Incremental Treatment Response by Cycle With Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum for Peyronie's Disease: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cumulative and incremental changes in penile curvature after each treatment cycle of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) in men with Peyronie's disease (PD). METHODS: Data from 2 phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed post hoc. Treatment was administered in up to 4 treatment cycles (per cycle: 2 injections, 1-3 days apart, of CCH 0.58 mg or placebo; subsequent penile modeling) at 6-week intervals. Penile curvature was measured at baseline and after each treatment cycle (weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24). Successful response was defined as ≥20% reduction from baseline penile curvature. RESULTS: Overall, 832 men (CCH, n = 551; placebo, n = 281) were included in the analysis. After each cycle, mean cumulative percent reduction from baseline penile curvature was significantly greater with CCH vs placebo (P <.001). Following one cycle, 29.9% of CCH recipients exhibited a successful response. Among nonresponders, additional cycles of injections led to further successful responses: 60.8% of first cycle failures achieved response after fourth cycle (8 injections), 42.7% of cycle 1-2 failures achieved response after fourth cycle, and 23.5% of cycle 1-3 failures achieved response after fourth cycle. CONCLUSION: Data showed incremental benefits from each of the 4 CCH treatment cycles. Completion of a full series of 4 CCH treatment cycles may optimize improvements in penile curvature in men with PD, including among those who did not clinically respond to previous treatment cycles.

Evaluation of five collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes injection techniques for the treatment of cellulite on the buttock or thigh.

BACKGROUND: Given differences in buttock versus thigh cellulite, collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes (CCH-aaes) injection technique may impact treatment effects at these sites. AIM: To evaluate efficacy and safety of 5 CCH-aaes injection techniques. METHODS: A phase 2A, open-label trial enrolled women with mild-to-severe cellulite (Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale) on both buttocks or thighs. CCH-aaes 0.84 mg was administered as 12 injections in each of two buttock or two thigh treatment areas (total dose, 1.68 mg) during three treatment sessions (Days 1, 22, 43). On Day 1, women were sequentially assigned to: Technique A = shallow injection/3 aliquots; Technique B = shallow injection/1 aliquot; Technique C = deep injection/1 aliquot; Technique D = deep and shallow injections/5 aliquots; or Technique E = shallow injection/4 aliquots. Change from baseline in Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) depression depth (range, 0 [no depressions] to 3 [deep depressions]) was assessed at Day 71. Safety was evaluated via adverse events. RESULTS: Sixty-three women with buttock (n = 31) or thigh (n = 32) cellulite received ≥1 CCH-aaes dose. For buttock cellulite, CCH-aaes injection Technique A resulted in the greatest baseline-adjusted improvement in CSS score on Day 71 (least-squares mean, 1.17-point improvement). For thigh cellulite, CSS score improvement was greatest with Technique D (least-squares mean, 1.40-point improvement). CCH injection Techniques A, D, and E were associated with more favorable safety profiles than Techniques B and C. CONCLUSION: Different CCH-aaes injection techniques are required with buttock (Technique A) versus thigh (Technique D) cellulite to optimize treatment outcomes.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations to Evaluate a Potential Dose Regimen of Testosterone Undecanoate in Hypogonadal Males.

Intramuscular testosterone undecanoate is indicated as testosterone replacement in adult males with a deficiency in or absence of endogenous testosterone (hypogonadism). Intramuscular testosterone undecanoate 750 mg is approved to be administered at initiation and at 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose every 10 weeks. However, a more frequent maintenance regimen may improve symptom management of low testosterone at the end of each dosing interval. The current objective was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for intramuscular testosterone undecanoate 750 mg and to perform PK simulations to assess the impact of an 8-week maintenance regimen on testosterone exposure. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination best described the PK of testosterone undecanoate. The model included time-dependent suppression and gradual recovery of endogenous testosterone production during testosterone undecanoate administration. Significant covariates included body weight and sex hormone-binding globulin level. With the final PK model, simulations were performed to evaluate the impact of an 8-week vs a 10-week maintenance regimen on testosterone exposure. The 8-week testosterone undecanoate regimen had a predicted 11% increase in average concentration and last observed concentration during a dosing interval before a subsequent dose and a 5% increase in maximum concentration. This translated into an ≈10% increase in the percentage of patients predicted to have a last observed concentration during a dosing interval before a subsequent dose >300 ng/dL, minimal change in the percentage of patients with average concentration in the normal range, and a low likelihood of maximum concentration >2500 ng/dL. These simulations suggest that more frequent administration of intramuscular testosterone undecanoate may be beneficial in some patients. Further clinical evaluation of an 8-week dose regimen is warranted.

Development and Validation Clinician and Patient Reported Photonumeric Scales to Assess Buttocks Cellulite Severity.

BACKGROUND: The Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS) and Patient Reported PCSS (PR-PCSS) are newly developed tools for assessing cellulite severity. OBJECTIVE: To report on the reliability, validity, and ability to detect a change in cellulite severity on the buttocks of adult women with the CR-PCSS and PR-PCSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Content validity of both scales was established through concept elicitation and cognitive interviews. Test-retest reliability was evaluated, and intra-rater (both scales) and inter-rater (CR-PCSS only) reliability were estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for agreement and consistency. Ability to detect a change was determined using the Subject-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) or Investigator-GAIS as anchors. RESULTS: For the CR-PCSS (n = 6) at baseline and Day 2, the mean interrater ICCs were ≥0.70 and mean intrarater ICCs (95% confidence interval [CI]) were ≥0.81 (0.72-0.90) for both buttocks. For the PR-PCSS (n = 99) at baseline and Day 14, the mean test-retest reliability ICCs (95% CI) were ≥0.86 (0.79-0.91) for both buttocks. A clinically meaningful change was 1.0 point on the PR-PCSS and 1.0 on the CR-PCSS. CONCLUSION: The CR-PCSS and PR-PCSS reliably assess cellulite severity of the buttocks and can detect a clinically meaningful change after treatment for cellulite.

Long-term Curvature Deformity Characterization in Men Previously Treated With Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum for Peyronie's Disease, Subgrouped by Penile Plaque Calcification.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term (5-year) efficacy and safety of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) therapy in men with Peyronie's disease and varying degrees of plaque calcification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CCH-treated adult men from the 12-month Investigation for Maximal Peyronie's Reduction Efficacy and Safety Studies I/II or 9-month open-label studies were eligible. Degree of plaque calcification (no calcification, noncontiguous stippled calcification, or calcification that did not interfere with CCH injection) was determined by penile x-ray or ultrasound. Penile curvature deformity and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire responses were assessed annually for up to 5 years, with ≥6 months between consecutive visits. RESULTS: For no calcification group, from baseline to last (Reference) visit during the prior studies (n = 160), mean penile curvature improved by 20.9° ± 16.3° (39.3%) with CCH. Similar improvements with CCH from baseline to Reference were observed in stippled calcification (n = 27; improvement of 24.1° ± 20.2° [42.7%]) and calcification (n = 27; improvement of 21.7° ± 14.8° [43.3%]) subgroups. At Year 5 follow-up in no calcification group (n = 119), an additional 10.0% improvement in mean penile curvature vs Reference (4.3°) occurred. Penile curvature improvements seen at Reference in stippled calcification and calcification groups were maintained through Year 5. Additional numeric improvements in 3 Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire domains were observed at Year 5 visit vs baseline scores. No long-term safety issues were identified. CONCLUSION: This first report of long-term (5-year) CCH clinical trial outcomes in a population with penile plaque calcification demonstrates that nonsurgical intralesional CCH therapy is an appropriate Peyronie's disease treatment in men with penile plaque calcification that is stippled or does not impede CCH injection.

Long-Term Safety and Curvature Deformity Characterization in Patients Previously Treated with Collagenase clostridium Histolyticum for Peyronie's Disease.

PURPOSE: We assessed the long-term safety and immunogenicity profile of collagenase clostridium histolyticum and characterized penile curvature deformity over time in patients previously treated for Peyronie's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 4 study included men who received collagenase clostridium histolyticum in either 12-month, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials (IMPRESS I/II), or one of two 9-month open label studies. Eligible patients received no additional collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment and were followed once yearly for up to 5 years to assess Peyronie's disease clinical symptoms, patient reported outcomes and safety. RESULTS: Of 280 patients enrolled 204 (73%) completed the study. At baseline 247 patients had already experienced a mean±SD penile curvature decrease from 51.8±15.0 to 31.0±16.1 degrees (improvement of 20.9±16.2 degrees or 39.5%). At year 5 in 180 patients, despite no additional treatment, there was an additional 9.1% improvement in mean penile curvature compared with reference data (4.3±13.4 degrees, 95% CI 2.3-6.2, p <0.02). At baseline 183 patients experienced mean Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire bother domain score improvement from 6.5±3.5 to 3.4±3.3. At year 5 there was additional score improvement to 2.4±2.9 (p=0.0003). Adverse events were reported in 17.5% (49) of patients but no adverse events were considered treatment related. No long-term safety issues were identified up to 5 years after treatment. Long-term immunogenicity profiling showed a decreasing trend in the number of anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II seropositive cases at years 4 and 5 after collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated with collagenase clostridium histolyticum continued to have penile curvature and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire domain score improvements through year 5 without additional collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment, and no additional safety signals were identified.

Efficacy, Safety, and Durability of Response of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum-aaes for Treating Cellulite.

Collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes (CCH) enzymatically releases fibrous septa that contribute to the skin dimpling characteristic of cellulite. Long-term safety/duration of efficacy (durability) results from an open-label extension (OLE) of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RCT) evaluating CCH efficacy/safety for moderate-to-severe cellulite of the buttocks or posterolateral thighs in women was assessed. Efficacy/safety of CCH treatment/retreatment during OLE was also evaluated. METHODS: After RCT unblinding, women could enroll in OLE for assessment of long-term CCH durability (observation only, up to day 720) or CCH treatment/retreatment, the latter in women with moderate-to-severe buttock/posterolateral thigh cellulite [Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS) and Patient Reported PCSS (PR-PCSS) scores of 3/4; Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale score ≤13]. A treatment/retreatment course comprised 1 or 2 courses of 3 sessions (0.84-mg CCH injected at days 1, 22, and 43). CCH efficacy/safety was assessed at baseline, days 22, 43, 71, and quarterly at day 360. RESULTS: Of the 259 OLE participants, 53 were observed for long-term CCH durability. For those who were ≥2-level composite responders during RCT (≥2-point CR-PCSS/PR-PCSS score improvements), CCH effect was durable (scores did not reach RCT baseline levels) in all women on days 180 (19/19), 360 (16/16), and 720 (7/7). Of the 200 women receiving CCH treatment/retreatment, more than 75% had ≥1-level improvement in patient and clinical assessments at day 71. The most common adverse events were injection-site bruising and pain. CONCLUSIONS: CCH treatment provided durable improvement in moderate-to-severe buttock/thigh cellulite and was generally well tolerated. Repeated CCH exposure did not increase adverse event risk or reduce efficacy.

Long-term safety and analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine buccal film in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic pain requiring around-the-clock opioids.

BACKGROUND: This open-label, single-arm study was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of a novel buprenorphine formulation, buprenorphine buccal film, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic pain requiring around-the-clock opioids. METHODS: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of buprenorphine buccal film. Five hundred and six patients who completed previous studies with buprenorphine buccal film (n=445; rollover patients) or were recruited de novo for this study (n=61) were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent a dose titration period of ≤6 weeks, during which doses of buprenorphine buccal film were adjusted to a maximum 900 µg every 12 hours, depending on tolerability and the need for rescue medication. An optimal dose was defined as the dose that the patient found satisfactory for both pain relief and tolerability, without the need for rescue medication or with ≤2 tablets of rescue medication per day. Once the optimal dose was reached, treatment was continued for ≤48 weeks. Pain intensity was measured throughout the study using a 0-10 numerical rating scale. RESULTS: Of 435 patients achieving an optimal dose of buprenorphine buccal film who commenced long-term treatment, 158 (36.3%) completed 48 weeks of treatment. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 116 patients (22.9%) during the titration phase and 61 patients (14.0%) during the long-term treatment phase, and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment occurred in 14 (2.8%) and 14 (3.2%) patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were those typically associated with opioids, such as nausea, constipation, and headache. In both rollover and de novo patients, pain intensity scores remained constant at approximately 3-4 during long-term treatment, and the dose of buprenorphine buccal film remained unchanged in 86.2% of patients. CONCLUSION: In appropriate patients, buprenorphine buccal film demonstrated tolerability and efficacy in the long-term management of chronic pain.

Efficacy and tolerability of buccal buprenorphine in opioid-experienced patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain: results of a phase 3, enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal study.

A buccal film of buprenorphine (BBUP) was evaluated for safety and efficacy in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched-enrollment, randomized-withdrawal study in opioid-experienced patients (30 to ≤160 mg/d morphine sulfate equivalent) with moderate to severe chronic low back pain taking around-the-clock opioid analgesics. Patients' opioid doses were tapered to ≤30 mg morphine sulfate equivalent before open-label titration with BBUP (range, 150-900 µg every 12 hours). Patients who responded (received adequate analgesia that was generally well tolerated for 14 days) were randomized to receive buprenorphine (n = 254) or placebo (n = 257) buccal film. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to week 12 of double-blind treatment in mean average daily pain-intensity scores using a rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). In the intent-to-treat population, mean pain scores were 6.7 after opioid taper and declined to 2.8 after the BBUP titration period. After randomization, mean pain scores were lower in the BBUP group than in the placebo group; the difference between groups in the mean change from baseline to week 12 was -0.98 (95% CI, -1.32 to -0.64; P < 0.001). A significantly larger percentage of patients receiving BBUP than placebo had pain reductions ≥30% and ≥50% (P < 0.001 for both). In the double-blind portion of the study, the only adverse event reported more frequently with BBUP than placebo and in ≥5% of patients was vomiting (5.5% vs 2.3%). These findings demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of BBUP in opioid-experienced patients taking around-the-clock opioid treatment for chronic low back pain.

Evaluation of the Tolerability of Switching Patients on Chronic Full µ-Opioid Agonist Therapy to Buccal Buprenorphine.

OBJECTIVE: Assess whether patients with chronic pain receiving 80 to 220 mg oral morphine sulfate equivalent of a full Μ: -opioid agonist could be transitioned to buccal buprenorphine at approximately 50% of their full dose without inducing opioid withdrawal or sacrificing analgesic efficacy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, two-period crossover study in adult patients receiving around-the-clock full opioid agonist therapy and confirmed to be opioid dependent by naloxone challenge. Study doses were substituted at the time of the regular dose schedule for each patient. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a maximum Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale score ≥ 13 (moderate withdrawal) or use of rescue medication. RESULTS: 35 subjects on ≥ 80 mg morphine sulfate equivalent per day were evaluable for opioid withdrawal. One patient during buccal buprenorphine treatment and two during 50% full Μ: -opioid agonist treatment experienced opioid withdrawal of at least moderate intensity. The mean maximum Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale scores were similar, and numerically lower on buccal buprenorphine. There were no significant differences in pain ratings between treatments. The most frequent adverse events with buccal buprenorphine were headache (19%), vomiting (13%), nausea, diarrhea, and drug withdrawal syndrome (each 9%), and with full Μ: -opioid agonist were headache (16%), drug withdrawal syndrome (13%), and nausea (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain patients treated with around-the-clock full Μ: -opioid agonist therapy can be switched to buccal buprenorphine (a partial Μ: -opioid agonist) at approximately 50% of the full Μ: -opioid agonist dose without an increased risk of opioid withdrawal or loss of pain control.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics of Single- and Multiple-dose Buprenorphine Buccal Film in Healthy Volunteers.

PURPOSE: Buprenorphine, a partial µ-receptor agonist, is approved for the management of moderate to severe pain, but it has low oral bioavailability. Two open-label studies were performed to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of buprenorphine from buccal film formulations of buprenorphine. METHODS: Both studies enrolled healthy volunteers, aged 18 to 55 years, who received concurrent oral naltrexone to reduce adverse events (AEs); subjects with a history or evidence of substance abuse or current use of any product affecting cytochrome P450 3A4 activity were excluded. The first study (n = 25) was a 5-period crossover trial with 4 single doses (75 and 300 and 300 and 1200 µg) of 2 formulations (F14 and F24) of buccal buprenorphine (BBUP) and a 300-µg intravenous dose of buprenorphine with a 7-day washout between periods. In the second study, each subject (n = 10) received 6 doses of 4 BBUP strengths (60, 120, 180, and 240 µg BID) in a dose-escalation design. Plasma concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine were assayed, and pharmacokinetics were summarized with descriptive statistics and analyzed by using a linear mixed effects model (single-dose study). AEs were recorded. FINDINGS: In the single-dose study, the 2 formulations exhibited comparable bioavailability of 46% to 51% that was independent of dose, with a single buprenorphine peak concentration from each BBUP dose occurring at 2.5 to 3 hours. The mean buprenorphine Cmax across the doses ranged from 0.17 ng/mL for the 75-µg dose to 1.43 ng/mL for the 1200-µg dose. AUC0-∞, AUC0-last, and Cmax were proportional to the dose of BBUP administered. Cmax of norbuprenorphine after BBUP administration was approximately one tenth that of buprenorphine Cmax. In the multiple-dose study, steady state was reached within 3 days of BID dosing. There was a linear increase in exposure across the dose range from 60 to 240 µg BID. Treatment-emergent AEs in both studies were consistent with those reported with opiate administration to healthy volunteers. IMPLICATIONS: The absolute bioavailability of BBUP was 46% to 51% across a 16-fold dose range, with dose-proportional increases in systemic exposure. Apparent steady-state conditions occurred within 3 days of dosing. These pharmacokinetic results suggest that therapeutic buprenorphine plasma concentrations can be obtained with BBUP across a wide dose range in a shorter time than other (eg, transdermal) dosage forms.

Differentiating the Effect of an Opioid Agonist on Cardiac Repolarization From µ-Receptor-mediated, Indirect Effects on the QT Interval: A Randomized, 3-way Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: A thorough QT study was conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the effect of buprenorphine hydrochloride administered through a buccal soluble film under coverage of naltrexone to block confounding, secondary QT effects. METHODS: Healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, partially blinded, 4-way crossover designed study. Subjects received buprenorphine 3 mg with naltrexone, naltrexone alone (with placebo films), placebo (placebo films and placebo naltrexone), and open-label moxifloxacin 400 mg with placebo naltrexone in separate in-house treatment periods. Naltrexone treatment (50 mg) was initiated 12 hours before buprenorphine and was given every 12 hours for a total of 4 doses. ECG data were extracted from a continuous recording predose and serially after dosing on the treatment day. ECG intervals were measured at a central ECG laboratory by using the high-precision QT technique. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate with Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and change-from-predose baseline QTcF (∆QTcF) was analyzed by using a mixed effect model. FINDINGS: Fifty-eight subjects (35 males) with a mean age of 32 were enrolled into the study. Treatment with buprenorphine 3 mg resulted in a small QT effect with the largest mean naltrexone-corrected ∆QTcF reaching 5.8 msec at 8 hours' postdosing (upper bound of the 90% CI below 10 msec). Exposure response analysis with a linear model demonstrated a significant linear relationship between plasma levels and naltrexone-corrected ∆QTcF, with an estimated mean slope of 0.65 msec per nanogram/milliliter (90% CI, 0.22 to 1.08). Using the exposure response model, an effect on ∆QTcF of 4.5 msec (2.80 to 6.12) can be predicted at the observed geometric peak plasma level after administration of the 3-mg buprenorphine dose in this study (3.6 ng/mL [3.33 to 3.98]). Naltrexone alone did not have a relevant effect on the QTcF interval. IMPLICATIONS: The present study showed that buprenorphine plasma levels up to 5 ng/mL had no effect on the QTc above the level of clinical concern.

Efficacy and tolerability of buccal buprenorphine in opioid-naive patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: Buprenorphine HCl buccal film has been developed for treating chronic pain utilizing BioErodible MucoAdhesive (BEMA(®)) delivery technology. Buccal buprenorphine (BBUP; Belbuca(TM), Endo Pharmaceuticals) was evaluated for the management of moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP) requiring around-the-clock analgesia in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched-enrollment, randomized-withdrawal study in opioid-naive patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 749) were titrated to a dose of BBUP (range, 150-450 µg every 12 h) that was generally well tolerated and provided adequate analgesia for ≥14 days, and then randomized to BBUP (n = 229) or placebo (n = 232), respectively. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to week 12 of double-blind treatment in the mean of daily average pain intensity scores (numeric rating scale from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]). RESULTS: Patients were experiencing moderate to severe pain at study entry: mean (SD) = 7.15 (1.05). Following titration, pain was reduced to the mild range; 2.81 (1.07). After randomization, mean (SD) pain scores increased from baseline to week 12 more with placebo (1.59 [2.04]) versus BBUP: (0.94 [1.85]) with a significant between-group difference (-0.67 [95% CI: -1.07 to -0.26]; p = 0.0012). A significantly larger percentage of patients receiving BBUP versus placebo had ≥30% pain reduction (63% vs 47%; p = 0.0012). During double-blind treatment, the most frequent adverse events (AEs) with BBUP were nausea (10%), constipation (4%) and vomiting (4%). The most common AEs with placebo were nausea (7%), upper respiratory tract infection (4%), headache (3%) and diarrhea (3%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of BBUP among opioid-naive patients requiring around-the-clock opioid treatment for CLBP.

Efficacy and safety of an octreotide implant in the treatment of patients with acromegaly.

CONTEXT: Acromegaly is caused by excessive GH secretion and IGF-I overproduction. The goals of treatment are to reduce GH and IGF-I values to normal and relieve the associated symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to demonstrate that an octreotide implant (84 mg) is safe and efficacious in patients with acromegaly who were responsive to prior monthly octreotide long-acting release (LAR) injections. DESIGN: This was a phase 3, open-label study. Before treatment, subjects received a stable monthly dose of octreotide LAR injections (10-40 mg) for ≥ 3 months. Randomization was in a 3:1 ratio to either a 6-month octreotide implant or monthly octreotide LAR injections. SETTING: This was a multicenter, international study conducted in private or institutional practices. SUBJECTS: Enrollment included 163 subjects (aged ≥ 18 years) with acromegaly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the octreotide implant during 24 weeks of treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, the success rate of the implant for maintenance of IGF-I and GH levels was 86% (95% confidence interval, 80.3%) compared with a rate of 84% (95% confidence interval, 73.8%) for octreotide LAR. Serum octreotide concentrations after implant insertion increased within 8 days and peaked between days 14 and 28. The overall safety of the octreotide implant and octreotide LAR were similar. Diarrhea and headache were more frequent with the implant, whereas cholecystitis and hypertension were more frequent with octreotide LAR. CONCLUSIONS: In this pivotal phase 3 study, the octreotide implant maintained reduced blood levels of GH and IGF-I with continuous octreotide release over 6 months, which was well tolerated.

The effects of ethanol on the bioavailability of oxymorphone extended-release tablets and oxymorphone crush-resistant extended-release tablets.

UNLABELLED: Adverse events may occur with an extended-release (ER) opioid if tampering or coadministration with ethanol causes excessive exposure (dose dumping) to the opioid. The effects of ethanol on the in vitro dissolution and in vivo pharmacokinetics of oxymorphone ER and oxymorphone crush-resistant formulation (CRF) were evaluated. In vitro dissolution rates were measured for oxymorphone ER 40-mg and oxymorphone CRF 40-mg tablets in aqueous solutions of 0 to 40% ethanol. In 2 in vivo, open-label, randomized, crossover studies, fasted healthy volunteers received single oral doses of oxymorphone ER 40 mg or oxymorphone CRF 40 mg with 240 mL of 0 to 40% ethanol. Naltrexone was used to minimize opioid effects. In the in vitro analyses, dissolution rates of oxymorphone ER and CRF were unaffected in aqueous solutions of ≤40% ethanol. Coadministration of oxymorphone ER or oxymorphone CRF with ethanol 20 and 40% increased oxymorphone peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) by 14 to 80% and reduced time to C(max). For both formulations, oxymorphone area under the curve and terminal half-life were largely unaffected, but C(max) increased with ethanol dose. Neither oxymorphone formulation exhibited dose dumping in terms of overall exposure when coingested with ethanol. PERSPECTIVE: Administering oxymorphone ER or oxymorphone CRF with 240 mL of ≤40% ethanol increased oxymorphone C(max) without dose dumping in terms of area under the curve. These results provide reassurance about the integrity of oxymorphone ER formulations with ethanol. Nonetheless, alcohol and opioids should never be combined because of the risk of respiratory depression.

Bioequivalence of oxymorphone extended release and crush-resistant oxymorphone extended release.

BACKGROUND: A formulation of crush-resistant extended-release opioids may deter abuse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of oxymorphone extended-release (Oxy-ER) and a crush-resistant formulation of oxymorphone extended-release (Oxy-CRF). METHODS: In three open-label, randomized studies, healthy adults at a clinical research center received two single oral doses of Oxy-ER and two single doses of Oxy-CRF, each separated by a ≥7-day washout. Doses were administered under fasted conditions (study 1, 5 mg doses; study 2, 40 mg doses) or after a high-fat breakfast (study 3, 40 mg doses). Subjects administered 40 mg doses also received naltrexone. The primary endpoint was systemic oxymorphone exposure; the bioequivalence criterion was met if the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio (Oxy-CRF/Oxy-ER) for oxymorphone area under the curve from time 0 to the last measured concentration (AUC(0-t)), AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-inf)), and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) were within 0.8-1.25. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: In studies 1, 2, and 3, the safety population comprised 30, 37, and 36 subjects and the pharmacokinetics population comprised 27, 30, and 29 subjects, respectively. Oxy-ER and Oxy-CRF produced similar mean ± standard deviation oxymorphone AUC(0-t) (study 1, 5.05 ± 1.55 versus 5.29 ± 1.52 ng · h/mL; study 2, 31.51 ± 10.95 versus 31.23 ± 10.33 ng · h/mL; study 3, 50.16 ± 14.91 versus 49.01 ± 14.03 ng · h/mL) and C(max) (0.38 ± 0.11 versus 0.37 ± 0.12 ng/mL; 2.37 ± 1.20 versus 2.41 ± 0.94 ng/mL; 5.87 ± 1.99 versus 5.63 ± 2.26 ng/mL) under all conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for plasma oxymorphone AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf), and C(max) fulfilled the bioequivalence criterion. Adverse event rates were similar with Oxy-ER and Oxy-CRF (study 1, 25% versus 23%; study 2, 9% versus 16%; study 3, 20% each group). CONCLUSION: Oxy-CRF and Oxy-ER (5 mg and 40 mg) are bioequivalent under fasted and fed conditions, suggesting that Oxy-CRF will have clinical efficacy and safety equivalent to Oxy-ER.

Treatment satisfaction in osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: the role of pain, physical and emotional functioning, sleep, and adverse events.

UNLABELLED: Global ratings of treatment satisfaction and improvement can provide an opportunity for patients to aggregate multiple aspects of their treatment into a single measure of its perceived benefits and disadvantages. Although such measures have been recommended for chronic pain clinical trials, only limited data are available that address the hypothesis that they reflect multiple aspects of patients' treatment experience. Our objective was to identify the factors that make independent contributions to ratings of treatment satisfaction. We analyzed data from 5 open-label clinical trials of lidocaine patch 5% in osteoarthritis knee pain and chronic low back pain that were 2 to 12 weeks in duration. A total of 383 patients completed the Patient Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction scale and measures of pain, interference with physical and emotional functioning, sleep interference, and adverse events. The results of multivariate analyses indicated that improvements in measures of pain intensity, pain relief, and interference with physical functioning each made independent contributions to treatment satisfaction in both groups of patients. Improvements in interference with emotional functioning and sleep and the presence and severity of adverse events were not associated with satisfaction. PERSPECTIVE: Measures of treatment satisfaction can reflect different aspects of the patient's treatment response, including improvements in pain and physical functioning. Increased understanding of such global measures may facilitate development of clinical trial outcomes that allow patients to evaluate with minimal burden those aspects of the treatment experience they consider personally meaningful.

Factors affecting acceptability of titrated oxymorphone extended release in chronic low back pain - an individual patient analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of age, sex, and previous opioid experience on the likelihood of successfully titrating opioid-naive and experienced patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) to an effective and well-tolerated dose of oxymorphone extended release (ER). METHODS: Post hoc analysis of open-label titration phases of two enriched-enrollment randomized-withdrawal phase III trials in 575 adults with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Opioid-naive patients (n = 325) initiated oxymorphone ER at 10 mg/day (5 mg q12 h). Opioid-experienced patients (n = 250) initiated at a dose equianalgesic to their previous opioid and were allowed doses of 5 mg oxymorphone immediate-release rescue medication every 4-6 h, as needed. Oxymorphone ER was gradually titrated to a dose that reduced pain to or=65 years were less likely than patients aged <65 years to complete titration (45 vs. 63%; p = 0.002; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.06) and more likely to discontinue owing to adverse events (40 vs. 15%; p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.14-0.36). Oxycodone-experienced patients were less likely than hydrocodone-experienced patients to complete titration (46 vs. 62%, p = 0.03; 95% CI,-0.30 to -0.02). Among successfully titrated patients, pain decreased regardless of prior opioid therapy, sex, or age. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with CLBP were titrated to an effective, generally well-tolerated oxymorphone ER dose. Older patients and those converted from oxycodone may require more gradual titration. A study limitation is that patients initiated oxymorphone ER to comply with protocol, whereas treatment failure typically motivates opioid initiation or switching in clinical practice.

Characteristics of menstrual vs nonmenstrual migraine: a post hoc, within-woman analysis of the usual-care phase of a nonrandomized menstrual migraine clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, using a within-woman analysis, the severity, duration, and relapse of menstrual vs nonmenstrual episodes of migraine during treatment with usual migraine therapy. BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the clinical characteristics of menstrual and nonmenstrual migraine attacks have yielded conflicting results, contributing to disagreement regarding whether menstrual migraine attacks are clinically more problematic than nonmenstrual migraine attacks. METHODS: Post hoc within-woman analysis of the usual-care phase (month 1) of a 2-month, multicenter, prospective, open-label study at 21 US medical practices (predominantly primary care). Participants were women > or =18 years of age with regular predictable menstrual cycles (28 +/- 4 days) who self-reported a > or =1-year history of migraine attacks occurring between days -2 and +3 (menses onset = day +1) and > or =8 such attacks within the previous 12 cycles. Migraine treatment episodes were categorized as menstrual (occurring on days -2 to +3 of menses) or nonmenstrual (occurring on days +4 to -3 of menses). Pain severity, functional impairment, duration, relapse in 24 hours, and use of rescue medication were compared. Sources of variability (within- or between-patient) were determined using mathematical modeling. The http://www.clinicaltrial.gov code for trial is NCT00904098. RESULTS: Women (n = 153; intent to treat) reported 212 menstrual (59.2%) and 146 nonmenstrual (40.8%) migraine treatment episodes. Compared with nonmenstrual treatment episodes, menstrual episodes were more likely to cause impairment (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.65, 95% CI, 1.05-2.60; P = .03), were longer (unadjusted hazard ratio 1.68; 95% CI, 1.31-2.16; P < .001), and were more likely to relapse within 24 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.25-5.68; P = .01). Within-patient effects accounted for only 18-33% of the total variance in these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Post hoc, within-woman analysis of migraine treatment episodes categorized based on International Headache Society criteria showed that menstrual treatment episodes were more impairing, longer lasting, and more likely to relapse than nonmenstrual treatment episodes in this selected population of women with frequent menstrual migraine. The current analysis indicates that most of the variability in these outcomes is due to differences between headache types and not within-patient differences for a given type of headache, suggesting that menstrual episodes are potentially treatable. These findings underscore the differences between menstrual and nonmenstrual episodes of migraine and the need to offer effective migraine treatment to women.

Illustrations on Using the Distribution of a P-value in High Dimensional Data Analyses.

Several statistical methods have recently been developed that use the distribution of P-values from multiple tests of hypotheses to analyze data from high-dimensional experiments. These methods are only as valid as the P-values that were derived from test statistics. If an incorrect distribution for a test statistic was used, the P-value will not be valid and the distribution of P-values from multiple test statistics could give misleading results. Moreover, if the correct distribution of a test statistic is used, a distribution of P-values may still give misleading results if P-values are correlated. A primary focus of this paper is on the distribution of a P-value under a null hypothesis, and the test statistic that is considered is the number of rejected null hypotheses. Two issues are demonstrated using six data examples, two that are simulated and four from actual microarray experiments. The results provide some insight into how much of an effect might be introduced into a distribution of P-values if invalid P-values are computed or if P-values are correlated. Additional illustration is given regarding the distribution of a P-value under an alternative hypothesis and some approaches to modeling it are presented.