Frailty assessment tools in the emergency department: A geriatric emergency department guidelines 2.0 scoping review.

Objective: Given the aging population and growing burden of frailty, we conducted this scoping review to describe the available literature regarding the use and impact of frailty assessment tools in the assessment and care of emergency department (ED) patients older than 60 years. Methods: A search was made of the available literature using the Covidence system using various search terms. Inclusion criteria comprised peer-reviewed literature focusing on frailty screening tools used for a geriatric population (60+ years of age) presenting to EDs. An additional search of PubMed, EBSCO, and CINAHL for articles published in the last 5 years was conducted toward the end of the review process (January 2023) to search specifically for literature describing interventions for frailty, yielding additional articles for review. Exclusion criteria comprised articles focusing on an age category other than geriatric and care environments outside the emergency care setting. Results: A total of 135 articles were screened for inclusion and 48 duplicates were removed. Of the 87 remaining articles, 20 were deemed irrelevant, leaving 67 articles for full-text review. Twenty-eight were excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria, leaving 39 full-text studies. Use of frailty screening tools were reported in the triage, care, and discharge decision-making phases of the ED care trajectory, with varying reports of usefulness for clinical decision-making. Conclusion: The literature reports tools, scales, and instruments for identifying frailty in older patients at ED triage; multiple frailty scores or tools exist with varying levels of utilization. Interventions for frailty directed at the ED environment were scant. Further research is needed to determine the usefulness of frailty identification in the context of emergency care, the effects of care delivery interventions or educational initiatives for front-line medical professionals on patient-oriented outcomes, and to ensure these initiatives are acceptable for patients.

"Nurses are every bit of the flow:" Emergency department nurses' conceptualization of patient flow management.

AIM: To validate and refine Benjamin and Jacelon's 2021 definition of patient flow management using the experience and knowledge of practicing emergency department nurses. BACKGROUND: Patient flow requires complex, real-time decision-making to match patients to limited resources and facilitate their movement through care processes. A literature-based concept analysis of patient flow management was first performed in 2021, but the voice of nurses is largely absent from existing patient flow research. DESIGN: This study employed an expanded concept analysis methodology, as articulated by Kathleen Cowles. DATA SOURCE: Focus groups of nine emergency nurses were conducted. RESULTS: Emergency nurses' conceptualization of patient flow management differs from the definition as it has emerged through patient flow literature. Patient flow management is a nurse-driven process that relies on nursing knowledge and the work of all emergency nurses, including bedside nurses. Emergency nurses perceive the ultimate goal of patient flow management to be the collective safety of patients, and they work to promote patient safety within their own scope of responsibility. CONCLUSION: Understanding patient flow management as a nurse-driven process emphasizes the importance of nurse training and capacity to effective patient flow. Future research should explore the role of emergency nurses as active directors, rather than passive components, of patient flow. More work is needed to investigate this complex nursing task.

Situational Analysis.

Situational analysis is not commonly used in nursing research; however, its usefulness in examining complicated phenomena that are locally situated makes it an effective approach to emergency nursing problems. This paper describes the situational analysis approach as an extension of the grounded theory method and uses 3 studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of this qualitative approach.

Validation of a grounded theory of nurse bullying in emergency department settings.

BACKGROUND: Workplace bullying in health care settings, including emergency departments (EDs), is a significant and negative factor in the dynamics of patient care, nursing work culture, and nurse retention. Specifically, workplace bullying has a significant and negative effect on patient care, with both direct (errors and substandard care) and indirect sequelae (high turnover and inexperienced nursing staff hired to replace those nurses who have left to escape bullying behavior). The purpose of this study was to determine the theoretical coherence of the ENA model of nurse bullying in emergency department and its impact on emergency nurses' intent to leave their job. METHODS: Correlational study using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI), the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS), and the Short Negative Acts Questionnaire (SNAQ) in a cross-sectional sample of emergency nurses working in the United States. RESULTS: Extremely high intent to leave the current ED (PD1) rates were associated with nurses' reported exposure to daily bullying (PD1 rate = 67.6%, zero-order OR = 4.77, Nr2 = 3.2%, p < .001) and bullying multiple times per week (49.1%, zero-order OR = 2.31, Nr2 = 2.6%, p < .001). Nurses who reported no exposure to bullying at work had a distinctly below average PD1 rate (22.9%, OR = 0.47, Nr2 = 3.9%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The relationships between the tested elements of the model (specifically, the influence of bullying on nurse intent to leave) as constructed appear to adequately reflect the phenomenon of workplace bullying and its effects on nurse retention in emergency care settings.

Establishing Research Priorities for the Emergency Severity Index Using a Modified Delphi Approach.

INTRODUCTION: The accuracy of an initial ED triage decision has been reported to drive the clinical trajectory for ED patients, and, therefore, this assessment is critical to patient safety. The Emergency Severity Index-a 5-point score assigned by a triage nurse and based on disease acuity, patient potential for decompensation, and anticipated resource use-is used both in the United States and internationally. In the US, the Emergency Severity Index is used by up to 94% of the academic medical center emergency departments. In 2020, the Emergency Nurses Association acquired the intellectual property rights to the Emergency Severity Index and is responsible for its maintenance and improvement. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish a research agenda for the improvement of individual and institutional understanding and use of the Emergency Severity Index. METHODS: Modified Delphi process was used with 3 rounds of data collection. RESULTS: Round 1 yielded 112 issues, which were collapsed into 18 potential research questions in 4 general categories: education and training (6 questions), workplace environment (3 questions), emergency care services (7 questions), and special populations (2 questions). These questions were used in round 2 to establish importance. Round 3 yielded a rank ordering of both categories and research questions. DISCUSSION: The research priorities as set through the use of this modified Delphi process align well with current gaps in the literature. Research in these areas should be encouraged to improve the understanding of educational, environmental, and process challenges to emergency nurses' triage decisions and accuracy of Emergency Severity Index assignments.

Triage Decisions Involving Pregnancy-Capable Patients: Educational Deficits and Emergency Nurses' Perceptions of Risk.

BACKGROUND: In areas where obstetric services are not available, emergency departments often become the default for unplanned obstetric care, yet emergency nurses are not universally trained in the identification and treatment of obstetric emergencies. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' perception of acuity in the triage of pregnant or postpartum patients presenting to the emergency department with high-risk complaints and to identify facilitators and challenges to the accurate identification and treatment of these patients. METHOD: A mixed-methods study was conducted using chart review data (N = 12,766) and focus group data (N = 39) from five emergency departments in the eastern United States. RESULTS: In 86.5% of cases, pregnancy status was not documented. Ninety-four percent of pregnant patients with a systolic blood pressure over 140 mmHg were under-triaged. The overall theme of the qualitative data was acuity blindness, with identified barriers to assessment that included educational needs and triage processes and workflow issues. CONCLUSION: There are significant knowledge deficits in the care of patients presenting with high-risk conditions associated with pregnancy. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2021;52(1):21-29.].

Traumatic stress in emergency nurses: Does your work environment feel like a war zone?

INTRODUCTION: Emergency nurses are exposed to both primary and secondary trauma with attendant sequelae in both work and personal spheres. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence of traumatic stress, measured by the secondary traumatic stress scale (STSS) in a sample of emergency nurses and describe the impact of traumatic stress on nursing practice and workplace environment. METHODS: Mixed methods approach using survey instrument data from the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS) (N = 125) and focus group data (N = 53). RESULTS: The average total score on the STSS was 51.83 for nurses who attended one of the focus groups 48.42 for nurses who did not attend (clinical cutoff for STS = 39). Focus group data aligned with elements of the STSS; thematic categories of cumulative trauma, mental health sequelae, bullying and organizational violence, coping mechanisms, relationship damage, and solutions were described. Although we measured only STS, participants often used the terms "PTSD" and "STS" interchangeably. CONCLUSIONS: The nurses in this study demonstrated high levels of STS and described in detail how chronic, cumulative trauma affected relational nursing care and social connections. Participants discussed high levels of suicidality in the profession, and the compounding trauma of relational and organizational violence. The pervasiveness of traumatic stress and the extent to which it affects all areas of nurses' lives is a cause for great concern.

The perceived impact of legalized cannabis on nursing workload in adult and pediatric emergency department visits: A qualitative exploratory study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in emergency nursing workload related to cannabis ingestion or inhalation by adult and pediatric patients in states and bordering states where recreational cannabis is legal. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory design using data collected from focus groups. SAMPLE: Twenty-four English-speaking emergency nurses over the age of 18 who provide direct care to patients and work in US emergency departments located in a state, or bordering state, where recreational cannabis use is legal. MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative data were gathered using a semi-structured interview format and analyzed using situational analysis. RESULTS: The legalization of recreational cannabis in some US states is reported as resulting in an increase in patients presenting with cyclic vomiting syndromes, and increased difficulty in managing both associated behaviors and repetitive ED presentations. New presentations also include unintentional intoxication in both pediatric and geriatric populations. An unexpected finding was the displacement of local homeless populations by younger, indigent "cannabis tourists"; social services agencies might consider this while planning for cannabis legalization in their state or territory. CONCLUSIONS: To protect public health and safety, regulatory efforts to standardize the formulation, dosing and labeling of cannabis products would be beneficial along with educational initiatives for both consumers and health care providers.

"Me First, Others Later" A focused ethnography of ongoing cultural features of waiting in an Iranian emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Waiting is an inevitable experience in all emergency departments (EDs). This waiting time may negatively influence the patients and their relatives' satisfaction, healthcare professionals' (HCPs) performance, and the quality of care provided. This study aims to explore, gain understanding of and describe what it is like to wait in an Iranian emergency department (ED) with particular focus on cultural features. METHOD: A focused ethnographic approach based on Spradley's (1980) developmental research sequence was conducted in the ED of a tertiary academic medical center in northwest Iran over a 9-month study period from July 2017 to March 2018. Participant observation, ethnographic interviews and examination of related documents and artefacts were used to collect data. All the data were recorded in either field notes or verbatim transcripts and were analysed using Spradley's ethnographic data analysis method concurrently. RESULTS: The overarching theme of "Me first, others later" emerged. Within this overarching theme there were seven sub-themes as follows: human-related factors, system-related factors, patients and their relatives' beliefs and behaviors, HCPs' beliefs and behaviors, consequences for patients and their relatives, consequences for HCPs, and consequences for ED environment and care process. CONCLUSION: The mentality 'me first, others later' as the main cultural barrier to emergency care, strenuously undermined our positive practice environment. An accountable patient/relative support liaison, a clearly-delineated process of ED care delivery, guidelines for providing culturally competent ED care, and public awareness programs are needed to address the concerns and conflicts which establish a mutual trust and rapport.

Emergency Nurses' Perception of Geriatric Readiness in the ED Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports 136.9 million ED visits in 2015, of which 21.4 million (15.6%) were by patients who were 65 or older. This US population demographic is expected to grow by 112% over the next 40 years, becoming just below 25% of the total US population. Emergency nurses will play an increasingly important part in the development of nursing care for geriatric patients. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' perception of their ability to care for geriatric patients in the emergency setting. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods sequential design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus group data, which were analyzed separately and then given equal priority during the data-interpretation phase. RESULTS: Less than 50% of survey respondents (N = 1,610) reported geriatric-specific screenings, accommodations, and communication with outside agencies as "always available" in their care settings. Qualitative analysis (N = 23) yielded the categories of Triage/Assessment, Care in the Emergency Environment, Discharge Planning, and Facilitators and Barriers, which generally reflected the trajectory of care for the older patient. The overarching concern was keeping patients safe in both the community and in the emergency department. DISCUSSION: Emergency departments should develop integrated systems to facilitate appropriate care of older patients. Identified barriers to improved care include a lack of integration between emergency care and community care, deficits in geriatric-specific education, inconsistent use of early screening for frailty, and lack of resources in the emergency care environment to intervene appropriately.

Emergency Nurses' Perceptions of Risk for Firearm Injury and its Effect on Assessment Practices: A Mixed Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Injury from firearms is a significant problem in the United States, accounting for 73% of all homicides and 50% of all suicides that occurred among US residents. What is not known are the perceptions of emergency nurses regarding the impact of in-home access on the risk for firearm-related injury and death in their patient populations. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' perception of patient risk for firearm injury and in which ways that perception affected the process of ED patient screening, assessment, counseling, and discharge education. METHODS: We employed a mixed methods, sequential, explanatory design using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus-group data. RESULTS: Between 21.8 and 43.5% of respondents reported asking patients about access to in-home firearms, depending on presentation. Statistical analyses showed the single most significant factor correlated with nurses asking about the availability of a staff person who could further assess risk and offer assistance and safety counseling to patients. Another important influence was identified from focus-group discussions in which nurses reported that they felt challenged to bring up the topic of firearms in a way that did not seem confrontational. DISCUSSION: Access to firearms poses risk to patients, and patient safety and the continuum of care depends upon the emergency nurse assessing patient firearms risk and taking appropriate action. The findings from this study suggest that emergency departments (1) normalize and standardize the assessment of firearms, (2) designate an ED staff member on each shift to further assess risk if a positive response is elicited, and (3) continue to improve workplace safety.

Assessing for Occult Suicidality at Triage: Experiences of Emergency Nurses.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for suicidality is a critical nursing function at the initial ED encounter. Suicide is the tenth leading cause of death in the United States, and a substantial percentage of people who die by suicide present for health care in the year before their deaths. The emergency department provides health care professionals with a critical opportunity to identify patients at risk for suicide and intervene appropriately. METHODS: Qualitative exploratory study using focus-group data. FINDINGS: Effective and accurate suicidality assessment occurs not by asking a single question but also with the assessment of patient behaviors and presentation (appearance, hygiene, etc). When emergency nurses suspected occult suicidality, additional actions (finding private space, keeping patients safe, and passing on information), took priority. DISCUSSION: The Joint Commission recommends using clinical judgment tools for the final determination of safety for a patient at suspected risk of suicide, as research findings suggest that a screening tool can identify persons at risk for suicide more reliably than a clinician's personal judgment. Our participants report that when they assessed suicide risk at triage, it was usually by asking a single question such as "Do you have thoughts or plans to harm yourself?" and they expressed concern about the effectiveness of doing so. Participants described their efforts to improve suicide screening across the duration of the patient's ED stay through an iterative process of assessment that included further probing and eliciting, evaluating, and reacting to the patient's response.

Workplace bullying in emergency nursing: Development of a grounded theory using situational analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine recognizes that the workplace environment is a crucial factor in the ability of nurses to provide safe and effective care, and thus interactions that affect the quality and safety of the work environment require exploration. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to use situational analysis to develop a grounded theory of workplace bullying as it manifests specifically in the emergency care setting. METHODS: This study used a grounded theory methodology called situational analysis. 44 emergency RNs were recruited to participate in one of 4 focus group sessions, which were transcribed in their entirety, and, along with field notes, served as the dataset. RESULTS: This grounded theory describes the characteristics of human actors and their reactions to conditions in the practice environment that lead to greater or lesser levels of bullying, and the responses to bullying as it occurs in U.S. emergency departments. DISCUSSION: Workplace bullying is a significant factor in the dynamics of patient care, nursing work culture, and nursing retention. The impact on patient care cannot be overestimated, both in terms of errors, substandard care, and the negative effects of high turnover of experienced RNs who leave, compounded by the inexperience of newly hired RNs. An assessment of hospital work environments should include nurse perceptions of workplace bullying, and interventions should focus on effective managerial processes for handling workplace bullying. Future research should include testing of the theoretical coherence of the model, and the testing of bullying interventions to determine the effect on workplace environment, nursing intent to leave/retention, and patient outcomes.

Triaging the Emergency Department, Not the Patient: United States Emergency Nurses' Experience of the Triage Process.

INTRODUCTION: Triage, as it is understood in the context of the emergency department, is the first and perhaps the most formal stage of the initial patient encounter. Bottlenecks during intake and long waiting room times have been linked to higher rates of patients leaving without being seen. The solution in many emergency departments has been to collect less information at triage or use an "immediate bedding" or "pull until full" approach, in which patients are placed in treatment areas as they become available without previous screening. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' understanding of-and experience with-the triage process, and to identify facilitators and barriers to accurate acuity assignation. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study using focus-group interviews (N = 26). RESULTS: Five themes were identified: (1) "Sick or not sick," (2) "Competency/qualifications," (3) "Triaging the emergency department, not the patient," (4) "The unexpected," and (5) "Barriers and facilitators." DISCUSSION: Our participants described processes that were unit- and/or nurse-dependent and were manipulations of the triage system to "fix" problems in ED flow, rather than a standard application of a triage system. Our participants reported that, in practice, the use of triage scales to determine acuity and route patients to appropriate resources varies in accuracy and application among emergency nurses and in their respective emergency departments. Nurses in this sample reported a prevalence of "quick look" triage approaches that do not rely on physiologic data to make acuity decisions. Future research should focus on intervention and comparison studies examining the effect of staffing, nurse experience, hospital policies, and length of shift on the accuracy of triage decision making. Contribution to Emergency Nursing Practice.

The Experience of Advanced Practice Nurses in US Emergency Care Settings.

INTRODUCTION: Little information has been published regarding the actual practice, training, and validation of basic skills and competencies needed by the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) in the emergency care setting. The purpose of this study was to (1) identify skills being performed by APRNs practicing in emergency care settings (2); explore types of training; and (3) describe competency validation. Additionally, we explored frequency of skill use and facilitators and barriers to performing a skill to the full extent of training and education. METHODS: An exploratory mixed-methods study was performed incorporating a self-report survey and focus group interviews. RESULTS: The educational path to advanced practice nursing in emergency care settings is not standardized. Few programs incorporate or address the need for APRNs to receive acute care training across the life span, which is the hallmark of emergency nursing practice. Similarly, training is reported as fragmented, and validation of skills for both nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists can vary. APRN practice autonomy is affected by the presence of other providers (specifically physicians), institutional culture, and state boards of nursing that regulate practice. DISCUSSION: Integrated educational and orientation programs are needed that address high-acuity patients across the life span. Additionally, a more nuanced approach to assessing APRN capabilities as a combination of hard (clinical emergency) and soft (communication and organizational) skills may be an appropriate framework within which to examine the advanced practice role. Future research should continue to evaluate training, competency assessment, and outcomes for APRNs in the emergency care setting.