RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Most clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) overexpresses carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX). [68Ga]Ga-NY104 is a small-molecule PET agent selectively targeting CAIX. This study aims to assess the efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-NY104 PET/CT to identify ccRCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were prospectively recruited in the study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05902377). They were further divided into two groups: group 1, patients with primary renal mass who were scheduled for surgery, group 2, patients with suspected/confirmed metastatic ccRCC. All patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-NY104 PET/CT. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (mean age, 58.8 years ± 13.5, 34 men) were recruited, including 20 patients in group 1 and 27 patients in group 2. The patient-level sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-NY104 PET scan was 62%, 33%, 58% for group 1 and 95%, 100%, 96% for group 2. [68Ga]Ga-NY104 PET identified additional 26 disease regions in 67% (14/21) of patients that were previously unknown. The tumor uptake was correlated with immunohistochemical staining results. CONCLUSIONS: [68Ga]Ga-NY104 PET/CT has a high diagnostic efficacy for patients with metastatic ccRCC, while it might be of limited value in the diagnosis of primary ccRCC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the COVID-19 pandemic continuing, various treatments have become widely practiced. Stem cells have a wide range of applications in the treatment of lung diseases and have therefore been experimentally used to treat patients with COVID-19, but whether the expanded use of stem cells is safe and reliable still lacks enough evidence. To address this issue, we systematically reviewed the safety and efficiency of stem cell therapy in COVID-19 cases. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP and SinoMed up to January 18, 2022. The included studies were assessed using the Risk-of-bias tool 1.0 and MINORS instrument. The adverse events, mortality, length of hospital day and laboratory parameters were analyzed by meta-analysis. We adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. RESULTS: We have included 17 studies meeting the inclusion data. There were no significant differences in AEs (OR = 0·39, 95% CI = 0·12 to 1·33, P = 0·13, I2 = 58%) and SAEs (OR = 0·21, 95% CI = 0·04 to 1·03, P = 0·05, I2 = 0%) between stem cell therapy group and control group. The analysis showed that stem cell treatment could significantly reduce the mortality rate(OR = 0·24, 95% CI = 0·13 to 0·45, P < 0·01, I2 = 0%), but was not able to cause changes in length of hospital stay or most laboratory parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that stem cell therapy for COVID-19 has a remarkable effect on efficiency without increasing risks of adverse events and length of hospital stay. It is potentially necessary to establish the criteria for COVID-19 for stem cell therapy.
