Long-Term Outcomes Following Sirolimus-Coated Balloon or Drug-Eluting Stents for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that drug-coated balloons may benefit in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatment. However, the efficacy of new-generation sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with the latest generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) has not been studied in this setting. METHODS: All patients in the EASTBORNE (The All-Comers Sirolimus-Coated Balloon European Registry) and DEB-DRAGON (DEB vs Thin-DES in DES-ISR: Long Term Outcomes) registries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for DES-ISR were included in the study. The primary study end point was target lesion revascularization at 24 months. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 24 months. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCB versus thin-struts DES in ISR at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1545 patients with 1679 ISR lesions were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 621 (40.2%) patients with 621 lesions were treated with thin-strut DES and 924 (59.8%) patients with 1045 lesions were treated with SCB. The unmatched cohort showed no differences in the incidence of target lesion revascularization (10.8% versus 11.8%; P=0.568); however, there was a trend toward lower rates of myocardial infarction (7.4% versus 5.0%; P=0.062) and major adverse cardiovascular events (20.8% versus 17.1%; P=0.072) in the SCB group. After propensity score matching (n=335 patients per group), there were no significant differences in the rates of target lesion revascularization (11.6% versus 11.8%; P=0.329), target vessel revascularization (14.0% versus 13.1%; P=0.822), myocardial infarction (7.2% versus 4.5%; P=0.186), all-cause death (5.7% versus 4.2%; P=0.476), and major adverse cardiovascular event (21.5% versus 17.6%; P=0.242) between DES and SCB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, angioplasty with SCB compared with thin-struts DES is associated with comparable rates of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years.

Wide Spectrum of Bradyarrhythmias and Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Sportsmen: Run Forrest, Run?!

The intricate relationship between sports participation and cardiac arrhythmias is a key focus of cardiovascular research. Physical activity, integral to preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, induces structural, functional, and electrical changes in the heart, potentially triggering arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the cardiovascular benefits, the optimal exercise amount remains unclear, revealing a J-shaped association between AF and exercise. Endurance athletes, particularly males, face elevated AF risks, influenced by age. Risk factors vary among sports modalities, with unique physiological responses in swim training potentially elevating AF risk. Clinical management of AF in athletes necessitates a delicate balance between rhythm control, rate control, and anticoagulation therapy. Sport-induced bradyarrhythmias, including sinus bradycardia and conduction disturbances, are prevalent among athletes. Managing bradycardia in athletes proves challenging due to its complex and not fully understood pathophysiology. Careful consideration is required, particularly in symptomatic cases, where pacemaker implantation may be necessary for sinus node dysfunction. Although pacing is recommended for specific atrioventricular (AV) blocks, milder forms often prevail without restricting sports participation. This review explores the nuanced relationship between exercise and tachy- and bradyarrhythmia in athletes, addressing the challenges clinicians face when optimizing patient care in this distinctive population.

Can transesophageal echocardiography be safely omitted in patients scheduled for elective ablation of atrial arrhythmias? Data based on the LATTEE registry.

BACKGROUND: According to the present guidelines, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before scheduled catheter ablation (CA) for atrial arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation [AF] or atrial flutter [AFL]) is not deemed obligatory for optimally anticoagulated patients. However, daily clinical practice significantly differs from the recommendations. AIMS: We aimed to identify transthoracic echocardiographic parameters that could be useful in identifying patients without left atrial thrombus (LAT), which makes it possible to avoid unnecessary TEE before scheduled CA. METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study - the LATTEE registry. A total of 1346 patients referred for TEE before scheduled CA of AF/AFL were included. RESULTS: LAT was present in 44 patients (3.3%) and absent in the remaining 1302, who were younger, more likely to have paroxysmal AF, and displayed sinus rhythm during TEE. Additionally, they exhibited a lower incidence of heart failure, diabetes, systemic connective tissue disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Furthermore, they had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score and a higher prevalence of direct oral anticoagulants. Echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >65%, left atrial diameter (LAD) <40 mm, left atrial area (LAA) <20 cm2, left atrial volume (LAV) <113 ml, and left atrial volume index (LAVI) <51 ml/m2, demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for the absence of LAT and were met by 417 patients. Additional echocardiographic indices: LVEF/LAD ≥1.4, LVEF/LAVI ≥1.6, and LVEF/LAA ≥2.7 identified 57 additional patients, bringing the total of predicted LAT-free patients to 474 (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Simple echocardiographic parameters could help identify individuals for whom TEE could be safely omitted before elective CA due to atrial arrhythmias.

Electro-anatomically-guided endomyocardial biopsy in a patient with focal myocardial infiltration and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

A 53-year-old female was admitted to the cardiology department on account of signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure (HF) with severe peripheral edema and dyspnea on exertion (New York Heart Association class III) for the past 3 months.

Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab - myocardial infarction versus other causes - differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous temporary cardiac pacing (TTCP) is a lifesaving procedure, but the incidence of complications and prognosis depends on the underlying cause. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics, complications, and prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) requiring TTCP vs. patients with TTCP due to other causes. METHODS: The present analysis involved 244 cases in whom TTCP was performed between 2017 and 2021 in a high-volume cathlab. All the procedures were performed by an interventional cardiologist. MI constituted 46.3% of the patients (n = 113), including 63 ST-segment elevation MI patients (55.75%). Non-MI patients (control group) consisted of patients with any cause of bradycardia requiring TTCP. RESULTS: Myocardial infarction patients requiring TTCP are younger and have a higher prevalence of hypertension and heart failure. The pacing lead is more frequently inserted during asystole/resuscitation, and pacing was needed for a longer time. MI patients required cardiac implantable electronic device implantation less frequently than in other causes (22% vs. 82%, p < 0.01). The incidence of TTCP complications did not differ. The incidence of in-hospital death was 6.5-fold higher in TTCP patients with MI. Logistic regression showed MI to be a strong predictor of in-hospital death (odds ratio: 8.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-57.9). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality in MI patients requiring TTCP is 6.5-fold higher than in other patients with bradycardia. The complication rate of TTCP is similar in MI and non-MI patients. It is not TTCP but the severity of MI itself and the fact that a pacing lead is frequently implanted in asystole or during resuscitation that is responsible for the higher mortality rate.

Artificial intelligence in detecting left atrial appendage thrombus by transthoracic echocardiography and clinical features: the Left Atrial Thrombus on Transoesophageal Echocardiography (LATTEE) registry.

AIMS: Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is often performed before catheter ablation or cardioversion to rule out the presence of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAT) in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC), despite associated discomfort. A machine learning model [LAT-artificial intelligence (AI)] was developed to predict the presence of LAT based on clinical and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) features. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from a 13-site prospective registry of patients who underwent TOE before cardioversion or catheter ablation were used. LAT-AI was trained to predict LAT using data from 12 sites (n = 2827) and tested externally in patients on chronic OAC from two sites (n = 1284). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of LAT-AI were compared with that of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and CHA2DS2-VASc score. A decision threshold allowing for a 99% negative predictive value was defined in the development cohort. A protocol where TOE in patients on chronic OAC is performed depending on the LAT-AI score was validated in the external cohort. In the external testing cohort, LAT was found in 5.5% of patients. LAT-AI achieved an AUC of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.89], outperforming LVEF (0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.86, P < .0001) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (0.69, 95% CI: 0.63-0.7, P < .0001) in the entire external cohort. Based on the proposed protocol, 40% of patients on chronic OAC from the external cohort would safely avoid TOE. CONCLUSION: LAT-AI allows accurate prediction of LAT. A LAT-AI-based protocol could be used to guide the decision to perform TOE despite chronic OAC.

Antiarrhythmic drugs for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and sex differences: Insights from the CANT II Study.

BACKGROUND: Data on sex differences in terms of action of antiarrhythmic agents (AADs) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical profile of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and efficacy and safety of AADs used for pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) of AF. METHODS: This research was a sub-analysis of the retrospective multicenter Cardioversion with ANTazoline II (CANT) registry, which comprised 1365 patients with short-duration AF referred for urgent PCV with the use of AAD. Patients were categorized according to and compared in terms of clinical parameters and PCV outcomes. The primary endpoint was return of sinus rhythm within 12 hours after drug infusion, and the composite safety endpoint involved bradycardia <45 bpm, hypotension, syncope, or death. RESULTS: The sex distribution of patients qualified for PCV was even (men, n = 725; 53.1%). Females were older and more symptomatic and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, higher prevalence of tachyarrhythmia, and higher use of chronic anticoagulation. The overall efficacy (71.4% vs. 70.1%; P = 0.59) and safety (5.2% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.60) of PCV was comparable in men and women. Amiodarone (68.3% vs. 65.9%; P = 0.66) and antazoline (77.1% vs. 80.0%; P = 0.19) had similar efficacy in men and women, but propafenone had a lower rate of rhythm conversion in men (64.7% vs. 79.3%; P = 0.046). None of the assessed AADs differed in terms of safety profile in both sexes. CONCLUSION: Female patients with AF have different clinical profiles but similar efficacy and safety of AADs as compared to male participants. Propafenone has significantly lower efficacy in men, which requires further investigation.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis.

Background: Percutaneous pericardiocentesis represents a salvage procedure in case of cardiac tamponade and diagnostic procedure in chronic pericardial effusion of unknown source. The study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients subject to pericardiocentesis and the predictors of in-hospital mortality. Methods: The study represents a registry that covered consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis from 2011 to 2022 in high-volume tertiary reference center. Electronic health records were queried to obtain demographic and clinical variables. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, while secondary endpoint was the need for recurrent pericardiocentesis. Results: Out of 132 456 patients hospitalized in the prespecified period, 247 patients were subject to percutaneous pericardiocentesis (53.9% women; median age of 66 years) who underwent 273 procedures. In-hospital death was reported in 14 patients (5.67%), while recurrent pericardiocentesis in 24 patients (9.72%). Iatrogenic cause was the most common etiology (42.5%), followed by neoplastic disease (23.1%) and idiopathic effusion (14.57%). In logistic regression analysis in-hospital mortality was associated with myocardial infarction (MI)-related etiology (p = 0.001) and recurrent/persistent cardiogenic shock (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Iatrogenic etiology and neoplastic disease seem to be the most common indications for pericardiocentesis, while in-hospital mortality was particularly high in patients with spontaneous tamponade in the course of MI.

Influence of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Wall Shear Stress on Platelets Function.

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a common heart valve disease in the elderly population, and its pathogenesis remains an interesting area of research. The degeneration of the aortic valve leaflets gradually progresses to valve sclerosis. The advanced phase is marked by the presence of extracellular fibrosis and calcification. Turbulent, accelerated blood flow generated by the stenotic valve causes excessive damage to the aortic wall. Elevated shear stress due to AS leads to the degradation of high-molecular weight multimers of von Willebrand factor, which may involve bleeding in the mucosal tissues. Conversely, elevated shear stress has been associated with the release of thrombin and the activation of platelets, even in individuals with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Moreover, turbulent blood flow in the aorta may activate the endothelium and promote platelet adhesion and activation on the aortic valve surface. Platelets release a wide range of mediators, including lysophosphatidic acid, which have pro-osteogenic effects in AS. All of these interactions result in blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, and the hemostatic process. This review summarizes the current knowledge on high shear stress-induced hemostatic disorders, the influence of AS on platelets and antiplatelet therapy.

Pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: practical considerations.

The choice between rhythm and rate control strategy represents one of the most intriguing dilemmas in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the advantage of rhythm over rate control in terms of outcome has not been unequivocally proven, the initial management of patients with symptomatic episodes of AF frequently involves early cardioversion. As electrical cardioversion (EC) is challenging in terms of fasting status and involvement of an anesthesiologic team, pharmacological cardioversion (PC) is usually selected as the first step toward rhythm conversion. Qualification criteria for PC or EC are similar and should comprise assessment of hemodynamic status, estimation of arrhythmic episode duration, evaluation of anticoagulation regimen, exclusion of other supraventricular arrhythmias, and assessment of the chance of rhythm conversion and persistence of sinus rhythm. Finally, the choice of adequate antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) depends on the presence of structural heart disease (SHD) and local experience. In patients without any SHD, complications occur rarely, hence traditional (propafenone, flecainide) or nonclassical Vaughan-Williams class I (antazoline) or class III (vernakalant, ibutilide, or dofetilide) drugs are preferred. The presence of SHD consistent with any left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, myocardial ischemia, or valvular heart disease limits the choice of AAD to amiodarone. Given the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia of AAD, safety should always prevail over the enticing possibility of rhythm conversion. The present review aims to provide a comprehensible summary of proper qualification for PC, selection of suitable AAD, and state­of­the­art periprocedural management of patients with recent­onset AF.

Clinical Characteristics of Atrial Flutter and Its Response to Pharmacological Cardioversion with Amiodarone in Comparison to Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Unlike atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFl) is thought to be relatively refractory to pharmacological cardioversion (PC), but the evidence is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and efficacy of the PC of AFl with amiodarone in comparison to AF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study covered 727 patients with urgent consult for AF/AFl in a high-volume emergency department between 2015 and 2018. AFl was diagnosed in 222 (30.5%; median age: 68 (62; 75) years; 65.3% men). In a nested case-control study, 59 control patients with AF, matched in terms of age and sex with 60 AFl patients, were subject to PC with amiodarone. The primary endpoint was return of sinus rhythm confirmed using a 12-lead ECG. RESULTS: The AFl population had a median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 (2; 4) and episode duration of 72 h (16; 120). In the AFl cohort, 36% of patients were initially subject to PC, 33.3% to electrical cardioversion (EC) and 40.5% to catheter ablation. In comparison to the AF group, the AFl patients required a longer hospitalization time, had a higher rate of EC (p < 0.001) and less frequent use of PC (p < 0.001) and, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001) and more pronounced cardiovascular risk factors. The efficacy of PC with amiodarone was significantly lower in AFl than AF group (39% vs. 65%, relative risk (RR) 0.60, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: AFl patients shared a greater burden of comorbidities than AF patients, while the efficacy of PC in AFl was low. Patients should be initially managed with primary electrical cardioversion.

Evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic impact on contractility recovery in patients with newly diagnosed, acute onset dilated cardiomyopathy.

In patients with acute onset dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) an improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) can occur as an effect of complex therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate a pharmacotherapeutic impact on LVEF recovery in newly diagnosed DCM heart failure (HF) patients. A total of 2436 patients hospitalized due to acute decompensated HF were retrospectively analyzed. Finally, 24 patients with newly diagnosed DCM (51.4 ±â€…16.3 years, New York Heart Association 2.3 ±â€…0.7, LVEF 25 ±â€…10%) were observed (13.4 ±â€…16.0 months) in terms of the result of complex therapy. Patients were divided according to LVEF improvement on follow-up echocardiography: "recovery group" (LVEF improvement > 5%; n = 13) and "nonrecovery group" (∆LVEF ≤ 5%; n = 11). Evaluation of baseline parameters showed lower LVEF (19 ±â€…6 vs 31 ±â€…10%; P = .0048) and lower incidence of arterial hypertension (27% vs 73%; P = .043) in "recovery" group. After follow-up period LVEF was similar in both groups; however, significant LVEF improvement was demonstrated only in the "recovery group" (19 ±â€…6% to 34 ±â€…8%; P < .001). Only the "recovery group" showed significant HF symptoms reduction (New York Heart Association class: 2.5 ±â€…0.7 to 1.6 ±â€…0.6; P = .003). The "recovery group" had prescribed higher doses of loop diuretic (equivalent dose of furosemidum: 80 ±â€…38 mg vs 43 ±â€…24 mg; P = .025). Despite optimal therapy, significant LVEF improvement is observed only in the half of the patients with newly diagnosed DCM with HF with reduced EF. Prescription of higher doses of loop diuretics may have positive effect on the reduction of symptoms in newly diagnosed DCM HF patients. Lack of other risk factors such as arterial hypertension may increase the chance of LVEF recovery.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Do we have to perform coronary angiography?

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of global mortality, while survivors are burdened with long-term neurological and cardiovascular complications. OHCA management at the hospital level remains challenging, due to heterogeneity of OHCA presentation, the critical status of OHCA patients reaching the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the demands of post ROSC treatment. The validity and optimal timing for coronary angiography is one important, yet not fully defined, component of OHCA management. Guidelines state clear recommendations for coronary angiography in OHCA patients with shockable rhythms, cardiogenic shock, or in patients with ST-segment elevation observed in electrocardiography after ROSC. However, there is no established consensus on the angiographic management in other clinical settings. While coronary angiography may accelerate the diagnostic and therapeutic process (provided OHCA was a consequence of coronary artery disease), it might come at the cost of impaired post-resuscitation care quality due to postponing of intensive care management. The aim of the current statement paper is to discuss clinical strategies for the management of OHCA including the stratification to invasive procedures and the rationale behind the risk-benefit ratio of coronary angiography, especially with patients in critical condition.