Evolving treatment paradigms for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: An update narrative review.

Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) refers to disease progression within 6 months after the completion of platinum-based chemotherapy. Historically, treatment options for PROC were limited with a poor prognosis and non-platinum single agent plus bevacizumab has been the mainstay of treatment. Fortunately, there have been notable advancements in recent years, leading to an advance in treatment paradigms for this challenging disease. Various combinations of chemotherapy, targeted agents such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and immunotherapy are being explored for an improved treatment outcome. Antibody-drug conjugates targeting folate receptor alpha, which deliver a cytotoxic payload directly to cancer cells, have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for PROC. WEE1 inhibitors, such as adavosertib, function by inhibiting the WEE1 kinase activity, leading to premature entry of a cell into mitosis phase and thus increased DNA damage. It has been observed that cancer cells with TP53 mutations may be more sensitive to WEE1 inhibitors. Biomarker testing such as analysis of the expression level of folate receptor alpha or mutation in TP53 may be applicable for identifying patients who are more likely to respond to the specific therapy, enabling a more personalized treatment approach. This overview summarizes key clinical findings on the efficacy and safety of theses novel biomarker-driven therapeutic approaches.

How Progesterone Receptor Expression Impacts Platinum Sensitivity in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: Insights from Clinical and Experimental Perspectives.

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is often considered a relatively platinum-resistant malignancy. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of progesterone receptor (PR) expression levels on platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes in people with OCCC. A retrospective analysis was conducted with 80 people with OCCC who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. PR expression was assessed via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and quantified using the H score. The platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes of patients with weak and strong PR expression were compared. Additionally, cisplatin viability and migration experiments were conducted with OCCC cell lines (ES-2 and TOV-21G) with varying PR isoform expressions. Among the 80 patients, 62 were classified as having platinum-sensitive disease, while 18 had platinum-resistant disease. The mean total PR H- score of platinum-sensitive tumors was significantly higher than that of platinum-resistant tumors (p = 0.002). Although no significant differences in progression-free and overall survival were observed between patients with high and low PR expression, those with high PR expression tended to have longer survival. While PR protein was only weakly detectable in ES-2 and TOV-21G cells, a transfection of the PR-A or PR-B gene resulted in a strong expression of PR-A or PR-B, which led to significantly reduced proliferation and migration in ES-2 and TOV-21G cells. Furthermore, overexpression of PR-A or PR-B enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity in these cell lines. In conclusion, strong PR expression was associated with improved platinum sensitivity and survival outcomes, consistent with our experimental findings. The potential of PR as a tumor sensitizer to cisplatin in OCCC warrants further investigation.

Consistency in human papillomavirus type detection between self-collected vaginal specimens and physician-sampled cervical specimens.

With the rising need for accessible cervical cancer screening, self-sampling methods offer a promising alternative to traditional physician-led sampling. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the HygeiaTouch Self Sampling Kit for Women in detecting human papillomavirus (HPV) types and predicting cervical lesions. We studied the concordance in identifying high-risk HPV (hrHPV) types between samples collected by physicians and those self-collected by women using a self-sampling kit for validation. Women aged 21-65, fitting into specific categories based on their cervical health history were eligible. Cohen's kappa coefficient to gauge concordance between the two specimen types and relative accuracy metrics in identifying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were also calculated, with physician-sampled specimens serving as a reference. A total of 1210 participants from three institutes were involved. The self-sampling kit closely matched the physician-led method in terms of collecting valid specimens (100% vs. 100%), identifying hrHPV types (kappa: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.72-0.79; agreement: 87.7%, 95% CI: 85.8-89.6) and predicting CIN grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) (relative sensitivity: 0.949, relative accuracy: 0.959). Kappa values varied between 0.71 and 0.83 for different hrHPV types and combinations, with an overall value 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79) signifying robust compatibility between the two methods. Our study underscores the potential of the HygeiaTouch Self Sampling Kit as a reliable, efficient, and user-friendly alternative to traditional sampling methods. This suggests that self-sampling could be pivotal in expanding cervical cancer screening accessibility and enhancing detection rates.

Integration of pretreatment tumor markers in a nomogram model for prognostic prediction of FIGO stage I endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, the prognosis of patients with FIGO stage I endometrial cancer is determined by clinicopathological risk factors. In this study, we assessed the potential contribution of pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125) levels to estimating the prognosis of these patients and aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with FIGO stage I endometrial cancer who underwent treatment between January 2009 and December 2021 in the four institutes of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. To identify optimal cutoff values of CEA and CA-125 for predicting survival, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, and a Cox regression model was used to analyze the independent prognostic factors. Finally, a nomogram and calibration curve were constructed to predict patient survival probability. RESULTS: Of the 1559 patients evaluated, the optimal cutoff values of CEA and CA-125 were 1.44 ng/mL (area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.601) and 39.77 U/mL (AUC 0.503), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that pretreatment CEA (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.35-3.28), CA-125 (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.31-3.27), age >70 years (HR 12.54, 95% CI 5.05-31.11), myometrial invasion >50% (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.03-2.73), non-endometrioid histology (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.14-2.95), high-grade tumor (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.46-3.97), and lymphovascular space invasion (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.26-4.25) were significant variables associated with overall survival. These factors were used to construct the nomogram model, which showed good concordance and accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of pretreatment CEA and CA-125 in a prognostic nomogram is feasible. Our prediction model has the potential to assist clinicians in guiding appropriate clinical practice.