Enhanced bacterial clearance in early secondary sepsis in a porcine intensive care model.

Early secondary sepsis (ESS), occurring after recent inflammatory activation is associated with a reduced inflammatory response. If this attenuation also is associated with decreased bacterial killing, the need for antibiotic efficacy might be greater than in primary sepsis (PS). This prospective, randomised interventional study compares bacterial killing in ESS and PS in a large animal intensive care sepsis model. 38 pigs were intravenously administered live Escherichia coli for 3 h. Before baseline ESS was pre-exposed to endotoxin 24 h, whereas PS was not. Bacterial growth was measured in organs immediately post-mortem, repeatedly during 6 h in blood in vivo and for blood intrinsic bactericidal capacity ex vivo. Splenic growth was lower in ESS animals, than in PS animals (3.31 ± 0.12, vs. 3.84 ± 0.14 log10 CFU/mL, mean ± SEM) (p < 0.01) with a similar trend in hepatic growth (p = NS). Blood bacterial count at 2 h correlated with splenic bacterial count in ESS (ESS: r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and to blood killing capacity in PS (PS: r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Attenuated inflammation in ESS is associated with enhanced antibacterial capacities in the spleen. In ESS blood bacterial count is related to splenic killing and in PS to blood bactericidal capacity. The results suggest no increased need for synergistic antibiotic combinations in ESS.

The impact of the systemic inflammatory response on hepatic bacterial elimination in experimental abdominal sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial translocation from the gut has been suggested to induce a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and organ dysfunction. The liver has a pivotal role in eliminating circulating bacteria entering from the gut. We investigated whether pre-existing inflammation affects hepatic bacterial elimination. METHODS: Fifteen anaesthetised piglets were infused with E. coli in the portal vein for 3 h. The naive group (n = 6) received the bacterial infusion without endotoxin exposure. SIRS (SIRS group, n = 6) was induced by endotoxin infusion 24 h before the bacterial infusion. For effects of anaesthesia, controls (n = 3) received saline instead of endotoxin for 24 h. Bacterial counts and endotoxin levels in the portal and hepatic veins were analysed during bacterial infusion. RESULTS: The bacterial killing rate was higher in the naive group compared with the SIRS group (p = 0.001). The ratio of hepatic to portal venous bacterial counts, i.e. the median bacterial influx from the splanchnic circulation, was 0.06 (IQR 0.01-0.11) in the naive group and 0.71 (0.03-1.77) in the SIRS group at 3 h, and a magnitude lower in the naive group during bacteraemia (p = 0.03). Similar results were seen for hepatic endotoxin elimination. Peak log tumour necrosis factor alpha was higher in the naive 4.84 (4.77-4.89) vs. the SIRS group 3.27 (3.26-3.32) mg/L (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that hepatic bacterial and endotoxin elimination is impaired in pigs with pre-existing SIRS while the inflammatory response to bacterial infusion is diminished. If similar mechanisms operate in human critical illness, the hepatic elimination of bacteria from the gut could be impaired by SIRS.