Serial high sensitivity troponin sampling in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple studies have investigated the role of cardiac troponin (cTn) in the risk stratification of patients with COVID-19. Most of these investigations are based on cTn values at presentation and do not consider the prognostic significance of cTn changes over time. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of serial cTn measurements in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with samples that were not obtained for clinical indications. METHODS: Patients hospitalized between April 2020 and March 2021 with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated. Blood samples collected for any reason were stored for subsequent analysis. If clinical high sensitivity hs-cTnT (Roche) was not measured, samples were tested separately in batches. Hs-cTnI (Abbott) was also evaluated. RESULTS: There were 228 unique patients. There were 21 (9.2 %) deaths. No patient with a low hs-cTnT (<6 ng/L) died and 1 patient with low hs-cTnI (<5 ng/L) died. Myocardial injury was associated with higher odds of death, when defined by hs-cTnT (OR: 7.88, 95 % CI: 2.04-30.40, p = 0.003) or hs-cTnI (OR: 7.46, 95 % CI: 2.68-20.77, p < 0.001). This association remained after propensity weighting. An increasing pattern was associated with higher odds of death compared to a stable pattern for hs-cTnT (OR: 5.45, 95 % CI: 1.81-16.40, p = 0.003) and hs-cTnI (OR: 4.49, 95 % CI: 1.02-19.81, p = 0.048). Among patients with myocardial injury defined by hs-cTnT, an increasing pattern was associated with higher odds of death compared to a decreasing pattern (OR: 4.80, 95 % CI: 1.16-19.97, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with myocardial injury have higher odds of death. Serial hs-cTn testing provides additional risk stratification in these patients.

Evaluation of the analytical sensitivity of ACON and LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests using samples with presumed Omicron variant.

BACKGROUND: Analytical sensitivity of 2 rapid antigen tests was evaluated for detection of presumed SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants and earlier variants of concern. METHODS: A total of 152 SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive samples (N and ORF1ab positive but S gene negative) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antigen by ACON lateral flow and LumiraDx fluorescence immunoassays. Sensitivity within 3 viral load ranges was compared among these 152 samples and 194 similarly characterized samples collected prior to the circulation of the Delta variant (pre-Delta). RESULTS: Antigen was detected in >95% of pre-Delta and presumed Omicron samples for both tests at viral loads >500,000 copies/mL, and 65 to 85% of samples with 50,000-500,000 copies/mL. At viral load <50,000 copies/mL, antigen tests showed better sensitivity in detecting pre-Delta compared to Omicron variants. LumiraDx was more sensitive than ACON at low viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen tests had decreased sensitivity for detecting presumed Omicron compared to pre-Delta variants at low viral load.

Absence of significant myocardial injury following elective direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

Background: Direct current (DC) cardioversion is used to terminate cardiac arrhythmias. Current guidelines list cardioversion as a cause of myocardial injury. Objective: This study determined whether external DC cardioversion results in myocardial injury measured by serial changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI). Methods: This was a prospective study of patients undergoing elective external DC cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI were measured precardioversion and at least 6 hours postcardioversion. Myocardial injury was present when there were significant changes in both hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI. Results: Ninety-eight subjects were analyzed. Median cumulative energy delivered was 121.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 102.2-302.7) J. Multiple cases 23 (23.5%) required 300 J or more. Maximum cumulative energy delivered was 2455.1 J. There were small significant changes in both hs-cTnT (median precardioversion 12 [IQR 7-19) ng/L], median postcardioversion 13 [IQR 8-21] ng/L; P < .001) and hs-cTnI (median precardioversion 5 [IQR 3-10) ng/L], median postcardioversion 7 [IQR 3.6-11) ng/L; P < .001). Results were similar in patients with high-energy shocks and did not vary based on precardioversion values. Only 2 (2%) cases met criteria for myocardial injury. Conclusion: DC cardioversion resulted in a small but statistically significant changes in hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI in 2% of patients studied irrespective of shock energy. Patients with marked troponin elevations after elective cardioversion should be assessed for other causes of myocardial injury. It should not be assumed the myocardial injury was from the cardioversion.

Evaluation of the Visby medical COVID-19 point of care nucleic acid amplification test.

Rapid and widespread diagnostic testing is critical to providing timely patient care and reducing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recently, the Visby Medical COVID-19 point of care (POC) test was granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid at the point of care. We evaluated its performance characteristics using residual specimens (n = 100) collected from Mayo Clinic patients using nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and placed in viral transport media (VTM). The same specimen was tested using both the laboratory reference method (RT-qPCR) and Visby test. The reference methods utilized included a laboratory developed test with EUA (Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Rochester, MN) using the TaqMan assay on a Roche Light Cycler 480 or a commercially available EUA platform (cobas® SARS-CoV-2; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Positive, negative, and overall percent agreement between the Visby COVID-19 test and the reference method were calculated. Additionally, the limit of detection (LoD) claimed by the manufacturer (1112 copies/mL) was verified with serial dilutions of heat inactivated virus. The Visby COVID-19 test correctly identified 29/30 positive samples and 69/70 negative samples, resulting in an overall concordance of 98.0%, positive percent agreement of 96.7%, and negative percent agreement of 98.6%. The abbreviated LoD experiment showed that the analytical sensitivity of the method is as low as or lower than 500 copies/mL. Our study demonstrated that Visby COVID-19 is well-suited to address rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing needs. It has high concordance with central laboratory-based RT-qPCR methods, a low rate of invalid results, and superior analytical sensitivity to some other EUA POC devices.

Validation of a Point-of-Care Analyzer for Determining Anticoagulation Status During Air Transport.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated a point-of-care prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) cartridge-based analyzer for its feasibility, accuracy, and value in critical care air transport. METHODS: In this prospective study, blood samples from 10 randomly selected adult patients were tested with the cartridge during transport to determine feasibility. The cartridge results were compared with the laboratory results for the same samples. Similarly, blood samples from an additional 20 randomly selected adult patients were tested to determine test accuracy. A chart review identified 110 adult patients with PT/INR cartridge results to determine the clinical value of those results. RESULTS: Data from the first group of 10 patients showed that vibration did not affect use of the cartridge. The average bias between the 2 testing methods was 0.0 INR units. A comparison of the PT/INR cartridge results and the laboratory results from the group of 20 patients showed that 73% of the cartridge values were within 0.2 of the laboratory values, 83% were within 0.4, and 93% were within 0.6. Of the 110 patients whose charts showed PT/INR cartridge results, 23% received blood products (45 trauma patients and 65 medical patients). CONCLUSION: The PT/INR cartridge withstands the rigors of rotor wing transport and provides accurate, valuable results for making clinical decisions.

Analytical and Clinical Considerations in Implementing the Roche Elecsys Troponin T Gen 5 STAT Assay.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance characteristics of the fifth-generation troponin T reagent. METHODS: Troponin T was measured in 2,332 paired serum and plasma samples from emergency department and hospital patients using the fourth- and fifth-generation reagents. Testing was repeated after recentrifugation to determine the frequency of analytical outliers and percentage of patients with elevated values for each assay. We conducted separate experiments to determine the effects of biotin and hemolysis interference, as well as measure interinstrument variability, for fifth-generation troponin T. RESULTS: Analytic outliers occurred more frequently using the fifth-generation reagent (3.4%) compared with the fourth-generation reagent (1.0%). The frequency of elevated troponin T above the 99th percentile upper reference limit was 26% for the fourth-generation reagent and 52% for the fifth-generation reagent. Clinically significant assay interference by biotin was observed at 20 ng/mL, but hemolysis interference was not observed until an H index of 150. Instrument-to-instrument variability between e411 and e601/602 instrument platforms is predicted to confound clinical interpretation of troponin changes. CONCLUSIONS: Analytical outliers and instrument-to-instrument variability are the two analytical variables most likely to confound interpretation of changes in fifth-generation troponin T results over time.

Evaluation of automated synovial fluid total cell count and percent polymorphonuclear leukocytes on a Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer for identifying patients at risk of septic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Total cell counts (TC-BF) and percent polymorphonuclear cells (%PMN) of synovial fluid (SF) aspirates provide important cues for the timely diagnosis and management of septic arthritis. To facilitate faster turnaround time, we compared automated to manual TC-BF and differential counts in order to identify reporting cut-offs for automated TC-BF and %PMN that would allow release of automated results concordant with manual counts and differentials. METHODS: Automated TC-BF and %PMN counts of a non-validated analyzer (Analyzer-B in STAT laboratory) were compared to a validated analyzer (Analyzer-A) and manual TC-BF counts and cytospin differentials. Concordance and %differences of Analyzer-B versus Analyzer-A and manual counts were assessed by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman comparison. RESULTS: Overall, automated and manual counts displayed good correlation. A majority of samples demonstrated unacceptable (>20%) differences between automated and manual counts at lower TC-BF (<10,000 cells/µl) and %PMN (<60%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on good overall correlation and fewer samples with unacceptable (>20%) differences between automated and manual counts, we adopted TC-BF > 10,000 cells/µl and %PMN > 60% as cutoffs for reporting automated counts. These cutoffs minimize differences between automated and manual cell counts and differentials and would allow rapid automated reporting in the vast majority of septic arthritis cases.

Estimating short- and long-term reference change values and index of individuality for tests of platelet function.

BACKGROUND: In order to manage risks of bleeding and thrombosis after some surgical procedures, platelet function is often measured repeatedly over days or weeks using laboratory tests of platelet function. To interpret test results in the perioperative period, it is necessary to understand analytical, biological and between-person variation. METHODS: We collected three separate blood specimens from 16 healthy volunteers on the first study day, and one additional specimen from each volunteer 1, 2, and 3 months later. Arachidonic acid-induced and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet function were measured in duplicate by whole blood impedance aggregometry using Multiplate (ASPI/ADP tests) and VerifyNow (Aspirin Reaction Units [ARU] and P2Y12 Reaction Units [PRU]). The analytical variation (CVA), within-subject variation (CVI), between-subject variation (CVG), index of individuality (II), and reference change values (RCV) were calculated. RESULTS: VerifyNow ARU demonstrated the smallest short-term and long-term variability (CVA, CVI, and CVG ~1%), resulting in short- and long-term RCV values <5%. II was also higher (1.92) for VerifyNow ARU than other platelet function tests. Multiplate ASPI and ADP tests had the highest RCV both short-(19.0% and 25.2%, respectively) and long-term (32.1% and 39.6%, respectively) due to increased CVA (>5%) and CVI (3.9-13.1%). VerifyNow PRU had a lower RCV than Multiplate ADP; but was the only test with II <0.6. CONCLUSIONS: VerifyNow ARU results can be interpreted relative to a fixed cut-off or population-based reference interval; or relative to small changes in an individual's previous values. VerifyNow PRU and Multiplate ASPI and ADP tests should only be interpreted based upon relative change; and can only distinguish relatively large (>23%) changes over several weeks.

Relationship between free hemoglobin (hemolysis), potassium and ionized calcium in lithium heparin blood gas samples collected intraoperatively.

OBJECTIVE: Develop sample acceptability rules by determining the relationship between free hemoglobin level (hemolysis) and potassium or ionized calcium in blood gas samples collected intraoperatively. DESIGN AND METHODS: Hemolysis was assessed visually or by H index for lithium heparin blood gas samples collected intraoperatively. During periods one and three this was done using two different rules for visual assessment of centrifuged lithium heparin plasma. During period two H index was measured for all visually hemolyzed samples on a Roche Cobas c501 analyzer to determine acceptability. Potassium and ionized calcium were measured in 75 lithium heparin whole blood samples on a Radiometer ABL90 to correlate H index and potassium or ionized calcium. RESULTS: During period one 35 of 5808 (0.6%) blood gas samples had visual hemolysis levels exceeding tolerance for reporting of potassium. By switching to measured H index using a laboratory-established threshold, during period 2 we estimate that 171 of 5396 (3.2%) blood gas samples exceeded the H index threshold for reporting of potassium. In 75 intraoperative blood gas samples with H index and whole blood potassium and ionized calcium measured; we observed no relationship between H index and potassium or ionized calcium. During period 3 we switched to visual assessment of hemolysis with a greater tolerance for hemolysis; with only 3 of 5345 (0.06%) samples exceeding the new visual hemolysis threshold. CONCLUSION: For blood gas samples collected intraoperatively, there is no relationship between hemolysis and measured potassium or ionized calcium. The results suggest that only grossly hemolyzed intraoperative blood gas samples should be rejected for measurement of whole blood potassium and ionized calcium.

Implementation of a reformulated Roche® bilirubin Gen.3 reagent did not affect the relationship between BiliChek transcutaneous and Roche total serum bilirubin.

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether introduction of a reformulated bilirubin reagent, the Roche bilirubin Gen.3 assay, changed the relationship between BiliChek transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) and total serum bilirubin (TSB). DESIGN AND METHODS: TcB results from term infants in the level 1 nursery obtained within one hour of a TSB were reviewed over two periods, six months before and after the conversion from the previous generation Roche bilirubin reagent to the new Roche Gen.3 bilirubin assay. TcB measurements were performed using BiliChek transcutaneous devices (Respironics, Marietta GA). Distribution of TSB results, and TcB minus TSB bias, were compared before and after introduction of the reformulated Roche bilirubin Gen.3 assay. Median and interquartile range (IQR) TSB values and bias were calculated. A statistical difference between median TSB values and bias were assessed using Man-Whitney test. RESULTS: A total of 301 paired TcB and TSB results were obtained, 172 before and 129 after implementation of the reformulated Roche bilirubin Gen.3 reagent. Median (IQR) TSB was 7.8 (6.8-8.7)mg/dL (133.3 (116.3-148.8) µmol/L) before and 7.6 (6.7-8.4)mg/dL (130 (114.6-143.6)µmol/L) after implementation of the reformulated reagent (p = .1373). Median (IQR) bias between TcB and TSB was 2.9 (2.2-3.7) mg/dL (49.6 (37.6-63.3)µmol/L) before the reformulated reagent was implemented; and did not change at 2.9 (2.1-3.9) mg/dL (49.6 (35.9-66.7)µmol/L) after implementation (p = .8242). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the reformulated Roche bilirubin Gen.3 reagent did not affect the relationship between BiliChek transcutaneous and total serum bilirubin; thus no changes were needed to the neonatal TcB screening protocol as a result of the new bilirubin reagent.

Blood gas sample spiking with total parenteral nutrition, lipid emulsion, and concentrated dextrose solutions as a model for predicting sample contamination based on glucose result.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effects of blood gas sample contamination with total parenteral nutrition (TPN)/lipid emulsion and dextrose 50% (D50) solutions on blood gas and electrolyte measurement; and determine whether glucose concentration can predict blood gas sample contamination with TPN/lipid emulsion or D50. DESIGN AND METHODS: Residual lithium heparin arterial blood gas samples were spiked with TPN/lipid emulsion (0 to 15%) and D50 solutions (0 to 2.5%). Blood gas (pH, pCO2, pO2), electrolytes (Na+, K+ ionized calcium) and hemoglobin were measured with a Radiometer ABL90. Glucose concentration was measured in separated plasma by Roche Cobas c501. Chart review of neonatal blood gas results with glucose >300 mg/dL (>16.65 mmol/L) over a seven month period was performed to determine whether repeat (within 4 h) blood gas results suggested pre-analytical errors in blood gas results. Results were used to determine whether a glucose threshold could predict contamination resulting in blood gas and electrolyte results with greater than laboratory-defined allowable error. RESULTS: Samples spiked with 5% or more TPN/lipid emulsion solution or 1% D50 showed glucose concentration >500 mg/dL (>27.75 mmol/L) and produced blood gas (pH, pO2, pCO2) results with greater than laboratory-defined allowable error. TPN/lipid emulsion, but not D50, produced greater than allowable error in electrolyte (Na+,K+,Ca++,Hb) results at these concentrations. Based on chart review of 144 neonatal blood gas results with glucose >250 mg/dL received over seven months, four of ten neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients with glucose results >500 mg/dL and repeat blood gas results within 4 h had results highly suggestive of pre-analytical error. Only 3 of 36 NICU patients with glucose results 300-500 mg/dL and repeat blood gas results within 4 h had clear pre-analytical errors in blood gas results. CONCLUSION: Glucose concentration can be used as an indicator of significant blood sample contamination with either TPN/lipid emulsion or D50 solution. NICU blood gas samples with glucose ≥300 mg/dL should be considered potentially contaminated, and samples with glucose >500 mg/dL have a risk for contamination.

Comparing analytical outliers and the percent of emergency department patients with results above the 99th percentile upper reference limit for 2 conventional and one high sensitivity troponin assay.

OBJECTIVES: We compared rates of analytical outliers, and percent of emergency department (ED) patients with cardiac troponin (cTn) values above the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL), for two conventional and one high sensitivity cTn assay. METHODS: We measured 3008 samples from 1931 ED patients by Roche e411 4th generation Troponin T (cTnT); and Abbott STAT Troponin I (cTnI) and high sensitivity troponin I (hscTnI) on an Architect i2000. Within 24h of initial measurement, samples were aliquoted, re-centrifuged, and repeated in duplicate by all methods. Outliers were defined as one or both replicates exceeding initial value by a critical difference (CD): where CD=z×2×SDanalytical (z=3.29 at a probability of 0.0005), and at least one replicate on a different side of 99th percentile URL compared to initial value. We also assessed percent of ED patients with values >99th percentile by all methods (excluding outliers), using both sex-neutral and sex-specific hscTnI URL. RESULTS: The outlier rate for cTnI (3.66%) was significantly higher than the outlier rate for either cTnT (0.33%) or hscTnI (0.47%) (p<0.0001). More ED patients (33%) had elevated cTnT values compared to either cTnI (25%) or hscTnI (29%). Application of sex-specific URL did not change the percent of ED patients with >99th percentile hscTnI values. CONCLUSION: Abbott STAT cTnI had more analytic outliers than Roche cTnT or Abbott hscTnI. Compared to cTnT, use of hscTnI will significantly decrease the percent of ED patients with elevated cTn values without increasing analytical outliers.

Evaluation of lactate, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte count as biomarkers for sepsis in emergency department patients.

BACKGROUND: Lactate, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte (IG) count were compared for the prediction of sepsis, and severe sepsis or septic shock, in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 501 ED patients with a sepsis panel ordered for suspicion of sepsis. WBC, neutrophil, and IG counts were measured on a Sysmex XT-2000i analyzer. Lactate was measured by i-STAT, and procalcitonin by Brahms Kryptor. We classified patients as having sepsis using a simplification of the 1992 consensus conference sepsis definitions. Patients with sepsis were further classified as having severe sepsis or septic shock using established criteria. Univariate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine odds ratio (OR), area under the ROC curve (AUC), and sensitivity/specificity at optimal cut-off for prediction of sepsis (vs. no sepsis), and prediction of severe sepsis or septic shock (vs. no sepsis). RESULTS: There were 267 patients without sepsis; and 234 with sepsis, including 35 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Lactate had the highest OR (1.44, 95th% CI 1.20-1.73) for the prediction of sepsis; while WBC, neutrophil count and percent (neutrophil/WBC) had OR>1.00 (p<0.05). All biomarkers had AUC<0.70 and sensitivity and specificity <70% at the optimal cut-off. Initial lactate was the best biomarker for predicting severe sepsis or septic shock, with an odds ratio (95th% CI) of 2.70 (2.02-3.61) and AUC 0.89 (0.82-0.96). CONCLUSION: Traditional biomarkers (lactate, WBC, neutrophil count, procalcitonin, IG) have limited utility in the prediction of sepsis.

Analytical performance of three whole blood point-of-care lactate devices compared to plasma lactate comparison methods and a flow-injection mass spectrometry method.

OBJECTIVES: Point of care (POC) whole blood lactate testing may facilitate rapid detection of sepsis. We evaluated three POC methods against both plasma lactate comparison methods and a flow-injection mass spectrometric (MS) method. DESIGN AND METHODS: Nova StatStrip, Abbott i-STAT CG4+ and Radiometer ABL90 POC lactate methods were evaluated against the mean of Cobas Integra 400 and Vitros 350 plasma lactate. POC methods were also compared to a flow-injection mass spectrometric assay measuring lactate in ZnSO4-precipitated whole blood extracts. Intra- and inter-assay precision was determined using quality control material. Method comparison included specimens from normal donors at rest, after exertion, and after spiking with lactic acid. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation was <5% for i-STAT and ABL90; but ranged from 3.1-8.2% on two StatStrip meters. Mean (±SD) bias between POC and plasma lactate ranged from -0.2±0.9 (i-STAT and ABL90) to -0.4±1.2 (StatStrip) mmol/L. At concentrations >6mmol/L, all POC methods showed proportional negative bias compared to plasma methods; but this bias was not observed when compared to the MS method. Despite proportional negative bias, all POC methods demonstrated acceptable concordance (94-100%) with plasma lactate within the reference interval (<2.3mmol/L) and >4mmol/L, commonly used clinical cut-offs for detection of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: POC lactate methods demonstrate acceptable concordance with plasma lactate across commonly used clinical cut-offs for detection of sepsis. Due to systematic negative bias at higher lactate concentrations, POC and plasma lactate should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients with elevated lactate concentrations.

Agreement between whole blood and plasma sodium measurements in profound hyponatremia.

OBJECTIVES: We compared two different methods of whole blood sodium measurement to plasma sodium measurement using samples in the profoundly hyponatremic range (Na < 120 mmol/L). DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole blood pools with a range of low sodium values were generated using combinations and dilutions of pooled electrolyte-balanced lithium heparin samples submitted for arterial blood gas analysis. Each pool was analyzed five times on a Radiometer 827 blood gas analyzer and iSTAT analyzer. Pools were centrifuged to produce plasma, which was analyzed five times on a Roche Cobas c501 chemistry analyzer. An additional 40 fresh (analyzed on day of collection) excess lithium heparin arterial blood gas samples from 36 patients were analyzed on the Radiometer 827, iSTAT, and Cobas c501 as described above. The setting was a tertiary referral center. Blood samples were collected from a combination of patients in the intensive care unit, operating theaters and emergency room. RESULTS: All methods demonstrated excellent precision, even in the profoundly hyponatremic measurement range (Na < 120 mmol/L using a plasma reference method). However, agreement between the methods varied with the degree of hyponatremia. In the profoundly hyponatremic range, Radiometer whole blood sodium values were nearly identical to plasma reference sodium, while iSTAT whole blood sodium showed a consistent positive bias relative to plasma sodium in this range. CONCLUSION: If whole blood direct sodium measurements are compared with plasma sodium in profoundly hyponatremic patients consideration should be given to the use of Radiometer blood gas analyzers over iSTAT since the latter shows a positive bias relative to a plasma comparative method.

Comparison of two point of care devices for capillary lipid screening in fasting and postprandial adults.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of two point of care (POC) devices for capillary lipid screening in fasting and post-prandial adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fasting and post-prandial capillary whole blood samples collected from 57 adult donors were analyzed simultaneously on Cholestech LDX Lipid Profile (Alere San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA) cassettes and CardioChek Lipid Panel (Polymer Technology Systems, Indianapolis, IN) strips. Paired serum samples were collected from the same donors and analyzed with CDC-certified methods for total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-blanked triglycerides. Non-HDL-C (total cholesterol minus HDL-C) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were calculated. Mean bias between capillary whole blood and serum laboratory lipids was calculated. RESULTS: HDL-C measurements were not affected by triglyceride content on either device. However, both devices exhibited significant variability in triglyceride measurement relative to the reference method. Compared to reference methods, Cholestech was more accurate than CardioChek for non-HDL-C while CardioChek was more accurate for HDL-C. Among the calculated cardiovascular risk parameters (LDL-C and non-HDL-C), Cholestech-calculated non-HDL-C exhibited the least average bias in both fasting and postprandial samples. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal approach to capillary lipid screening may be to use Cholestech non-HDL cholesterol; as it exhibited little bias relative to CDC reference methods in both fasting and postprandial samples, facilitating lipid screening in non-fasting adults.

Precision and reliability of 5 platelet function tests in healthy volunteers and donors on daily antiplatelet agent therapy.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation protocols used during mechanical circulatory support call for titration of antiplatelet agents. We compared the precision and reliability of 5 platelet function tests in healthy volunteers and donors on daily antiplatelet therapy to distinguish their efficacy for titrating antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: We assessed arachidonic acid-induced platelet function by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), Multiplate impedance aggregometry, VerifyNow, and platelet mapping by thromboelastography (TEG PM). We assessed ADP-induced platelet function by the same methods and flow cytometry. Forty healthy volunteers and 10-13 volunteers on daily aspirin and/or clopidogrel therapy were evaluated. We compared tests for intraassay precision, interassay precision (samples from 2 separate blood draws), and reliability coefficient. RESULTS: For arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers, intra- and interassay CVs were ≤ 10% for all methods. Intra- and interassay precision among donors on daily aspirin was ≤ 30% for all methods except LTA (38% interassay CV) and TEG PM (95% intraassay and 104% interassay CV). For ADP-induced platelet function, intra- and interassay precision was ≤ 10% and ≤ 30% for all methods. Only Multiplate demonstrated moderate or greater (R > 0.40) reliability coefficients for arachidonic acid-induced platelet function among all subjects. All methods of ADP-induced platelet function, except TEG PM, demonstrated substantial or greater (R > 0.60) reliability among all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: TEG PM is least suited to monitor effects of antiplatelet agents. Multiplate impedance aggregometry was the only method to demonstrate an acceptable reliability coefficient among healthy volunteers and donors on both aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

Retrospective evaluation of the accuracy of Roche AccuChek Inform and Nova StatStrip glucose meters when used on critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: More stringent accuracy guidelines for hospital-use glucose meters have recently been published, but it remains unclear whether glucose meters can meet these accuracy guidelines when measurement is performed on critically ill patients with fresh whole blood samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of a conventional (Roche Diagnostics [Indianapolis, IN] AccuChek® Inform) and a newer-generation (Nova Biomedical [Waltham, MA] StatStrip®) glucose system by comparing paired (drawn within 5 min of each other) whole blood glucose meter and laboratory serum glucose values obtained from intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We also performed a prospective evaluation of the accuracy of the Nova StatStrip. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) bias between Roche AccuChek Inform and serum laboratory glucose measurements was 11 (6-18) mg/dL, compared with a median bias between the Nova StatStrip and serum glucose measurements of 1 (-5 to 5) mg/dL. StatStrip met International Organization for Standardization 15197 and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) POCT12-A3 accuracy guidelines using both retrospective and prospective datasets. CONCLUSIONS: The newer-generation (StatStrip) glucose meter met more stringent CLSI POCT12-A3 accuracy criteria because of reduced bias compared with the previous-generation device. Reduced glucose meter bias led to fewer insulin dosing discrepancies when the insulin dose determined from serum glucose was compared with that determined from the glucose meter value using the institutional glycemic control protocol.

Analytical performance of three point of care methods for pleural fluid pH analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The performance of three point of care methods for pleural fluid pH analysis was compared to a currently validated blood gas analyzer. DESIGN AND METHODS: An ABL 725 (Radiometer America, Westlake, OH) was used as the reference method to evaluate three cartridge-based assays: ABL 90 FLEX (Radiometer), and i-STAT 1 (Abbott Point of Care, Abbott Park, IL) CG4+ and G3+ cartridges for pleural fluid pH analysis. Pooled residual pleural fluid samples and quality control material were analyzed to determine intra- and inter-assay precision. Method comparison was performed with spiked (n=40) and clinically-ordered (n=10) pleural fluid samples across the analytical measuring range. RESULTS: All methods demonstrated inter-assay CVs<0.1% at pH values of 7.1 and 7.6, and intra-assay CVs<0.3% at pH values of 7.2 and 7.7. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated clinically significant bias between ABL 725 and each cartridge-based method only at pH>7.6. For samples with pH<7.6 mean bias vs. ABL 725 was -0.01 for ABL 90 FLEX and 0.03 for i-STAT 1 CG4+ and G3+ cartridges. Clinical concordance using a decision limit of pH7.2 was 96-98% for the three methods. CONCLUSIONS: Analytical and clinical performance of the three cartridge-based methods was comparable to a validated blood gas analyzer for pleural fluid pH analysis. Cartridge-based pH methods offer the advantage of easier troubleshooting for clots and clogs as they use disposable electrodes. However cartridge-based methods are not currently FDA-approved for pleural fluid samples, such that additional validation would be required for this specimen type.

Discordance between urine pH measured by dipstick and pH meter: implications for methotrexate administration protocols.

OBJECTIVES: To minimize toxicity of high-dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy, urinary alkalinization with frequent monitoring of urine pH is required. Urine pH is usually assessed by fast and convenient dipstick methods. When urine color interferes with dipstick measurement, as occurs in patients receiving MTX, alternative methods such as pH meters are used. Nursing staff caring for patients on high-dose MTX reported that urine pH results from dipstick and pH analyzers were often clinically discordant. As a result urine pH by dipstick and pH meter were compared in patients on high-dose MTX therapy and patients with normal-colored urine samples. DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured urine pH by dipstick and pH meter in 116 urine samples from 4 patients receiving high-dose MTX therapy, and in 50 normal-colored urine samples from 50 patients not on MTX therapy. RESULTS: In patients on MTX therapy the mean (±standard deviation) bias between dipstick and pH meter urine pH was 0.7±0.4, compared to 0.4±0.3 in patients not on MTX. For patients on MTX clinical concordance between dipstick and pH meter urine results was poor around a clinical cut-off of pH 8.0. Of the 92 samples with a meter urine pH≤8.0, 72 had a discordant value by dipstick (pH>8). CONCLUSIONS: Urine pH readings by dipstick and pH meter are not equivalent, and the bias between them is exacerbated in patients on MTX. Institutions with high-dose MTX therapy protocols should not alternate between dipstick and pH meter urine pH monitoring.