Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Emergent Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits: A Multicenter Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sociodemographic factors in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with emergent and non-emergent eye-related concerns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicenter study. SUBJECTS: 60,677 patients with eye-related concerns who visited EDs at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Wills Eye Hospital, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, and Johns Hopkins Hospital/Wilmer Eye Institute from January 1st, 2019 until December 31st, 2019. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were performed using STATA 17. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) Sociodemographic factors associated with emergent diagnoses, 2) Visit patterns across ED settings (i.e. standard ED vs eye ED), and 3) the most common emergent and non-emergent diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 60,677 eye-related ED encounters were included in the study, including 22,434 at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, 16,124 at Wills Eye Hospital, 15,487 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear, and 6,632 at Johns Hopkins Hospital/Wilmer Eye Institute. Most patients had non-emergent diagnoses (56.7%). Males (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.79-1.92) were more likely to have an emergent diagnosis than females. Patients with private/employer-based insurance (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.96), Medicare (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.87), and Medicaid (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89) were all less likely to have an emergent diagnosis than uninsured patients. Those with veteran/military insurance (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87-1.34) were equally likely to have an emergent diagnosis compared to uninsured patients. Non-White Hispanic patients (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12-1.42) were more likely to present with an emergent condition than White patients. Patient seen in the standard ED setting were more likely to have emergent diagnoses than those who visited standalone eye EDs (P < 0.001). The most common emergent diagnoses were corneal abrasion (12.97%), extraocular foreign body (7.61%), and corneal ulcer (7.06%). The most common non-emergent diagnoses were dry eye (7.90%), posterior vitreous detachment (7.76%), and chalazion (6.57%). CONCLUSIONS: ED setting was associated with the acuity of patient diagnoses. Lack of insurance coverage and non-White Hispanic race/ethnicity were associated with emergent eye-related ED visits. Improving access to ophthalmic care in these populations may reduce the incidence of preventable eye emergencies related to untreated chronic conditions. This combined with measures to redirect non-emergent issues to outpatient clinics may alleviate ED overload.

Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties.

OBJECTIVE: With the advent of virtual interviews, the potential for interview hoarding by applicants became of greater concern due to lack of financial constraints associated with in-person interviewing. Simultaneously, the average number of applications submitted each year is rising. Currently there is no cap to the number of applications or interviews an applicant may complete when applying to residency, with the exception of ophthalmology with a cap of 15 interviews. No studies have assessed the applicants' perspectives on an application or interview cap. We assessed the attitudes of surgical subspecialty applicants towards capping, which may be useful when considering innovations in residency selection. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: About 1841 applicants to the Johns Hopkins' ophthalmology, urology, plastic surgery, and orthopedic surgery residency programs from the 2022-2023 cycle were invited to respond to a 22-item questionnaire. Statistical analyses of aggregate data were conducted using R. RESULTS: Of the 776/1841 (42%) responses, 288 (40%) were in support of an application cap, while 455 (63%) were in support of an interview cap. Specialty (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), taking a gap year (p = 0.02), medical school region (p = 0.04), and number of interviews accepted off of a waitlist (p = 0.01) were all significantly associated with a difference in opinion regarding an application cap. Specialty (p < 0.001), USMLE Step 1 score (p = 0.004), number of interviews (p < 0.001), and number of programs ranked (p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with a difference in opinion regarding an interview cap. Of those applicants who were in support of the respective caps they believed that on average a cap should consist of 48.1 (16.1) applications and 16.0 (8.0) interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the desire for interview caps among the majority of applicants to surgical subspecialties and thus this innovation may be considered by other specialties in the era of virtual interviews.

An Analysis of Solicitations From Predatory Journals in Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate trends associated with email communication from potentially predatory publishers to faculty in ophthalmology. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study METHODS: Ophthalmologists (n = 14) from various subspecialties and institutions were recruited to participate. Participants identified unsolicited emails that they had received originating from publishers in May 2021. Information collected included details on email contents and publisher organizations. Trends in communications from predatory publishers were evaluated. RESULTS: Over a 30-day study period, a total of 1813 emails were received from 383 unique publishers and 696 unique journals, with a mean (SD) of 4.73 (2.46) emails received per day per participant. Of the 1813 emails identified, 242 (13%) emails were invitations to conferences, whereas 1440 (80%) were solicitations for article submissions to open-access, pay-to-publish journals. A total of 522 (29.0%) emails were related to ophthalmology, and reference to a prior publication of the participant occurred in 262 emails (14%). Of the 696 unique journals identified, 174 (25%) journals were indexed on PubMed and 426 (61%) were listed on Beall's list. When comparing journals that were listed on PubMed vs those that were not, PubMed indexed journals had a higher impact factor (2.1 vs 1.5, P = .002), were less likely to use "greetings" (76% vs 91%, P < .001), had fewer spelling/grammar errors (40% vs 51%, P = .01), and were less likely to offer rapid publication (16% vs 25%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Unsolicited requests to publish occur frequently and may diminish the quality of the scientific literature. We encourage individuals in ophthalmology to be aware of these trends in predatory publishing.

Etiology and Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Eyelid Lacerations at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Purpose: To investigate the etiology and demographic associations of patients presenting with eyelid lacerations to a US level 1 trauma center emergency department (ED). Patient and Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients with eyelid lacerations presenting to the ED at a single level 1 trauma center was performed. Eyelid lacerations were categorized as simple eyelid lacerations, eyelid lacerations with eyelid margin involvement, and eyelid lacerations with nasolacrimal system involvement. Data on demographics and clinical characteristics were analyzed. Results: A total of 303 eyelid laceration cases were identified, 56% were simple eyelid lacerations, followed by 24% with nasolacrimal involvement and 20% involving the eyelid margin. Sixty percent of animal bites/scratches resulted in a nasolacrimal system involving laceration, most commonly affecting children. Falls were the most common etiology in children and patients over the age of 60. Black patients, patients presenting with concomitant ophthalmic injuries, and those with Medicaid insurance were more likely to have an assault etiology (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Falls were the most common etiology for eyelid lacerations in children and the elderly, while assault was the most common in adults. Identifying the most common etiology by demographic factors can help raise awareness regarding targeted prevention strategies for high-risk populations.

Corneal Transplant Rejection Postvaccination Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of corneal graft rejection after COVID and influenza vaccination. METHODS: Patients 65 years or older undergoing penetrating keratoplasty or endothelial keratoplasty any time between 2016 and 2021 followed by COVID or influenza vaccination in 2021 among the 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service database were included. Demographic and ocular history characteristics of patients with (cases) and without graft rejection (controls) were compared using the χ2 test. RESULTS: After COVID (n = 31,398) and influenza (n = 24,290) vaccination, 0.45% (n = 140) and 0.17% (n = 41) patients developed rejection within 90 days, respectively. There was no difference in the rate of graft rejection within 90 days relative to 90 to 180 days after vaccination after both COVID (90 days: 0.45% vs. 180 days: 0.61%, P = 0.37) and influenza (90 days: 0.17% vs. 180 days: 0.29%, P = 0.11) vaccines. For COVID vaccination, patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (n = 51, 0.97%; vs. endothelial keratoplasty = 89; 0.34%, P < 0.001), history of rejection up to 1 year before vaccination (n = 13; 1.30% vs. no history = 127, 0.42%; P < 0.001), and having an ocular comorbidity (n = 110, 0.54% vs. no ocular comorbidity = 30, 0.27%; P = 0.001) had higher rates of graft rejections, and most rejections were after 1 year postkeratoplasty (87.14%, n = 122). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of graft rejection postvaccination is low compared with the overall rates of rejection in the published literature. Most post-COVID vaccination graft rejections were after 1 year postkeratoplasty when corticosteroids are expected to have been tapered to lower doses. Surgeons may counsel patients regarding graft rejection symptoms, but overall low rates may not warrant pretreatment in low-risk keratoplasty patients.

All about traumatic cataracts: narrative review.

Ocular trauma is an important cause of monocular blindness worldwide. Injury to the lens after blunt or penetrating trauma is common and can result in vision impairment. Selecting the most appropriate therapeutic approaches depends on factors such as patients' age, mechanism of trauma, and underlying clinical conditions. Early management, especially within childhood, is essential because of the difficulties involved in examination; anatomical variations; as well as accompanying intraocular inflammation, amblyopia, or vitreoretinal adhesions. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology and clinical management of traumatic cataract, highlighting the significance of accurate diagnosis and selection of the optimal therapeutic approach.

Anti-inflammatory medication use after cataract surgery: online survey of practice patterns.

PURPOSE: To determine current prescribing patterns for topical or intraocular/periocular anti-inflammatory medications (AIMs) after routine cataract surgery. SETTING: kera-net online members. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to subscribers of kera-net, a global online platform sponsored by the Cornea Society. Questions were asked regarding the use of topical or intraocular/periocular AIM after cataract surgery and types of medications prescribed. RESULTS: Of 217 surgeon respondents (23% response rate), 171 (79%) practiced in the United States and 171 (79%) were cornea subspecialists. Most of the respondents (n = 196, 97%) prescribed topical corticosteroids after routine cataract surgery. The most frequently prescribed were prednisolone acetate (n = 162, 83%), followed by dexamethasone (n = 26, 13%), difluprednate (n = 24, 12%), and loteprednol etabonate (n = 13, 7%). Corticosteroids comprised (n = 40, 32%) of total intraocular/periocular injections, with triamcinolone acetonide 10 or 40 mg (n = 19, 47.5%) most commonly used. 23 surgeons (58%) who utilized intraocular/periocular corticosteroids also prescribed topical corticosteroids. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed postoperatively by 148 surgeons (73%). CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons prescribed topical AIM after routine cataract surgery. Many surgeons injected intraocular or periocular AIM while prescribing topical AIM. The diversity of practice patterns may reflect the lack of clear evidence-based guidelines.

Surgical Approach for Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance-Related Ocular Copper Deposition.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to present the surgical management of a patient with ocular copper deposition associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). METHODS: This is a case report of a 44-year-old man with MGUS who presented to us with bilateral diffuse deposition of copper in the cornea and lens. RESULTS: Despite initiating systemic therapy for MGUS, no corneal clearing was observed. A decision was made to proceed with cataract extraction in the left eye given worsening vision. Despite trypan blue staining and a central descemetorhexis, visualization remained too poor to complete phacoemulsification. Pars plana lensectomy and vitrectomy to remove the residual lens material and placement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens in the sulcus with endoillumination was subsequently performed. As vision in the left eye steadily improved postoperatively, cataract surgery was then performed in the right eye. With use of trypan blue, creation of a 6-mm central descemetorhexis, and a retinal light pipe for endoillumination anteriorly to augment visualization, capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification, and insertion of intraocular lens in the bag were completed without difficulty. The patient's vision improved at subsequent follow-ups, reaching a final best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20-1 in the right eye and 20/25-1 in the left eye. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular copper deposition is a rare manifestation of MGUS. Cataract extraction is challenging, often requiring advanced techniques. Endoillumination is useful to improve visualization through the dense corneal copper deposition.

Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Different Lens Pathology in Electronic Health Records.

PURPOSE: Nearly all published ophthalmology-related Big Data studies rely exclusively on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing codes to identify patients with particular ocular conditions. However, inaccurate or nonspecific codes may be used. We assessed whether natural language processing (NLP), as an alternative approach, could more accurately identify lens pathology. DESIGN: Database study comparing the accuracy of NLP versus ICD billing codes to properly identify lens pathology. METHODS: We developed an NLP algorithm capable of searching free-text lens exam data in the electronic health record (EHR) to identify the type(s) of cataract present, cataract density, presence of intraocular lenses, and other lens pathology. We applied our algorithm to 17.5 million lens exam records in the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) repository. We selected 4314 unique lens-exam entries and asked 11 clinicians to assess whether all pathology present in the entries had been correctly identified in the NLP algorithm output. The algorithm's sensitivity at accurately identifying lens pathology was compared with that of the ICD codes. RESULTS: The NLP algorithm correctly identified all lens pathology present in 4104 of the 4314 lens-exam entries (95.1%). For less common lens pathology, algorithm findings were corroborated by reviewing clinicians for 100% of mentions of pseudoexfoliation material and 99.7% for phimosis, subluxation, and synechia. Sensitivity at identifying lens pathology was better for NLP (0.98 [0.96-0.99] than for billing codes (0.49 [0.46-0.53]). CONCLUSIONS: Our NLP algorithm identifies and classifies lens abnormalities routinely documented by eye-care professionals with high accuracy. Such algorithms will help researchers to properly identify and classify ocular pathology, broadening the scope of feasible research using real-world data.

Utilizing a composite citation index for evaluating clinical ophthalmology research: insights into gender, nationality, and self-citation among top ophthalmology researchers.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of a composite citation score (c-score) and its six constituent citation indices, including H-index, in predicting winners of the Weisenfeld Award in ophthalmologic research. Secondary objectives were to explore career and demographic characteristics of the most highly cited researchers in ophthalmology. METHODS: A publicly available database was accessed to compile a set of top researchers in the field of clinical ophthalmology and optometry based on Scopus data from 1996 to 2021. Each citation index was used to construct a multivariable model adjusted for author demographic characteristics. Using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) analysis, each index's model was evaluated for its ability to predict winners of the Weisenfeld Award in Ophthalmology, a research distinction presented by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). Secondary analyses investigated authors' self-citation rates, career length, gender, and country affiliation over time. RESULTS: Approximately one thousand unique authors publishing primarily in clinical ophthalmology/optometry were analyzed. The c-score outperformed all other citation indices at predicting Weisenfeld Awardees, with an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.0). The H-index had an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96). Authors with higher c-scores tended to have longer career lengths and similar self-citation rates compared to other authors. Sixteen percent of authors in the database were identified as female, and 64% were affiliated with the United States of America. CONCLUSION: The c-score is an effective metric for assessing research impact in ophthalmology, as seen through its ability to predict Weisenfeld Awardees.

Trends of Surgery, Patient, and Surgeon Characteristics for Corneal Transplants in the Medicare Population From 2011 to 2020.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe recent trends in corneal transplants and patient and surgeon characteristics for corneal transplants that occurred in the Medicare population. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study using Current Procedural Terminology codes. We identified Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) claims for different types of corneal transplant procedures performed on Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older from 2011 to 2020. Number and types of corneal transplants performed each year and patient and surgeon demographics and characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 148,981 corneal transplants performed by 2972 surgeons within the study period. Most corneal transplants performed were endothelial keratoplasties (70.1%). Most patients were women (60.3%) and White (85.8%). 18.2% of patients lived in a rural area, whereas only 3.5% of transplants occurred in a rural area and 5% of surgeons practiced in a rural area. Male surgeons represented 77.8% of all surgeons and performed 84.9% of all corneal transplants in the study period. The proportion of corneal transplants performed by female surgeons gradually increased over time, from 12.1% in 2011 to 19.0% in 2020. The proportion of female surgeons also increased from 16.2% in 2011 to 23.8% in 2020. Most surgeons (67%) performed <6 corneal transplants per year. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of female corneal transplant surgeons has increased over time, women remain underrepresented in the surgical workforce. Further investigation should be conducted to identify the underlying reason and address the identified disparities within the landscape of corneal transplantation.

Early Endophthalmitis Incidence and Risk Factors after Glaucoma Surgery in the Medicare Population from 2016 to 2019.

PURPOSE: To determine early endophthalmitis incidence and risk factors after glaucoma surgeries in the Medicare population. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries in the United States aged 65 years or older undergoing glaucoma surgery. METHODS: Medicare claims were used to identify all patients who underwent glaucoma, cataract, or combined cataract/glaucoma surgery from 2016 to 2019. Endophthalmitis cases within 42 days of the index surgery were identified using the diagnostic codes. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with postoperative endophthalmitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 42-day postoperative endophthalmitis incidence and risk factors associated with endophthalmitis after glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: There were 466 928 glaucoma surgeries, of which 310 823 (66.6%) were combined with cataract surgery. Cataract surgeries alone (n = 8 460 360) served as a reference group. Microinvasive glaucoma surgeries constituted most glaucoma procedures performed (67.8%), followed by trabeculectomy (14.0%), tube shunt (10.9%), and other procedures (7.3%). There were 572 cases of endophthalmitis identified after all glaucoma surgeries. Endophthalmitis incidence after glaucoma, combined cataract/glaucoma, and cataract surgeries alone was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.7), 1.1 (95% CI, 1.0-1.2), and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.8-0.8) per 1000 procedures, respectively. The median day of diagnosis of endophthalmitis was later for glaucoma surgeries (16.5 days) compared with combined cataract/glaucoma or cataract surgeries alone (8 and 6 days, respectively). Compared with microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), tube shunts were the only surgery type to be a significant risk factor for endophthalmitis for both stand-alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8, P = 0.002) and combined surgery (aOR 1.8, P = 0.047). The other risk factor for both stand-alone (aOR 1.1, P = 0.001) and combined (aOR 1.06, P = 0.049) surgeries was the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Age (aOR 1.03, P = 0.004) and male gender (1.46, P = 0.001) were significant risk factors for combined cataract and glaucoma surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with cataract surgery, early endophthalmitis incidence was higher for both glaucoma and combined cataract/glaucoma surgeries, with the highest incidence among tube shunts. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

The Risk of Sympathetic Ophthalmia Associated with Open-Globe Injury Management Strategies: A Meta-analysis.

TOPIC: Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a sight-threatening granulomatous panuveitis caused by a sensitizing event. Primary enucleation or primary evisceration, versus primary repair, as a risk management strategy after open-globe injury (OGI) remains controversial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This systematic review was conducted to report the incidence of SO after primary repair compared with that of after primary enucleation or primary evisceration. This enabled the reporting of an estimated number needed to treat. METHODS: Five journal databases were searched. This review was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier, CRD42021262616). Searches were carried out on June 29, 2021, and were updated on December 10, 2022. Prospective or retrospective studies that reported outcomes (including SO or lack of SO) in a patient population who underwent either primary repair and primary enucleation or primary evisceration were included. A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled SO rates and absolute risk reduction (ARR). RESULTS: Eight studies reporting SO as an outcome were included in total. The included studies contained 7500 patients and 7635 OGIs. In total, 7620 OGIs met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis; SO developed in 21 patients with OGI. When all included studies were pooled, the estimated SO rate was 0.12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00%-0.25%) after OGI. Of 779 patients who underwent primary enucleation or primary evisceration, no SO cases were reported, resulting in a pooled SO estimate of 0.05% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.21%). For primary repair, the pooled estimate of SO rate was 0.15% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.33%). The ARR using a random effects model was -0.0010 (in favour of eye removal; 95% CI, -0.0031 [in favor of eye removal] to 0.0011 [in favor of primary repair]). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations analysis highlighted a low certainty of evidence because the included studies were observational, and a risk of bias resulted from missing data. DISCUSSION: Based on the available data, no evidence exists that primary enucleation or primary evisceration reduce the risk of secondary SO. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Visual Acuity Outcomes and Complications after Intraocular Lens Exchange: An IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess risk factors for worse visual acuity (VA) outcomes after intraocular lens (IOL) exchange, and the most common postsurgical complications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes from patients 18 years of age and older in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) that underwent IOL exchange in the United States between 2013 and 2019. METHODS: Vision improvement compared with baseline was determined at 1 year after surgery. A multivariable generalized estimating equation model adjusting for demographic factors and baseline vision was used to identify factors associated with VA worse than 20/40 at 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual outcomes and postoperative complications after lens exchange. RESULTS: A total of 46 063 procedures (n = 41 925 unique patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, VA improved from a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 0.53 ± 0.58 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/70) before surgery to a mean ± SD of 0.31 ± 0.40 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) at 1 year. Among eyes with VA recorded at both baseline and 1 year after surgery, 60.5% achieved VA of 20/40 or better at 1 year. Vision of worse than 20/40 at 1 year was associated with greater age (odds ratio [OR], 1.16 per 5-year increase; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.18) and higher logMAR baseline VA (OR, 1.14 per 0.1-logMAR increase; 95% CI, 1.14-1.15), as well as Black or African American (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.68-2.28), Hispanic (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.59-2.08), and Asian (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.21-1.81) race or ethnicity versus White race, Medicaid (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.40-2.25) versus private insurance, smoking history (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.35), and concurrent anterior (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.51-1.81) and posterior (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.41-1.66) vitrectomy versus no vitrectomy. Female sex was associated with better VA at 1 year. At 1 year, epiretinal membrane (10.9%), mechanical lens complication (9.4%), and dislocation of the replacement lens (7.1%) were the most common complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this large national cohort, the annual number of IOL exchanges rose steadily over time. Vision improved in 60.2% of patients; worse visual outcomes were associated with greater age, worse baseline vision, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid insurance, smoking, and concurrent vitrectomy. Epiretinal membrane was the most common complication. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Disparities in Promotion and Retention Rates Among Underrepresented in Medicine Faculty in U.S. Ophthalmology Departments.

PURPOSE: This study examines the rates and trends of faculty promotions within the field of ophthalmology, with comparative emphasis on the rates of promotion among underrepresented in medicine (URiM) faculty. DESIGN: A retrospective panel study was conducted using the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster database. METHODS: We used the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster data to assess trends in academic faculty promotions within U.S. ophthalmology departments. Full-time assistant and associate professors appointed between 2000 and 2010 were included in the analysis, and tracked until November 2021 to determine promotion rates. Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate differences in promotion and retention rates based on gender, race and ethnicity, advanced degree, and tenure status. RESULTS: The demographics of 1436 assistant and 680 associate faculty members were obtained for analysis through the Association of American Medical Colleges. Black faculty had lower promotion rates when compared with White faculty (20% vs 37%, P < .001). Faculty with MD and PhD degrees demonstrated higher promotion rates than faculty with MD degrees alone (59% vs 36%, P < .001). In addition, faculty not on tenure track had lower rates of promotion than those on tenure track (35% vs 48%, P < .001). With respect to faculty retention, among assistant and associate professors combined, Black faculty and faculty without tenure track appointments were more likely to leave academic medicine (46% vs 33%, P < .001) and (36% vs 27%, P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, promotion rates varied significantly by race/ethnicity. Specifically, Black faculty had lower rates of promotion and retention in academic medicine. These findings underscore the need to explore and implement strategies and policies to address equity in promotion rates and retention of URiM faculty within academic ophthalmology.

Infectious Keratitis After Keratoplasty in the United States: Analysis of a National Medicare Claims Data Set.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, trends, and risk factors of infectious keratitis (IK) and subsequent repeat keratoplasty after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and endothelial keratoplasty (EK). METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort study design, IK cases within 6 months of keratoplasty were identified using billing codes among 100% Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who underwent either PK or EK between 2011 and 2020. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with postkeratoplasty IK. RESULTS: We identified 115,588 keratoplasties, of which 20.0% (n = 23,144) were PK and 80.0% (n = 92,444) were EK. IK developed within 6 months with a rate of 3.32% (n = 769) post-PK and 0.72% (n = 666) post-EK. Overall rates of IK decreased from 16.05 to 9.61 per 1000 keratoplasties between 2011 and 2020 ( P < 0.001). The median interval between keratoplasty and diagnosis of IK was 73 days (interquartile range: 29-114 days) for PK and 74 days (interquartile range: 38-116 days) for EK. After IK, 22.9% (n = 176) and 23.8% (n = 159) eyes underwent repeat keratoplasty within 1 year for PK and EK, respectively. The occurrence of IK after PK was associated with age 85 years and older [odds ratio (OR): 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.68] relative to patients aged 65 to 74 years. The occurrence of IK after EK was also associated with age 85 years and older (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.14-1.82) relative to patients aged 65 to 74 years. CONCLUSIONS: IK was 4 times more common after PK than EK and the complication was associated with older age. Our findings may help corneal surgeons in counseling patients at higher risk and guiding their postoperative care.

Epidemiology of ophthalmic trauma in the United States from 2009-2018: A Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence, characteristics, disposition, and economic burden of emergency department (ED) visits for ophthalmic trauma in the United States (US). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample was used to calculate and characterize ED visits for ophthalmic trauma in the US from 2009 to 2018. Linear regression was used to estimate trends in annual incidence and mean inflation-adjusted ED charges. Logistic regression was used to assess variables associated with inpatient admission. RESULTS: There were over 7.3 million ED visits for ophthalmic trauma in the US over the 10 years, with an annual incidence of 233 per 100,000 population. Patients were predominantly male (65 %), 21-44 years old (39 %), and from low-income households (56 %). Only 1 % of patients were hospitalized. Older age, male sex, metropolitan teaching hospitals, and trauma centers were associated with significantly higher odds of inpatient admission. The mean inflation-adjusted ED charge per visit more than doubled over the decade ($1,333 to $3,187) with total charges exceeding $14 billion. Superficial injuries (44 %) and eyelid/orbit wounds (20 %) accounted for the majority of visits. Orbital floor fractures (4 %) and open globe injuries (2 %) accounted for a minority of visits but were responsible for most admissions (49 % and 29 %, respectively) and the highest mean ED charge ($7,157 and $6,808, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmic trauma represents an increasingly significant burden to EDs in the US. Preventive efforts should target young males from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Strategies to improve outpatient access and redirect non-urgent injuries may help alleviate costs.

Endophthalmitis rates and risk factors following intraocular surgeries in the medicare population from 2016 to 2019.

AIMS: To determine endophthalmitis rates and risk factors following intraocular surgeries in the Medicare population. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study from 2016 to 2019 in Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. 100% Medicare claims were used to identify eyes that underwent intraocular surgery. Exclusion criteria included eyes that had intraocular surgery 42 days before or after and eyes in patients with a history of endophthalmitis within 12 months. RESULTS: 9 744 400 intraocular surgeries were performed among Medicare beneficiaries from 2016 to 2019. A 42-day postoperative endophthalmitis rate was 0.09%. Endophthalmitis rate by surgery type was 0.43% for corneal transplant, 0.36% for secondary intraocular lens (IOL), 0.24% for retina, 0.16% for glaucoma, 0.11% for cataract combined with other procedures and 0.08% for cataract surgeries alone. On multivariable analysis, the risk of endophthalmitis was increased for all intraocular surgery types when compared with cataract surgeries; adjusted OR (aOR) 5.30 (p<0.01) for corneal transplant, aOR 4.50 (p<0.01) for secondary IOL, aOR 3.00 (p<0.01) for retina, aOR 1.93 (p<0.01) for glaucoma, aOR 1.45 (p<0.01) for combined cataract surgeries. Increased risk of developing endophthalmitis was associated with older age (≥85 vs 65-75 years: aOR 1.36; p<0.01), male sex (aOR 1.20; p<0.001) and greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (≥7 vs 0: aOR 1.79; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative endophthalmitis rate after intraocular surgeries was 0.09% between 2016 and 2019 for Medicare beneficiaries. Endophthalmitis rates were highest for corneal transplant surgeries followed by secondary IOL surgeries and lowest for cataract surgeries. Older age, male gender and higher comorbidity index were associated with risk of endophthalmitis.