Persistently elevated joint contact stress after periacetabular osteotomy is associated with joint failure at minimum 10-year follow-up.

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a common treatment for prearthritic hip dysplasia. The goal of this investigation was to determine if computationally assessed hip contact mechanics are associated with joint failure at minimum 10-year follow-up. One hundred patients with hip dysplasia (125 hips) completed patient-reported outcomes an average of 13.8 years (range 10.0-18.0 years) after PAO. 63/125 hips were classified as having failed: 26 converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 37 with significant disability indicated by modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) ≤ 70. Differences in discrete element analysis-computed contact mechanics were compared between (1) preserved and failed hips, (2) preserved hips and hips that failed by THA, and (3) preserved hips and hips that failed by mHHS ≤ 70. Failed hips had significantly higher preoperative contact stress and exposure metrics (p < 0.001-0.009) than preserved hips. Failed hips also had significantly higher postoperative peak contact stress (p = 0.018), higher mean contact stress (p < 0.001), and smaller contact area (p = 0.044). When assessed based on type of failure, hips that failed by THA had significantly higher postoperative contact stress and exposure metrics than preserved hips (p < 0.001-0.020). In hips that failed by mHHS ≤ 70, mean postoperative contact stress exposure was significantly higher compared to preserved hips (p = 0.043). Despite improved radiographic measures of dysplasia after PAO, pathologic joint contact mechanics can persist and predict treatment failure at minimum 10 years after surgery. Operative and nonoperative techniques specifically intended to reduce harmful contact mechanics in dysplastic hips may have the potential to further improve clinical outcomes after PAO.

Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.

Background: Early post-operative pain control is essential to facilitate rapid recovery after orthopaedic surgery. Despite periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) being the gold standard treatment of prearthritic hip dysplasia, there is limited evidence assessing efficacy of early post-operative pain management strategies. Recent literature has focused on non-opioid supplemental treatments such as nerve blocks or local wound infiltration. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess efficacy of these interventions to reduce pain, facilitate mobilization, reduce length of stay after PAO surgery. Methods: A systematic review was created under the guidance of PRISMA from databases that included PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov from their creation dates to 12/21/23. These studies were screen based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A total of six studies were included in this analysis from independent institutions. Three investigated nerve blocks (fascia iliaca, pericapsular, transversus abdominis), one investigated local wound infiltration with ropivacaine, one investigated high-dose dexamethasone, and the last investigated removal of the epidural catheter on postoperative (POD) 1 compared to POD 2. There were heterogeneous outcomes that were measured from these studies. In general, nerve blocks decreased opioid use, pain, and length of hospital stay. The local wound infiltration decreased pain on POD 3 and 4. Removing the epidural catheter on POD1 compared to POD 2 decreased pain and length of stay. High-dose dexamethasone use decreased opioid use on POD 1, otherwise, there was no difference in pain. Conclusion: In summary, supplemental pain management strategies peri-operatively for PAO surgery can decrease pain, opioid use, and length of hospital stay, though there are few studies assessing these interventions. Limiting opioid use after surgery reduces known negative consequences of the medication and facilitates rapid recovery. Clinical trials are needed that assess efficacy of supplemental pain management strategies after PAO surgery. Level of Evidence: II.

Hip Dysplasia Treated With Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients Over 40 Years Old: A Systematic Review.

Background: Hip dysplasia is a leading cause of hip osteoarthritis. While periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is effective for relieving pain and dysfunction caused by hip dysplasia in adolescents and young adults, there is concern that patients over 40 years of age will have an increased risk of persistent dysfunction and need for total hip arthroplasty. Current available evidence for PAO in older adults is limited and there is no systematic review in the literature focusing on this topic. The current systematic review offers insight into the demographics, patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores, and hip survivorship from total hip arthroplasty in patients over 40 years older treated for hip dysplasia with PAO. Methods: The review was conducted under the guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Databases that were searched included PubMed, OVID Medline, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Studies were screened based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Five studies were included in this systematic review. Enrollment years were 1990-2013. In total, there were 335 hips with mean ages between 43.5-47.2 years. Mean follow up was 4-10.8 years. Most patients that underwent hip preservation had Tonnis osteoarthritis grade 0-1. There was contradicting evidence whether patients >40 years did better or worse compared to <40 years; although, most patients in the >40 years group had good outcomes after PAO. PAO survivorship ranged from 67-100% depending on the study. Complications ranged from 2-36% of cases depending on the study; although, none of these complications had lasting effects. Conclusion: Patients over 40 years old appear to have positive outcomes when treated for hip dysplasia with PAO, though these patients were likely selected for no to minimal osteoarthritis, high functional status, and good health. PAO should be considered for patients with hip dysplasia over 40 years old without hip arthritis, though we recommend very selective indications. Level of Evidence: II.

Prevalence of Radiographic Hip Dysplasia in the General Adult Population: A Systematic Review.

Background: Acetabular dysplasia has a wide range of prevalence reported in the literature. This variation is likely due to differences in the population under investigation and studies focusing on cohorts with hip pain and osteoarthritis. There are reports of radiographic hip dysplasia prevalence for adults without hip pain but there is no systematic review of these studies to document the incidence in the general population. The purpose of this systematic review was to provide a full summary of all studies that report prevalence of hip dysplasia in adults without hip pain. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were utilized as an outline for this systematic review. Articles were pulled from PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov from their inception dates to 1/7/24. Studies were included if participants were asymptomatic and reported rates of prevalence. Results: Fourteen studies were included in this systematic review. There were 10,998 hips from 5,506 participants included in this analysis. The overall prevalence of radiographic hip dysplasia was 2.3%. Eight studies of 5,930 hips reported the prevalence of hip dysplasia by sex. The prevalence rate in these studies was 3.8% in females and 2.7% in males. Conclusion: Acetabular dysplasia based on radiographic measurements is relatively common in the general adult population. Furthermore, females have a higher prevalence rate when compared to males. It is important to recognize the incidence of hip dysplasia in the asymptomatic adult population as we recommend surgical treatment for patients who present with hip pain and dysplasia. Further studies should investigate the natural history of untreated and treated hip dysplasia. Level of Evidence: III.

Incorporating patient-specific hip orientation from weightbearing computed tomography affects discrete element analysis-computed regional joint contact mechanics in individuals treated with periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia.

Computational models of the hip often omit patient-specific functional orientation when placing imaging-derived bony geometry into anatomic landmark-based coordinate systems for application of joint loading schemes. The purpose of this study was to determine if this omission meaningfully alters computed contact mechanics. Discrete element analysis models were created from non-weightbearing (NWB) clinical CT scans of 10 hip dysplasia patients (11 hips) and oriented in the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) coordinate system (NWB-ISB). Three additional models were generated for each hip by adding patient-specific stance information obtained via weightbearing CT (WBCT) to each ISB-oriented model: (1) patient-specific sagittal tilt added (WBCT-sagittal), (2) coronal and axial rotation from optical motion capture added to (1; WBCT-combo), and (3) WBCT-derived axial, sagittal, and coronal rotation added to (1; WBCT-original). Identical gait cycle loading was applied to all models for a given hip, and computed contact stress and contact area were compared between model initialization techniques. Addition of sagittal tilt did not significantly change whole-joint peak (p = 0.922) or mean (p = 0.871) contact stress or contact area (p = 0.638). Inclusion of motion-captured coronal and axial rotation (WBCT-combo) decreased peak contact stress (p = 0.014) and slightly increased average contact area (p = 0.071) from WBCT-sagittal models. Including all WBCT-derived rotations (WBCT-original) further reduced computed peak contact stress (p = 0.001) and significantly increased contact area (p = 0.001). Variably significant differences (p = 0.001-1.0) in patient-specific acetabular subregion mechanics indicate the importance of functional orientation incorporation for modeling applications in which local contact mechanics are of interest.

Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgical Hip Preservation Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Female patients undergoing hip preservation surgery often have inferior patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), raising concerns about the clinical benefit of hip preservation surgery in women. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative PROs, and change in PROs, for female versus (vs.) male hip preservation patients was completed via systematic review. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Em-base databases were searched. Level I-IV studies of patients undergoing surgical intervention for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and/or developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with at least two years of postoperative follow-up were included. Sex-stratified PRO scores or outcome information had to be included. Results: We identified 32 hip preservation studies evaluating sex-related PRO differences, and/or providing sex-specific PRO data. The quantitative analysis of 24 studies (1843 patients) was stratified by DDH status. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL), and Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific subscale (HOS-SSS) were assessed. Patients undergoing surgery for FAI only were 52.1% female (n= 806/1546). As predicted, women had lower preoperative PRO scores, however, they had significantly greater improvements in HOS-ADL (20.14±4.41 vs. 26.00±0.35, p<0.05) and HOS-SSS (33.21± 0.71 vs. 38.33± 0.46, p<0.05) compared to males. Similar results were found in the DDH cohort of 330 patients (72.1% female): females had lower preoperative PRO scores, but significantly greater improvement of mHHS (22.68±0.45 vs. 10.60±1.46, p<0.01). Conclusion: The present review suggests that men undergoing surgery for FAI and/or DDH tend to have higher preoperative and postoperative PRO scores. However, it appears that women often have greater preoperative to postoperative improvement in PRO scores. This finding is strongest in surgical treatment of DDH. Level of Evidence: III.

What Are the Barriers to Incorporating Nutrition Interventions Into Care of Older Adults With Femoral Fragility Fractures?

Femoral fragility fractures cause substantial morbidity and mortality in older adults. Mortality has generally been approximated between 10-20% in the first year after fracture and among those who do survive, another 20-60% require assistance with basic activities within 1-2 years following fracture.1 Malnutrition is common and perpetuates these poor outcomes. Nutrition supplementation has potential to prevent post-injury malnutrition, preserve functional muscle mass, and improve outcomes in older adults with femoral fragility fractures, however high-quality evidence is lacking, thus limiting translation of interventions into clinical practice. This review article is designed to highlight gaps in the evidence investigating nutrition interventions in this population and identify barriers for translation to clinical practice. Our goal is to guide future nutrition intervention research in older adults with femoral fragility fractures. Level of Evidence: V.