RESUMEN
Recent advancements have elucidated the multifaceted roles of the Schlafen (SLFN) family, including SLFN5, SLFN11, SLFN12, SLFN13, and SLFN14, which are implicated in immunological responses. However, little is known about the roles of this gene family in relation to malignancy development. The current study aimed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic potential of Schlafen family genes in colorectal adenocarcinoma (COAD) through bioinformatics analysis. Leveraging advanced bioinformatics tools of bulk RNA-sequencing and single-cell sequencing, we conducted in-depth analyses of gene expressions, functional enrichment, and survival patterns of patients with colorectal cancer compared to normal tissue. Among Schlafen family genes, the transcription levels of SLFN5 in COAD tissues were significantly elevated and correlated with poor survival outcomes. Furthermore, SLFN5 regulated the immune response via Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transduction and activator of transcription (STAT)/interferon (IFN)-alpha/beta signaling. These chemokines in inflammation are associated with diabetes and metabolism, suggesting their involvement in altered cellular energetics for COAD progress. In addition, an immune cell deconvolution analysis indicated a correlation between SLFN5 expression and immune-related cell populations, such as regulatory T cells (Tregs). These findings highlighted the potential clinical significance of SLFN5 in COAD and provided insights into its involvement in the tumor microenvironment and immune regulation. Meanwhile, the drug discovery data of SFLN5 with potential targeted small molecules suggested its therapeutic potential for COAD. Collectively, the current research demonstrated that SFLN5 play crucial roles in tumor development and serve as a prospective biomarker for COAD.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/inmunología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Análisis de la Célula Individual/métodos , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biología Computacional/métodos , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Transducción de Señal/genética , Transducción de Señal/inmunología , Proteínas de Ciclo CelularRESUMEN
Malaria eradication efforts prioritize safe and efficient vaccination strategies, although none with high-level efficacy against malaria infection are yet available. Among several vaccine candidates, Sanaria® PfSPZ Vaccine and Sanaria PfSPZ-CVac are, respectively, live radiation- and chemo-attenuated sporozoite vaccines designed to prevent infection with Plasmodium falciparum, the leading cause of malaria-related morbidity and mortality. We are conducting a randomized normal saline placebo-controlled trial called IDSPZV1 that will analyze the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of PfSPZ Vaccine and PfSPZ-CVac administered pre-deployment to malaria-naive Indonesian soldiers assigned to temporary duties in a high malaria transmission area. We describe the manifold challenges of enrolling and immunizing 345 soldier participants at their home base in western Indonesia before their nearly 6,000-km voyage to eastern Indonesia, where they are being monitored for incident P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria cases during 9 months of exposure. The unique regulatory, ethical, and operational complexities of this trial demonstrate the importance of thorough planning, frequent communication, and close follow-up with stakeholders. Effective engagement with the military community and the ability to adapt to unanticipated events have proven key to the success of this trial.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Malaria , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria Vivax , Personal Militar , Plasmodium falciparum , Esporozoítos , Vacunas Atenuadas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Malaria/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Malaria/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra la Malaria/administración & dosificación , Indonesia/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Esporozoítos/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/uso terapéutico , Plasmodium falciparum/inmunología , Malaria Vivax/prevención & control , Malaria Vivax/epidemiología , Masculino , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Plasmodium vivax/inmunología , FemeninoRESUMEN
Background: Limited data exist from southeast Asia on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants and inactivated vaccines on disease severity and death among patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Methods: A multicentre hospital-based prospective cohort was enrolled from September 2020 through January 2023, spanning pre-delta, delta, and omicron periods. The participant hospitals were conveniently sampled based on existing collaborations, site willingness and available study resources, and included six urban and two rural general hospitals from East Nusa Tenggara, Jakarta, and North Sumatra provinces. Factors associated with severe disease and day-28 mortality were examined using logistic and Cox regression. Findings: Among 822 participants, the age-adjusted percentage of severe disease was 26.8% (95% CI 22.7-30.9) for pre-delta, 50.1% (44.0-56.2) for delta, and 15.2% (9.7-20.7) for omicron. The odds of severe disease were 64% (18-84%) lower for omicron than delta (p < 0.001). One or more vaccine doses reduced the odds of severe disease by 89% (65-97%) for delta and 98% (91-100%) for omicron. Age-adjusted mortality was 11.9% (8.8-15.0) for pre-delta, 24.4% (18.8-29.9) for delta and 9.6% (5.2-14.0) for omicron. The day-28 cumulative incidence of death was lower for omicron (9.2% [5.6-13.9%]) than delta (28.6% [22.0-35.5%]) (p < 0.001). Severe disease on admission was the predominant prognostic factor for death (aHR34.0 [16.6-69.9] vs mild-or-moderate; p < 0.001). After controlling for disease severity on admission as an intermediate, the risk of death was 48% (32-60%) lower for omicron than delta (p < 0.001); and 51% (38-61%; p < 0.001) lower for vaccinated participants than unvaccinated participants overall, and 56% (37-69%; p < 0.001) for omicron, 46% (-5 to 73%; p = 0.070) for pre-delta (not estimable for delta). Interpretation: Infections by omicron variant resulted in less severe and fatal outcomes than delta in hospitalised patients in Indonesia. However, older, and unvaccinated individuals remained at greater risk of adverse outcomes. Funding: University of Oxford and Wellcome Trust.