Rapid detection of adulteration of olive oil with soybean oil combined with chemometrics by Fourier transform infrared, visible-near-infrared and excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy: A comparative study.

Several spectroscopic techniques have been used to detect olive oil adulteration. To evaluate the performance of these spectral techniques on this issue, this work performed a comparative study on identifying adulterated olive oil with different concentrations of soybean oil based on Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), visible-near-infrared (Vis-NIR) and excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy (EEMs) combined with chemometrics. Principal component analysis (PCA)/ multi-way-PCA analysis showed the feasibility of the three spectral methods for the identification of olive oil adulteration. The accuracy of FTIR and Vis-NIR based on partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) for adulterated olive oil was 100%, while the accuracy of EEMs based on unfold-PLS-DA was only 73%. The accuracy of EEMs combined with back-propagation artificial neural network based on self-weighted alternating trilinear decomposition is 100%. In comparison, FTIR and Vis-NIR are superior for the detection of olive oil adulteration due to the convenience of instrument operation and modeling.

A comparative study on classification of edible vegetable oils by infrared, near infrared and fluorescence spectroscopy combined with chemometrics.

Driven by economic benefits like any other foods, vegetable oil has long been plagued by mislabeling and adulteration. Many studies have addressed the field of classification and identification of vegetable oils by various analysis techniques, especially spectral analysis. A comparative study was performed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), visible near-infrared spectroscopy (Vis-NIR) and excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy (EEMs) combined with chemometrics to distinguish different types of edible vegetable oils. FTIR, Vis-NIR and EEMs datasets of 147 samples of five vegetable oils from different brands were analyzed. Two types of pattern recognition methods, principal component analysis (PCA)/multi-way principal component analysis (M-PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)/multilinear partial least squares discriminant analysis (N-PLS-DA), were used to resolve these data and distinguish vegetable oil types, respectively. PCA/M-PCA analysis exhibited that three spectral data of five vegetable oils showed a clustering trend. The total correct recognition rate of the training set and prediction set of FTIR spectra of vegetable oil based on PLS-DA method are 100%. The total recognition rate of Vis-NIR based on PLS-DA are 100% and 97.96%. However, the total correct recognition rate of training set and prediction set of EEMs data based on N-PLS-DA method is 69.39% and 75.51%, respectively. The comparative study showed that FTIR and Vis-NIR combined with chemometrics were more suitable for vegetable oil species identification than EEMs technique. The reason may be concluded that almost all chemical components in vegetable oil can produce FTIR and NIR absorption, while only a small amount of fluorophores can produce fluorescence. That is, FTIR and NIR can provide more spectral information than EEMs. Analysis of EEMs data using self-weighted alternating trilinear decomposition (SWATLD) also showed that fluorophores were a few and irregularly distributed in vegetable oils.