Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spec Care Dentist ; 42(3): 209-215, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34791692

RESUMEN

AIMS: This study aimed to assess the longevity of a fixed prosthesis in patients with intellectual disability (ID) and to investigate the risk factors associated with the failure of a prosthesis due to abutment tooth extraction or prosthesis dislodgement or removal. METHODS: We studied past medical records to evaluate the longevity of 315 prostheses that were luted in 76 patients with ID. We calculated the survival rates and assessed 15 variables potentially associated with prosthetic failure using multivariate Cox regression analyses with shared frailty for patients. RESULTS: Three-quarters of our sample population had severe or profound ID. The maximum observation period was 31.0 years, and the corresponding survival ratio was 32.5%; the survival ratio at 10 years was 59.4%. The use of intravenous sedation significantly influenced the success of the prosthesis, with the hazard ratio (HR) being 0.49 times that of conventional treatment without behavior-altering drug therapy. The most significant risk factor for prosthetic failure was age at placement; the HR for patients aged ≥31 years was 2.82 times that for patients aged ≤ 20 years. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe ID, appropriate intravenous sedation was effective in prolonging the longevity of a fixed prosthesis.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Discapacidad Intelectual , Adulto , Atención Odontológica , Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado/efectos adversos , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(43): e22826, 2020 Oct 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33120808

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The persistent loss of consciousness caused by general anesthesia without the existence of repeated 90-minute cycles of non-REM and REM sleep might significantly disturb and suppress the cycle of normal physiological sleep in postoperative periods after general anesthesia. Patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) with existing circadian rhythm disorder are reported to rapidly deteriorate due to acute sleep disorder during the perioperative period after general anesthesia.A melatonin receptor agonist, ramelteon (Rozerem), which is a sleep cycle regulator, is used as a therapeutic drug for patients with sleep disorders, but there are no studies on the prevention of postoperative sleep disorder after general anesthesia.In this study, we investigate whether prophylactic administration of a sleep-inducing substance, a melatonin receptor agonist, is effective against sleep disorder after general anesthesia in patients with ASD. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is intended for patients with ASD aged 12 years and above who undergo treatment at Nagasaki University Hospital, Isahaya General Hospital Dentistry, and Sasebo City General Medical Center Dentistry and undergo dental treatment under general anesthesia. A melatonin receptor agonist (Rozerem) will be taken 7 days prior and 7 days postsurgery in patients diagnosed with insomnia. A randomized comparison will be made between 2 groups: an experimental group that is additionally administered Rozerem and a control group.The primary endpoint is the incidence of NREM-REM sleep disorders that occur within 3 to 5 days after general anesthesia. The secondary endpoint is the incidence of circadian rhythm sleep disorders (rate of occurrence of sleep-retardation syndrome with drowsiness and strong fatigue). DISCUSSION: Postoperative sleep disorders after general anesthesia has been reported in patients with ASD; however, effective preventive pharmacological treatments have not been established. A sleep cycle regulator, ramelteon (Rozerem), is used as a therapeutic drug for patients with sleep disorders by decreasing the difficulty of falling asleep in insomnia. If sleep disorder can be prevented after the administration of general anesthesia in patients with ASD, we can support social participation while maintaining their quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the jRCT1071200030.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/complicaciones , Indenos/uso terapéutico , Receptor de Melatonina MT2/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto Joven
3.
Clin Exp Dent Res ; 6(3): 296-304, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32067414

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Body position might affect the coordination between respiration and swallowing. This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that during swallowing, coordinated movements of muscle groups such as the diaphragm and rectus abdominis muscles are important to control normal swallowing apnea. OBJECTIVE: To investigate this hypothesis, respiratory parameters, swallowing apnea and muscle activity were measured in each of four body positions: sitting position with feet on the floor, 30° reclining position, lateral position, and standing position. METHODS: All measurements were performed in nine healthy subjects. Nasal airflow was measured using a pneumotachometer and muscle activity was measured using an electromyograph. All lung volume fraction parameters were measured using spirometer and swallowing apnea time was calculated. RESULTS: The maximum inspiratory volume was 2.76 ± 0.83 L in the 30° reclining position, which was significantly larger than that in the other positions (p = .0001). The preliminary expiratory volume was 1.05 ± 0.42 L in the 30° reclining position, which was significantly smaller than that in the other positions (p < .0001). The swallowing apnea time during water swallowing was 1.17 ± 0.35 sec in the lateral position and 0.87 ± 0.28 sec in the 30° reclining position, which tended to be longer than the 0.78 sec in the sitting position. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both lateral and reclining positions require a longer period of swallowing apnea compared to the sitting and standing positions. Differences in body position may significantly influence the coordination between respiration and swallowing.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Abdominales/fisiología , Apnea/fisiopatología , Deglución , Postura , Reflejo/fisiología , Respiración , Adulto , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Mediciones del Volumen Pulmonar , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...