A Decision Aid to Support Tubal Sterilization Decision-Making Among Pregnant Women: The MyDecision/MiDecisión Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tubal sterilization is common, especially among individuals with low income. There is substantial misunderstanding about sterilization among those who have undergone the procedure, suggesting suboptimal decision-making about a method that permanently ends reproductive capacity. Objective: To test the efficacy of a web-based decision aid for improving tubal sterilization decision quality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial conducted between March 2020 and November 2023 included English- or Spanish-speaking pregnant cisgender women aged 21 to 45 years who had Medicaid insurance and were contemplating tubal sterilization after delivery. Participants were recruited from outpatient obstetric clinics in 3 US cities. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to usual care (control arm) or to usual care plus a web-based decision aid (MyDecision/MiDecisión) (intervention arm). The aid includes written, audio, and video information about tubal sterilization procedures; an interactive table comparing contraceptive options; values-clarifying exercises; knowledge checks; and a summary report. Main Outcomes and Measures: The co-primary outcomes were tubal sterilization knowledge and decisional conflict regarding the contraceptive decision. Knowledge was measured as the percentage of correct responses to 10 true-false items. Decisional conflict was measured using the low-literacy Decision Conflict Scale, with lower scores on a range from 0 to 100 indicating less conflict. Results: Among the 350 participants, mean (SD) age was 29.7 (5.1) years. Compared with the usual care group, participants randomized to the decision aid had significantly higher tubal sterilization knowledge (mean [SD] proportion of questions answered correctly, 76.5% [16.9%] vs 55.6% [22.6%]; P < .001) and lower decisional conflict scores (mean [SD], 12.7 [16.6] vs 18.7 [20.8] points; P = .002). The greatest knowledge differences between the 2 groups were for items about permanence, with more participants in the intervention arm answering correctly that tubal sterilization is not easily reversible (90.1% vs 39.3%; odds ratio [OR], 14.2 [95% CI, 7.9-25.4]; P < .001) and that the tubes do not spontaneously "come untied" (86.6% vs 33.7%; OR, 13.0 [95% CI, 7.6-22.4]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: MyDecision/MiDecisión significantly improved tubal sterilization decision-making quality compared with usual care only. This scalable decision aid can be implemented into clinical practice to supplement practitioner counseling. These results are particularly important given the recent increase in demand for permanent contraception after the US Supreme Court decision overturning federal abortion protections. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04097717.

Global inequities in cesarean section deliveries and required resources persist.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the global distribution and financial cost associated with the inequities present in the use of cesarean sections (CS) worldwide. STUDY DESIGN: We used the latest estimates on CS rates published by WHO and we adopted 10-15 % as the range of CS rates that are considered optimal for adequate use. We calculated the cost (in USD) to achieve CS rates of 10-15 % for countries that reported rates below 10 %. We also calculated the cost of CS rates in excess (>15 % and > 20 %) by estimating how much it would cost to reduce the rates to 10-15 % for each of those countries. RESULTS: 137 countries are included in this analysis with updated data on CS rates between the years 2010 and 2018. Our analysis found that 36 countries reported CS rates < 10 %, whereas 91 countries reported CS rates > 15 % (a majority of which were > 20 %); only 10 countries reported CS rates between 10 and 15 %. The cost of CS exceeding a rate of 15 % is estimated to be $9,586,952,466 including inflation and exceeding 20 % is $7.169.248.033 (USD). The cost of achieving "needed" CS among countries with CS rates < 10 % is $612,609,418 (USD). The cost of cesarean sections exceeding 15 % has increased by 313 % between 2008 and more recent years, accruing $7 billion (USD) more in surplus since 2008. The reallocation of CS funding would save the global economy $9 billion (USD). CONCLUSION: Global inequities in CS performed and associated costs have increased since 2008, resulting in a disproportionate number of resources allocated.

Calculation of the contribution of water to calcium intake in low- and middle-income countries.

Dietary calcium intake is low in many countries, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Water is often overlooked as a source of dietary calcium despite it being universally consumed and providing good calcium bioavailability. Our objective was to assess water distribution systems in LMICs and to develop a formula to simulate the contribution of different water sources to calcium availability. We calculated the contribution of drinking water considering different calcium concentration levels to estimate total calcium availability. We consider a country's households' access to drinking water sources and the distribution of the country's population by age and gender. Calcium availability could be increased by an average of 49 mg of calcium per person per day in the 62 countries assessed if calcium in drinking water was considered. In 22 (31%) of the countries studied, 80% of households are supplied by water sources that could increase calcium availability. Improving calcium concentration in water could be considered as a strategy in LMICs to slightly improve calcium availability.