CTR > 0.7 predicts the subgroup of lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm at risk of poor outcome treated by sublobar resection compared to lobar resection.

BACKGROUND: A standard surgical procedure for patients with small early-stage lung adenocarcinomas remains unknown. Hence, we aim in this study to assess the clinical utility of the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) when treating patients with small (2 cm) early stage lung cancers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 298 sublobar resection and 266 lobar resection recipients for early stage lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm was assembled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between 2016 and 2019. To compare survival rates among the different groups, Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated, and the log-rank test was used. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was constructed utilizing variables that were significant in univariate analysis of survival. RESULTS: In the study, 564 patients were included, with 298 patients (52.8%) undergoing sublobar resection and 266 patients (47.2%) undergoing lobar resection. Regarding survival results, there was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS, P = 0.674) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS, P = 0.253) between the two groups. Cox regression analyses showed that CTR ≥ 0.75(P < 0.001), age > 56 years (P = 0.007), and sublobar resection(P = 0.001) could predict worse survival. After examining survival results based on CTR categorization, we segmented the individuals into three categories: CTR<0.7, 0.7 ≤ CTR<1, and CTR = 1.The lobar resection groups had more favorable clinical outcomes than the sublobar resection groups in both the 0.7 ≤ CTR < 1(RFS: P < 0.001, OS: P = 0.001) and CTR = 1(RFS: P = 0.001, OS: P = 0.125). However, for patients with 0 ≤ CTR < 0.7, no difference in either RFS or OS was found between the lobar resection and sublobar resection groups, all of which had no positive events. Patients with a CTR between 0.7 and 1 who underwent lobar resection had similar 5-year RFS and OS rates compared to those with a CTR between 0 and 0.7 who underwent sublobar resection (100% vs. 100%). Nevertheless, a CTR of 1 following lobar resection resulted in notably reduced RFS and OS when compared to a CTR between 0.7 and 1 following lobar resection (P = 0.005 and P = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lobar resection is associated with better long-term survival outcomes than sublobar resection for small lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm and CTR ≥ 0.7.

Prognostic implication of consolidation-to-tumor ratio in early lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Background: The threshold value of consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) for distinguishing between ground-glass opacity (GGO)-predominant and solid-predominant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) needs to be clarified, as the lack of clarity has caused the prognostic implications to remain ambiguous. This study aimed to determine the threshold value of CTR for distinguishing between GGO-predominant GGNs and solid-predominant GGNs and elucidate the prognostic implications of the solid-predominant GGNs categorized by CTR on c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2018, 764 c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma cases were assembled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Of the 764 lesions, 515 (67.4%) were nodules with a GGO component, and 249 (32.6%) were solid nodules (SNs) on thin-section computed tomography (CT). We evaluated the correlation of the 3-dimensional (3D) consolidation component volume ratio with CTR based on the coefficient of determination, r. After receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of 515 GGNs, we defined the nodule with CTR >0.750 as solid-predominant GGN and the nodule with CTR ≤0.750 as GGO-predominant GGN. Subsequently, the prognosis of 439 patients who had follow-up registration was evaluated. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was employed to compare survival rates among different groups. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to evaluate the independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Among 764 patients, 515 (67.4%) were nodules with a GGO component, and 249 (32.6%) were SNs on thin-section CT. For 515 GGNs, the 3D consolidation component volume ratio correlated well with CTR (r=0.888). CTR tended to be slightly larger than the 3D consolidation component volume ratio. A 3D consolidation component volume ratio >50% was best predicted by CTR >0.750, followed by CTR >0.549. CTR >0.750 and CTR >0.549 predicted 3D consolidation component volume ratio >50% with 85% and 99.2% sensitivity and 91.6% and 57.2% specificity, respectively. The 5-year RFS and overall survival (OS) of patients with 0.750< CTR <1 were worse than those of patients with 0≤ CTR ≤0.750 (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) but better than those of patients with CTR =1 (P=0.002 and P=0.03, respectively). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) >2.1 [hazard ratio (HR) =12.516, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.729-90.598], CTR >0.750 (HR =13.934, 95% CI: 3.341-58.123), larger consolidation component size with diameter more than 20 mm (HR =1.855, 95% CI: 1.242-2.770), poorly differentiated (HR =1.622, 95% CI: 1.056-2.491), lymph node metastasis (HR =2.473, 95% CI: 1.601-3.821), and sublobar resection (HR =2.596, 95% CI: 1.701-3.962) could predict the poor prognosis. Patients with 0≤ CTR ≤0.750 receiving sublobar resection had prognoses comparable to those receiving lobar resection, whether the tumor size ≤2 cm or consolidation component size ≤3 cm. Lobar resection was superior to sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm with CTR >0.750. Conclusions: Compared to CTR =0.5, the 2-dimensional (2D) CTR =0.750 found using the 3D consolidation component volume ratio as the gold standard better differentiated between solid-predominant GGNs and GGO-predominant GGNs. CTR >0.750 was an independent risk factor associated with the poor prognosis of patients with c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Sublobar resection should be cautiously adopted in GGNs with 0.750< CTR ≤1.

Potential application of peripheral blood biomarkers in intracranial aneurysms.

Intracranial aneurysm (IA) counts are increasing yearly, with a high mortality and disability after rupture. Current diagnosis and treatment rely on costly equipment, lacking effective indicators for progression prediction and specific drugs for treatment. Recently, peripheral blood biomarkers, as common clinical test samples, reflecting the immune and inflammatory state of the body in real-time, have shown promise in providing additional information for risk stratification and treatment in IA patients, which may improve their outcomes after aneurysm rupture through anti-inflammatory therapy. Therefore, this paper reviewed the progress of potential biomarkers of IAs, including inflammatory blood indicators, cytokines, and blood lipids, aiming to aid individual management and therapy of aneurysms in clinical practices.