RESUMEN
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Whether adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) might prevent peritoneal metastases after curative surgery for high-risk colon cancer is an ongoing debate. This study aimed to determine 5-year oncologic outcomes of the randomized multicenter COLOPEC trial, which included patients with clinical or pathologic T4N0-2M0 or perforated colon cancer and randomly assigned (1:1) to either adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and HIPEC (n = 100) or adjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone (n = 102). HIPEC was performed using a one-time administration of oxaliplatin (460 mg/m2, 30 minutes, 42°C, concurrent fluorouracil/leucovorin intravenously), either simultaneously (9%) or within 5-8 weeks (91%) after primary tumor resection. Outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Long-term data were available of all 202 patients included in the COLOPEC trial, with a median follow-up of 59 months (IQR, 54.5-64.5). No significant difference was found in 5-year overall survival rate between patients assigned to adjuvant HIPEC followed by systemic chemotherapy or only adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (69.6% v 70.9%, log-rank; P = .692). Five-year peritoneal metastases rates were 63.9% and 63.2% (P = .907) and 5-year disease-free survival was 55.7% and 52.3% (log-rank; P = .875), respectively. No differences in quality-of-life outcomes were found. Our findings implicate that adjuvant HIPEC should still be performed in trial setting only.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de CitorreducciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: As in nonsurgical weight loss populations, body image may partly explain differences in weight loss outcomes after surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the prospective association between body image and weight loss in a longitudinal cohort of patients up to 3 years after bariatric metabolic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The BODY-Q self-report questionnaire was used to assess body image. Linear mixed models evaluated associations of baseline body image with weight loss in the first year as well as associations of body image at 12 months and first-year change in body image with weight loss 12 to 36 months after surgery. RESULTS: Available body image data included 400 (100%), 371 (93%), 306 (77%), 289 (72%), and 218 (55%) patients at baseline and 4, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Body image scores improved significantly until 12 months, followed by a gradual decline. Scores remained improved in comparison to baseline (ß = 31.49, 95% CI [27.8, 35.2], p < .001). Higher baseline body image was associated with less weight loss during the first year, and the effect size was trivial (ß = -0.05, 95% CI [-0.09, -0.01], p = .009). Body image and change in body image were not associated with weight loss 12 to 36 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Body image improved after bariatric metabolic surgery. Although no clinically relevant associations of body image with weight loss were demonstrated, the gradual decline in body image scores underlines the importance of long-term follow-up with regular assessment of this aspect of quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Imagen Corporal , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The foramen of Winslow is the opening between the peritoneum and the omental bursa just caudal to the liver and dorsal to the lesser omentum. Internal herniation of the intestine through the foramen of Winslow can cause acute abdominal pain. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 45-year old man without relevant medical history presented with acute abdominal pain. CT scan showed an internal herniation of the intestine through the foramen of Winslow, with signs of ischemia of the herniated intestine. Emergency laparoscopy was performed. The herniated intestine was decompressed with a needle before it could be repositioned, no resection was necessary. Postoperative course was characterized by a paralytic ileus, eventually the patient was discharged on postoperative day 8. CONCLUSION: Internal herniation of the intestine through the foramen of Winslow is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, which requires surgery to reposition the intestine.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen Agudo , Herniorrafia , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hernia , Peritoneo , Epiplón , Abdomen Agudo/diagnóstico , Abdomen Agudo/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As part of a randomized phase II trial in patients with isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPMs), the present study compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients treated with perioperative systemic therapy versus cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) alone. Also, PROs of patients receiving perioperative systemic therapy were explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to perioperative systemic therapy (experimental) or CRS-HIPEC alone (control). PROs were assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires at baseline, after neoadjuvant treatment (experimental), and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare five predefined PROs (visual analog scale, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, C30 summary score) between arms and to longitudinally analyze PROs in the experimental arm. RESULTS: Of 79 analyzed patients, 37 (47%) received perioperative systemic therapy. All predefined PROs were comparable between arms at all timepoints and returned to baseline at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. The experimental arm had worsening of fatigue [mean difference (MD) + 14, p = 0.001], loss of appetite (MD + 15, p = 0.003), hair loss (MD + 18, p < 0.001), and loss of taste (MD + 27, p < 0.001) after neoadjuvant treatment. Except for loss of appetite, these PROs returned to baseline at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable CPM randomized to perioperative systemic therapy or CRS-HIPEC alone, PROs were comparable between arms and returned to baseline postoperatively. Together with the trial's previously reported feasibility and safety data, these findings show acceptable tolerability of perioperative systemic therapy in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Terapia Combinada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent but mostly undiagnosed in obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. To prevent cardiopulmonary complications, many clinics perform preoperative OSA screening. Consequently, adequate adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is essential but challenging. We aimed to evaluate CPAP adherence and its influence on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter cohort study, we compared different perioperative strategies for handling undiagnosed OSA in bariatric patients. In this subgroup analysis, patients newly diagnosed with OSA were compared to those with pre-existing OSA. We assessed inadequate CPAP adherence, defined as < 4 h/night, between the preoperative period and 6 months postoperative. Cardiopulmonary complications and (un)scheduled ICU admissions were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 272 patients with newly diagnosed OSA (67.4%) and 132 patients with pre-existing OSA (32.6%) were included. Before surgery, 41 newly diagnosed patients used CPAP inadequately, compared to 5 patients with pre-existing OSA (15% vs. 4%, p = 0.049). Six months after surgery, inadequate CPAP use increased to 73% for newly diagnosed patients and 39% for patients with pre-existing OSA, respectively (p < 0.001). Incidences of cardiopulmonary complications, scheduled, and unscheduled ICU admissions were similar in the two study groups (p = 0.600, p = 0.972, and p = 0.980, respectively). CONCLUSION: Inadequate CPAP adherence is higher in bariatric patients newly diagnosed with OSA when compared to patients with pre-existing OSA. Strategies to increase CPAP adherence may be valuable when considering routine OSA screening and CPAP therapy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Further studies are needed to improve current guidelines on perioperative OSA management of obese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: POPCORN study, registered at Netherlands Trial Register, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6805 . ID no: 6805.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Estudios Prospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Obesidad/complicaciones , Cooperación del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Selecting patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCPM) who might benefit from cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is challenging. Computed tomography generally underestimates the peritoneal tumor load. Diagnostic laparoscopy is often used to determine whether patients are amenable for surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown to be accurate in predicting completeness of CRS. The aim of this study is to determine whether MRI can effectively reduce the need for surgical staging. METHODS: The study is designed as a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of colorectal cancer patients who are deemed eligible for CRS-HIPEC after conventional CT staging. Patients are randomly assigned to either MRI based staging (arm A) or to standard surgical staging with or without laparoscopy (arm B). In arm A, MRI assessment will determine whether patients are eligible for CRS-HIPEC. In borderline cases, an additional diagnostic laparoscopy is advised. The primary outcome is the number of unnecessary surgical procedures in both arms defined as: all surgeries in patients with definitely inoperable disease (PCI > 24) or explorative surgeries in patients with limited disease (PCI < 15). Secondary outcomes include correlations between surgical findings and MRI findings, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life (QOL) analysis. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial determines whether MRI can effectively replace surgical staging in patients with CRCPM considered for CRS-HIPEC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the clinical trials registry of U.S. National Library of Medicine under NCT04231175 .
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Laparoscopía , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Países Bajos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Tamaño de la Muestra , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
High-risk submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma's might be treated curatively by means of radical endoscopic resection, followed by thoracolaparoscopic lymphadenectomy without concomitant esophagectomy. A preclinical study has shown the feasibility and safety of this approach; however, no studies are performed in a clinical setting. In addition, sentinel node navigation surgery could be valuable in tailoring the extent of the lymphadenectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of thoracolaparoscopic lymphadenectomy without esophagectomy (phase I) and sentinel node navigation surgery (phase II) in patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients with T1N0M0 early esophageal adenocarcinoma scheduled for esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy were included. Phase I: Two-field, esophagus preserving, thoracolaparoscopic lymphadenectomy was performed, followed by esophagectomy in the same session. Primary outcome parameters were the number of lymph nodes resected, and number of retained lymph nodes in the esophagectomy specimen. Phase II: A radioactive tracer was injected endoscopically the day before surgery. Static imaging was performed 15 and 120 minutes after injection. The day of surgery, sentinel node navigation surgery followed by esophagectomy was performed. Primary outcome parameters were the percentage of patients with a detectable sentinel node, and the concordance between static imaging and probe-based detection of sentinel node. Phase I: Five patients were included, and a median of 30 (IQR: 25-46) lymph nodes was resected. A median of 6 (IQR: 2-9) retained lymph nodes was found in the esophagectomy specimen. No acute adverse events occurred, but near the end of lymphadenectomy esophageal discoloration was observed, possibly indicating ischemia. Phase II: In all five included patients sentinel nodes could be visualized and resected, at a median of 3 (IQR: 2-5) locations. There was a high concordance between imaging and probe-based detection of sentinel nodes. In conclusion, sentinel node navigation surgery followed by lymphadenectomy without concomitant esophagectomy seems feasible in patients with high-risk submucosal early esophageal adenocarcinoma. More evidence is however needed before applying this technique in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esófago/patología , Esófago/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proyectos Piloto , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología , Toracoscopía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study compares neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with perioperative chemotherapy (pCT) for patients with resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma in terms of toxicity, postoperative complications, pathologic response, and survival. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed and compared 313 patients with resectable esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with either nCRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel 41.4 Gy, n = 176) or pCT (epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine, n = 137). RESULTS: The baseline and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. The ability to deliver all planned preoperative cycles was greater in the nCRT group (92.0 vs. 76.6%). Whereas nCRT was associated with a higher rate of grades 3 and 4 esophagitis, pCT was associated with a higher rate of grades 3 and 4 thromboembolic events, febrile neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, cardiac complications, and electrolyte imbalances. Two patients in the pCT group died during neoadjuvant treatment due to febrile neutropenia. More postoperative cardiac complications occurred in the nCRT group. All other postoperative complications and the in-hospital mortality rate (nCRT, 4.7%; pCT, 2.3%) were comparable. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 15.1% after nCRT and 6.9% after pCT. Radicality of surgery was comparable (R0: 93.0 vs. 91.6%). The median overall survival was 35 months after nCRT versus 36 months after pCT. CONCLUSION: For patients with esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma, chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy, and perioperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabin lead to equal oncologic outcomes in terms of radical resection rates, lymphadenectomy, patterns of recurrent disease, and (disease-free) survival. However, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a considerably lower level of severe adverse events and should therefore be the preferred protocol until a well-powered randomized controlled trial provides different insights.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Quimioradioterapia , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Atención Perioperativa , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Hiatal hernia (HH) is an infrequent yet potentially life-threatening complication after esophagectomy. Several studies have reported the incidence of this complication after both open and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). This meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled incidence of HH after both types of esophagectomy and, importantly, to provide insight in the outcome of subsequent HH repair. A systematic search was performed of the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases. Article selection was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria. Articles describing the incidence of HH after different open and minimally invasive techniques were included. Only when five or more comparable studies reported on the same outcome were data pooled. The incidence of postoperative HH and the outcome of HH repair were analyzed. Twenty-six studies published between 1985 and 2015 were included, describing a total of 6058 patients who underwent esophagectomy, of whom 240 were diagnosed with a postoperative HH. The pooled incidence of symptomatic HH after MIE was 4.5 %, compared to a pooled incidence of 1.0 % after open esophagectomy. 11 studies reported on the outcome of HH repair in 125 patients. A pooled morbidity rate after HH repair of 25 % was found. During follow-up, a pooled recurrence rate of 14 % was reported in 11 of the included studies. The pooled incidence of HH after MIE is higher compared to open esophagectomy. Most importantly, surgical repair of these HHs is associated with a high morbidity rate. Both radiologists and surgeons should be aware of this rare yet potentially life-threatening complication.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Hiatal/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: CytoReductive Surgery and Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is now the preferred treatment of many peritoneal surface malignancies. In this retrospective study we aimed to analyze how several performance indicators changed during the first 100 CRS-HIPEC procedures in hospitals which recently introduced this treatment, and compare those with an experienced institution. METHODS: The first consecutive 100 CRS-HIPEC procedures of three institutions were compared to those of the pioneer hospital. The training provided by the pioneer hospital consisted of hands-on training during the first ten procedures; hereafter guidance was available on consult basis. Operation characteristics, morbidity and completeness of cytoreduction were evaluated by case sequence. Locally-estimated-scatter-plot smoothing was used to evaluate the learning curve. RESULTS: From four institutions 372 cases were included. A macroscopic complete cytoreduction was reached in 66% of the cases in the pioneer hospital and in 86% in the new hospitals (p < 0.001). Complete cytoreduction rates were higher at start off in the new institutions compared with the experienced institution and increased significantly in the first 100 procedures. The new hospitals started with lower morbidity than the experienced hospital, which did not significantly decrease during the study period. CONCLUSION: New institutions that were trained and mentored by an experienced CRS-HIPEC hospital performed better from the beginning with regard to complete cytoreduction and morbidity rate with than the experienced center. An improvement in complete cytoreduction rate during the first 100 procedures was observed in the new institutions.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/normas , Hipertermia Inducida/normas , Curva de Aprendizaje , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Infusiones Parenterales , Capacitación en Servicio , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Mentores , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Hemorragia Posoperatoria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECC) chemotherapy was evaluated in patients who underwent esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). METHODS: A cohort of 93 consecutive patients was analyzed. The median follow-up period was 60 months. Source data verification of adverse events was performed by two independent observers. RESULTS: All three planned preoperative chemotherapy cycles were administered to 65 patients (69.9 %). Only 27 % of the patients completed both pre- and postoperative chemotherapy. The reasons for not receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy could be separated in two main problems: toxicity of the preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative problems involving difficulty in recovery and postoperative complications. Finally, 25 patients (27 %), completed three preoperative and three postoperative cycles. Grades 3 and 4 nonhematologic adverse events of preoperative chemotherapy mainly consisted of thromboembolic events (16.2 %) and cardiac complications (7.5 %). A history of cardiac and vascular disease was independently associated with discontinuation of preoperative chemotherapy and the occurrence of grade 3 or higher adverse events. Surgery was performed for 94 % of all the patients who started with ECC chemotherapy. A radical resection (R0) was achieved in 93 % of the patients. A complete pathologic response was observed in 8 % of the patients. During a median follow-up period of 60 months, the median disease-free survival time was 28 months, and the median overall survival time was 36 months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 50 %, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 42 %. CONCLUSION: For patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or GEJ, six cycles of ECC-based perioperative chemotherapy is associated with a relatively high number of adverse events. Although this toxicity did not affect the esophageal resectability rate, this regimen should be used with caution in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Unión Esofagogástrica/efectos de los fármacos , Atención Perioperativa , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seguridad , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is currently the only curative option for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. Despite meticulous preoperative assessment, CRS and HIPEC appear to be impossible in a subset of patients at the time of surgery. This study investigated which clinical factors may identify these patients before surgery and reported on factors influencing survival. METHODS: All patients with PC of colorectal origin between April 2005 and November 2013 who underwent exploratory surgery to determine whether cytoreduction and HIPEC was feasible were included in this study. Details concerning preoperative patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, treatment and survival were compared. RESULTS: In total, 350 patients with PC were referred to evaluate the possibility of CRS + HIPEC of which 268 (76.6 %) underwent CRS and HIPEC and 82 (23.4 %) had an open-close procedure. The main reason for discontinuing surgery was widespread peritoneal disease (50 %). A preoperative ostomy and an ASA score of 3 were associated with an increased risk for "open and close" (O&C). Median survival was 11.2 months in patients treated with palliative chemotherapy (75 %) compared with 2.7 months with palliative care only. CONCLUSIONS: CRS and HIPEC were deemed unsuitable in almost a quarter of all patients undergoing surgery. No strong clinical predictors for O&C were found, stressing the need for better preoperative imaging modalities. Survival in these patients is limited, but the majority could be treated with palliative chemotherapy resulting in survival of almost 1 year.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell cancer (SRCC) patients have a poor oncologic outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether the potential drawbacks of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) outweigh the benefits in patients with peritoneally metastasized SRCC. METHODS: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin referred to two tertiary centers between April 2005 and December 2013 were identified and retrospectively analyzed. Data were compared between SRCC histology and other differentiations. RESULTS: Three-hundred-fifty-one patients were referred for CRS+HIPEC among which 20 (5.7%) patients were identified with SRCC histology. CRS + HIPEC was performed in 16 of these 20 (80%) and 252 out of the 331 remaining patients (76.1%). A higher proportion of patients in the SRCC-group were diagnosed with N2 stage (62.5% vs. 36.1%, P=0.04). A macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 87.5% and 97.2% respectively (P=0.04). Median survival was 14.1 months compared to 35.1 months (P<0.01). Recurrence occurred in 68.8% of the SRCC patients and in 43.7% of the other histology patients (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with SRCC and PC treated with CRS+HIPEC have a poor median survival only slightly reaching over 1 year. In the presence of other relative contraindications, SRCC histology should refrain a surgeon from performing CRS and HIPEC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/terapia , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/patología , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/secundario , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves outcome of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal carcinoma. Data on the occurrence of PC in T4 colorectal carcinoma are scarce. We investigated the occurrence and risk factors for PC in these patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing a first resection of a T4 colorectal carcinoma in a tertiary hospital between January 2000 and December 2007. Primary outcome was the occurrence of synchronous or metachronous PC. The association with PC and several patient and tumor characteristics was evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients underwent resection of a T4 colorectal carcinoma. Median follow-up censored for death was 66 months (18-89 months). Synchronous PC was found in 46 of 200 patients (23 %) and metachronous PC in 33 of 154 patients (21 %). In univariable analysis, factors associated with PC were: age (OR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.94-0.99; P = 0.03), radical resection (OR 0.32; 95 % CI 0.11-0.91; P = 0.03), and N stage (OR 1.63; 95 % CI 1.36-2.34; P = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, only N stage was associated with PC (OR 1.62; 95 % CI 1.12-2.34; P = 0.01). This association was not significant for the 154 patients at risk for metachronous PC. CONCLUSIONS: Around 1 in 5 patients undergoing resection of a T4 colorectal carcinoma either have PC during primary resection or develop PC during follow-up. N stage was associated with PC in the entire study population. However, none of the clinical or pathological variables were associated with the risk of metachronous PC and therefore cannot be used to develop targeted surveillance strategies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Peritoneales/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/etiología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Discrimination between simple and perforated appendicitis in patients with suspected appendicitis may help to determine the therapy, timing of surgery and risk of complications. The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing between simple and perforated appendicitis, and to compare MRI against ultrasound imaging with selected additional (conditional) use of computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Patients with clinically suspected appendicitis were identified prospectively at the emergency department of six hospitals. Consenting patients underwent MRI, but were managed based on findings at ultrasonography and conditional CT. Radiologists who evaluated the MRI were blinded to the results of ultrasound imaging and CT. The presence of perforated appendicitis was recorded after each evaluation. The final diagnosis was assigned by an expert panel based on perioperative data, histopathology and clinical follow-up after 3 months. RESULTS: MRI was performed in 223 of 230 included patients. Acute appendicitis was the final diagnosis in 118 of 230 patients, of whom 87 had simple and 31 perforated appendicitis. MRI correctly identified 17 of 30 patients with perforated appendicitis (sensitivity 57 (95 per cent confidence interval 39 to 73) per cent), whereas ultrasound imaging with conditional CT identified 15 of 31 (sensitivity 48 (32 to 65) per cent) (P = 0.517). All missed diagnoses of perforated appendicitis were identified as simple acute appendicitis with both imaging protocols. None of the MRI features for perforated appendicitis had a positive predictive value higher than 53 per cent. CONCLUSION: MRI is comparable to ultrasonography with conditional use of CT in identifying perforated appendicitis. However, both strategies incorrectly classify up to half of all patients with perforated appendicitis as having simple appendicitis. Triage of appendicitis based on imaging for conservative treatment is inaccurate and may be considered unsafe for decision-making. Presented to a scientific meeting of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 2012; published in abstract form as Br J Surg 2012; 99(Suppl 7): S6.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estándares de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Ultrasonografía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: To compare the clinical outcome of a one-stage, primary tumour resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedure, versus a two-stage procedure of tumour resection and secondary HIPEC in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis. METHODS: A prospective database of all patients treated with HIPEC in the St. Antonius Hospital in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2012 was analysed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from CRC were included. In 20 patients (27.8%) the primary tumour was resected simultaneously with HIPEC (early referral). In the other 52 patients (72.2%) the primary tumour was resected prior to the HIPEC procedure (late referral). During CRS + HIPEC following late referral, 22 (59.5%) of the 37 anastomoses of the earlier operation were resected, revealing malignancy in 12 (54.5%) on histopathological examination. In twenty (27.8%) patients a permanent colostomy was constructed after HIPEC. Ten of these patients had complete bowel continuity after earlier primary resection. The relaparotomy rate was higher in patients after a resection of a previous anastomosis (36.4%) compared to 12% in the rest of the patients (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the primary tumour simultaneously with HIPEC in patients with synchronous PC from CRC may prevent extended bowel resections and permanent colostomy. Our data support early referral of patients with PC from colorectal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Anciano , Carcinoma/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Information on long-term outcome of patients treated conservatively for diverticular abscess is scarce. This study aims to compare diverticulitis patients with abscess to patients without abscess with regard to readmission, complications, and surgical treatment during a follow-up period of at least 12 months. METHODS: A chart review of all patients admitted for a primary manifestation of diverticulitis between January 2005 and January 2011 was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients with abscess and 663 without abscess were identified. Median follow-up was 28 months (range 12-103). Initial conservative management was achieved in 54 (91.5 %) patients with diverticular abscess and 635 (96.8 %) without abscess. Readmission occurred more frequently among patients with abscess (hazard ratio (HR) 2.6; confidence interval (CI) 1.51-4.33) with a first-year risk of 27.3 versus 10.7 % and second-year risk of 8.2 versus 4.6 %. Surgery was more frequently performed in patients with diverticular abscess (HR 2.3; CI 1.42-3.66). The first-year risk was 35.1 versus 16.6 % and second-year risk was 12.9 versus 2.4 %. The most frequent indication for surgery was persisting or recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with diverticular abscess have a higher risk of being readmitted and/or requiring surgical treatment. The pattern suggests that readmission and need for surgery are the results of an ongoing inflammation of the initial episode.
Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/complicaciones , Diverticulitis del Colon/complicaciones , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Intervalos de Confianza , Diverticulitis del Colon/clasificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotura Espontánea/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
AIM: To determine the diagnostic value of serological infection markers and body temperature in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated diverticulitis. METHODS: Patients in whom diverticulitis was pathologically or radiologically proven at presentation were included. Patients were classified as either complicated (Hinchey Ib, II, III and IV) or uncomplicated (Hinchey Ia) diverticulitis. The discriminative value of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count and body temperature at presentation was tested. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients were included in this study of which 364 (85%) presented with uncomplicated and 62 (15%) with complicated diverticulitis. Only CRP was of sufficient diagnostic value (area under the curve 0.715). The median CRP in patients with complicated diverticulitis was significantly higher than in patients with uncomplicated disease (224 mg/l, range 99-284 vs 87 mg/l, range 48-151). Patients with a CRP of 25 mg/l had a 15% chance of having complicated diverticulitis. This increased from 23% at a CRP value of 100 mg/l to 47% for 250 mg/l or higher. The optimal threshold was reached at 175 mg/l with a positive predictive value of 36%, negative predictive value of 92%, sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 82%. CONCLUSION: WBC count and body temperature are of no value in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated diverticulitis. Only CRP can be used as an indicator for the presence of complications, but a low CRP does not mean that complicated disease can safely be excluded. Therefore, radiological examination remains central in the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with diverticulitis.
Asunto(s)
Temperatura Corporal , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Diverticulitis del Colon/sangre , Diverticulitis del Colon/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Estudios Transversales , Diverticulitis del Colon/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Internal herniation following a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) operation is a complication whereby the small bowel herniates through to the newly formed peritoneal compartment. Medical history, physical examination and laboratory tests are often non-specific and could lead to misdiagnosis. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 46-year-old male with a history of a gastric bypass came to the emergency department with colicky upper-abdominal pain. The patient was initially diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis and a laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. However, the pain persisted and the internal hernia was finally identified and repaired during the third abdominal operation. CONCLUSION: Internal herniation must be considered in patients with a history of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and upper-abdominal pain, especially because such operations are being performed more frequently. When there is a high suspicion of internal herniation, a diagnostic laparoscopy must be performed and the entire small intestine must be systematically inspected.