A Pilot Study on the Collection of Adverse Event Data from the Patient Using an Electronic Platform in a Cancer Clinical Trial Unit.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate and robust adverse event (AE) data collection is crucial in cancer clinical trials to ensure participant safety. Frameworks have been developed to facilitate the collection of AE data and now the traditional workflows are facing renewal to include patient-reported data, improving completeness of AE data. We explored one of these workflows in a cancer clinical trial unit. METHODS: The study was a single-site study conducted at a tertiary hospital located in Australia. Patients consenting to a clinical trial were eligible for inclusion in this study. Participants used an electronic platform-My Health My Way (MHMW)-to report their symptomatic data weekly for 24 weeks. A symptom list was included within the platform, along with a free text field. Data reported via the platform was compared with data recorded in the patient's medical chart. Time taken to compile data from each source was recorded, along with missing data points. Agreement between patient-reported data and data recorded in the medical notes was assessed using Kappa and Gwet's AC1; time taken to compile data and missing data points were assessed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Low agreement was found between patient- and clinician-reported data (- 0.482 and - 0.159 by Kappa and Gwet's AC1 respectively). Only 127 (30%) of the total 428 AEs were reported by both MHMW and medical notes. Patients reported higher rates of symptoms from the symptom list, while clinicians reported higher rates of symptoms outside of the symptom list. Time taken to compile the data from MHMW was significantly less than that taken to review medical notes (2.19 min versus 5.73 min respectively; P <  0.001). There were significantly less missing data points from the MHMW data compared with the medical notes (1.4 versus 7.8; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous reports that patient- and clinician-reported adverse event data show low agreement. This study also shows that clinical trial sites could significantly reduce the work performed by research staff in the collection of adverse event data by implementing an electronic, patient-reported platform.

Evaluating allied health primary contact models of care: A mixed methods analysis of current practice.

RATIONALE: Allied Health Primary Contact Clinic (AHPCC) models of care are increasingly used to manage growing demands on health service capacity. There is a critical need for new models of care to demonstrate value, however comprehensive evaluation of AHPCCs, including use of metrics frameworks like the Moretto framework, have been slow to uptake, and the reasons for this are unclear. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To understand current evaluation practices as mapped to the Moretto framework, and explore clinician attitudes to the process of service evaluation across a variety of AHPCC models implemented within a metropolitan health service in Queensland, Australia. METHOD: A convergent mixed methods approach was used. Data were collected in 2022 using a quantitative presurvey, followed by a qualitative descriptive interview with AHPCC lead clinicians. Thirty AHPCCs were eligible, and all potential participants who provided consent were included. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used for quantitative and qualitative data respectively, then merged and reported jointly. RESULTS: Twenty-three clinicians representing 22 different AHPCCs participated. AHPCC models were found to be complex and varied. Evaluation practices were variable across AHPCCs, although more than half collected most of the Moretto framework measures. Quality of life and resource use measures were least commonly collected. Themes regarding participants' experience of AHPCCs evaluation were that: Evaluation is complex and challenging; Evaluation is important; and Evaluation needs to be enabled. CONCLUSION: For health services to fully understand the value of their AHPCC services and direct their limited resources appropriately, evaluation activity needs to be better valued and enabled at a local, statewide and national level. Strategies should include protected time, funding, administrative support, leadership support, access to mentorship, development of structures which enable collaborative evaluation at a state-wide (or broader) level, and a shared understanding of value and core areas for measurement across stakeholders.

Adverse Event Reporting in Cancer Clinical Trials: Incorporating Patient-Reported Methods. A Systematic Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The history of clinical trials is fraught with unethical practices. Since 1945, robust frameworks have evolved to standardise the collection and reporting of safety data, most notably, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) from the National Cancer Institute; used by investigators to report side effects experienced by participants. As medicine moves into the patient-centred model, interest has been growing to collect data on adverse events directly from participants (patient-reported adverse events). The aim of this systematic scoping review was to investigate the inclusion of patient-reported adverse event data within safety/tolerability analyses and explore the collection and reporting of patient-reported adverse event data. METHODS AND RESULTS: A database search was undertaken and the Covidence platform was used to manage the review; results were analysed descriptively. Sixty-eight studies were included in the analysis. An increase in the number of studies that incorporate patient-reported adverse event data was seen by year. Seventy instruments were used for the collection of patient-reported adverse event data with recall period, mode, frequency and site of administration varying across studies; the duration of data collection ranged from 28 days to 6 years. Frequently, information on these details was omitted from publications. The number of instruments used by studies to collect patient-reported adverse event data ranged from one to seven instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing calls for the inclusion of patient-reported adverse events, this has not yet translated into published reports. The collection and reporting of these data were variable and conducted using instruments that were not designed for purpose. To address these inconsistencies, standardisation of data collection and reporting using a purpose-built validated instrument is required.

'The big value of it is getting the patient seen by the right person at the right time': clinician perceptions of the value of allied health primary contact models of care.

Allied health primary contact clinic models of care have increasingly been used as a strategy to increase public health service capacity. A recent systematic review found little consistency or agreement on how primary contact clinics are evaluated. The concept of value of primary contact clinics, which has important implications for evaluation, has not yet been explored in-depth. To explore allied health clinicians' perceptions of the value of allied health primary contact clinics, with the goal of informing an evaluation framework, a descriptive qualitative approach utilizing semi-structured interviews was employed. Participants included allied health staff embedded in clinical lead roles within primary contact clinics across four acute care hospitals in a metropolitan health service located in South-East Queensland, Australia. Lead staff from 30 identified primary contact clinic models in the health service were approached to take part via email. All eligible participants who provided consent were included. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used. A total of 23 clinicians (n = 23) representing 22 diverse models of primary contact clinics participated. Most participants were physiotherapists, dietitians, or occupational therapists, although speech pathology, audiology, and podiatry were also represented. Participant perceptions of the 'value' of PCCs were a highly complex phenomenon, comprising five intersecting domains: (i) patient satisfaction; (ii) clinical outcomes; (iii) care pathway and resource use; (iv) health service performance; and (v) staff satisfaction and professional standing. These five core value domains were positively or negatively influenced by 12 perceived benefits and 8 perceived drawbacks, respectively. Value domains were also highly interrelated and impacted upon each other. The concept of 'value' relating to primary contact clinics involves multiple intersecting domains encompassing different perspectives. This study highlighted potential benefits and drawbacks of primary contact clinics that have not yet been measured or explored in the literature, and as such may be useful for healthcare administrators to consider. The findings of this study will inform an evaluation framework including health economics calculator for primary contact clinics.

Dysphagia Management in the Emergency Department: Using Concept Mapping to Identify Actionable Change to Improve Services.

BACKGROUND: Integrated speech-language pathology (SLP) services within the emergency department (ED) may facilitate timely dysphagia management. However, there are multiple patient and logistical factors specific to the ED that challenge the delivery of optimal dysphagia referral and management practices within this setting. The aim of the current study was to engage a stakeholder group to identify prioritised, actionable goals that could help enhance dysphagia management within the ED. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Applying concept mapping methodology, 16 ED stakeholders from SLP, medical, nursing, and leadership participated in semi-structured interviews to develop action statements which were sorted and ranked for importance and changeability. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to organise data in clusters with unifying themes before statements were ranked by importance and changeability. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Stakeholders identified 53 unique statements, grouped into 8 clusters. Review of the 8 clusters identified 3 overarching aspects for change: (a) Improving processes related to identification and referral of patients as well as communication; (b) Teamwork and collaboration amongst the ED multidisciplinary team and SLP; and (c) Improving staffing and access to training resources for SLP and nursing teams. Seventeen statements were within the Go-zone rated highest for importance and changeability) with the highest rated statement being: Clear documentation by SLP re: recommendations. CONCLUSION: The current data identified multiple aspects of service provision that require change to facilitate improved dysphagia referral and management services in the ED. Collaborative actions are required by both SLP and the ED multidisciplinary team to help optimise dysphagia services.

Nature and timeliness of dysphagia management within an emergency setting.

PURPOSE: To examine referral pathways, clinical demographics, and timeliness of dysphagia management within an emergency department (ED) setting utilising both ED staff and speech-language pathology (SLP) initiated referral pathways. METHOD: Six-month retrospective service review of patients who received dysphagia assessment by SLP within a major Australian ED. Data were collected on demographics, referral information, and SLP assessment and service outcomes. RESULT: Three hundred and ninety-three patients were assessed by SLP staff in the ED, consisting of 200 stroke and 193 non-stroke referrals. In the stroke cohort, 57.5% of referrals were initiated by ED staff, while 42.5% were SLP initiated. ED staff initiated 91% of non-stroke referrals, with few (9%) proactively identified by SLP staff. SLP staff identified a higher proportion of non-stroke patients within 4 hr of presentation compared to ED staff. Stroke patients identified by SLP staff were more likely to have assessments completed within 8 hr compared to the ED referral pathway. Collectively, 51% of patients required ongoing dysphagia management following initial assessment. CONCLUSION: Findings provide an overview of SLP services and referral pathways in an ED context. The SLP initiated referral pathway facilitated early assessment of stroke patients, and collaboration with ED staff was integral in referring other at risk populations. SLP/ED synergy is needed for appropriate and timely dysphagia management practices in an ED.

Advances in and applications of imaging and radiomics in head and neck cancer survivorship.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Radiological imaging is an essential component of head/neck cancer (HNC) care. Advances in imaging modalities (including CT, PET, MRI and ultrasound) and analysis have enhanced our understanding of tumour characteristics and prognosis. However, the application of these methods to evaluate treatment-related toxicities and functional burden is still emerging. This review showcases recent literature applying advanced imaging and radiomics to the assessment and management of sequelae following chemoradiotherapy for HNC. RECENT FINDINGS: Whilst primarily early-stage/exploratory studies, recent investigations have showcased the feasibility of using radiological imaging, particularly advanced/functional MRI (including diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI), to quantify treatment-induced tissue change in the head/neck musculature, and the clinical manifestation of lymphoedema/fibrosis and dysphagia. Advanced feature analysis and radiomic studies have also begun to give specific focus to the prediction of functional endpoints, including dysphagia, trismus and fibrosis. SUMMARY: There is demonstrated potential in the use of novel imaging techniques, to help better understand pathophysiology, and improve assessment and treatment of functional deficits following HNC treatment. As larger studies emerge, technologies continue to progress, and pathways to clinical translation are honed, the application of these methods offers an exciting opportunity to transform clinical practices and improve outcomes for HNC survivors.

Exploring the impact of remoteness on people with head and neck cancer: Utilisation of a state-wide dataset.

OBJECTIVE: Living in regional/rural areas can impact outcomes for people with head and neck cancer (HNC). Using a comprehensive state-wide dataset, the impact of remoteness on key service parameters and outcomes for people with HNC was examined. METHODS: Retrospective quantitative analysis of routinely collected data held within the Queensland Oncology Repository. DESIGN: Quantitative methods (descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression and geospatial analysis). SETTING: All people diagnosed with HNC in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: The impact of remoteness was examined in 1991 people (1171 metropolitan, 485 inner-regional, 335 rural) with HNC cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This paper reports key demographics and tumour characteristics (age, gender, socioeconomic status, First Nations status, co-morbidities, primary tumour site and staging), service use/uptake (treatment rates, attendance at multidisciplinary team review and timing to treatment) and post-acute outcomes (readmission rates, causes of readmission and 2-year survival). In addition to this, the distribution of people with HNC across QLD, distances travelled and patterns of readmission were also analysed. RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed remoteness significantly (p < 0.001) impacted access to MDT review, receiving treatment, and time to treatment commencement, but not readmission or 2-year survival. Reasons for readmission did not differ by remoteness, with dysphagia, nutritional inadequacies, gastrointestinal disorders and fluid imbalance indicated in the majority of readmissions. Rural people were significantly (p < 0.0001) more likely to travel to care and to readmit to a different facility than provided primary treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insights into the health care disparities for people with HNC residing in regional/rural areas.

Managing deteriorating patients with a physiotherapy critical care outreach service: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Critical care outreach teams support ward staff to manage patients who are seriously ill or after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Respiratory deterioration is a common reason for (re)admission to the ICU. Physiotherapists are health professionals with skills to address acute respiratory concerns. Experienced respiratory physiotherapists play a role in supporting junior clinicians, particularly in managing deteriorating patients on the ward. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel respiratory physiotherapy critical care outreach-style service. The primary objective was to describe service referrals and the patient cohort. Other objectives were to compare the effects of this model of care on ICU readmission rates to a historical cohort and explore clinician perceptions of the model of care and its implementation. METHODS: A new physiotherapy model of care worked alongside an existing nurse-led outreach service to support physiotherapists with the identification and management of patients at risk of respiratory deterioration or ICU (re)admission. Purpose-built and pre-existing databases were used for prospective data collection and for a historical ICU readmissions control group. Questionnaires and semistructured group interviews were utilised to evaluate clinician satisfaction and perceptions. RESULTS: The service accepted referrals for 274 patients in 6 months (on average 2.25/working day; commonly after trauma [29%] and abdominal surgery [19%]). During the implementation period of the model of care, fewer preventable respiratory ICU readmissions were reported (n = 1/20) than in the historical cohort (n = 6/19: Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05). Likelihood of respiratory ICU readmission, compared to all-cause readmissions, was not affected (intervention: 31%, historical control: 41%; odds ratio: 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.29 to 1.4]). Postimplementation surveys and focus groups revealed clinicians highly valued the support and perceived a positive impact on patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care outreach-style physiotherapy services can be successfully implemented and are positively perceived by clinicians, but any effect on ICU readmissions is unclear.

Enhancing speech-language pathology head and neck cancer service provision in rural Australia: Using a plan, do, study, act approach.

PURPOSE: People with head and neck cancer (HNC) require ongoing speech-language pathology (SLP) services into the post-acute recovery phase of care. However, there are recognised service inequities/barriers for people from rural areas who are unable to access SLP services locally, necessitating travel to metropolitan centres. This study implemented strategies to assist rural speech-language pathologists to work to full scope of practice and support post-acute rehabilitation services for people with HNC. METHOD: The study involved five SLP departments within a rural health referral network (one tertiary cancer centre, four rural sites). It involved a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method, across two six month cycles, to achieve implementation of a model to support local SLP delivery of HNC care. Data collected included service activity, consumer feedback from people accessing local care, staff perceptions of the model and changes to local SLP service capabilities. RESULT: Staff identified four objectives for change across the two PDSA cycles including resource development, upskilling/training and improving communication, and handover processes. In cycle 1, multiple resources were developed such as an eLearning program for training and skill development. In cycle 2, a pilot trial of a shared-care model was implemented, which successfully supported a transfer of care to local services for eight people with HNC. The majority of consumers accessing HNC care locally were satisfied with the service and would recommend future people with HNC receive similar care. CONCLUSION: The PDSA process supported development and implementation of a model enabling local speech-language pathologists to offer post-acute care for people with HNC. This model helps rural people with HNC to access care closer to home by supporting rural clinicians to work to full scope of practice.

Understanding barriers and facilitators to speech-language pathology service delivery in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: Timely speech-language pathology (SLP) involvement with dysphagic patients in the Emergency Department (ED) may improve patient outcomes. This study utilised qualitative interviews to understand current models and explore factors which have influenced establishment and current dysphagia service provision in Australian EDs. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives from 12 acute hospital facilities with a SLP ED service. Interview transcripts were analysed using plain content analysis to identify key themes. Sub-analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) model was undertaken for facilities with more "expanded" models (n = 4). RESULT: SLP ED service models ranged from referral-only services, to models with referral-only and proactive SLP-led screening procedures (classified as "expanded"). Patient-related factors, the ED setting, SLP service factors and perceptions of dysphagia management were key themes reported to impact service delivery. With expanded models, 14 CFIR constructs (innovation source, external policy and incentives, networks and communications, stakeholders and relative priority) were identified as facilitators, while four constructs (adaptability, cost, compatibility, available resources) were barriers to services. CONCLUSION: There are service-specific issues with providing SLP care within the ED. Factors related to the unique ED environment must be considered by SLP departments when establishing/optimising dysphagia management within the ED.

Telepractice and Dysphagia Management: The Era of COVID-19 and Beyond.

The COVID-19 pandemic drove rapid and widespread uptake of telepractice across all aspects of healthcare. The delivery of dysphagia care was no exception, with telepractice recognized as a service modality that could support social distancing/infection control, overcome service delivery challenges created by lockdowns/service closures, and address consumer concerns about attending in-person appointments. Now, almost two years since most services first rapidly deployed telepractice, it is time to reflect on the big picture, and consider how telepractice will continue as a service option that is sustained and integrated into mainstream dysphagia care. It is also timely to consider the research agenda needed to support this goal. To this end, in this paper we present 4 discussion topics, which raise key considerations for the current and future use of telepractice within adult and pediatric dysphagia services. These are (1) Dysphagia services must meet consumer and service needs; (2) Aspects of dysphagia services can be safely and reliably provided via telepractice; (3) Telepractice can be used in flexible ways to support the delivery of dysphagia services; and (4) Providing quality dysphagia services via telepractice requires planned implementation and evaluation. Then directions for future research are discussed. These considerations are presented to help shift perspectives away from viewing telepractice as simply a COVID-19 "interim-care solution". Rather, we encourage clinicians, services, and researchers to embrace a future of "integrated care", where traditional dysphagia services are combined with telepractice models, to enhance the quality of care provided to our clients.

Post-acute health care needs of people with head and neck cancer: Mapping health care services, experiences, and the impact of rurality.

BACKGROUND: People with head and neck cancer (HNC) have complex health care needs; however, limited evidence exists regarding the nature or patterns of service access and use. This study explored the post-discharge health care needs and experiences of individuals with HNC from metropolitan and rural areas. METHODS: Health care appointments and services accessed by people with HNC were collated for 6-month post-treatment. Data analysis of the whole cohort examined patterns of access while journey mapping integrated participants' experiences of recovery. RESULTS: The 6-month service access journey was mapped for 11 people. Rural participants attended a significantly greater number of appointments (p = 0.012), higher canceled/missed appointments (p = 0.013), and saw more professionals (p = 0.007). Rural participants reported higher stress and burden due to service access barriers and unmet needs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple challenges and inequities exist for rural people with HNC. Findings inform opportunities to enhance the post-treatment recovery of people with HNC in rural areas.

Clinician and consumer perceptions of head and neck cancer services in rural areas: Implications for speech pathology service delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with head and neck cancer residing in rural areas face numerous challenges accessing post-acute rehabilitation services, including speech pathology services. In order to inform future service enhancements, the key issues impacting access to, and the provision of, speech pathology head and neck cancer services in rural areas was explored through the perspectives of patients, carers, speech pathology clinicians and service managers. SETTING: A rural health referral network in Queensland consisting of tertiary, regional and remote hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight participants, including 12 speech pathology staff/managers and 16 consumers (people with head and neck cancer/carers). DESIGN: Qualitative methodology using semi-structured interviews was analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Two themes were identified from the consumer group including (a) navigating health services for head and neck cancer management and (b) burden of accessing head and neck cancer care. Speech pathology staff/managers interviews raised 3 themes: (a) transfer of care and access to local services, (b) workforce and workload and (c) travelling impacts the service our patients can receive. An integrative theme across both groups highlighted the perceived disparity in health care access that existed for people with head and neck cancer in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: In rural areas, consumers face multiple barriers navigating the head and neck cancer treatment pathway, while health services encounter specific challenges ensuring access and equity in care. Despite the complexities, possible avenues for service change and service enhancement are proposed. Speech pathology services in rural areas need to proactively evaluate services and address existing disparities in order to enact positive change for people with head and neck cancer living outside metropolitan locations.

Exploring the Interplay Between Radiotherapy Dose and Physiological Changes in the Swallowing Mechanism in Patients Undergoing (Chemo)radiotherapy for Oropharynx Cancer.

This study explored associative relationships between radiotherapy dose volumes delivered to the dysphagia aspiration risk structures (DARS) and swallowing physiological disturbance at 3 months post treatment in a homogenous cohort of patients who received (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT) for oropharyngeal head and neck cancer (HNC). Participants(n = 53) were a subgroup of patients previously recruited as part of a prospective randomised trial, and had undergone physiological swallowing assessment using videofluroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) at 3 months post (C)RT. The extended oral cavity (EOC), supraglottic larynx (SGL), glottic larynx (GL), cricopharyngeal inlet (CI), and pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM) were contoured as per international consensus guidelines and dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for each structure. Each DVH was analysed to reveal mean, maximum and partial radiotherapy doses of V40, V50 and V60 for each structure. Physiological swallowing function on VFSS was rated using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP). A binary logistic regression model was used to establish associative relationships between radiotherapy dose to the DARS and physiological changes within the swallowing mechanism. Structures that received the largest volumes of radiotherapy dose were the PCM and SGL. Significant relationships were found between the proportion of the EOC, SGL, GL and PCMs that received radiotherapy doses > 40 Gy, > 50 Gy and > 60 Gy and the likelihood of a moderate-severe physiological swallowing impairment (on the MBSImP). Whilst the current study was exploratory in nature, these preliminary findings provide novel evidence to suggest structure-specific associative relationships between radiotherapy dose and impacts to corresponding swallow physiology in patients with oropharyngeal HNC.

Multi-site evaluation of advanced practice hand therapy clinics for the management of patients with trigger digit.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort design. BACKGROUND: Patient time on Australian public hospital surgical outpatient department (SOPD) waitlists often exceeds clinical recommendations for chronic hand conditions. Diversion to allied health is an alternative option, however evidence regarding patient and organizational outcomes in hand therapy is lacking. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To evaluate clinical and organizational efficacy, patient outcomes and satisfaction of diversion of referrals for patients with trigger digit (TD) from SOPD waitlists to Advanced Practice Hand Therapy (APHT) at 3 Australian hospitals. METHODS: Data was collected from eligible patients with TD through chart reviews and telephone satisfaction surveys. Data included number of patients requiring SOPD review, repeat referral to SOPD in the 12 months following APHT discharge, patient-rated outcomes, satisfaction scores, wait times to SOPD review and conversion to surgery-rates. Mann Whitney-U, t-test, Pearson's chi-squared test and a Binary Logistic Regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: 104 patients completed APHT treatment. Seventy patients (67%) did not require return to the SOPD waitlist. Repeat referral to SOPD within 12 months of APHT discharge occurred for only 1 patient. Patients requiring SOPD review after APHT treatment were seen within target time frames and demonstrated 88% conversion to surgery-rates. Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores showed greater improvement in those not requiring SOPD review (P< .001~25.9 vs 4.2). Regression analysis identified a negative association between initial total Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores and unfavorable discharge outcomes (OR 0.96, P= .007). Most (81%-93%) patients indicated satisfaction with the APHT service. CONCLUSION: Diversion of referrals for TD from SOPD to APHT is an effective waitlist management strategy, with the propensity to reduce waiting times, improve patient flow, whilst resulting in favorable clinical and patient-rated outcomes and satisfaction.

Conventional supportive cancer care services in Australia: A national service mapping study (The CIA study).

AIM: Cancer and its treatment produce significant acute and long-term adverse effects in cancer survivors, resulting in a range of supportive cancer care needs across the disease trajectory. To enhance supportive cancer care in Australia, this study sought to understand and describe conventional services offered nationwide, specific to their structure (ownership, setting, duration), process (participants, delivery mode, referral pathways), and outcomes (evaluation). METHODS: A survey canvassing 13 conventional supportive cancer care interventions was electronically distributed to 265 cancer organizations in all Australian states and territories over 2019 and 2020. Cancer organizations were invited to participate if they provided at least one cancer-directed treatment (ie, surgery, radiation therapy, or systemic therapies); or clinical cancer care to adults, adolescents, or children; or conventional supportive care interventions to cancer survivors. RESULTS: A response rate of 46% (n = 123/265) was achieved, with 72% of cancer organizations (n = 88) delivering at least one intervention. Most were provided as outpatient or inpatient services, with few at home (<13%) or via telehealth (<10%). Psychological therapy (90%), self-care (82%), exercise (77%), healthy eating (69%), and lymphedema (69%) services were most common. Fatigue management (51%) and pelvic health (32%) were less common. Services offering massage, return-to-work, cognitive therapy, sleep hygiene, and leisure were underrepresented (<31%). CONCLUSION: Provision of conventional supportive cancer care services continues to evolve in Australia. Multiple areas of care require development of dedicated services to address supportive cancer care intervention shortfalls across the country. Online resources and telemedicine are currently underutilized modalities that are available for further development.

Association Between Objective Ratings of Swallowing and Dysphagia-Specific Quality of Life in Patients Receiving (Chemo)radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer.

The pervasive nature of dysphagia in the head/neck cancer (HNC) population necessitates a comprehensive evaluation approach, including both objective assessment of dysphagia, and subjective patient-reported functional measures. However, the congruence between clinician-rated and patient-perceived function is still not well understood. The current study investigated the association between objective clinician-rated swallow physiology (using the MBSImP) and patient-reported measures of swallowing-related quality of life (using the MDADI) in a secondary analysis of patients with oropharyngeal HNC treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Seventy-nine patients with oropharyngeal HNC receiving (chemo)radiotherapy completed a standardised videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) rated using the MBSImP, and the MDADI, at pre-treatment (baseline), 6 weeks and 3 months post-treatment as per a previous prospective RCT. Data on n = 67 participants were analysed as part of the secondary analysis. Association between MBSImP oral and pharyngeal composite scores versus MDADI Global and subscale scores was examined using ordinary least squares regression and mixed-effects general linear modelling (GLM). Univariable analyses demonstrated significant associations between MBSImP oral composite scores and each of the MDADI subscales, as well as the MBSImP pharyngeal composite scores and all MDADI subscales. GLM analysis revealed significant associations were maintained between MBSImP pharyngeal scores and the MDADI global and emotional subscale scores at the multivariable level, with the physical subscale trending towards significance. No significant association was observed between the MBSImP oral composite scores and any of the MDADI subscales at the multivariable level. This study found significant associations between objective measures of pharyngeal swallow physiology and patient-perceived swallowing-related quality of life. These findings suggest a higher degree of concordance between clinician-rated and patient-reported measures up to 3 months post-(C)RT than previously reported.

A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform.

INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that electronic platforms can assist data capture of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care. In comparison, routine collection of carer-reported outcome measures (CROMs) to support the patient-carer dyad during cancer treatment has had limited attention. The current study utilised a novel electronic CROM (eCROM) system, ScreenIT Carer, to monitor the prevalence and nature of distress in carers of patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT) for head/neck cancer (HNC), and explore factors associated with carer distress. METHODS: Carers completed ScreenIT Carer weekly when attending patients' (C)RT treatment sessions from planning to 2 weeks post-treatment. ScreenIT Carer included the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List, and a purpose-built Mealtime-Specific DT and Problem list. Data were first examined descriptively, then associations between demographic/treatment-related factors and distress severity were analysed using mixed-effects general linear modelling. RESULTS: 135 carers provided 434 ScreenIT Carer entries during the study period (mean entries = three/carer; yielding average adherence rate of 41% (range 11-100%)). A high prevalence of general (59%) and mealtime-specific distress (46%) was reported by carers. Nature of distress was multifactorial, with emotional problems and the patients' physical condition/symptoms common contributing factors. Based on multivariate analysis, tumour site, geographical location of residence and time during (C)RT when ScreenIT Carer was completed were significant predictors of carer distress severity. CONCLUSIONS: Carer distress is prevalent and multifactorial during (C)RT. This study highlights the feasibility of utilising eCROM platforms such as ScreenIT Carer, to monitor carer wellbeing and guide supportive care services as part of a holistic care pathway.