, providing diabetes care and advice. This review aims to show whether a range of diabetes care interventions delivered by pharmacists is successful in improving adherence to medication. METHODS: The studies reviewed formed a subgroup of a Cochrane review on interventions to improve adherence to medication in people with type 2 diabetes. Search terms were 'type 2 diabetes mellitus' and 'compliance' or 'adherence'. Studies were included if they assessed adherence to medical treatment specifically, rather than other aspects of self-management. Out of the 21 studies selected for review, five described an intervention delivered by a pharmacist. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Two studies reported on attempts to improve adherence focused on the taking of medication. A system of reminders and packaging improved medication adherence, but measuring medicine taking through pill counts or Medication Event Monitoring System was not effective. Three studies evaluated pharmacist-led integrated management and education programmes designed to improve glycaemic control for under-served patient populations. They all succeeded in lowering glycated haemoglobin, but it remains unclear whether this resulted from improved patient adherence. CONCLUSION: This review indicates a potential benefit of pharmacist interventions to improve medication adherence in diabetes, especially in providing patient education.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research suggests adherence to treatment recommendations is low. In type 2 diabetes, which is a chronic condition slowly leading to serious vascular, nephrologic, neurologic and ophthalmological complications, it can be assumed that enhancing adherence to treatment recommendations may lead to a reduction of complications. Treatment regimens in type 2 diabetes are complicated, encompassing life-style adaptations and medication intake. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. SEARCH STRATEGY: Studies were obtained from searches of multiple electronic bibliographic databases supplemented with hand searches of references. Date of last search: November 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled and controlled clinical trials, before-after studies and epidemiological studies, assessing changes in adherence to treatment recommendations, as defined in the objectives section, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two teams of reviewers independently assessed the trials identified for inclusion. Three teams of two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. The analysis for the narrative part was performed by one reviewer (EV), the meta-analysis by two reviewers (EV, JW). MAIN RESULTS: Twentyone studies assessing interventions aiming at improving adherence to treatment recommendations, not to diet or exercise recommendations, in people living with type 2 diabetes in primary care, outpatient settings, community and hospital settings, were included. Outcomes evaluated in these studies were heterogeneous, there was a variety of adherence measurement instruments. Nurse led interventions, home aids, diabetes education, pharmacy led interventions, adaptation of dosing and frequency of medication taking showed a small effect on a variety of outcomes including HbA1c. No data on mortality and morbidity, nor on quality of life could be found. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current efforts to improve or to facilitate adherence of people with type 2 diabetes to treatment recommendations do not show significant effects nor harms. The question whether any intervention enhances adherence to treatment recommendations in type 2 diabetes effectively, thus still remains unanswered.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Cooperación del Paciente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this descriptive study is to investigate the incidence of type 2 diabetes in sentinel general practices in three regions in Belgium and to describe the patient characteristics and the start of the medical management after diagnosis. METHODS: For two successive years all patients who were newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were registered. Two weeks after inclusion, the registering physician completed an extensive questionnaire. This questionnaire dealt with risk factors, biochemical parameters, existing complications and treatment. RESULTS: According to this study, the yearly incidence of type 2 diabetes in Belgium is 231 per 100,000 inhabitants. Though the biochemical parameters (BMI, HbA1c, serum cholesterol and triglycerides) do not differ in the three regions of the country being investigated, there are considerable differences in the treatment prescribed for diabetes and its co-morbidity. In Flanders, treatment is usually started with sulphonylurea, in the Walloon provinces with biguanides. Hypolipaemic treatment is also started more frequently in the latter region. In Flanders, hypertension is registered in 51.4% of the newly diagnosed patients with diabetes, which is higher than in the other regions. However, no difference is noted between the different regions in the number of patients with diabetes who are treated for hypertension. CONCLUSION: A network of sentinel physicians, taking part in voluntary registration, can be helpful in calculating the incidence of a health problem, in particular type 2 diabetes in general practice. The sentinel net can also serve as an instrument for describing patient characteristics and showing how physicians deal with health problems. The regional differences in medical approach that are described require further investigation, mainly with respect to their impact on the patients' outcome.