Effect of propranolol on pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Clozapine is the effective therapy for treatment-refractory schizophrenia. However, the use of clozapine is limited by its adverse effects. As propranolol is frequently used for the prevention and treatment of clozapine-induced tachycardia, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of propranolol on steady state pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients. METHODS: We included 16 retrospective studies on the effects of propranolol on steady state pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients, with data from both generic and brand name treatment phases in eight clozapine bioequivalence studies conducted in a single center in China from 2018 to 2022. Review Manager 5.4 was used for meta-analysis of the included studies. RESULTS: The SMDs with 95% CIs of AUC0-12, Cmax,ss, C, and C were calculated to be 0.44 (0.23, 0.64), 0.40 (0.20, 0.61), 0.43 (0.22, 0.63), and 0.44 (0.23, 0.64), respectively. These findings proved that combination with propranolol would increase the systemic exposure of clozapine. T1/2 of clozapine was significantly longer in the presence of propranolol than in the absence of propranolol (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.12, 0.52], p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference for T of clozapine in the presence or absence of propranolol (SMD = - 0.05, 95% CI [- 0.25, 0.15], p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: The combination with propranolol could significantly increase systemic exposure and extended T1/2 of clozapine, and thus need to be considered in prescribing decisions.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two metoprolol succinate extended release tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and establish bioequivalence of test and reference metoprolol succinate extended-release (ER) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to either the fasting or the fed group and also to one of the two treatment sequences (test-reference or reference-test), according to which they received a single 47.5-mg dose of the test or reference metoprolol ER tablet in the study periods. During each period, blood samples were collected at pre-dose and at intervals up to 48 hours after dosing. Plasma concentrations of metoprolol were determined by liquid chromatography. The safety of both ER tablets was monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: 60 subjects were enrolled and all completed the study, with 30 participants each in the fasting and fed groups. In both groups, the 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-48h, AUC0-inf, and Cmax were within the acceptable bioequivalence range (80 - 125%). There were no significant differences in adverse event (AE) reporting between the subjects receiving test or reference ER tablet. No serious AEs occurred during the study period. CONCLUSION: The test metoprolol ER tablet was bioequivalent to the reference metoprolol ER tablet (Betaloc ZOK) in healthy Chinese subjects measured under both fasting and fed conditions. Both formulations were well tolerated by all study participants.

First-in-human phase I studies of YJ001 spray applied to local skin in healthy subjects and patients with diabetic neuropathic pain.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of YJ001 spray, a candidate drug for diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP) therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS: Forty-two healthy subjects received one of four single doses (240, 480, 720, 960 mg) of YJ001 spray or placebo, and 20 patients with DNP received repeated doses (240 and 480 mg) of YJ001 spray or placebo via topical route of administration to the local skin of both feet. Safety, and efficacy assessments were performed, and blood samples were collected for PK analyses. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic results revealed that the concentrations of YJ001 and its metabolites were low, and most of them were lower than the lower limit of quantitation. In patients with DNP, treatment with a 480 mg YJ001 spray dose significantly reduced pain and improved sleep quality compared with placebo. No serious adverse events (SAEs) or clinically significant findings of the safety parameters were observed. CONCLUSION: Systemic exposure to YJ001 and its metabolites is low after YJ001 spray is applied locally to the skin, which will reduce systemic toxicity and adverse reactions. YJ001 appears to be well tolerated and potentially effective in the management of DNP and is a promising new remedy for DNP.

Multiple doses of SHR-1222, a sclerostin monoclonal antibody, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase 1 trial.

SHR-1222, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin, has been shown to induce bone formation and decrease bone resorption at a single dose ranging 50-400 mg in our previous phase 1 trial. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase 1 trial, which further investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of multiple ascending doses of SHR-1222 in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (POP). A total of 105 women with POP were enrolled and randomly assigned. Twenty-one received placebo and eighty-four received SHR-1222 sequentially (100 mg QM, n=4; 200 or 300 mg QM, n=20; and 400 or 600 mg Q2M, n=20). The most common adverse events included increased blood parathyroid hormone, increased low-density lipoprotein, increased blood alkaline phosphatase, increased blood cholesterol, back pain, and arthralgia, the majority of which were mild in severity without noticeable safety concerns. Serum SHR-1222 exposure (Cmax,ss and AUC0-tau,ss) increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner. Following multiple doses of SHR-1222, the bone formation markers (terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin) increased in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the bone resorption marker (ß-C-telopeptide) was downregulated. Accordingly, BMD gains in the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were observed. The maximum BMD increase from baseline at the lumbar spine was detected in the 300 mg QM cohort (14.6% vs. 0.6% in the placebo group on day 169). Six (6/83; 7.2%) subjects developed anti-SHR-1222 antibodies with no discernible effects on PKs, PDs, and safety. Thus, multiple doses of SHR-1222 showed an acceptable safety profile and dose-dependent plasma exposure in women with POP, and could improve their BMD rapidly and prominently by promoting bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption. These findings further support SHR-1222 as a potential alternative agent for the treatment of POP.

Single Dose of SHR-1222, a Sclerostin Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Men and Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation, Phase I Study.

SHR-1222 is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin and has the potential to promote bone formation and reduce bone resorption. This study was aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of SHR-1222 in healthy men and postmenopausal women with low bone mass (BMD). It was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, phase I study. Subjects received SHR-1222 at 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg sequentially or matching placebo subcutaneously. Totally, 50 subjects with low BMD were enrolled and randomly assigned; 10 received placebo and 40 received SHR-1222 (50 mg, n = 4; 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg, n = 9). The most common adverse events that occurred at least 10% higher in subjects with SHR-1222 treatment than those with placebo were decreased blood calcium, blood urine present, increased blood cholesterol, electrocardiogram T wave abnormal, urinary tract infection, increased blood pressure diastolic, and positive bacterial test. All the above adverse events were mild in severity and well resolved except one of increased blood cholesterol in a subject lost to follow-up. The serum SHR-1222 concentration increased in a dose-dependent manner. Administration of SHR-1222 upregulated the bone-formation markers N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, osteocalcin, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, while downregulated the bone-resorption marker ß-C-telopeptide. The BMD at the lumbar spine notably rose after a single dose of SHR-1222. The largest increase occurred in the 400 mg cohort (3.8, 6.7, and 6.1% on day 29, 57, and 85, respectively; compared with 1.4, 0.8, and 1.0% in the placebo group). Although 10.0% of subjects receiving SHR-1222 tested positive for anti-SHR-1222 antibodies, no obvious effects of antibody formation were found on pharmacokinetics. Overall, SHR-1222 was well tolerated at doses from 50 to 400 mg and is a promising new remedy for osteoporosis. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03870100.

Evaluation of bioequivalence between generic and brand-name clozapine in Chinese schizophrenic patients: A randomized, two-period, crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is the most effective therapy for schizophrenia. This study compared the bioequivalence of a generic formulation of clozapine (ChangZhou Pharmaceutical Factory Co. Ltd. Jiangsu, China) to the brand name formulation (Clozaril, HLS Therapeutics, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA) after multiple doses in Chinese schizophrenic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover study in which patients with schizophrenia received the generic clozapine or Clozaril 100 mg twice daily for 10 days before crossing over to the alternate formulation for the next 10 days. Blood samples were collected at regular intervals during each treatment period, and plasma concentration of clozapine was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: 26 patients were enrolled, of whom 24 completed the study and were included in the steady-state analyses. The mean AUC0-12 was 6,003.29 h×ng/mL for generic clozapine and 6,347.53 h×ng/mL for Clozaril. The mean Cmax,ss was 698.52 ng/mL for generic clozapine and 739.75 ng/mL for Clozaril. The ratio of the adjusted geometric means and its 90% CI of the ratios for AUC0-12 was 96.24% (89.60 - 103.36%), and for Cmax,ss was 95.90% (88.91 - 103.44%). A total of 66 adverse events were reported by 22 (84.62%) subjects. Among them, 34 occurred in 17 (65.38%) patients during dosing of generic clozapine, and 32 occurred in 16 (61.54%) patients during dosing of brand-name clozapine. CONCLUSION: The result demonstrated that the generic clozapine was bioequivalent to brand-name clozapine (Clozaril). This would provide physicians with reassurance that patients who receive the studied generic clozapine will achieve similar plasma drug concentrations to those of brand-name clozapine (Clozaril).