Evaluation of altered cell-cell communication between glia and neurons in the hippocampus of 3xTg-AD mice at two time points.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and is characterized by progressive memory loss and cognitive decline, affecting behavior, speech, and motor abilities. The neuropathology of AD includes the formation of extracellular amyloid-ß plaque and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles of phosphorylated tau, along with neuronal loss. While neuronal loss is an AD hallmark, cell-cell communication between neuronal and non-neuronal cell populations maintains neuronal health and brain homeostasis. To study changes in cell-cell communication during disease progression, we performed snRNA-sequencing of the hippocampus from female 3xTg-AD and wild-type littermates at 6 and 12 months. We inferred differential cell-cell communication between 3xTg-AD and wild-type mice across time points and between senders (astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and OPCs) and receivers (excitatory and inhibitory neurons) of interest. We also assessed the downstream effects of altered glia-neuron communication using pseudobulk differential gene expression, functional enrichment, and gene regulatory analyses. We found that glia-neuron communication is increasingly dysregulated in 12-month 3xTg-AD mice. We also identified 23 AD-associated ligand-receptor pairs that are upregulated in the 12-month-old 3xTg-AD hippocampus. Our results suggest increased AD association of interactions originating from microglia. Signaling mediators were not significantly differentially expressed but showed altered gene regulation and TF activity. Our findings indicate that altered glia-neuron communication is increasingly dysregulated and affects the gene regulatory mechanisms in neurons of 12-month-old 3xTg-AD mice.

Signature reversion of three disease-associated gene signatures prioritizes cancer drug repurposing candidates.

Drug repurposing is promising because approving a drug for a new indication requires fewer resources than approving a new drug. Signature reversion detects drug perturbations most inversely related to the disease-associated gene signature to identify drugs that may reverse that signature. We assessed the performance and biological relevance of three approaches for constructing disease-associated gene signatures (i.e., limma, DESeq2, and MultiPLIER) and prioritized the resulting drug repurposing candidates for four low-survival human cancers. Our results were enriched for candidates that had been used in clinical trials or performed well in the PRISM drug screen. Additionally, we found that pamidronate and nimodipine, drugs predicted to be efficacious against the brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM), inhibited the growth of a GBM cell line and cells isolated from a patient-derived xenograft (PDX). Our results demonstrate that by applying multiple disease-associated gene signature methods, we prioritized several drug repurposing candidates for low-survival cancers.

The landscape of SETBP1 gene expression and transcription factor activity across human tissues.

The SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) gene encodes a transcription factor (TF) involved in various cellular processes. Variants in SETBP1 can result in three different diseases determined by the introduction (germline vs. somatic) and location of the variant. Germline variants cause the ultra-rare pediatric Schinzel Giedion Syndrome (SGS) and SETBP1 haploinsufficiency disorder (SETBP1-HD), characterized by severe multisystemic abnormalities with neurodegeneration or a less severe brain phenotype accompanied by hypotonia and strabismus, respectively. Somatic variants in SETBP1 are associated with hematological malignancies and cancer development in other tissues in adults. To better understand the tissue-specific mechanisms involving SETBP1, we analyzed publicly available RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We found SETBP1 and its known target genes were widely expressed across 31 adult human tissues. K-means clustering identified three distinct expression patterns of SETBP1 targets across tissues. Functional enrichment analysis (FEA) of each cluster revealed gene sets related to transcriptional regulation, DNA binding, and mitochondrial function. TF activity analysis of SETBP1 and its target TFs revealed tissue-specific TF activity, underscoring the role of tissue context-driven regulation and suggesting its impact in SETBP1-associated disease. In addition to uncovering tissue-specific molecular signatures of SETBP1 expression and TF activity, we provide a Shiny web application to facilitate exploring TF activity across human tissues for 758 TFs. This study provides insight into the landscape of SETBP1 expression and TF activity across 31 non-diseased human tissues and reveals tissue-specific expression and activity of SETBP1 and its targets. In conjunction with the web application we constructed, our framework enables researchers to generate hypotheses related to the role tissue backgrounds play with respect to gene expression and TF activity in different disease contexts.

Cell-type-specific gene expression and regulation in the cerebral cortex and kidney of atypical Setbp1S858R Schinzel Giedion Syndrome mice.

Schinzel Giedion Syndrome (SGS) is an ultra-rare autosomal dominant Mendelian disease presenting with abnormalities spanning multiple organ systems. The most notable phenotypes involve severe developmental delay, progressive brain atrophy, and drug-resistant seizures. SGS is caused by spontaneous variants in SETBP1, which encodes for the epigenetic hub SETBP1 transcription factor (TF). SETBP1 variants causing classical SGS cluster at the degron, disrupting SETBP1 protein degradation and resulting in toxic accumulation, while those located outside cause milder atypical SGS. Due to the multisystem phenotype, we evaluated gene expression and regulatory programs altered in atypical SGS by snRNA-seq of the cerebral cortex and kidney of Setbp1S858R heterozygous mice (corresponds to the human likely pathogenic SETBP1S867R variant) compared to matched wild-type mice by constructing cell-type-specific regulatory networks. Setbp1 was differentially expressed in excitatory neurons, but known SETBP1 targets were differentially expressed and regulated in many cell types. Our findings suggest molecular drivers underlying neurodevelopmental phenotypes in classical SGS also drive atypical SGS, persist after birth, and are present in the kidney. Our results indicate SETBP1's role as an epigenetic hub leads to cell-type-specific differences in TF activity, gene targeting, and regulatory rewiring. This research provides a framework for investigating cell-type-specific variant impact on gene expression and regulation.

The landscape of SETBP1 gene expression and transcription factor activity across human tissues.

Background: The SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) gene encodes a transcription factor (TF) involved in various cellular processes. Distinct SETBP1 variants have been linked to three different diseases. Germline variants cause the ultra-rare pediatric Schinzel Giedion Syndrome (SGS) and SETBP1 haploinsufficiency disorder (SETBP1-HD), characterized by severe multisystemic abnormalities with neurodegeneration or a less severe brain phenotype accompanied by hypotonia and strabismus, respectively. Somatic variants in SETBP1 are associated with hematological malignancies and cancer development in other tissues in adults. Results: To better understand the tissue-specific mechanisms involving SETBP1, we analyzed publicly available RNA-sequencing data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We found SETBP1, and its known target genes were widely expressed across 31 adult human tissues. K-means clustering identified three distinct expression patterns of SETBP1 targets across tissues. Functional enrichment analysis (FEA) of each cluster revealed gene sets related to transcription regulation, DNA binding, and mitochondrial function. TF activity analysis of SETBP1 and its target TFs revealed tissue-specific TF activity, underscoring the role of tissue context-driven regulation and suggesting its impact in SETBP1-associated disease. In addition to uncovering tissue-specific molecular signatures of SETBP1 expression and TF activity, we provide a Shiny web application to facilitate exploring TF activity across human tissues for 758 TFs. Conclusions: This study provides insight into the landscape of SETBP1 expression and TF activity across 31 non-diseased human tissues and reveals tissue-specific expression and activity of SETBP1 and its targets. In conjunction with the web application we constructed, our framework enables researchers to generate hypotheses related to the role tissue backgrounds play with respect to gene expression and TF activity in different disease contexts.

Computational Advancements in Cancer Combination Therapy Prediction.

Given the high attrition rate of de novo drug discovery and limited efficacy of single-agent therapies in cancer treatment, combination therapy prediction through in silico drug repurposing has risen as a time- and cost-effective alternative for identifying novel and potentially efficacious therapies for cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide an introduction to computational methods for cancer combination therapy prediction and to summarize recent studies that implement each of these methods. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed, focusing on studies published within the past 10 years. Our search included reviews and articles of ongoing and retrospective studies. We prioritized articles with findings that suggest considerations for improving combination therapy prediction methods over providing a meta-analysis of all currently available cancer combination therapy prediction methods. Computational methods used for drug combination therapy prediction in cancer research include networks, regression-based machine learning, classifier machine learning models, and deep learning approaches. Each method class has its own advantages and disadvantages, so careful consideration is needed to determine the most suitable class when designing a combination therapy prediction method. Future directions to improve current combination therapy prediction technology include incorporation of disease pathobiology, drug characteristics, patient multiomics data, and drug-drug interactions to determine maximally efficacious and tolerable drug regimens for cancer. As computational methods improve in their capability to integrate patient, drug, and disease data, more comprehensive models can be developed to more accurately predict safe and efficacious combination drug therapies for cancer and other complex diseases.

Evaluating cancer cell line and patient-derived xenograft recapitulation of tumor and non-diseased tissue gene expression profiles in silico.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical models like cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are vital for studying disease mechanisms and evaluating treatment options. It is essential that they accurately recapitulate the disease state of interest to generate results that will translate in the clinic. Prior studies have demonstrated that preclinical models do not recapitulate all biological aspects of human tissues, particularly with respect to the tissue of origin gene expression signatures. Therefore, it is critical to assess how well preclinical model gene expression profiles correlate with human cancer tissues to inform preclinical model selection and data analysis decisions. AIMS: Here we evaluated how well preclinical models recapitulate human cancer and non-diseased tissue gene expression patterns in silico with respect to the full gene expression profile as well as subsetting by the most variable genes, genes significantly correlated with tumor purity, and tissue-specific genes. METHODS: By using publicly available gene expression profiles across multiple sources, we evaluated cancer cell line and patient-derived xenograft recapitulation of tumor and non-diseased tissue gene expression profiles in silico. RESULTS: We found that using the full gene set improves correlations between preclinical model and tissue global gene expression profiles, confirmed that glioblastoma (GBM) PDX global gene expression correlation to GBM tumor global gene expression outperforms GBM cell line to GBM tumor global gene expression correlations, and demonstrated that preclinical models in our study often failed to reproduce tissue-specific expression. While including additional genes for global gene expression comparison between cell lines and tissues decreases the overall correlation, it improves the relative rank between a cell line and its tissue of origin compared to other tissues. Our findings underscore the importance of using the full gene expression set measured when comparing preclinical models and tissues and confirm that tissue-specific patterns are better preserved in GBM PDX models than in GBM cell lines. CONCLUSION: Future studies can build on these findings to determine the specific pathways and gene sets recapitulated by particular preclinical models to facilitate model selection for a given study design or goal.

Prioritized polycystic kidney disease drug targets and repurposing candidates from pre-cystic and cystic mouse Pkd2 model gene expression reversion.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is one of the most prevalent monogenic human diseases. It is mostly caused by pathogenic variants in PKD1 or PKD2 genes that encode interacting transmembrane proteins polycystin-1 (PC1) and polycystin-2 (PC2). Among many pathogenic processes described in ADPKD, those associated with cAMP signaling, inflammation, and metabolic reprogramming appear to regulate the disease manifestations. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin receptor-2 antagonist that regulates cAMP pathway, is the only FDA-approved ADPKD therapeutic. Tolvaptan reduces renal cyst growth and kidney function loss, but it is not tolerated by many patients and is associated with idiosyncratic liver toxicity. Therefore, additional therapeutic options for ADPKD treatment are needed. METHODS: As drug repurposing of FDA-approved drug candidates can significantly decrease the time and cost associated with traditional drug discovery, we used the computational approach signature reversion to detect inversely related drug response gene expression signatures from the Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) database and identified compounds predicted to reverse disease-associated transcriptomic signatures in three publicly available Pkd2 kidney transcriptomic data sets of mouse ADPKD models. We focused on a pre-cystic model for signature reversion, as it was less impacted by confounding secondary disease mechanisms in ADPKD, and then compared the resulting candidates' target differential expression in the two cystic mouse models. We further prioritized these drug candidates based on their known mechanism of action, FDA status, targets, and by functional enrichment analysis. RESULTS: With this in-silico approach, we prioritized 29 unique drug targets differentially expressed in Pkd2 ADPKD cystic models and 16 prioritized drug repurposing candidates that target them, including bromocriptine and mirtazapine, which can be further tested in-vitro and in-vivo. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these results indicate drug targets and repurposing candidates that may effectively treat pre-cystic as well as cystic ADPKD.

Evaluating cancer cell line and patient-derived xenograft recapitulation of tumor and non-diseased tissue gene expression profiles in silico.

Preclinical models like cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are vital for studying disease mechanisms and evaluating treatment options. It is essential that they accurately recapitulate the disease state of interest to generate results that will translate in the clinic. Prior studies have demonstrated that preclinical models do not recapitulate all biological aspects of human tissues, particularly with respect to the tissue of origin gene expression signatures. Therefore, it is critical to assess how well preclinical model gene expression profiles correlate with human cancer tissues to inform preclinical model selection and data analysis decisions. Here we evaluated how well preclinical models recapitulate human cancer and non-diseased tissue gene expression patterns in silico with respect to the full gene expression profile as well as subsetting by the most variable genes, genes significantly correlated with tumor purity, and tissue-specific genes by using publicly available gene expression profiles across multiple sources. We found that using the full gene set improves correlations between preclinical model and tissue global gene expression profiles, confirmed that GBM PDX global gene expression correlation to GBM tumor global gene expression outperforms GBM cell line to GBM tumor global gene expression correlations, and demonstrated that preclinical models in our study often failed to reproduce tissue-specific expression. While including additional genes for global gene expression comparison between cell lines and tissues decreases the overall correlation, it improves the relative rank between a cell line and its tissue of origin compared to other tissues. Our findings underscore the importance of using the full gene expression set measured when comparing preclinical models and tissues and confirm that tissue-specific patterns are better preserved in GBM PDX models than in GBM cell lines. Future studies can build on these findings to determine the specific pathways and gene sets recapitulated by particular preclinical models to facilitate model selection for a given study design or goal.

Ten simple rules for using public biological data for your research.

With an increasing amount of biological data available publicly, there is a need for a guide on how to successfully download and use this data. The 10 simple rules for using public biological data are: (1) use public data purposefully in your research; (2) evaluate data for your use case; (3) check data reuse requirements and embargoes; (4) be aware of ethics for data reuse; (5) plan for data storage and compute requirements; (6) know what you are downloading; (7) download programmatically and verify integrity; (8) properly cite data; (9) make reprocessed data and models Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) and share; and (10) make pipelines and code FAIR and share. These rules are intended as a guide for researchers wanting to make use of available data and to increase data reuse and reproducibility.