Spiritual well-being and moral distress among Iranian nurses.

BACKGROUND: Moral distress is increasingly recognized as a problem affecting healthcare professionals, especially nurses. If not addressed, it may create job dissatisfaction, withdrawal from the moral dimensions of patient care, or even encourage one to leave the profession. Spiritual well-being is a concept which is considered when dealing with problems and stress relating to a variety of issues. OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to examine the relationship between spiritual well-being and moral distress among a sample of Iranian nurses and also to study the determinant factors of moral distress and spiritual well-being in nurses. RESEARCH DESIGN: A cross-sectional, correlational design was employed to collect data from 193 nurses using the Spiritual Well-Being Scale and the Moral Distress Scale-Revised. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: This study was approved by the Regional Committee of Medical Research Ethics. The ethical principles of voluntary participation, anonymity, and confidentiality were considered. FINDINGS: Mean scores of spiritual well-being and moral distress were 94.73 ± 15.89 and 109.56 ± 58.70, respectively. There was no significant correlation between spiritual well-being and moral distress (r = -.053, p = .462). Marital status and job satisfaction were found to be independent predictors of spiritual well-being. However, gender and educational levels were found to be independent predictors for moral distress. Age, working in rotation shifts, and a tendency to leave the current job also became significant after adjusting other factors for moral distress. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study could not support the relationship between spiritual well-being and moral distress. However, the results showed that moral distress is related to many elements including individual ideals and differences as well as organizational factors. Informing nurses about moral distress and its consequences, establishing periodic consultations, and making some organizational arrangement may play an important role in the identification and management of moral distress and spiritual well-being.

Effect of remifentanil on the recovery profile after head and neck surgeries: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Development of opioid tolerance in the perioperative period due to remifentanil remains controversial. We evaluated occurrence of opioid tolerance and other adverse effects due to remifentanil in patients undergoing head and neck surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited adult participants with ASA status I to III who received general anesthesia for approximately 2 h for elective head and neck procedures. Remifentanil infusion was used in one group and intermittent boluses of morphine or fentanyl were administered in another group. Postoperative pain was treated with intermittent boluses of morphine and fentanyl in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) to achieve a numerical rating scale score of 3. Opioid requirement was assessed as an indicator of opioid tolerance. Patients were also evaluated for time to discharge from PACU. RESULTS: We studied 222 adults aged between 21 and 80 years. One hundred and eleven patients received a combination of remifentanil infusion and morphine boluses, and another 111 patients received only fentanyl and/or morphine boluses intraoperatively. Fifty-one patients in the remifentanil group and 25 in the fentanyl/morphine group required opioids in the PACU. Opioid requirement were significantly more (mean ± SD, 44.98 ± 59.7 Vs 20.23 ± 46.66 mcg.kg-1; P = 0.001) and required longer time to discharge from PACU in the remifentanil group compared to the fentanyl/morphine group (Mean ± SD, 88.6 ± 39.5 min Vs 73.1 ± 38.4 min; P < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of adverse effects in two groups was noted. CONCLUSION: At clinically relevant doses, intraoperative remifentanil infusion appears to increase opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period. This can result in delayed discharge from PACU for patients undergoing elective head and neck procedures.

A randomised control trial to compare retention rates of two cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction methods in the novice.

BACKGROUND: Studies show that after implementation of chest compression only CPR (CCC) in the community, there was an increase in bystander CPR rates and survival of OHCA victims. There have been very few studies to compare the retention rates of CCC and conventional CPR (CVC) in lay people. METHODS: First year nursing students were randomised into one of the two CPR training methods: CVC - 30 chest compressions, followed by 2 mouth-to-mouth ventilations; and CCC - 100 chest compressions with 10s of rest before the next compression cycle. Within each group, they were sub-randomised into two groups for locating chest compression landmark: 2F - 2 finger-breadth proximal from xiphoid process, identified by tracing the lower margin of the victim's rib cage; or SL - shown the approximate location on the lower half of the sternum. 6 months later, participants underwent an unannounced test to perform one-man CPR on a moulaged mannikin. RESULTS: During the test, CVC groups did significantly fewer chest compressions per minute than CCC groups (57.8±23.7 vs 77.7±24.2, adjusted p<0.001). SL groups compressed significantly deeper than 2F groups (34.3±11.5cm vs 27.3±13.7cm, adjusted p<0.001), and was associated with higher rate of correct landmark for chest compression. 50.0% of the participants did not compress at the correct location. For those who were trained in CVC, only 3.7% were able to perform ≥10 effective ventilations in 5min. CONCLUSION: CCC, with SL as the method to locate landmark for chest compression, should be taught to lay people.

Complex and novel determinants of empathy change in medical students.

PURPOSE: Physician empathy is a core attribute in medical professionals, giving better patient outcomes. Medical school is an opportune time for building empathetic foundations. This study explores empathy change and focuses on contributory factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 881 students (63%) from Years 1 to 5 in a Singaporean medical school using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Student version (JSPE-S) and a questionnaire investigating the relationship between reported and novel personal-social empathy determinants. RESULTS: Empathy declined significantly between preclinical and clinical years. Female and medical specialty interest respondents had higher scores than their counterparts. Despite strong internal consistency, factor analysis suggested that the JSPE model is not a perfect fit. Year 1 students had highest Perspective Taking scores and Year 2 students had highest Compassionate Care scores. High workload and inappropriate learning environments were the most relevant stressors. Time spent with family, arts, and community service correlated with higher empathy scores, whilst time spent with significant others and individual leisure correlated with lower scores. Thematic analysis revealed that the most common self-reported determinants were exposure to activity (community service) or socialisation, personal and family-related event as well as environment (high work-load). CONCLUSION: While the empathy construct in multicultural Singapore is congruent with a Western model, important differences remain. A more subtle understanding of the heterogeneity of the medical student experience is important. A greater breadth of determinants of empathy, such as engagement in arts-related activities should be considered.

Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty for the treatment of OSA: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

This study seeks to determine the success rates of the expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty and its variants on the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Two independent searches of MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and Evidence Based Medicine Reviews to identify publications relevant to OSA and expansion pharyngoplasty. All relevant studies published before 31 March 2015 were included. Five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The numbers of patients in each paper ranged from 10 to 85 (total = 155), and mean age ranged from 8 to 56 years. Substantial and consistent improvement in PSG outcomes were observed post-expansion pharyngoplasty patients, with or without multilevel surgery groups. The results showed that the expansion pharyngoplasty technique has significantly lower AHI than control group [Standardised mean difference -7.32, 95 %CI (-11.11, -3.52), p = 0.0002]; however, substantial heterogeneity between these studies were observed. The mean pre-operative AHI (in the five papers) improved from 40.0 ± 12.6 to 8.3 ± 5.2 post-operatively. The overall pro-rated pooled success rate for all the patients was 86.3 %. The expansion pharyngoplasty is effective in the management of patients with OSA.