Decoding the Prevalent High-Risk Breast Cancers: Demographics, Pathological, Imaging Insights, and Long-Term Outcome.

Objective: To investigate the features and outcomes of breast cancer in high-risk subgroups. Materials and Methods: REB approved an observational study of women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2019. Three radiologists, using the BI-RADS lexicon, blindly reviewed mammogram and MRI screenings without a washout period. Consensus was reached with 2 additional reviewers. Inter-rater agreement was measured by Fleiss Kappa. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square tests for cohort analysis, and Kaplan-Meier for survival rates, with a Cox model for comparative analysis using gene mutation as a reference. Results: The study included 140 high-risk women, finding 155 malignant lesions. Significant age differences noted: chest radiation therapy (median age 44, IQR: 37.0-46.2), gene mutation (median age 49, IQR: 39.8-58.0), and familial risk (median age 51, IQR: 44.5-56.0) (P = .007). Gene mutation carriers had smaller (P = .01), higher-grade tumours (P = .002), and more triple-negative ER- (P = .02), PR- (P = .002), and HER2- (P = .02) cases. MRI outperformed mammography in all subgroups. Substantial to near-perfect inter-rater agreement observed. Over 10 years, no deaths occurred in chest radiation group, with no significant survival difference between gene mutation and familial risk groups, HR = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.27, 3.26), P = .92. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of age and specific tumour characteristics in identifying high-risk breast cancer subgroups. MRI is confirmed as an effective screening tool. Despite the aggressive nature of cancers in gene mutation carriers, early detection is crucial for survival outcomes. These insights, while necessitating further validation with larger studies, advocate for a move toward personalized medical care, strengthening the existing healthcare guidelines.

Utilization of a rapid diagnostic centre during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced diagnostic delays in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Access to breast imaging was restricted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We assessed the impact of healthcare restrictions on the Gattuso Rapid Diagnostic Centre (GRDC) at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients seen at the GRDC between March 12 - August 31, 2020 and the corresponding period from 2019 was performed. RESULTS: There was an 18.6% decrease in patients seen at the GRDC (n = 429 in 2020 vs. 527 in 2019). Time from the first abnormal breast image to diagnosis was significantly shorter (17.4 days [IQR 13.0-21.8] in 2020 vs. 25.9 days [21.0-30.8] in 2019; p = 0.020) with no appreciable difference in time from diagnosis to consult or from consult to surgery. CONCLUSION: The GRDC enabled patients with concerning breast symptoms to access breast imaging, which helped to ensure timely treatment during the first wave of the pandemic.

[SCREENING WOMEN AT HIGH RISK FOR BREAST CANCER - BRCA AND BEYOND].

BACKGROUND: Radiologic screening for breast cancer is performed with the goal of diagnosing the disease at an earlier stage, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. Screening recommendations for women at higher than average risk for breast cancer differ from those of women with an average risk, and include yearly breast MRI and mammography starting at a young age. OBJECTIVES: Review the morbidity and mortality, and check whether the goal of early diagnosis was achieved in the participants of the High-Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Canada. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted of 2,081 women participating in the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre high risk screening program 2011-2018. Demographic, imaging, and if applicable biopsies, diagnosis and treatment data were captured in a prospectively maintained database starting with each participant's enrolment in the program. RESULTS: A total of 32% of the participants were carriers of pathogenic variants in breast cancer related genes (BRCA, NF, CHEK2, TP53 etc.), 8% had a history of therapeutic chest radiotherapy, and the remaining 60% had a calculated elevated lifetime risk based on family history or personal risk factors, without an identifiable pathogenic mutation or previous radiation. During the follow-up period 89 breast cancer cases were diagnosed at the median age of 49 years. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 0.9 cm, correlating with a T1 disease. Nodal disease was found only in 4 cases. Breast cancer incidence was the same in the mutation carriers and chest radiotherapy groups, but 3-fold lower in the third group. Diagnosis of breast cancer was most commonly conducted by MRI imaging, and only 6% of cases were diagnosed based solely on mammography findings. Furthermore, 38 women died during follow-up, 29 of them (76%) were BRCA carriers who died from ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis at an early stage was achieved in this cohort of women followed in the high risk screening program. Most cases were diagnosed by MRI, thus emphasizing the importance of identifying women at high risk for breast cancer and referring them to the appropriate screening program.

Screening women at high risk for breast cancer: one program fits all? : Subgroup analysis of a large population high risk breast screening program.

INTRODUCTION: The Ontario High Risk Breast Screening program follows women aged 30-69 at an increased risk of breast cancer, using a yearly mammography and breast MRI. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes for the enrolled women. METHODS: Observational cohort study following 2081 participants in the high-risk screening program 2011-2017. The participants were divided into three subgroup according to their risk criteria: (a) known carriers of pathogenic variants (PV) in hereditary breast cancer genes. (b) Previous chest radiotherapy. (c) Estimated life time risk (ELR) ≥ 25%, calculated using the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) tool, with no known mutation or previous radiation. All Breast Cancer (BC) diagnosed during the follow-up time were recorded. RESULTS: 673 women carried PVs in hereditary breast cancer genes, 159 had a history of chest radiotherapy, and 1249 had an ELR ≥ 25%. The total cohort of screening years was 8126. Median age at BC diagnosis was 41 for the first group, 47 for the second group and 51 for the third. BC incidence rate was 18.2 for PV mutation carriers, 17.9 for the chest radiotherapy group and 6.2 for ELR ≥ 25%. Hazard ratio was similar for the first two groups, but significantly lower for the ELR ≥ 25% group. When stratifying by age, the incidence rate in the ELR ≥ 25% increased over time, until it became similar to that of the other subgroups after age 50. CONCLUSION: Our findings question the need to screen women with an elevated lifetime risk using the same screening practices used for women who are PV mutation carriers, or with a history of chest radiation, prior to the age of 50.

NF1 Patients Receiving Breast Cancer Screening: Insights from The Ontario High Risk Breast Screening Program.

Neurofibromatosis Type I (NF1) is caused by variants in neurofibromin (NF1). NF1 predisposes to a variety of benign and malignant tumor types, including breast cancer. Women with NF1 <50 years of age possess an up to five-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer compared with the general population. Impaired emotional functioning is reported as a comorbidity that may influence the participation of NF1 patients in regular clinical surveillance despite their increased risk of breast and other cancers. Despite emphasis on breast cancer surveillance in women with NF1, the uptake and feasibility of high-risk screening programs in this population remains unclear. A retrospective chart review between 2014-2018 of female NF1 patients seen at the Elizabeth Raab Neurofibromatosis Clinic (ERNC) in Ontario was conducted to examine the uptake of high-risk breast cancer screening, radiologic findings, and breast cancer characteristics. 61 women with pathogenic variants in NF1 enrolled in the high-risk Ontario breast screening program (HR-OBSP); 95% completed at least one high-risk breast screening modality, and four were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Our findings support the integration of a formal breast screening programs in clinical management of NF1 patients.

Iron depletion is associated with daytime bottle-feeding in the second and third years of life.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between daytime bottle-feeding and iron depletion in young children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design with concurrent measurement of exposure and outcome. The exposure was the current container (bottle or cup) used for daytime milk consumption. Child, maternal, and dietary variables were collected. SETTING: Community-based pediatric practice serving a diverse population in an urban Canadian city. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty healthy children, aged 12 to 38 months, attending a well-child care visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Iron depletion (serum ferritin level, <10 microg/L]). RESULTS: Of the 150 children, 82 (55%) were bottle-fed and 68 (45%) were cup fed. Iron depletion occurred in 29 (37%) of 78 bottle-fed and in 12 (18%) of 67 cup-fed children. The crude relative risk for iron depletion was 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.01). In the final logistic regression model, a significant association between bottle use and iron depletion was identified, beginning after the age of 16 months. At 18 months, the relative risk, adjusted for several child, maternal, and dietary variables, for the association between bottle use and iron depletion was 1.31 (95% confidence interval,1.24-1.47); at 24 months, the adjusted relative risk was 2.50 (95% confidence interval, 2.46-2.53). Milk consumption of more than 16 oz/d occurred in 55 (67%) of the 82 bottle-fed and in 22 (32%) of the 68 cup-fed children (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the second and third years of life, there is an almost 2-fold association between iron depletion and daytime bottle-feeding compared with cup feeding. The child's age may be a modifier, and milk volume consumed may be a mediator, of this association. Duration of bottle use is a potentially modifiable practice.