Multicenter randomized phase II study on S-1 and oxaliplatin therapy as an adjuvant after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (YCOG1001).

PURPOSE: The high recurrence rate of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) after surgery remains a crucial problem. However, adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM has not yet been established. This study evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant therapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX). METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, phase II study, patients undergoing curative resection of CRCLM were randomly enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to either the low- or high-dose group. S-1 and oxaliplatin were administered from days 1 to 14 of a 3-week cycle as a 2-h infusion every 3 weeks. The dose of S-1 was fixed at 80 mg/m2. The doses in the low- and high-dose oxaliplatin groups were 100 mg/m2 (low-dose group) and 130 mg/m2 (high-dose group), respectively. This treatment was repeated eight times. The primary endpoint was the rate of discontinuation owing to toxicity. The secondary endpoints were the relapse-free survival (RFS) and frequency of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Between August 2010 and March 2015, 44 patients (low-dose group: 31 patients and high-dose group: 13 patients) were enrolled in the study. Of these, one patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis. In the high-dose group, five of nine patients were unable to continue the study due to toxicity in February 2013. At that time, recruitment to the high-dose group was stopped from the protocol. The relative dose intensity (RDI) for S-1 in the low- and high-dose groups were 49.8 and 48.7% (p = 0.712), and that for oxaliplatin was 75.9 and 73.0% (p = 0.528), respectively. The rates of discontinuation due to toxicity were 60 and 53.8% in the low- and high-dose groups, respectively, with no marked difference noted between the groups (p = 0.747). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 common adverse events was neutropenia (23.3%/23.1%), diarrhea (13.3%/15.4%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (6.7%/7.7%). The disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years was 52.9% in the low-dose group, which was not significantly different from that in the high-dose group (46.2%; p = 0.705). CONCLUSIONS: SOX regimens as adjuvant therapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM had high rates of discontinuation due to toxicity in both groups. In particular, the RDI of S-1 was < 50%. Therefore, the SOX regimen is not recommended as adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM.

Exploratory randomized phase II trial for optimizing treatment dosage and duration of adjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with stage III colon cancer: YCOG1402 (SOAP trial).

Introduction: Conventionally, the recommended duration of adjuvant chemotherapy of colon cancer had been 6 months. The IDEA Collaboration suggested that shortening capecitabin and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) adjuvant chemotherapy may be possible. S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) treatment is standard treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. The aim of this study was to optimize treatment dosage and duration of adjuvant SOX in stage III colon cancer. Methods: This trial was as open-label multi-center randomized phase II study. Patients with stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant SOX treatment in different doses: 130 mg/m2 (3 months) or 100 mg/m2 (6 months) of oxaliplatin. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and the null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was that the 3-year DFS was ≤72% in each arm and was tested with a one-sided significance level of 10%. Results: Eighty-two patients were assigned to the 6 months arm and 81 to the 3 months arm. The 3-year DFS was 75.0% (80% CI 67.95-80.72, p = 0.282) in the 6 months arm and 76.9% (80% CI 70.1-82.38, p = 0.171) in the 3 months arm. Treatment completion rate and relative dose intensity (RDI) were higher in 3 months than 6 months arm. The adverse events (AE) were similar in both arms. Conclusions: The 3-year DFS was not significantly superior to null hypothesis in both 3 months and 6 months arms for the stage III colon cancer. Primary endpoint was not achieved. The SOX regimen was not feasible in long-term outcomes.

Usefulness of 3D-CT Angiography to Determine the Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Colon Cancer of the Splenic Flexure.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the extent of lymph node dissection (LND) determined using preoperative Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography (3D-CTA), in the management of splenic flexure colon cancer (SFC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, 61 patients who underwent preoperative 3D-CTA and laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for SFC between December 2011 and December 2021 were identified at a tertiary care center in Japan. Preoperative 3D-CTA was used to confirm the feeding arteries, following which the extent of LND was determined. Left hemicolectomy was performed in cases requiring LND in the domains of the middle colic artery and left colic artery. In other cases, a partial colectomy (PC) that was defined as a segmental resection of the splenic flexure with LND in the domains of the feeding arteries was performed. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between PC and left hemicolectomy. RESULTS: Preoperative 3D-CTA enabled the evaluation of the feeding artery in all patients. PC was performed in 51 patients (83.6%). Patients who underwent PC had a shorter operative time (p=0.03) and less blood loss (p=0.01). There was no difference in complications between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in 5-year overall survival, nor 3-year disease free survival. CONCLUSION: Preoperative simulation using 3D-CTA has the potential to be useful in the identification of feeding arteries and determination of the oncologically adequate extent of LND for each patient.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy following colorectal perforation: defining the risk factors for delayed wound healing.

PURPOSE: The World Health Organization recommends prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for high-risk SSI wounds, despite which delayed wound healing (DWH) remains a problem. The aim of this study was to define the risk factors for DWH under prophylactic NPWT following colorectal perforation (CP). METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were patients who underwent emergency laparotomy and prophylactic NPWT for CP between 2011 and 2019 at Fujisawa City Hospital in Japan. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify which perioperative factors impact DWH. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients met the inclusion criteria and the median period from surgery to wound closure was 12 days (IQR: 8-18). Most factors, including preoperative steroid use, diabetes, and serum albumin, were not associated with DWH, although patients requiring catecholamine were more likely to have DWH (OR 7.81, 95% CI 1.55-39.24, p = 0.013). The median in-hospital cost was more than double for patients with DWH vs. those without DWH (41.36 kUSD [IQR 24.95-51.89] vs. 20.32 kUSD [IQR 16.69-28.45], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Catecholamine use was a greater risk factor for DWH than previously reported factors such as diabetes and the serum albumin level. Further study is needed to investigate strategies to prevent DWH and optimize the utilization of NPWT, especially in patients requiring catecholamine.

Japanese multicenter prospective study investigating laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer with evaluation of CRM and TME quality (PRODUCT trial).

Aim: In Japan, we have not been able to validate the results of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer using the universal index "circumferential resection margin (CRM)." Previously, we established a semi-opened circular specimen processing method and validated its feasibility. In the PRODUCT trial, we aimed to assess CRM in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic rectal resection. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma located at or below 12 cm above the anal verge with clinical stage II or III and were scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological CRM. CRM ≤1 mm was defined as positive. Results: A total of 303 patients operated on between August 2018 and January 2020 were included in the primary analysis. The number of patients with clinical stage II and III was 139 and 164, respectively. Upfront surgery was performed for 213 patients and neoadjuvant therapy for 90 patients. The median CRM was 4.0 mm (IQR, 2.1-8.0 mm), and CRM was positive in 26 cases (8.6%). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that a predicted CRM from the mesorectal fascia of ≤1 mm on MRI was the significant factor for positive CRM (P = .0012 and P = .0045, respectively). Conclusion: This study showed the quality of laparoscopic rectal resection based on the CRM in Japan. Preoperative MRI is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer to prevent CRM positivity.

Evaluation of aesthetic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery by the surgeon, nurse, and patients.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the cosmetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) differs depending on the evaluator. We performed a clinical trial to examine the differences between assessments of cosmetic outcomes performed by a surgeon, patients, and a nurse as a third party after BCS; the evaluation was performed two times (at 3 months and 9 months after surgery). Similarly, we identified factors most significantly affecting the overall cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with primary breast cancer who had undergone BCS between September 2017 and December 2018 were consecutively enrolled in the study. Breast shape, symmetry, hardness, scarring, and overall outcomes were evaluated by a surgeon, patients, and a nurse via a questionnaire. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 3- to 9-month comparisons of the surgeon, patients, and nurse were 0.73, 0.64, and 0.29, respectively. The ICCs for the surgeon-patient, nurse-patient, and surgeon-nurse comparisons (3 months/9 months) were 0.49/0.44, 0.34/0.10, and 0.41/0.51, respectively. The partial regression coefficient for shape was 0.45 (p = 0.003)/0.61 (p = 0.001), 0.37 (p = 0.005)/0.50 (p < 0.001), and -0.08 (p = 0.48)/0.58 (p < 0.001) for evaluations performed by the surgeon, patients, and nurse, 3 months and 9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: With reproducibility, only moderate agreement was observed between the surgeon and the patients. Breast shape was identified as the most important factor affecting cosmetic outcomes.

A novel discriminant formula for the prompt diagnosis of strangulated bowel obstruction.

PURPOSES: The diagnosis of strangulated bowel obstruction (SBO) is sometimes difficult. We attempted to create and verify a discriminant formula for use as a diagnostic aid for the early diagnosis of SBO. METHODS: This retrospective study included 97 patients who underwent an operation for SBO from January 2007 to September 2018. First, a discriminant analysis was performed for 73 patients who underwent an operation from January 2007 to December 2015 in order to obtain a formula. Next, we analyzed 34 patients who underwent an operation from January 2016 to September 2018 to verify the formula. RESULTS: The risk factors for SBO included ascites, signs of preperitoneal irritation, and lactate > 1.16 mmol/L. The discriminant formula is as follows: 1.954 × collection of ascites (1 or 0) + 1.239 × peritoneal irritation sign (1 or 0) + 0.378 × lactate - 2.331 (1: positive, 0: negative). The predictive value was as follows: sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 64.7%; and predictive accuracy, 73.5%. In patients who presented within 24 h of the onset, the sensitivity was 92.3%, the specificity was 75.0%, and the predictive accuracy was 85.7%. CONCLUSION: Our discriminant formula seems useful for the rapid diagnosis of SBO.

Long-term results of a randomized study comparing open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (Eld Lap study).

BACKGROUND: We reported favorable short-term results of laparoscopic surgery in a randomized study comparing open and laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study is to clarify the long-term outcomes of the laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with CRC. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were ≥ 75 years, adenocarcinoma, ≤ T4a, M0 and elective surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to open or laparoscopic surgery according to the tumor location. The survival rates, recurrence and reasons for death were compared. RESULT: One hundred patients (right colon 43, left colon 28, rectum 29) were included in each group. Eight patients who underwent open surgery and 2 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were excluded from the analysis because of metastatic diseases and other malignancies found during the operations. One hundred ninety patients (98 open, 98 laparoscopic) were analyzed. There was no difference in the backgrounds excluding more patients with vascular invasion in the laparoscopic rectal cancer. There were no differences in the 5-year overall survival rate (open vs. laparoscopic; 78.9% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.638), 5-year disease-free survival rate (70.5% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.276), 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (76.1% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.419), or 5-year cancer-specific survival rate (86.1% vs. 80.5%, p = 0.208). No differences in survival were detected in the analyses of stage and tumor location. There was no significant difference in the overall recurrence rate or recurrence site. However, distant lymph node metastases and local recurrences were more common after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery. There was no difference in the cause of death. More than half of the patients died from other diseases in both groups (57.9% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.765). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery showed similar long-term results compared to open surgery in elderly patients with CRC. Laparoscopic surgery is an effective surgical procedure for elderly patients with CRC.

Planned Versus On-Demand Relaparotomy Strategy in Initial Surgery for Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: There has been insufficient evidence regarding a treatment strategy for patients with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) due to the lack of large-scale studies. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of strategic planned relaparotomy in patients with NOMI using detailed perioperative information. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study that included NOMI patients who underwent laparotomy. In-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, incidence of total adverse events, ventilator-free days, and intensive care unit (ICU)-free days were compared between groups experiencing the planned and on-demand relaparotomy strategies. Analyses were performed using a multivariate mixed effects model and a propensity score matching model after adjusting for pre-operative, intra-operative, and hospital-related confounders. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients from 17 hospitals were included, of whom 107 (59.1%) were treated using the planned relaparotomy strategy. The multivariate mixed effects regression model indicated no significant differences for in-hospital mortality (61 patients [57.0%] in the planned relaparotomy group vs. 28 patients [37.8%] in the on-demand relaparotomy group; adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.94 [0.78-4.80]), as well as in 28-day mortality, adverse events, and ICU-free days. Significant reduction in ventilator-free days was observed in the planned relaparotomy group. Propensity score matching analysis of 61 matched pairs with comparable patient severity did not show superiority of the planned relaparotomy strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The planned relaparotomy strategy, compared with on-demand relaparotomy strategy, did not show clinical benefits after the initial surgery of patients with NOMI. Further studies estimating potential subpopulations who may benefit from this strategy are required.

Effective Treatment of a Malignant Breast Phyllodes Tumor with Doxorubicin-Ifosfamide Therapy.

Malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast occur infrequently and are difficult to treat with chemotherapy. Here, we present an effective chemotherapy strategy for recurrent malignant breast phyllodes tumors. A 48-year-old woman was diagnosed with a malignant phyllodes tumor in her right breast and underwent total right mastectomy. One year later, the tumor recurred in the right (a 2.2 cm mass) and left (a 10 cm mass) lungs; pleural effusion was also observed in the left lung. Eight courses of doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) therapy were administered. After treatment, the right lung mass and pleural effusion regressed completely and the left lung mass regressed to 2 cm. In conclusion, AI therapy is useful for treating recurrent malignant breast phyllodes tumors.

[A case of para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colon cancer with complete response to uracil/tegafur plus leucovorin therapy].

In October 2008, a 66-year-old male patient underwent resection of the right half of the colon for ascending colon cancer. Histopathological examination revealed a tumor classification of tub2, pSE, ly1, v0, PM0, DM0, RM0, pN1(2/23), H0 , P0 , Stage III a. The patient was treated with uracil/tegafur plus Leucovorin(UFT/LV)chemotherapy after surgery. However, he developed Grade 2 liver dysfunction after completion of 1 course, so UFT/LV was discontinued. In June 2009, a rise in the carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)level was observed, and computed tomography(CT)and positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose(FDG-PET)showed a single enlarged lymph node, 2 cm in diameter, located around the aorta. We informed the patient of the therapeutic effect of anticancer drug treatment and surgery, risk of adverse events, and other management methods, and UFT/LV chemotherapy was selected as treatment. After 3 courses, the lymph node had completely disappeared, and UFT/LV was discontinued in April 2011, as there was no sign of recurrence. The patient remains alive and well. We report a case of para-aortic lymph node metastasis after surgery, treated with UFT/LV, which led to a complete response without major adverse events.

Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In surgical treatment of elderly patients, securing the safety of surgery and radical cure must be balanced. Our purpose was to verify the safety and validity of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer in elderly patients. METHODS: Patients with cTis­T4a colorectal cancer who were 75 years or older were randomized to receive open or laparoscopic surgery. Exclusion criteria were patients who had a bulky tumor, rectal cancer that required pelvic side wall lymphadenectomy, and history of colon resection. Patients were divided according to tumor location (right colon, left colon, and rectum). The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: One hundred patients (right 43, left 28, and rectum 29) were registered in each group from August 2008 to August 2012. There were no differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. Three patients were converted from laparoscopic to open, because of bleeding, excision of peritoneum metastasis, and patient's desire, respectively. In the short-term results (open:laparoscopic), there were significant differences in the rates of complications (36:23 %) and ileus (12:4 %), amount of blood loss (157:63 mL), and duration of surgery (150:172 min). There were no significant differences in the pathological margins, and the number of dissected lymph nodes. In the subgroup analysis according to the tumor location, there were significant differences in the rate of complications (39.4:22.5 %), amount of blood loss (135:42 mL), duration of surgery (139:160 min), and length of postoperative stay (13.0:10.0 days) in the colon cancer. There were no significant differences in short-term results in the rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients did not result in a difference in radical cure compared with open surgery, and the short-term results except the duration of surgery were excellent. It is an effective procedure for elderly patients with colorectal cancer, especially colon cancer.

Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery by a colon lifting-up technique that decreases the number of access ports: comparison by propensity scoring of short-term and long-term outcomes with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer has become established as a minimally invasive surgical approach. However, many disposable instruments are required, and there is an associated disadvantage of cost. We have developed a new technique, which uses a suture string to lift up the colon. This method is expected to reduce the number of access ports required without compromising the radical cure. OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: A suture string piercing the abdominal wall is passed through the mesocolon. The colon is retracted anteriorly and is fixed at the abdominal wall. The main mesenteric vessels are under tension, and lymph node dissection is performed easily by a medial approach. The working space is more stable because the colon is fixed to the abdominal wall. METHODS: This study examined the short-term and long-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer using our colon lifting-up technique (CLT), compared with the standard multiport technique. The study design was a case-matched control by propensity scoring. Analyzed variables were sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, cancer in a different organ, multiple colorectal cancer, operator, operative year, tumor location, operative procedure, adjuvant chemotherapy, and International Union Against Cancer TNM stage. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, 301 patients underwent CLT and 436 standard multiport technique, 148 patients were matched by propensity score and analyzed. Regarding short-term outcomes, there was no difference between the 2 groups. The mean number of ports needed was 3.37±0.48 for CLT (93 with 3 ports, 55 with 4). There were no differences in recurrence-free survival and overall survival in long-term follow-up results for each stage. There were neither recurrences nor complications due to CLT. CONCLUSIONS: The CLT facilitated laparoscopic colectomy without compromising cure rates. It is a useful method to keep a stable view and to conserve medical resources.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been used for colorectal cancer as a minimally invasive procedure. However, there are still difficulties concerning effective triangulation and countertraction. The study's purpose was to clarify the usefulness of the colon-lifting technique (CLT) in SILS for colorectal cancer. METHODS: SILS was performed for cancer (cT2N0 or less) of the right-sided colon (near the ileocecum), sigmoid, or rectosigmoid. The SILS™ Port was used for transumbilical access. A suture string was inserted through the abdominal wall and passed through the mesocolon. The colon was retracted anteriorly and fixed to the abdominal wall. The main mesenteric vessels were placed under tension. Lymph node dissection was performed by medial approach. Short-term surgical outcomes and access port costs were compared between SILS (using CLT) and the standard multiport technique (MPT). The two groups were case-matched by propensity scoring. Analyzed variables included preoperative Dukes stage and tumor location. RESULTS: From June 2009 to April 2011, 27 patients underwent SILS, and from April 2005 to April 2011, 85 patients underwent MPT. Propensity scoring generated 23 matched patients per group for SILS versus MPT comparisons. There were no significant differences in operating time, blood loss, early complications, postoperative analgesic frequency, or length of hospital stay. One MPT patient was converted to open surgery (4.5%); no SILS patients were converted. There were no significant differences in the length of distal cut margin and the number of harvested lymph nodes, except incision length (SILS vs. MPT: 33 vs. 55 mm, P < 0.001). Significant differences favored SILS in access instrument cost (SILS vs. MPT: 62,761 vs. 77,130 Japanese yen, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SILS performed using CLT was safe and effective in providing radical treatment of cT2N0 cancer in the right-sided colon, sigmoid, or rectosigmoid. SILS was advantageous with respect to cosmesis and lower cost of access instruments.

Solo surgery in laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched study comparing robotic and human scopist.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent technical developments have enabled solo surgery in laparoscopic surgery. Our experience of solo surgery using the voice-guided robotic arm in laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer was analyzed. METHODOLOGY: The colon-lifting method was used in this study. The laparoscope was handled by AESOP3000. The colon was retracted anteriorly by the thread that passed through the mesocolon. This method enables lymphadenectomy by stretching of feeding vessels and obviates the need for an assistant. The short-term outcomes and survival between robotic arm and human scopist in a series of laparoscopic colectomies were compared with a case-matched control study. RESULTS: The numbers of both group patients were 11 respectively. There was no conversion to open surgery in both groups. The operation time (Robotic vs. Human=269 min. vs. 265) and laparoscopic time (209 vs. 212) were not significant differences. There were also no significant differences in the bleeding, the morbidity rate and the numbers of dissected lymph nodes between the two groups. The five-year overall (81.8% vs. 72.7%) and disease-free (72.7% vs. 62.3%) survivals showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic solo-surgery in colectomy is safe and feasible, without any deterioration of the curative potential of the procedure.

Paraaortic lymph node metastasis showed CR to UFT/LV therapy in elderly rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intravenous chemotherapy with a combination of several drugs is commonly used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the associated adverse events can be severe. Here we report a rare case of metastatic rectal cancer in an elderly patient who got complete response for metastatic rectal cancer with oral uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin therapy. METHODOLOGY: 77-year-old male. An abdominoperineal resection of the rectum was performed, but para-aortic lymph-node metastasis occurred. Uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin therapy was started on postoperative day 48. Each chemotherapy course comprised 400 mg/day uracil-tegafur and 75 mg/day leucovorin administered for 28 days every 35 days. RESULTS: After 10 courses, abdominal computed tomography indicated that a good partial response had been achieved. The para-aortic lymph-node swelling disappeared after 17 courses, indicating a complete response. During this period, no adverse events were noted. No recurrence had occurred 4 months after the complete response. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates that uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin therapy can be used safely even in elderly patients, and suggests that it is likely to be effective in treating metastatic colorectal cancer.

Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter randomized study is high quality, but it is also true that there are differences between institutions. The quality of treatment is consistent in a single center so comparisons in a retrospective study can be matched for many variables. METHODS: This single-center study examined short-term and long-term outcomes for colorectal cancer in 258 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection (LC) and 258 matched open resection (OC) cases. The health-related qualities of life (HRQOL) at 1-2 years after the operations in 62 patients (35 LC and 27 OC) were compared by SF-36. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 5.0%. Mean follow-up periods in LC and OC were 62.3 and 62.1 months, respectively. Operation time was longer in LC than in OC, although the difference was not significant in the later period. Bleeding and postoperative stay were reduced in LC. The morbidity rate was 18.6% in LC and 26.4% in OC. The 5-year overall survival in LC and OC were 94.6% vs. 92.0% for stage I, 95.2% vs. 91.8% for stage II, and 80.9% vs. 79.1% for stage III, respectively. The corresponding 5-year disease-free survival were 94.0% vs. 88.4%, 92.1% vs. 84.0%, and 64.3% vs. 65.4%, respectively. Recurrence rates did not differ between groups. In the analysis of HRQOL scores, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning, role emotional, and physical component summary scores in LC were better than in OC. CONCLUSIONS: In LC for colorectal cancer, short-term outcomes except operation time and mid-term HRQOL were better than in OC, and there were no adverse effects relating to long-term outcomes.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor with two genetic abnormalities on different alleles: report of a case.

We report a case of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with strong and faint KIT protein staining, respectively, at two different sites. A single point mutation (c1727 T>C) was detected in DNA extracted from both sites, and a further deletion mutation (c1678_1680 del GTT) was detected in DNA from the site with strong KIT protein staining. Cloning analysis indicated that the point mutation and the deletion were present on different alleles.

A Y-shaped vinyl hood that creates pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (Y-hood method.): a new technique for laparoscopic low anterior resection.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have focused on laparoscopic techniques for the treatment of colon cancer, but such work is more limited for the treatment of rectal cancer, largely because of concerns for safety issues. This report presents an effective method of anal lavage and excision in laparoscopic low anterior resection. METHODS: The authors developed clamp forceps for intestinal lavage and a Y-shaped vinyl hood that can be operated under pneumoperitoneum for airproof surgery. These devices enabled secure clamping and cleansing of the area and use of automatic suture instruments for open laparotomy through a minilaparotomy wound. The authors called this technique the Y-Hood method and compared its short-term results from May 2005 to October 2008 (n = 28) with those for double-stapling technique surgical cases between September 2000 and October 2008 in which automatic suture instruments were used more than once (n = 107). A multivariate analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage also was performed. RESULTS: No difference in background factors such as patient sex, age, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging were detected. Anastomotic leakage was found in 12 cases that used multiple stapling for rectal transection (11.2%) and 2 cases that used the Y-Hood (7.1%). The cost for rectectomy was 92,505 yen for multiple stapling and 53,107 yen for the Y-Hood (p < 0.0001). As risk factors for anastomotic leakage, multivariate analysis identified the number of times stapling for rectal transection was performed and the height of the anastomotic region. CONCLUSION: The Y-Hood method enables operations to be performed within the interior of the pelvis without reducing the number of ports because the instruments can be accessed using minilaparotomy. Because the use of stapling for rectal transection is minimized, this method is effective in avoiding anastomotic leakage and also cost efficient. The Y-Hood method allows for thorough intestinal lavage and safe laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Surgical strategy for local recurrence after resection of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate surgery for local recurrence after rectal cancer resection. METHODOLOGY: In total, 76 patients with local recurrence after rectal cancer resection were enrolled between 1978 and 1998. Of these, 61 underwent curative resection. Outcomes were assessed according to treatment. Recurrence was classified as visceral or parietal based on preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates were 17.8%, 25.9%, and 36.9% for patients who underwent total pelvic exenteration, abdomino-perineal resection, and local resection, respectively. Of the 61 patients who underwent curative resection, 18 (29.5%) showed visceral recurrence and 43 (70.5%) showed parietal recurrence. Among patients with visceral recurrence, 9 (50%) underwent total pelvic exenteration, 6 (33.3%) underwent abdomino-perineal resection, and 3 (16.7%) underwent local resection. Among patients with parietal recurrence, 27 (62.8%) underwent total pelvic exenteration, 4 (9.3%) underwent abdomino-perineal resection, and 12 (27.9%) underwent local resection. Mucinous adenocarcinomas were most common among patients with parietal recurrence. Overall 5-year survival rates were 64.9% and 14.0% for patients with visceral and parietal recurrence, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Curative resection was effective in rectal cancer patients with visceral recurrence. Novel systemic chemical radiotherapy should be considered for patients with parietal recurrence.