A National Cancer Database Analysis of the Characteristics and Outcome of Colon Cancer According to Type of Preexisting Adenoma.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of colon cancers occur in pre-existing adenomas. Little is known about the impact of adenoma type on behavior and outcome of subsequent carcinomas. The present study aimed to assess characteristics, behavior, and outcome of colon adenocarcinoma based on histologic type of pre-existing adenoma. METHODS: US-National Cancer Database was searched between 2005 and 2019 for patients with colonic adenocarcinoma with known adenoma type who underwent colectomy. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to type of adenoma in which carcinoma developed: tubular adenoma (TA), villous adenoma (VA), and tubulovillous adenoma (TVA)-associated carcinomas. The main outcome of the study was 5-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 66,854 patients were included. 79.3% of carcinomas originated from TVA, 10.2% from VA, and 0.5% from TA. Patients with adenocarcinoma in VA were more often female whereas carcinomas in TA affected patients of Asian race more often. Approximately one-third of carcinomas in villous and tubulovillous adenomas were in the cecum whereas one-third of carcinomas in tubular adenomas were in the sigmoid colon. More TA-associated carcinomas were of clinical T1-2 stage (30.2% vs. 20.8%; P < .001), clinical N0 stage (69% vs. 62.2%, P < .001), and high grade (15.9% vs. 11.5%, P < .001) compared to VA-associated carcinomas. Patients with TA-associated carcinomas had longer mean OS than patients with VA and TVA-associated carcinomas (130.1 vs. 116.9 vs. 123.5 months, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Adenocarcinomas that arose in TA had more T1-2 stage and N0 stage, higher grade, and longer OS than did adenocarcinomas that arose in VA and TVA.

Risk factors for suicide in patients with colorectal cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Specific risk factors for suicide in patients with colorectal cancer have not been well established. Therefore, we aimed to assess factors associated with increased risk of suicide among patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients with colorectal cancer. Patients who survived were compared with patients for whom suicide was registered as their cause of death. Data were extracted from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Research Database 2000-2020. Primary outcome was risk factors for suicide. RESULTS: In total, 309,561 patients were included in the analysis; 160,095 (51.7%) were male. Suicide was the cause of death in 1,052 (0.34%). The suicide rate among patients with colorectal cancer decreased over time from 1% between 2000 and 2010 to 0.05% between 2011 and 2020 (P < .001). Male sex (odds ratio, 6.44; P < .001), non-Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio, 2.84; P = .014), household income between $50,000 and $74,999 (odds ratio, 1.79; P = .008) or <$50,000 (odds ratio, 1.84; P = .030), and metastatic disease (odds ratio, 2.89; P = .001) were independent risk factors for suicide. Colorectal cancer diagnosis in the second half of the study (2011-2020) was associated with lower risk of suicide compared with the first half (odds ratio, 0.338; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Among patients with colorectal cancer, male patients of non-Hispanic ethnicity and income <$75,000 USD who presented with metastatic disease were at increased risk of suicide. This trend decreased in the last decade, especially compared with the suicide rate among all patients with cancer. On the basis of these findings, we recommend targeted screening of this group of patients with colorectal cancer for suicidality as part of routine oncologic care.

Technical risk factors for benign anastomotic strictures in colorectal and/or coloanal anastomosis: A retrospective case-control study.

AIM: Anastomotic stricture occurs in up to 30% of colorectal resections; however, evidence on risk factors and preventive measures remains scarce. This study aimed to identify technical factors responsible for increasing the risk for colorectal and coloanal anastomotic strictures. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with anastomotic stricture who underwent resection and/or redo anastomosis between January 1, 2011 and August 1, 2021 in a tertiary referral centre. Patients with anastomotic stricture were compared with an equal number of randomly selected patients without anastomotic complications, who were operated on during the same time period. The main outcome measures were technical risk factors of anastomotic stricture. RESULTS: Each group included 50 patients who were similar for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, distance of anastomosis to the dentate line and indication for surgery. Median follow-up was significantly longer in the non-stricture group (38.6 months vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.04). Splenic flexure mobilization [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.18 [2], 95% CI: 0.08-0.39, p < 0.001], high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (HR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09-0.5, p < 0.001) and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09-0.50, p < 0.001) were associated with a lower likelihood of anastomotic stricture. Conversely, use of a 25-mm-diameter circular stapler (HR = 22.69, 95% CI: 2.69-191.10, p < 0.001), clinically significant anastomotic leak (HR = 3.94, 95% CI: 2.04-7.64, p < 0.001), firing the stapler more than once for rectal division (HR = 24.75, 95% CI: 6.85-89.38, p < 0.001) and diverting stoma (HR = 3.087, 95% CI: 1.736-5.491, p < 0.0001) were predictive of an anastomotic stricture. CONCLUSION: Failure to mobilize the splenic flexure and to perform high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels were associated with higher odds of anastomotic stricture. A small-diameter circular stapler and multiple distal stapler firings were also associated with anastomotic stricture. These data support routine splenic flexure ligation and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels as well as avoidance of both multiple  stapler firings for rectal transection and a 25-mm circular stapler for anastomosis..

Trends in surgical outcomes for Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis construction using a large nationwide database.

AIM: Ulcerative colitis (UC) affects over 3 million (1.3%) US adults, approximately 20% of whom will require surgery. Since it was first described in 1978, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the gold standard for patients requiring surgery, as well as for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). In 1991 the laparoscopic approach to IPAA was introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the advances made in IPAA as minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become more prevalent. METHOD: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2005 to 2019 was used. Laparoscopic (MIS) and open cases of IPAA construction for UC or FAP were used. These patients were subdivided into three time point cohorts: early (2005-2009), middle (2010-2014) and recent (2015-2019). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate morbidity, mortality and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 6184 patients were analysed, and 2555 underwent MIS while 3629 underwent open surgery. After multivariable analysis, the MIS approach was associated with a lower risk of morbidity compared with open procedures [relative risk (RR) = 0.86, p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.78-0.94], both in the early and recent periods [early period = RR = 0.66 (p < 0.0001), recent period RR = 0.78 (p = 0.0029)]. Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) was consistently lower in the MIS cohort across all three time periods. After multivariable analysis, the overall RR of superficial SSI in the MIS cohort was 0.41 (p < 0.0001) [early period RR = 0.35 (p < 0.0001), middle period RR = 0.55 (p = 0.0007), recent period RR = 0.31 (p < 0.0001)]. The RR of deep space SSI was decreased overall (RR = 0.58, p = 0.013, 95% CI 0.62-0.93), with the most significant effect occurring during the early period (RR = 0.30, p = 0.0260, 95% CI 0.105-0.868). Sepsis related to any infective aetiology was also decreased in the MIS cohort (RR = 0.76, p = 0.0093, 95% CI 0.62-0.93), especially in the recent time period (RR = 0.63, p = 0.0344, 95% CI 0.41-0.97). Furthermore, hospital length of stay was decreased in the MIS cohort (-0.287 days, p = 0.0170), with a greater difference occurring in the more recent cohort (-0.375 days, p = 0.0418). CONCLUSION: With increasing utilization of minimally invasive techniques in IPAA creation there have been significant decreases in the rates of morbidity including decreasing rates of superficial and deep space SSI, as well as decreased hospital length of stay.

Mentorship of Junior Surgical Faculty Across Academic Programs in Surgery.

Importance: Because mentorship is critical for professional development and career advancement, it is essential to examine the status of mentorship and identify challenges that junior surgical faculty (assistant and associate professors) face obtaining effective mentorship. Objective: To evaluate the mentorship experience for junior surgical faculty and highlight areas for improvement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study was an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study including an anonymous survey on mentorship followed by semistructured interviews to expand on survey findings. Junior surgical faculty from 18 US academic surgery programs were included in the anonymous survey and interviews. Survey responses between "formal" (assigned by the department) vs "informal" (sought out by the faculty) mentors and male vs female junior faculty were compared using χ2 tests. Interview responses were analyzed for themes until thematic saturation was achieved. Survey responses were collected from November 2022 to August 2023, and interviews conducted from July to December 2023. Exposure: Mentorship from formal and/or informal mentors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey gauged the availability and satisfaction with formal and informal mentorship; interviews assessed broad themes regarding mentorship. Results: Of 825 survey recipients, 333 (40.4%) responded; 155 (51.7%) were male and 134 (44.6%) female. Nearly all respondents (319 [95.8%]) agreed or strongly agreed that mentorship is important to their surgical career, especially for professional networking (309 respondents [92.8%]), career advancement (301 [90.4%]), and research (294 [88.3%]). However, only 58 respondents (18.3%) had a formal mentor. More female than male faculty had informal mentors (123 [91.8%] vs 123 [79.4%]; P = .003). Overall satisfaction was higher with informal mentorship than formal mentorship (221 [85.0%] vs 40 [69.0%]; P = .01). Most male and female faculty reported no preferences in gender or race and ethnicity for their mentors. When asked if they had good mentor options if they wanted to change mentors, 141 (47.8%) responded no. From the interviews (n = 20), 6 themes were identified, including absence of mentorship infrastructure, preferred mentor characteristics, and optimizing mentorship. Conclusions and Relevance: Academic junior surgical faculty agree mentorship is vital to their careers. However, this study found that few had formal mentors and almost half need more satisfactory options if they want to change mentors. Academic surgical programs should adopt a framework for facilitating mentorship and optimize mentor-mentee relationships through alignment of mentor-mentee goals and needs.

Factors Associated With Prolonged Operative Times in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy and Its Association With Short-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate factors associated with prolonged operative time in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy between 2011 and 2021. Linear and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with prolonged operative time. The association between longer operative times and complications and hospital stay was assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven patients (52.3% female; mean age: 68.8 ± 14.1 years) were included. Factors independently associated with operative time were male sex (ß = 17.3, 95% CI: 2, 32.5; p = 0.026) and extended hemicolectomy (ß = 67.7, 95% CI: 27.6, 107.9; p = 0.001). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV classification had a borderline significant association with operative time (ß = 100.4, 95% CI: -2.05, 202.9; p = 0.055). Male sex (r = 0.158; p = 0.026), body mass index (r = 0.205; p = 0.004), ASA classification (r = 0.232; p = 0.001), extended hemicolectomy (r = 0.256; p < 0.001), and intracorporeal vessel control (r = 0.161; p = 0.025) had significant positive correlation with operative times. Patients with operative times ≥ 160 min had significantly longer hospital stays (5 vs. 4 days; p = 0.043) and similar complication rates to patients with shorter operative times. CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, advanced ASA classification, and extended hemicolectomy were independently and significantly associated with longer operative times in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Longer operative times were associated with longer hospital stays and similar complication rates.

Heterogeneity in survival within age groups of early-onset colorectal cancer patients: A National Cancer Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify predictors of and heterogeneity in survival among different age groups of patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used National Cancer Database data from 2004 to 2019. Differences in survival among CRC patients <50 years, subcategorized into age groups (<20, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49 years) were compared for demographic, clinical, and histologic features by univariate and multivariate analyses. Cox hazard regression and Kaplan Meier survival analysis were performed. RESULTS: 134 219 of the 1 240 787 individuals with CRC (10.8%) were <50 years old; 46 639 (34.8%) had rectal and 87 580 (65.3%) had colon cancer. Within the colon cancer cohort, individuals aged between 30 and 39 years had the highest overall survival rate (66.7%) during a median follow-up of 47.6 months (interquartile range IQR 23.1-89.7). The same age group in the rectal cancer cohort had the lowest survival rate (31%) over a median follow-up of 54.5 (IQR 28.24-97.31) months. Leading factors affecting survival included tumor stage (HR 8.23 [4.64-14.6]; p < 0.0001), lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.88 [1.70-2.06]; p < 0.0001) and perineural invasion (HR 1.08 [1.02-1.15]; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Survival trends vary within age groups of patients affected with early onset colon cancer compared to rectal cancer. Tumor stage and unfavorable pathological characteristics are the strongest factors predicting survival.

The impact of facility type on surgical outcomes in colon cancer patients: analysis of the national cancer database.

BACKGROUND: The type of facility where patients with colon cancer are treated may play a significant role in their outcomes. We aimed to investigate the influence of facility types included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) on surgical outcomes of colon cancer. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with stage I-III colon cancer included in the NCDB database between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Patients were grouped based on facility type: Academic/Research Programs (ARP), Community Cancer Programs (CCP), Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs (CCCP), and Integrated Network Cancer Programs (INCP). Study outcomes included overall survival, 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission and conversion to open surgery. RESULTS: 125,935 patients were included with a median age of 68.7 years (50.5% females). Most tumors were in the right colon (50.6%). Patient were distributed among facility types as ARP (n = 34,321, 27%), CCP (n = 12,692, 10%), CCCP (n = 54,356, 43%), and INCP (n = 24,566, 19%). In terms of surgical approach, laparoscopy was more commonly used in ARP (46%) (p < 0.001). Laparotomy was more common in CCP (58.7%) (p < 0.001), and conversely, CCP had the least amount of robotic surgery (3.9%) (p < 0.001). Median overall survival was highest in ARP (129 months, 95% CI 127.4-134.1) and lowest in CCP (103.7 months, 95% CI 100.1-106.7) (p < 0.001). Conversion rates were comparable between ARP (12%), CCCP (12%) and INCP (11.8%) but were higher in CCP (15.5%) (p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rates and 30-day mortality rates were significantly lower in ARP compared to other facility types (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings display differences in surgical outcomes of colon cancer patients among facility types. The findings suggest better outcomes in terms of operative access and survival at ARP as compared to other facilities. These findings underscore the importance of understanding facility-specific factors that may influence patient outcomes and can guide resource allocation and targeted interventions for improving colon cancer care.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials on the role of prehabilitation programs in colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation is gaining popularity in colorectal surgery but lacks high-quality postoperative outcomes data. This meta-analysis explored whether prehabilitation impacts postoperative outcomes. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, we searched PubMed and Scopus through November 2022. High-quality randomized control trials involving adults who underwent colorectal surgery with/without exercise-based prehabilitation were included. The main outcomes were short-term postoperative morbidity, readmissions, and length of stay. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Seven high-quality randomized control trials comprising 1,225 patients were included. The median prehabilitation duration was 4 (2-4) weeks. Four studies compared prehabilitation and standard of care, and 3 compared prehabilitation and rehabilitation. Exercise-based prehabilitation did not reduce the odds of short-term complications (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.27-1.40, P = .25, I2 = 68%) or readmission (odds ratio 1, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.46, P = .85, I2 = 0%). The prehabilitation group had shorter length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference -0.2, 95% confidence interval -0.25 to -0.14, P < .0001, I2 = 43.3%). Prehabilitation and rehabilitation had similar odds of short-term complications (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.89, P = .91, I2 = 33%), length of stay (weighted mean difference -0.16, 95% confidence interval -0.47 to 0.16, P = .33, I2 = 59%), and readmission (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.28-5.56, P = .77, I2 = 52%). The only benefit of prehabilitation over rehabilitation was better 6-minute walking distance test results at time of surgery (weighted mean difference: -9.4 m; 95% confidence interval -18.04 to 0.79, P = .03, I2 = 42%). CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation provided decreased postoperative length of hospital stay and improved preoperative functional outcomes, but not reduced odds of complications and/or readmissions. Prehabilitation and rehabilitation had similar clinical outcomes.

Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Patients with Rectal Cancer and Increased Body Mass Index.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the association between increased body mass index (BMI) and rectal cancer outcomes. METHODS: We included patients who underwent surgery for stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who were divided according to BMI at diagnosis: ideal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and increased BMI (≥25 kg/m2). Groups were compared using univariate association analyses relative to baseline characteristics, pathologic outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Main outcome measures involved circumferential resection margin (CRM), pathologic TNM stage, total mesorectal incision (TME) grade, OS, and DFS. RESULTS: 243 patients (64.6% male; median age 59 years) with a median BMI of 26.3 kg/m2 were included. 62.1% had BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Increased BMI patients had similar proportions of males (66.9% vs. 60.9%; p = 0.407) and comorbidities (ASA III: 47% vs. 37.4%; p = 0.24) to ideal BMI patients. There were no significant differences in cN1-2 stage (p = 0.279) or positive CRM (p = 0.062) rates. The groups had similar complete/near-complete TME, pathologic TN stage, and survival rates. Pathologic and survival outcomes were also similar with a BMI cutoff of 30. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward more nodal involvement in preoperative assessment and less CRM involvement in the final pathology of patients with increased BMI. Complete/near-complete TME and survival rates were comparable between the groups.

Predictors and outcomes of delays between diagnosis and definitive surgery for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) recommends definitive treatment of rectal cancer commence within 60 days from diagnosis. This study aimed to assess predictors of >60 days delay between diagnosis and definitive surgery of rectal cancer and the impact on survival and short-term outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent proctectomy without preoperative neoadjuvant treatment from the National Cancer Database (2015-2019). Based on the time interval between diagnosis and definitive surgery, patients were divided into timely non-adherent (>60 days) and timely-adherent (≤60 days) groups. Multivariate analysis determined predictors of delayed definitive surgery. RESULTS: 9479 patients (57.5 % males; mean age: 63.7 years) had a 41-day median time between diagnosis and definitive surgery. Non-adherence was noted in 27.9 % of patients. Independent predictors of non-adherence were male sex (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.25; p < 0.001), Black (OR: 1.65; p < 0.001) or Asian (OR: 1.33; p = 0.014) race, Charlson score 2 (OR: 1.33; p = 0.005) or 3 (OR: 1.55; p < 0.001), urban residence (OR: 1.21; p = 0.003), abdominoperineal resection (OR: 1.69; p < 0.001), pelvic exenteration (OR: 1.7; p = 0.002), and robotic-assisted surgery (OR: 1.22; p = 0.001). Medicare (OR: 0.725; p = 0.003) and private insurance (OR: 0.711; p < 0.001) were associated with better adherence. 30-day and 90-day mortality, unplanned readmission, and overall survival were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Male Black or Asian patients with high Charlson scores, and undergoing abdominoperineal resection, pelvic exenteration, and robotic-assisted surgery were more likely non-adherent with NAPRC standards with >60 days delay before definitive surgery for rectal cancer. Hopefully, recognition for these reasons for delay of definitive surgery will lead to an improvement in adherence to the standards.

Umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of using mesh in the prevention of parastomal hernias.

BACKGROUND: This umbrella review aimed to summarize the findings and conclusions of published systematic reviews on the prophylactic role of mesh against parastomal hernias in colorectal surgery. METHODS: PRISMA-compliant umbrella overview of systematic reviews on the role of mesh in prevention of parastomal hernias was conducted. PubMed and Scopus were searched through November 2023. Main outcomes were efficacy and safety of mesh. Efficacy was assessed by the rates of clinically and radiologically detected hernias and the need for surgical repair, while safety was assessed by the rates of overall complications. RESULTS: 19 systematic reviews were assessed; 7 included only patients with end colostomy and 12 included patients with either ileostomy or colostomy. The use of mesh significantly reduced the risk of clinically detected parastomal hernias in all reviews except one. Seven reviews reported a significantly lower risk of radiologically detected parastomal hernias with the use of mesh. The pooled hazards ratio of clinically detected and radiologically detected parastomal hernias was 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26-0.41) and 0.55 (95%CI: 0.45-0.68), respectively. Six reviews reported a significant reduction in the need for surgical repair when a mesh was used whereas six reviews found a similar need for hernia repair. The pooled hazards ratio for surgical hernia repair was 0.46 (95%CI: 0.35-0.62). Eight reviews reported similar complications in the two groups. The pooled hazard ratio of complications was 0.81 (95%CI: 0.66-1). CONCLUSIONS: The use of surgical mesh is likely effective and safe in the prevention of parastomal hernias without an increased risk of overall complications.

Accuracy of Clinical Staging of Localized Colon Cancer: A National Cancer Database Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess concordance between clinical and pathologic assessment of colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with stage I-III colon cancer in the National Cancer Database (2010-2019) was conducted. Concordance between clinical and pathologic assessment of colon cancer was calculated using Kappa coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 125,473 patients (51.2% female; mean age 68.2 years) were included. There was moderate concordance between clinical and pathologic T stage (Kappa = 0.606, 95%CI: 0.602-0.609) and between clinical and pathologic N stage (Kappa = 0.506, 95%CI: 0.501-0.511). For right-sided colon cancer, there was moderate agreement between clinical and pathologic T stage (Kappa = 0.594, 95%CI: 0.589-0.599) and N stage (Kappa = 0.530, 95%CI: 0.523-0.537). For left-sided colon cancer, there was substantial agreement between clinical and pathologic T stage (Kappa = 0.624, 95%CI: 0.619-0.630) and moderate agreement between N stage (Kappa 0.472, 95%CI: 0.463-0.480). Sensitivity of clinical assessment of T and N stage ranged from 64.3% to 77.2% and 41.6% to 54.5%, respectively. Specificity ranged from 96.7% to 97.7% for T stage and 95.7% to 97.3% for N stage. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical assessment of T and N stages of colon cancer had good diagnostic accuracy with moderate concordance with the final pathologic stage. While clinical assessment was highly specific with < 3% of patients being over-staged, it had modest sensitivity, especially for detection of nodal involvement. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment of right and left colon cancers was similar, except for higher sensitivity and accuracy of assessment of nodal involvement in right than left colon cancers.