Baseline gut microbial profiles are associated with the efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium in IBS-D.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about association between the efficacy of probiotics and baseline gut microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to explore gut microbiota in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) and whether baseline gut microbiota was related to the efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium (BE). METHODS: This study recruited 19 healthy controls (HC) and 50 IBS-D patients, among whom 19 patients were administrated 500 mg BE orally three times daily for 2 weeks. Clinical data and fecal samples were collected from patients before and after treatment. 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to obtain fecal bacterial data. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of alpha diversity, beta diversity, profiles of microbial phyla and genera between HC and IBS. BE improved IBS-SSS (IBS severity scoring system) and stool consistency, and altered Enterococcus, Blautia, Lachnoclostridium and Fusobacterium without significant impact on microbial structure in IBS-D. Notably, baseline fecal bacterial composition differed between non-responders and responders to BE concerning abdominal pain and bloating, with Atopobium, Pyramidobacter, Ruminococcus gnavus and Peptostreptococcus enriched in responders in terms of abdominal pain. There was reduced abundance of Prevotella, Ruminococcaceae UCG, Eubacterium eligens, Faecalibacterium and Eubacterium coprostanoligenes in responders compared with non-responders. Furthermore, BE increased beneficial bacteria including Faecalibacterium, Blautia and Butyricicoccus, decreased Lachnoclostridium and Bilophila, and influenced some microbial metabolic pathways in responders, such as mineral absorption, metabolism of arachidonic acid, d-arginine, D-ornithine, phenylalanine and vitamin B6. CONCLUSION: Baseline fecal microbiome is associated with the efficacy of BE in attenuating abdominal pain and bloating in IBS-D.

Understanding of the Site-Specific Microbial Patterns towards Accurate Identification for Patients with Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Fecal microbial community could not fully represent the intestinal microbial community. However, most studies analyzing diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) were mainly based on fecal samples. We aimed to characterize the IBS-D microbial community patterns using samples at multiple intestinal sites. This study recruited 74 IBS-D patients and 20 healthy controls (HC). 22.34%, 8.51%, 14.89%, and 54.26% of them contributed to one, two, three, and four sites: duodenal mucosa (DM), duodenal lumen (DL), rectal mucosa (RM), and rectal lumen (RL) of intestinal samples, respectively. Then 16S rRNA gene analysis was performed on these 283 samples. The result showed that IBS-D microbial communities have specific patterns at each intestinal site differing from that of HC. Across hosts and sites, Bacillus, Burkholderia, and Faecalibacterium were the representative genera in duodenum of IBS-D, duodenum of HC, and rectum of HC, respectively. Samples from mucosa and lumen in rectum were highly distinguishable, regardless of IBS-D and HC. Additionally, IBS-D patients have lower microbial co-abundance network connectivity. Moreover, RM site-specific biomarker: Bacteroides used alone or together with Prevotella and Oscillospira in RM showed outstanding performance in IBS-D diagnosis. Furthermore, Bacteroides and Prevotella in RM were strongly related to the severity of abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, and bloating in IBS-D patients. In summary, this study also confirmed fecal microbial community could not fully characterize intestinal microbial communities. Among these site-specific microbial communities, RM microbial community would be more applicable in the diagnosis of IBS-D. IMPORTANCE Microbial community varied from one site to another along the gastrointestinal tract, but current studies about intestinal microbial community in IBS-D were mainly based on fecal samples. Based on 283 intestinal samples collected from DM, DL, RM, and RL of HC and IBS-D, we found different intestinal sites had their site-specific microbial patterns in IBS-D. Notably, RM site-specific microbes Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Oscillospira could be used to discriminate IBS-D from HC accurately. Our findings could help clinicians realize the great potential of the intestinal microbial community in RM for better diagnosis of IBS-D patients.

Fecal bacteria can predict the efficacy of rifaximin in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Rifaximin for treating diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) by regulating intestinal microbiota has been studied and recommended. In this study, we tried to investigate the effect of rifaximin on different components of intestinal microbiota and explore which component of gut microbiota can predict the efficacy of rifaximin in IBS-D. METHODS: Healthy controls (HC) and IBS-D patients meeting the Rome III criteria were recruited, and IBS-D patients were orally administered 400 mg rifaximin three times daily for 2 weeks. Subjects were tested for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), their symptoms were recorded, and fecal and rectal mucosal samples were collected before and after treatment. Fecal and rectal mucosal bacterial data were obtained via 16S rRNA sequencing, and fecal fungal data were obtained via ITS2 sequencing. RESULTS: IBS-D patients were divided into two subgroups based on fecal bacterial composition, IBS1 (patients whose fecal bacterial composition were different from HC) and IBS0 (patients whose fecal bacterial profiles were similar to HC). Rifaximin increased fecal Bifidobacterium and decreased E. coli and Enterobacter in IBS1 patients. Although rectal mucosal bacteria and fecal fungi were not significantly altered in all patients after rifaximin intervention, rifaximin enhanced the connections among fecal bacteria, mucosal bacteria and fecal fungi in IBS1 patients. Compared with IBS0, we surprisingly found rifaximin ameliorated abdominal symptoms of IBS1 much better. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed patients whose fecal microbial dysbiosis indices (MDI) were higher than -3.006 could be diagnosed as IBS1. CONCLUSION: Fecal bacterial dysbiosis could be a biomarker for rifaximin treatment for IBS-D.

Gut fungal dysbiosis and altered bacterial-fungal interaction in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: An explorative study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about intestinal fungi in IBS patients whose gut bacteria have been investigated a lot. In order to explore causal relationship between IBS and gut mycobiome, and use gut fungi to diagnose or even treat IBS, further characterization of it in IBS is required. METHODS: Fifty-five diarrhea-predominant IBS (D-IBS) patients fulfilling Rome III criteria, and 16 healthy controls (HC) were recruited. Fresh fecal samples were collected and used for 16s rRNA and ITS2 high-throughput sequencing. Diversity and composition of gut bacteria and fungi, as well as bacterial-fungal interactions in D-IBS patients, were characterized. Specific fungal taxa differentiating D-IBS from HC were recognized by LEfSe and RandomForest methods, and their association with clinical symptoms was assessed by Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome patients showed abnormal (IBS-dysbiosis) or normal (HC-like IBS) fecal bacterial structure and diversity compared with healthy controls. However, fecal fungal signatures differed absolutely between D-IBS and HC, which indicated a more susceptible alteration of gut fungi than bacteria in D-IBS. Fecal fungi showed significant correlations with IBS symptoms, especially Mycosphaerella, Aspergillus, Sporidiobolus, and Pandora which were identified to potentially differentiate D-IBS from HC. Moreover, compared with HC there were markedly declined bacterial-fungal interactions in D-IBS, in which Candida changed from negative to positive correlations with bacteria, and Eurotium changed from positive correlations to irrelevance, while Debaryomyces gained negative correlations with bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Gut fungal dysbiosis and altered bacterial-fungal interactions were present in patients with D-IBS, and gut fungi could be used to diagnose D-IBS.

Duodenal and rectal mucosal microbiota related to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been proposed as an etiologic factor in irritable bowel syndrome, particularly the diarrhea-predominant subtype (IBS-D). We aimed to identify potential intestinal microbial pattern in IBS-D patients with SIBO. METHODS: Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome patients fulfilling Rome III criteria were recruited and randomly divided into an exploratory cohort (57 cases) and a validation cohort (20 cases). SIBO was identified according to standard glucose hydrogen breath test. For 16S rRNA gene sequencing, samples of duodenal mucosa, duodenal fluid, rectal mucosa, and fresh feces were collected and performed. The α and ß diversity, as well as differences in microbial composition and function, in SIBO+ and SIBO- IBS-D subjects were evaluated. RESULTS: The microbial diversity and composition obviously differed between SIBO+ and SIBO- IBS-D in duodenal and rectal mucosa but not in duodenal fluid and fresh feces. For rectal mucosal microbiota, it displayed markedly reduced aerobe and Gram-negative bacteria and increased facultative anaerobe and Gram-positive bacteria, moreover, altered functions of microbial metabolism in SIBO+ IBS-D. Significantly higher rectal mucosa-related microbial dysbiosis index was observed in SIBO+ IBS-D, and a cut-off value at -0.37 had a sensitivity of 56.55% and specificity of 90.91% to identify the SIBO in IBS-D subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal microbiota, rather than luminal bacteria, has a more apparent dysbiosis in SIBO+ IBS-D patients relative to those without SIBO. Rectal mucosa-associated microbiota may act as a potential predictor of SIBO in IBS-D patients.

Helicobacter pylori infection progresses proximally associated with pyloric metaplasia in age-dependent tendency: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The elderly population presents higher morbidity of H. pylori associated diseases in proximal stomach. The specific pathogenesis and mechanism have not been clearly addressed. The gastric environment for H. pylori colonization is dynamic with increasing age. The aim of present study is to investigate the correlation among the distribution of H. pylori, mucosal inflammation, gastric microenvironment and age. METHODS: A total of 180 patients with dyspepsia symptoms were divided into young, middle-aged and elderly groups. Biopsies were obtained from each patient in five locations: great curvature (mid-corpus, mid-antrum), lesser curvature (mid-corpus, mid-antrum) and incisura angularis (IA), analyzed for H. pylori density, mucosal inflammation and histopathology. RESULTS: The infection rate of H. pylori increased linearly with age (p <  0.001) in corpus, but not in antrum and IA. The H. pylori density was significantly aggravated in IA (p = 0.002) and corpus (p <  0.001) in elderly patient, but not in antrum. The mucosa inflammation scores were consistent with the severity of H. pylori colonization among three age groups. In elderly patients, the pyloric glands present more frequently in corpus, comparing with young and middle-aged group. A significant positive correlation among aggravating severity of H. pylori infection, mucosal inflammation and pyloric metaplasia in corpus with increasing age (p <  0.001) was occurred. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing age, both topographic distribution of H. pylori and the expansion of pyloric glands increased in a distal-to-proximal gastric direction. Pyloric metaplasia in corpus was correlated with the risk of aggravated H. pylori colonization and associated inflammation in elderly population.

Involvement of shared mucosal-associated microbiota in the duodenum and rectum in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Most studies of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) focused on microbiota dysbiosis in a single segment of the intestine such as the colon. However, the intestine as a whole is involved in IBS-D and knowledge about the role of microbiota shared by the duodenum and rectum in IBS-D is limited. Here, we investigated the characteristics of mucosal microbiota shared by the duodenum and rectum in IBS-D patients. METHODS: We collected duodenal and rectal mucosal samples from 33 adult IBS-D patients and 15 healthy control (HC) subjects. The 454 pyrosequencing method and multiple bioinformatics analyses were used to examine bacterial 16S rRNA. Clinical data including symptoms and Bristol Stool Form were analyzed. RESULTS: Mucosal microbiota in duodenal samples differed from rectal samples in HC, while less difference was shown in IBS-D. More numbers in terms of shared operational taxonomic units and genera found in IBS-D compared with HC. The frequency of genera in the duodenum and rectum of HC differed from that of IBS-D. We identified 24 genera shared in the duodenum and rectum, which both changed dramatically in IBS-D. Among these 24 genera, half had similar trends in frequency differences, and the other half had opposite trends. The frequency of Faecalibacterium and Hyphomicrobium were associated with clinical data of IBS-D patients. CONCLUSIONS: Shared mucosal-associated microbiota in the duodenum and rectum appear to contribute to the etiology and pathophysiology of whole intestine of IBS-D and to be potential therapeutic targets.

Diversity of Duodenal and Rectal Microbiota in Biopsy Tissues and Luminal Contents in Healthy Volunteers.

The diverse microbial communities that colonize distinct segments of the gastrointestinal tract are intimately related to aspects of physiology and the pathology of human health. However, most recent studies have focused on the rectal or fecal microbiota, and the microbial signature of the duodenum is poorly studied. In this study, we compared the microbiota in duodenal and rectal samples to illustrate the characteristic microbial signatures of the duodenum in healthy adults. Nine healthy volunteers donated biopsies and luminal contents from the duodenum and rectum. To determine the composition and diversity of the microbiota, 454- pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA was performed and multiple bioinformatics analyses were applied. The α-diversity and phylogenetic diversity of the microbiota in the duodenal samples were higher than those of the rectal samples. There was higher biodiversity among the microbiota isolated from rectal biopsies than feces. Proteobacteria were more highly represented in the duodenum than in the rectum, both in the biopsies and in the luminal contents from the healthy volunteers (38.7% versus 12.5%, 33.2% versus 5.0%, respectively). Acinetobacter and Prevotella were dominant in the duodenum, whereas Bacteroides and Prevotella were dominant in the rectum. Additionally, the percentage of OTUs shared in biopsy groups was far higher than in the luminal group (43.0% versus 26.8%) and a greater number of genera was shared among the biopsies than the luminal contents. Duodenal samples demonstrated greater biological diversity and possessed a unique microbial signature compared with the rectum. The mucosa-associated microbiota was more relatively conserved than luminal samples.