RESUMEN
KEY MESSAGE: Covering a subset of individuals with a quantitative predictor, while imputing records for all others using pedigree or genomic data, could improve the precision of predictions while controlling for costs. Predicting genetic values with high accuracy is pivotal for effective candidate selection in animal and plant breeding. Novel 'omics'-based predictors have been shown to improve upon established genome-based predictions of important complex traits but require laborious and expensive assays. As a consequence, there are various datasets with full genetic marker coverage of all studied individuals but incomplete coverage with other 'omics' data. In animal breeding, single-step prediction was introduced to efficiently combine pedigree information, collected on a large number of animals, with genomic information, collected on a smaller subset of animals, for breeding value estimation without bias. Using two maize datasets of inbred lines and hybrids, we show that the single-step framework facilitates imputing transcriptomic data, boosting forecasts when their predictive ability exceeds that of pedigree or genomic data. Our results suggest that covering only a subset of inbred lines with 'omics' predictors and imputing all others using pedigree or genomic data could enable breeders to improve trait predictions while keeping costs under control. Employing 'omics' predictors could particularly improve candidate selection in hybrid breeding because the success of forecasts is a strongly convex function of predictive ability.
Asunto(s)
Genómica/métodos , Zea mays/genética , Genotipo , Hibridación Genética , Endogamia , Sitios de Carácter Cuantitativo/genéticaRESUMEN
The ability to predict the agronomic performance of single-crosses with high precision is essential for selecting superior candidates for hybrid breeding. With recent technological advances, thousands of new parent lines, and, consequently, millions of new hybrid combinations are possible in each breeding cycle, yet only a few hundred can be produced and phenotyped in multi-environment yield trials. Well established prediction approaches such as best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using pedigree data and whole-genome prediction using genomic data are limited in capturing epistasis and interactions occurring within and among downstream biological strata such as transcriptome and metabolome. Because mRNA and small RNA (sRNA) sequences are involved in transcriptional, translational and post-translational processes, we expect them to provide information influencing several biological strata. However, using sRNA data of parent lines to predict hybrid performance has not yet been addressed. Here, we gathered genomic, transcriptomic (mRNA and sRNA) and metabolomic data of parent lines to evaluate the ability of the data to predict the performance of untested hybrids for important agronomic traits in grain maize. We found a considerable interaction for predictive ability between predictor and trait, with mRNA data being a superior predictor for grain yield and genomic data for grain dry matter content, while sRNA performed relatively poorly for both traits. Combining mRNA and genomic data as predictors resulted in high predictive abilities across both traits and combining other predictors improved prediction over that of the individual predictors alone. We conclude that downstream "omics" can complement genomics for hybrid prediction, and, thereby, contribute to more efficient selection of hybrid candidates.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Asociación Genética , Genoma de Planta , Genómica , Zea mays/genética , Algoritmos , Genética de Población , Genómica/métodos , Hibridación Genética , Metabolómica , Modelos Genéticos , Fitomejoramiento , Sitios de Carácter Cuantitativo , Carácter Cuantitativo Heredable , Selección Genética , TranscriptomaRESUMEN
KEY MESSAGE: Complementing genomic data with other "omics" predictors can increase the probability of success for predicting the best hybrid combinations using complex agronomic traits. Accurate prediction of traits with complex genetic architecture is crucial for selecting superior candidates in animal and plant breeding and for guiding decisions in personalized medicine. Whole-genome prediction has revolutionized these areas but has inherent limitations in incorporating intricate epistatic interactions. Downstream "omics" data are expected to integrate interactions within and between different biological strata and provide the opportunity to improve trait prediction. Yet, predicting traits from parents to progeny has not been addressed by a combination of "omics" data. Here, we evaluate several "omics" predictors-genomic, transcriptomic and metabolic data-measured on parent lines at early developmental stages and demonstrate that the integration of transcriptomic with genomic data leads to higher success rates in the correct prediction of untested hybrid combinations in maize. Despite the high predictive ability of genomic data, transcriptomic data alone outperformed them and other predictors for the most complex heterotic trait, dry matter yield. An eQTL analysis revealed that transcriptomic data integrate genomic information from both, adjacent and distant sites relative to the expressed genes. Together, these findings suggest that downstream predictors capture physiological epistasis that is transmitted from parents to their hybrid offspring. We conclude that the use of downstream "omics" data in prediction can exploit important information beyond structural genomics for leveraging the efficiency of hybrid breeding.
Asunto(s)
Zea mays/genética , Mapeo Cromosómico , Genómica , Vigor Híbrido , Metabolómica , Modelos Genéticos , Fenotipo , Fitomejoramiento , Sitios de Carácter Cuantitativo , Carácter Cuantitativo Heredable , TranscriptomaRESUMEN
Heterosis has been extensively exploited for yield gain in maize (Zea mays L.). Here we conducted a comparative metabolomics-based analysis of young roots from in vitro germinating seedlings and from leaves of field-grown plants in a panel of inbred lines from the Dent and Flint heterotic patterns as well as selected F1 hybrids. We found that metabolite levels in hybrids were more robust than in inbred lines. Using state-of-the-art modeling techniques, the most robust metabolites from roots and leaves explained up to 37 and 44% of the variance in the biomass from plants grown in two distinct field trials. In addition, a correlation-based analysis highlighted the trade-off between defense-related metabolites and hybrid performance. Therefore, our findings demonstrated the potential of metabolic profiles from young maize roots grown under tightly controlled conditions to predict hybrid performance in multiple field trials, thus bridging the greenhouse-field gap.