Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Treat Res Commun ; 35: 100694, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36868002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. As the molecular mechanism for liver metastasis of CRC has not yet been completely discovered, identification of hub genes and pathways of this disease is of importance for revealing potential molecular mechanism of colorectal cancer progression. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers and survival analysis of hub genes for CRC treatment. METHODS: The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between colorectal cancer liver metastasis and primary tumor were screened using microarray data from two datasets GSE179979, GSE144259 obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed for DEGs using DAVID database, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the Cytoscape software, and module analysis was performed using MCODE. Then, overall survival (OS), progression free interval (PFI) and disease specific survival (DSS) analysis of hub genes was performed by using TCGA database. The correlations between hub genes and clinical values were validated through CRN and immunohistochemistry (IHC) stain. RESULTS: A total of 64 DEGs were obtained, KEGG pathway analysis showed that the significant pathways included PPAR signaling pathway, Complement and coagulation cascades. Four hub genes (ITIH2, ALB, CPB2, HGFAC) and two biomarkers (CPB2, HGFAC) with significantly prognostic values were verified by Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. CONCLUSIONS: CPB2 and HGFAC may serve as new biomarkers in diagnosing liver metastasis of CRC or potential drug target.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Transcriptoma , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Biología Computacional
2.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ; 39: 100465, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36935858

RESUMEN

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the different response patterns after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and their predictive value in local control and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and methods: Seventy-two HCC patients who were treated with SBRT during 2015-2020 were included in this retrospective study. The assessment was made using MRI, CT, and PET-CT. Local and systemic responses were determined according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria during follow up. Patients were categorized as early responders (complete response during 6 months after radiotherapy) or non-early responders (the rest of the patients). Prognostic factors were determined using multivariate logistic models. Results: The median follow-up was 24.0 months (range, 7.7-74.5 months). We found that 84.7%(61/72) of patients achieved a complete response. Early responses occurred in 45 patients (45/72, 62.5%), and they had 1-, 2-, and 5- year intrahepatic outfield-free survival (OutFFS) rates of 86.2%, 80.3%, and 76.3% vs. 55.3%, 44.7%, and 33.5% in non-early responses patients, whereas the 1-, 2-, and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 95.5%, 84.5% and 79.5% and 74.1%, 56.2% and 56.2%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 97.7%, 92.1%, 79.1%, and 85.2%, 53.8%, and 40.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that early tumor response was an independent predictor of OutFFS, DMFS, and OS. Conclusions: Early complete tumor response within 6 months after radiotherapy predicted better intrahepatic outfield-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival outcomes. Confirmation is warranted for early response on SBRT to guide decision making.

3.
Transl Oncol ; 25: 101492, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35944415

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate whether dosimetric parameters affect the intrahepatic out-field recurrence or distant metastasis-free survival following the stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients with HCC who were treated with SBRT from January 2015 to May 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The main clinical endpoints considered were intrahepatic out-field free survival (OutFFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). The target parameters and the liver were documented including tumor diameters, gross tumor volume (GTV), Liver minus GTV volume (LGV), and Liver minus GTV mean dose (LGD). Multivariable Cox regression with forward stepwise selection was performed to identify independent risk factors for OutFFS and DMFS. Maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine the most informative cut-off value for age and LGD. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 28.2 months (range, 7.7-74.5 months). LGD higher than 12.54 Gy [HR, 0.861(0.747-0.993); p = 0.040] and age greater than 67-year-old [HR, 0.966(0.937-0.997); p = 0.030] are two independent predictors of OutFFS, previous TACE treatment [HR, 0.117(0.015-0.891); p = 0.038] was an independent predictor of DMFS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that the higher the dose received by the normal liver (greater than 12.54 Gy) the better the intrahepatic out-field recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. Further study is warranted to confirm and to better understand this phenomenon.

4.
J BUON ; 26(5): 1950-1957, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34761604

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of different peri-operative regimens using the network meta-analysis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal/hepatic vein tumor thrombosis. The interested modalities included neoadjuvant three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-CRT), post-operative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), post-operative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 3DCRT plus TACE and surgery alone. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published up to March 2021. Data related to treatment efficacy including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were extracted and compared using a Bayesian approach. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Five studies published between 2009 and 2021 were enrolled in this network meta-analysis. The comparison showed that surgery with IMRT ranks relatively higher in prolonging OS in advanced HCC patients, followed by neoadjuvant 3DCRT and surgery plus TACE. Neoadjuvant 3DCRT and postoperative IMRT appear to be better choices than 3DCRT plus TACE in terms of OS. IMRT, TACE and neoadjuvant 3DCRT group were all superior to surgery alone in terms of DFS. The rate of AEs did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant IMRT showed more favorable treatment responses compared to other regimens in HCC patients as a peri-operative regimen.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundario , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Venas Hepáticas , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Vena Porta , China , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J BUON ; 26(3): 889-896, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34268950

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of different perioperative regimens using network meta-analysis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with hepatic/portal vein thrombosis. The interested modalities included neoadjuvant three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), post-operative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). post-operative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and surgery alone. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published up to November 2020. Data related to treatment efficacy including overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were extracted and compared using a Bayesian approach. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Four studies published between 2005 and 2020 involving a total of 422 patients were enrolled in this network meta-analysis. The comparison showed that surgery with IMRT ranked relatively higher in prolonging OS in advanced HCC patients, followed by neoadjuvant 3DCRT and surgery plus TACE. Postoperative IMRT appeared better choice in terms of DFS. The rate of AEs did not significantly differ. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant IMRT showed more favorable treatment responses compared with other regimens in HCC patients with hepatic/portal vein thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Venas Hepáticas , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Vena Porta , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , China , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA