Consistency of immunogenicity in three consecutive lots of a tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003): A randomized placebo-controlled trial in US adults.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a trial to demonstrate immunogenic equivalence of three consecutive manufacturing lots of Takeda's tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate, TAK-003, and further assessed its safety and reactogenicity. METHODS: Healthy US adults (n = 923) randomized 2:2:2:1 to four groups received two doses of one of three TAK-003 lots or placebo on Days 0 and 90, with follow-up to Day 270. Primary endpoint evaluated lot-to-lot equivalence of geometric mean neutralizing titers at Day 120 against each of 4 dengue serotypes in baseline seronegative participants. Solicited local and systemic, and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were assessed for 7, 14 and 28 days after each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAE) were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Eight of 12 prespecified equivalence comparisons were met in the per-protocol set but failed marginally in the other 4 mainly due to loss of statistical power following higher than anticipated baseline seropositivity and drop-out rates. All three TAK-003 lots elicited high rates of tetravalent dengue seropositivity (96.7 %, 93.0 % and 97.5 % at Day 120; 91.0 %, 80.5 % and 85.7 % at Day 270) and had similar reactogenicity profiles with no vaccine-related SAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The three lots of TAK-003 were immunogenic for all four dengue serotypes and well tolerated in healthy adults. Despite not meeting all equivalence comparisons, no major differences were observed between lots and the data support acceptable consistency of the manufacturing process. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03423173.

Bridging the immunogenicity of a tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) from children and adolescents to adults.

Immunobridging is an important methodology that can be used to extrapolate vaccine efficacy estimates to populations not evaluated in clinical studies, and that has been successfully used in developing many vaccines. Dengue, caused by a mosquito-transmitted flavivirus endemic to many tropical and subtropical regions, is traditionally thought of as a pediatric disease but is now a global threat to both children and adults. We bridged immunogenicity data from a phase 3 efficacy study of a tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003), performed in children and adolescents living in endemic areas, with an immunogenicity study in adults in non-endemic areas. Neutralizing antibody responses were comparable in both studies following receipt of a two-dose TAK-003 schedule (months 0 and 3). Similar immune responses were observed across exploratory assessments of additional humoral responses. These data support the potential for clinical efficacy of TAK-003 in adults.

A randomised trial comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of the biosimilar CT-P6 with reference trastuzumab.

PURPOSE: Access to trastuzumab, a valuable anti-cancer treatment, can be limited by cost. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the PK profiles of CT-P6, a biosimilar of trastuzumab, and US-licensed reference trastuzumab (Herceptin®) in healthy subjects. Secondary study aims included comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab in these subjects. METHODS: We performed a single-dose, randomised, double-blind, parallel group study (NCT02665637) comparing CT-P6 with reference trastuzumab (6 mg/kg, 90 min intravenous infusion) in 70 healthy adult males. Pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity were evaluated up to 10 weeks post-dose. Primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf); AUC from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUClast); and observed maximum serum concentration (Cmax). The pre-determined equivalence criterion was a 90% confidence interval of 80-125% for ratios of geometric least squares (LS) means. RESULTS: Equivalence of CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab was demonstrated. Ratios (CT-P6/reference trastuzumab) of geometric LS means (90% confidence interval) were: AUCinf 99.05 (93.00, 105.51); AUClast 99.30 (92.85, 106.20); Cmax 96.58 (90.93, 102.59). Safety profiles were similar; treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in ten subjects (28.6%) in the CT-P6 group and 11 (31.4%) in the reference trastuzumab group. No serious adverse events or deaths occurred. No subjects tested positive for anti-drug antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: These data add to the totality of evidence required to demonstrate biosimilarity. A phase III study of CT-P6-in which equivalent neoadjuvant efficacy to reference trastuzumab has been demonstrated-is ongoing.

The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a TYK2/JAK1 Inhibitor (PF-06700841) in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Plaque Psoriasis.

The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06700841 were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose escalation, parallel-group study in healthy subjects and patients with plaque psoriasis. The single ascending dose (1, 3, 10, 30, 100, or 200 mg) and multiple ascending dose (MAD; PF-06700841; up to 175 mg once daily or 50 mg twice daily for 10 days) periods included 54 healthy participants. In addition, 30 patients with psoriasis received PF-06700841 30 or 100 mg or placebo once daily for 28 days. Single PF-06700841 doses were rapidly absorbed, with peak plasma concentrations ≤ 1 hour, proportional exposure up to 100 mg, and mean half-life 3.8-7.5 hours. On day 10 of MAD, plasma concentrations peaked at ≤1.5 hours postdose (10-175 mg once daily). Elimination half-life was 4.9-10.7 hours; steady state was reached by day 8. In psoriasis patients on day 28, peak plasma concentrations occurred at 1-2 hours. Biomarkers IP-10 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were reduced and returned to near baseline levels after dosing. Maximal mean percent change from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores for PF-06700841 30 mg once daily and 100 mg once daily were -67.92% and -96.31%, respectively, in week 4. All adverse events were mild/moderate. PF-06700841 was safe and well tolerated up to 200 mg once daily in healthy subjects and 100 mg once daily in patients with psoriasis, suggesting potential therapeutic utility in plaque psoriasis and other inflammatory diseases.

BPS804 Anti-Sclerostin Antibody in Adults With Moderate Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Results of a Randomized Phase 2a Trial.

This 21-week, open-label, phase 2a trial aimed to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety of multiple, escalating infusions of BPS804, a neutralizing, anti-sclerostin antibody, in adults with moderate osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Patients received BPS804 (three escalating doses each separated by 2 weeks [5, 10, and 20 mg/kg]) or no treatment (reference group). The primary efficacy endpoints were mean changes from baseline to day 43 in: procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), procollagen type 1 C-terminal propeptide (P1CP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), osteocalcin (OC), and type 1 collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX-1). Mean change from baseline to day 141 in lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was also assessed. BPS804 safety and tolerability were assessed every 2 weeks. Overall, 14 adults were enrolled (BPS804 group: n = 9, mean age 30.7 years, mean aBMD Z-score -2.6; reference group, n = 5, mean age 27.4 years, mean aBMD Z-score -2.2). In the BPS804 group, P1NP, P1CP, BSAP, and OC were increased by 84% (p < 0.001), 53% (p = 0.003), 59% (p < 0.001), and 44% (p = 0.012), respectively, versus baseline (reference: P1NP, +6% [p = 0.651]; P1CP, +5% [p = 0.600]; BSAP, -13% [p = 0.582]; OC, -19% [p = 0.436]). BPS804 treatment downregulated CTX-1 by 44% from baseline (reference: -7%; significance was not tested for this biomarker), and increased aBMD by 4% (p = 0.038; reference group: +1%; p = 0.138). BPS804 was generally well tolerated. There were 32 adverse events reported in nine patients; none was suspected to be treatment-related. There were no treatment-related fractures. BPS804 stimulates bone formation, reduces bone resorption, and increases lumbar spine aBMD in adults with moderate OI. This paves the way for a longer-term, phase 3 trial into the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BPS804 in patients with OI. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine currently being developed for procedural sedation and for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. This trial was the fourth study for procedural sedation. The aim was to compare the safety and efficacy profile of remimazolam and to refine suitable doses for subsequent phase III studies in this indication. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active controlled clinical trial with 162 male and female patients, aged 18 to 70, scheduled to undergo a routine colonoscopy. Patients were randomized to receive 1 of 3 remimazolam doses or midazolam for sedation. Supplemental oxygen and 100 µg of fentanyl was given before procedures were started, and the colonoscopy commenced as soon as suitable sedation had been achieved (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score ≤3). Top-up doses of the study drug and/or fentanyl were allowed to maintain suitable sedation and/or analgesia. Response was defined as sufficient sedation, no rescue sedative, and no ventilation required. RESULTS: This study showed that a single dose of remimazolam or midazolam, followed by top-up doses to maintain suitable sedation, provided adequate sedation with a high success rate (>92%) for the remimazolam groups, compared with 75% for the midazolam group (P = .007). There was no requirement for mechanical ventilation in any group, and procedure failures were all due to use of rescue sedative. CONCLUSIONS: The high success rates and good safety profile of remimazolam observed in this study warrants further investigation and confirmation in phase III trials. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01145222.).

A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: This exploratory study was the first study of remimazolam in patients to assess the safety and efficacy of different single doses for procedural sedation. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized to receive 1 of 3 doses of remimazolam or midazolam (25 per group) in a double-blind manner. After a single dose of study drug to achieve sedation, patients underwent gastroscopy. We assessed the success of the procedure, sedation levels, recovery from sedation, and safety. RESULTS: A single dose of remimazolam resulted in a successful procedure in 32%, 56%, and 64% of patients in the low (0.10), middle (0.15), and high (0.20 mg/kg) dose groups compared with 44% of patients in the midazolam (0.075 mg/kg) dose group. The onset of sedation was 1.5 to 2.5 minutes in the remimazolam dose groups compared with 5 minutes for midazolam. Because this was a single administration study, sedation could be maintained for as long as necessary to complete the procedure, using rescue midazolam or propofol. Recovery from sedation was rapid for all treatment groups but was influenced by the choice of rescue medication. There were no obvious differences in the safety profiles of remimazolam and midazolam. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory dose-finding study showed that a single administration of remimazolam (0.10-0.20 mg/kg) was capable of inducing rapid sedation with a quick recovery profile in patients undergoing a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The safety profile was favorable and appeared to be similar to that of midazolam, warranting further development of this short-acting compound.

The effect of medical nutrition therapy by a registered dietitian nutritionist in patients with prediabetes participating in a randomized controlled clinical research trial.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have provided evidence that lifestyle change prevents or delays the occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The challenge is to translate research evidence for type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention into health care settings. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) compared with usual care on fasting plasma glucose values, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum lipid levels, and Diabetes Risk Score, from baseline to the end of a 12-week intervention in overweight or obese adults with prediabetes. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel group study of 76 adults with impaired fasting plasma glucose or an HbA1c of 5.7% to 6.4%, recruited between April 2010 and May 2011 who completed a 12-week intervention period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was fasting plasma glucose. Secondary outcome measures were HbA1c, serum lipid levels, and Diabetes Risk Score. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: A factorial repeated measures analysis of variance was used to make comparisons between the two groups (the MNT and usual care groups) and two measures of time (baseline and 12 weeks postintervention). Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (release 19.0, 2010, SPSS Inc). RESULTS: There was a significant interaction for group assignment and HbA1c (P=0.01), with the MNT group experiencing significantly lower HbA1c levels than the usual care group (5.79% vs 6.01%) after the 12-week intervention. There was a significant interaction for group assignment and Diabetes Risk Score (P=0.001). Diabetes Risk Score for the MNT group decreased from 17.54±3.69 to 15.31±3.79 compared with the usual care group score, which went from 17.23±4.69 to 16.83±4.73. Regardless of group assignment, both groups experienced a reduction in total cholesterol (P=0.01) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.04) level. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that individualized MNT is effective in decreasing HbA1c level in patients diagnosed with prediabetes.