Synthetic Mid-urethral Sling for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Women With Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: We assess the efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for failure of synthetic mid-urethral slings for the treatment of urinary incontinence in a large cohort of women with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women aged 18 years or older who received a synthetic mid-urethral sling for stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence in 3 centers between 2004 and 2019 and who had a neurological disorder were included. Exclusion criteria were less than 1 year of follow-up, concomitant pelvic organ prolapse repair, previous synthetic sling implantation, and no baseline urodynamics. The primary outcome was surgical failure, defined as recurrence of stress urinary incontinence during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the 5-year failure rate. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify factors associated with surgical failure. Complications and reoperations during the follow-up have also been reported. RESULTS: A total of 115 women with a median age of 53 years were included. The median follow-up duration was 75 months. The 5-year failure rate was 48% (95 CI 46%-57%). Age above 50 years, negative tension-free vaginal tape test and transobturator route were associated with surgical failure. Thirty-six patients (31.3%) underwent at least 1 reoperation for complications or failure, and 2 required definitive intermittent catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic mid-urethral slings may be an acceptable alternative to autologous slings or artificial urinary sphincters for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a selected group of patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Robotic versus hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two minimally invasive techniques in kidney transplantation.

Robot-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN) is increasingly used due to its advantages such as its precision and reduced learning curve when compared to laparoscopic techniques. Concerns remain among surgeons regarding possible longer warm ischemia time. This study aimed to compare patients undergoing robotic living donor nephrectomy to the more frequently used hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HLDN) technique, focusing on warm ischemia time, total operative time, learning curve, hospital length of stay, donor renal function and post-operative complications. Retrospective study comparing RDN to HLDN in a collaborative transplant network. 176 patients were included, 72 in RDN and 104 in HLDN. Left-sided nephrectomy was favored in RDN (82% vs 52%, p < 0.01). Operative time was longer in RDN (287 vs 160 min; p < 0.01), while warm ischemia time was similar (221 vs 213 secs, p = 0.446). The hospital stay was shorter in RDN (3.9 vs 5.7 days, p < 0.01).Concerning renal function, a slightpersistent increase of 7% of the creatinine ratio was observed in the RDN compared to the HLDN group (1.56 vs 1.44 at 1-month checkup, p < 0.01). The results show that RDN appears safe and efficient in comparison to the gold-standard HLDN technique. Warm ischemia time was similar for both techniques, whereas RDN operative time was longer. Patients undergoing RDN had a shorter hospital stay, this being possibly mitigated by differences in center release criteria. Donor renal function needs to be assessed on a longer-term basis for both techniques.