Efficacy and safety of durvalumab with olaparib in metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer (phase II DOMEC trial).

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced endometrial cancer have a poor prognosis, and treatment options are limited. The investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase II DOMEC trial (NCT03951415) is the first trial to report data on efficacy and safety of combined treatment with PD-L1 and PARP inhibition for advanced endometrial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer were enrolled. Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously q4w and olaparib 300 mg 2dd until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Patients with at least 4 weeks of treatment were evaluable for analysis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months. Evidence for efficacy was defined as progression-free survival at 6 months in ≥50% of patients. Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response and overall survival. RESULTS: From July 2019, through November 2020, 55 patients were enrolled. At data cut-off (September 2021), 4 of the 50 evaluable patients were still on treatment. Seventeen patients (34%) were progression-free at 6 months. Objective response rate was 16% (95% CI, 8.3 to 28.5) with 1 complete and 7 partial responses. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months, median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 6.2) and median overall survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 14.3). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8 patients (16%), predominantly anemia. There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: The combination of durvalumab and olaparib was well tolerated, but did not meet the prespecified 50% 6-month progression-free survival in this heterogeneous patient population with advanced endometrial cancer.

Prospective practice survey of management of cetuximab-related skin reactions.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based guidelines on how to prevent or treat cetuximab-related skin reactions are lacking and multiple care and management strategies are used. The main purpose of the present study is to gain information about the different skincare products being used against skin reactions in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and recurrent/metastatic (R/M) or locally advanced (LA) squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) patients treated with cetuximab. METHODS: An open-label, prospective observational study conducted in the Netherlands. The occurrence of skin reactions and the care and management options taken were documented for 16 weeks, starting from the first administration of cetuximab. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in 7 hospitals. 38 patients (37%) developed a grade ≥ 2 skin reaction. Eighty-six patients could be analysed for the primary endpoint (73.3% males, mean age 62.4 years, n = 44 LA SCCHN, n = 16 R/M SCCHN, n = 26 mCRC). The most frequently used skin products at some point during the observation period were moisturizing products (70%), systemic antibiotics (64%), topical antibiotics (58%), lipid-regenerating (28%) and other topical products (28%). The overall use of products gradually increased from baseline to week 6-10, reducing by week 16. Hospital protocols were the primary reason (> 50%) for choice of the skincare products and medications. CONCLUSION: A variety of skin care products and antibiotics were commonly used. Only few patients developed severe cutaneous reactions. For patients, the occurrence of skin reactions did not influence their willingness to continue cetuximab therapy.

Intraperitoneal treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, the Dutch experience. What did we learn?

BACKGROUND: Combined administration of intravenous (iv) and intraperitoneal (ip) (iv/ip) chemotherapy is an effective adjuvant treatment option after primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Increased toxicityand patient burden limit its use in daily practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess toxicity and survival outcomes of iv/ip chemotherapy in daily practice in the Netherlands. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 81 women who underwent at least an optimal PDS for FIGO stage III OC followed by iv/ip chemotherapy according to the Armstrong regimen, in four hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2007 and May 2016. We collected information on surgical procedure, abdominal port implantation, toxicity, and recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS: All participants underwent PDS, of whom 60 (74%) had their ip catheter implanted during PDS. Most frequently reported all grade toxicity was haematological n = 44 (54%). Forty-four patients (54%) completed all six cycles of iv/ip chemotherapy. The most frequent causes of discontinuation of iv/ip administration were renal dysfunction (12/37 = 32%) and catheter problems (7/37 = 19%). Median recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 24 months (range 0 - 108) and 80 months (range 4-115), respectively. Surgical outcome, completion of more than three courses of treatment and intra-abdominal localisation of recurrent disease were associated with better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: In daily practice, 54% of patients with advanced OC could complete all scheduled cycles of iv/ ip chemotherapy with acceptable morbidity and toxicity, leading to outcomes comparable with the results of published trials on iv/ip chemotherapy.

Tamoxifen and pregnancy: an absolute contraindication?

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among young women of reproductive age. Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen reduces the risk of recurrence in hormone-sensitive breast cancer. However, the use of tamoxifen is considered contraindicated during pregnancy, because of a limited number of case reports demonstrating potential adverse effects on the fetus. The objective of this report is to give a more broad overview of the available data on the effect of tamoxifen exposure during pregnancy. METHODS: A literature review was performed using PubMed and the databases of the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb and of the International Network on Cancer, Infertility, and Pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 238 cases of tamoxifen use during pregnancy were found. Of the 167 pregnancies with known outcome, 21 were complicated by an abnormal fetal development. The malformations described were non-specific and the majority of cases concerned healthy infants despite exposure to tamoxifen. CONCLUSION: There seems to be an increased risk of fetal abnormalities when taking tamoxifen during pregnancy (12.6% in contrast to 3.9% in the general population), but the evidence is limited and no causal relationship could be established. The possible disadvantage of postponing or discontinuing tamoxifen for the maternal prognosis is unclear. Patients should be counseled about the use of tamoxifen during pregnancy instead of presenting it as being absolutely contraindicated.

Interval between debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) consists of debulking surgery and (neo)adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC) was associated with clinical outcome. METHODS: We identified all Dutch patients who received optimal or complete debulking surgery for primary EOC (FIGO IIb-IV) between 2008 and 2015 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. TTC was divided into three groups based on the interquartile range (IQR). Early (<25%) and prolonged (>75%) TTC were compared to intermediate TTC (25-75%). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with a prolonged TTC and multivariable Cox regression to evaluate the independent effect of treatment interval on overall survival (OS). Patients receiving primary debulking surgery (PDS) and patients receiving interval debulking surgery (IDS) were analyzed separately. RESULTS: 4097 patients were included, 1612 underwent PDS and 2485 IDS. Median TTC was 29 days (IQR 24-37). Age ≥ 65, complete debulking surgery, postoperative complications, and hospitalization ≥10 days were independently associated with a longer TTC for both PDS and IDS. TTC in the longest quartile was associated with poor OS after both PDS (Hazard Rate (HR) 1.43, 95% CI 1.09-1.88) and NACT-IDS (HR 1.22 (1.02-1.47)) when compared to the intermediate TTC, but only in patients with no macroscopic residual disease after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival after complete (interval)debulking surgery. We advise to start adjuvant chemotherapy within five to six weeks after debulking surgery.

Patient-reported outcome measures in a pharmacokinetic study with sunitinib, a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: During treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib, patients experience treatment and/or disease-related symptoms. Although application of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) enhances early recognition of symptoms, early clinical trials are focused on symptom severity objectified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) in order to evaluate drug safety and to determine a personalized and/or safe dosage range. To gain insight into patient-reported symptoms in addition to healthcare professional-reported adverse events (AEs), a substudy was conducted in an ongoing pharmacokinetic-guided sunitinib dosing study. METHODS: In patients for whom sunitinib was considered standard therapy or patients with advanced/metastatic tumors for whom no standard therapy was available, patient-reported symptoms and well-being besides healthcare professional-reported AEs were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included for analysis. Over 50% of them experienced a decreased well-being, caused by symptoms of mild and moderate intensity. Compared to healthcare professionals, all measured symptoms, with the exception of fatigue and vomiting, were reported statistically significantly more often by patients. CONCLUSIONS: Application of PROMs in early clinical trials on personalized or individualized oral targeted anticancer agents is feasible and enhances early recognition of symptom burden due to multiple CTCAE grade 1-2 AEs, just as pro-active symptom management and effect evaluation of interventions performed. Application of PROMs in these trials might be clinically relevant in obtaining dose-limiting toxicities.

Patient-reported symptoms and stepwise symptom management in patients on epidermal growth factor inhibitors: A retrospective, descriptive cohort study.

Adverse events (AEs) of epidermal growth factor inhibitors (EGFRi) influence well-being with a risk to dose modifications (DMs). Hereby, clinical benefit of treatment might be affected. This retrospective cohort study was set up to gain insight into the suitability and added value of a patient-reported outcome measurement tool (PROM), together with a stepwise intervention management plan for EGFRi-related AEs in daily practice. The primary objective was to gain insight into total treatment duration and DMs, and the secondary objective to gain insight into patient-reported symptoms and well-being as well as healthcare professional-reported AEs. Sixty-eight patients on cetuximab and 19 on panitumumab treatment were included for analysis; 69% had squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) and 26% metastatic colorectal carcinoma. DMs due to AEs occurred in 39% of the patients and dose discontinuations in 22%. Especially anorexia, dysphagia, oral pain and skin changes led to a decreased well-being. In patients on EGFRi, application of PROMs together with a stepwise symptom management plan enhances early recognition of symptom burden, pro-active symptom management and effect evaluation of interventions performed whereby well-being recovers. Since only SCCHN patients discontinued treatment due to AEs, patient-centred care focused on radiotherapy-related AEs, creates opportunities for amelioration.

Surgical lymph node assessment in mucinous ovarian carcinoma staging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of women with mucinous ovarian carcinoma in whom nodal metastases are identified during staging remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on surgical lymph node assessment during staging of women diagnosed with mucinous ovarian carcinoma. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search using synonyms of 'mucinous ovarian carcinoma' and 'lymph node assessment' was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: When they covered ten or more mucinous ovarian carcinoma cases, staging surgery and minimally one of the following outcomes: prevalence of metastases, stage shift or survival data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were quality evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool for non-randomised studies of interventions. Outcomes were pooled using an inverse variance weighted random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. In 278 women with mucinous ovarian cancer suspected to be stage I-II, a pooled proportion of 0.8% (95% CI <0.1-2.9%) had lymph node metastases and were upstaged. In those suspected of stage I (n = 184), this proportion was 0.7% (95% CI <0.1-3.8%). No difference (P = 0.287) was found in metastases between sampling at 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-3.3%) and complete pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection at 1.2% (95% CI <0.1-4.2%). One study directly compared the survival of patients staged with and without lymph node dissection and reported no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical lymph node assessment in women suspected of stage I-II mucinous ovarian carcinoma rarely identifies nodal metastases and consequently has no significant impact on staging. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Surgical lymph node assessment in women with stage I-II mucinous ovarian cancer rarely has staging consequences.

A phase I, dose escalation, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and food-effect study of α2 integrin inhibitor E7820 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

UNLABELLED: Introduction E7820 is an orally administered sulfonamide that inhibits alfa-2-integrin mRNA expression. Pre-clinically E7820 showed tumor anti-angiogenic effects in various tumor cell lines and xenograft mouse models. Human daily dosing of 100 mg QD had previously been shown to be safe and tolerable. Methods The study consisted of two parts: Part A (food effect) and Part B (determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for bi-daily (BID) dosing). E7820 dosing started at 50 mg BID with planned escalation to 60, 80 and 100 mg BID every 28 days. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled in Part A and 26 in Part B. The most frequent adverse events of all grades were constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue while anemia, neutropenia, and fatigue were most frequent grade ≥3 toxicities. At dose-level 60 mg BID, two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 neutropenic sepsis and grade 4 neutropenia). Therefore the recommended dose (RD) was 50 mg BID. Food had no effect on E7820 exposure. E7820 exposure following twice daily administration was dose-proportional. Expression of platelet integrin-α2 measured as a response biomarker in Part B, generally decreased by a median 7.7 % from baseline following treatment with 50 mg BID E7820. Reduction was most pronounced within 1-week post treatment. The median duration of treatment was median 54, range 20-111 days. The best overall response in any treatment group was stable disease (SD): 23.1 % in Part A (100 mg QD); at the RD 66.7 % (12 of 18 patients) and 40 % in the 60 mg BID group in Part B. CONCLUSIONS: Food had no effect on E7820 exposure. A dose of 50 mg BID was considered the MTD. Treatment with E7820 is safe and tolerable with 2/3 of patients (66.7 %) at MTD having SD as their best response.

Phase I and pharmacological study of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1-5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand-foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.

Symptoms from treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib: a multicenter explorative cohort study to explore the influence of patient-reported outcomes on therapy decisions.

PURPOSE: Optimal long-lasting treatment with sunitinib and sorafenib is limited by dose modifications (DMs) due to adverse events (AEs). These AEs may be underrecognized and their influence on health-related quality of life (HRQL) underestimated. Improved insight into the relationship between AEs and therapy decisions is needed. To improve decision making around managing symptoms and reduce DMs, this study was set up to explore the influence of patient-reported symptoms on therapy decisions. METHODS: In this multicenter cohort study, patient characteristics, reasons for and different forms of used dose modifications, and AEs were prospectively obtained from cancer patients on sunitinib/sorafenib treatment. Used instruments to get insight into AEs were the patient-scored Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) and the professional-scored Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 3.0. RESULTS: Median total treatment duration in 42 patients was 16 weeks. Median time till dose modification was 10 weeks. DMs occurred mostly due to multiple mild AEs. By using the USD, a higher prevalence of most AEs was found compared to the literature. Sixty percent of the patients experienced a decreased HRQL due to multiple AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Because severe AEs due to sunitinib/sorafenib treatment seldom occur, it is more important to focus on treating and preventing multiple mild AEs with higher impact on HRQL, when trying to avoid dose modifications. Using patient self-reported measurement methods helps to early recognize symptoms and to differentiate among symptom intensities. This systematic approach might help to achieve the optimal dosing, which might improve PFS and OS.

Clinical and radiologic signs of relapsed ovarian germ cell tumor: tissue is the issue.

Malignant ovarian germ cell tumor is a rare disease, but with current treatment strategies including surgery and platinum based chemotherapy survival is excellent. After treatment, intensive followup is indicated to encounter tumor relapse at an early stage. This case describes a 22-year-old female with a history of common variable immune deficiency (CVID) who underwent a resection of a large ovarian germ cell tumor followed by 4 cycles of cisplatin and etoposide resulting in clinical complete remission. During followup, she developed a mass at the umbilicus and ascites. Initially, the cytology of the ascites was interpreted as tumor positive, suspicious of relapse of the disease, but tumor markers remained negative. However, during laparoscopy it turned out to be a mature teratoma, which can develop after chemotherapy, the so called growing teratoma syndrome. In retrospect, the ascites was false positive. This case shows that current diagnostic tools are not sufficient to distinguish between vital tumor and mature teratoma and can be misleading. Tumor biopsy and/or laparoscopic inspection are therefore indicated.

Phase I study of oral CP-4126, a gemcitabine derivative, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

CP-4126 is a gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) 5' elaidic acid ester. The purpose of this dose-escalating study was to assess safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary antitumor activity of the oral formulation and to determine the recommended dose (RD) for phase II studies. The study had a two-step design: a non-randomized dose-escalating step I with oral CP-4126 alone, followed by a randomized, cross-over step II that compared oral CP-4126 with dFdC i.v.. CP-4126 was given on days 1,8,15 in a 4-week schedule with increasing doses until the RD was established. 26 patients with different solid tumours were enrolled in step I at seven dose levels (100-3,000 mg/day). The most frequent drug-related AEs were fatigue and dysgeusia, the majority being grade 1-2. One patient experienced a dose limiting toxicity after one dose of CP-4126 at 1,300 mg/day (ASAT grade 3). PK of CP-4126 could not be determined. The metabolites dFdC and dFdU obeyed dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. Exposures to dFdC were about ten-fold lower compared to exposures after comparable doses of dFdC i.v.. Nine patients reached stable disease as best response, whereby in one patient with vaginal carcinoma a 25 % reduction of tumor volume was reached. This study demonstrates that CP-4126 can be safely administered orally to patients up to 3,000 mg/day in a d1,8,15 q4w schedule with a tolerable safety profile. CP-4126 acts as a prodrug for dFdC when given orally, but because of the poor absorption and the rapid pre-systemic metabolism the study was terminated early and no RD could be determined.

Pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate in patients with solid tumors and hepatic impairment.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate in patients with solid tumors with mild and moderate hepatic impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase I, pharmacokinetic study was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors and normal hepatic function or Child-Pugh A (mild) or Child-Pugh B (moderate) hepatic impairment. Treatments were given on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle and consisted of 1.4, 1.1 and 0.7 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate, for normal hepatic function, Child-Pugh A and B hepatic impairment, respectively. Also safety and anti-tumor activity were determined. RESULTS: Hepatic impairment increased exposure to eribulin. In patients with Child-Pugh A (N = 7) and Child-Pugh B (N = 5), mean dose-normalized AUC(0-∞) was 1.75-fold (90 % confidence intervals (CI): 1.16-2.65) and 2.48-fold (90 % CI: 1.57-3.92) increased, respectively, compared with patients who have normal function (N = 6). The most frequently reported treatment-related events were alopecia (12/18) and fatigue (7/18) and these were observed across all groups. Nine patients (50 %) had stable disease as best response. CONCLUSIONS: A reduced dose of 1.1 and 0.7 mg/m(2) of eribulin mesylate is recommended for patients with Child-Pugh A or B hepatic impairment, respectively.

Phase I evaluation of telatinib, a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Blocking both receptor and ligand of the vascular endothelial growth factor (receptor) VEGF(R) pathway might be feasible and increase antitumor activity. This phase I study investigated telatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-2, combined with bevacizumab, in adults with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated in successive cohorts with telatinib (twice-daily continuously, 450-900 mg) or bevacizumab (bi-weekly, starting dose 5 mg/kg). Safety, pharmacokinetics, endothelial (progenitor) cell (E(P)C)/growth factor kinetics and efficacy were assessed. RESULTS: Most frequent adverse events were pain, nausea, voice changes and fatigue. Five dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred: hypertension (cohort I and II), bowel perforation, lipase increase and atrial flutter (cohort III). Cumulative toxicity resulted in a bevacizumab dose reduction to 1 mg/kg (cohort III). Due to three DLTs (n = 14), this cohort represented the best-tolerated dose level. Bevacizumab effectively neutralized plasma VEGF even at 1 mg/kg. Twelve patients had stable disease (clinical benefit 46%). EPC and SDF-1α levels increased during monotherapy telatinib. CONCLUSIONS: Telatinib (450 mg b.i.d.) combined with bevacizumab (1 mg/kg bi-weekly) shows antitumor activity, but accumulating constitutional toxicity impedes long-term treatment of patients. Therefore, this combination will not be pursued in a phase II setting.

Clinical evaluation of AZD1152, an i.v. inhibitor of Aurora B kinase, in patients with solid malignant tumors.

BACKGROUND: To determine, for each of two dosing schedules, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of AZD1152, an Aurora B kinase inhibitor, and to evaluate its safety, biologic activity and pharmacokinetics (PK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses (100-650 mg) of AZD1152, administered as a 2-h infusion every 7 days (A) or 14 days (B). Adverse events (AEs), PK variables and tumor response were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were treated; 19 in schedule A and 40 in schedule B. The MTDs were 200 and 450 mg, respectively. Neutropenia (with/without fever) was the most frequent AE and DLT in each schedule. Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 3.0 grade ≥3 neutropenia and leukopenia occurred in 58% and 11% of patients, respectively, in schedule A and 43% and 20%, respectively, in schedule B. No objective tumor responses were observed at any dose or schedule, although stable disease, as defined by RECIST, was achieved in 15 patients (25%) overall. Systemic exposure to AZD1152-hQPA (active drug) was observed by 1 h into the infusion and exhibited linear PK. CONCLUSIONS: AZD1152 was generally well tolerated with neutropenia being the most frequently reported AE and DLT. Exposure to AZD1152-hQPA, the active drug of AZD1152, was linear.

Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of orally administered indibulin (D-24851) to patients with advanced solid tumors.

Indibulin (ZIO-301/D-24851) is an orally applied small molecule with antitumor activity based upon destabilization of microtubule polymerization. The purpose of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as well as the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of orally administered indibulin as capsule formulation in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received a single dose of indibulin. Seven dose-levels were evaluated: 100 mg, 150 mg, 250 mg, 350 mg and 600 mg once daily (QD), 450 mg and 600 mg twice daily (BID). After a washout period, patients received indibulin at the pre-defined daily dose for 14 days every 3 weeks (multiple dose part). A total of 28 patients entered the study. Indibulin administered as capsules was generally well tolerated. The MTD was not reached. There was a disproportionate increase of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) with dose, with declining AUC corrected for dose starting at the 250 mg dose-level. There was no significant difference in AUC of indibulin after multiple dosing (day 1-14) compared to single administration (day-4). Inter-patient variability in AUC (102% CV) was high. A plateau in drug exposure was observed prior to reaching the MTD. Continued dose-escalation was unlikely to yield any increase in exposure of indibulin. The formulation needs optimization to increase the systemic exposure upon oral administration.

Phase II study on paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, metastatic or locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy: a study of the EORTC-GCG (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynaecological Cancer Group).

BACKGROUND: No standard treatment options are available for patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic vulvar carcinoma not amenable for locoregional treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II study, patients with advanced vulvar cancer received paclitaxel (Taxol) every 3 weeks for up to 10 cycles. Primary objective was response rate. Secondary objectives were response duration and toxicity. Response evaluation was assessed by World Health Organisation criteria, toxicity according to Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-one women from 10 institutions were included, with a median age of 64 (range 47-84), of which 29 were assessable for response. On study patients received a median of four cycles (range 1-10). SAFETY: Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was seen in eight patients (8/29 = 27.6%), which in one patient resulted in neutropenic fever and treatment-related death. Further treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity includes fatigue in three patients (10.3%) and neuropathy in one patient (3.4%). EFFICACY: Overall response was 13.8% (n = 4; two complete responses + two partial responses). With a median follow-up of 24 months, median PFS was 2.6 months (95%confidence interval 2.04-4.21). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel shows moderate activity for local control in advanced vulvar cancer.

Bioequivalence study of a new oral topotecan formulation, relative to the current topotecan formulation, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate the bioequivalence of a new oral topotecan formulation (i.e., proposed commercial formulation) relative to the current oral formulation (formulation used in previous clinical trials), the effect of food on the absorption and disposition of the new oral topotecan and its safety and tolerability in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multi-center, pharmacological Phase I, multiple-dose, randomized, open-label, cross-over bioequivalence study. In the bioequivalence part, 85 patients were randomized to receive either a 4 mg (4 x 1 mg) dose of the new or current formulation on Days 1 or 8. In the food-effect part, 23 patients received a 4 mg (4 x 1 mg) dose of the new formulation in a fasted and fed state. Total topotecan and topotecan lactone were determined and pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by non-compartmental method. RESULTS: Bioequivalence was demonstrated as the 90% confidence intervals of the ratio of the new to current formulation for both the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximal drug concentration (Cmax) for topotecan lactone were contained within the 0.8 - 1.25 boundary. The AUC and Cmax were similar in the fed and fasted state whilst food delayed the tmax for topotecan lactone and total topotecan. Safety data were collected on all subjects enrolled (n = 108) and were consistent with observations from previous studies of oral topotecan. All subjects experienced at least one adverse event, the majority of which were graded as mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: The new oral topotecan formulation demonstrated bioequivalence to the current formulation and demonstrated it can be administered to patients with solid tumors in the fed or fasted state with similar systemic exposure.

[Skin eruptions as an adverse reaction to epidermal growth-factor receptor inhibitors]. / Huidafwijkingen als bijwerking van remmers van epidermale-groeifactorreceptor.

Inhibition of the epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR) is a new strategy in the treatment of solid malignancies. Two men, aged 65 and 59 years, with a metastasized renal carcinoma and a 51-year-old man with a metastasized melanoma developed an acneiform eruption during EGFR inhibition. The second and third patient also developed paronychia. Treatment in all patients consisted of antiseptics and topical antibiotics; the first and third patient also received an oral antibiotic. Withdrawal of the EGFR inhibitor because of progression of the disease led to complete recovery of the cutaneous lesions in the first and the third patient; both died after several months. In the second patient, the side effects reached an acceptable level during continued EGFR therapy. EGFR inhibition is usually accompanied by cutaneous side effects. An acneiform eruption is seen in up to 90% of all treated patients. Other side effects include dry skin, and nail and hair changes. The pathogenesis of these side effects is related to inhibition of EGFR signalling pathways in the skin, but is not yet fully understood. The treatment of EGFR inhibitor-mediated cutaneous toxicity is based mainly on clinical experience.