Afatinib and Dacomitinib Efficacy, Safety, Progression Patterns, and Resistance Mechanisms in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Carrying Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Comparative Cohort Study in China (AFANDA Study).

(1) Background: Afatinib has been approved for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying major uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations. Dacomitinib, another second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has also shown promising potential for uncommon EGFR mutations. However, no comparative study has been conducted. (2) Methods: Two cohorts were employed: the AFANDA cohort, an ambispective cohort including 121 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations admitted to two tertiary hospitals in China, and an external validation afatinib cohort (ex-AC), extracted from the Afatinib Uncommon EGFR Mutations Database (N = 1140). The AFANDA cohort was divided into an afatinib cohort (AC) and a dacomitinib cohort (DC) for internal exploration. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed for comparison. Progression patterns and resistance mechanisms were explored. (3) Results: In total, 286 patients with advanced NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations treated with afatinib or dacomitinib were enrolled, including 79 in the AFANDA cohort (44 in the DC, 35 in the AC) and 207 in the ex-AC. In internal exploration, the ORR of the DC was significantly higher than that of the AC (60.5 vs. 26.7%, p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in median PFS between the DC and the AC (12.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.305). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent favorable effect of dacomitinib on PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.909; p = 0.047). In external validation, multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic role of dacomitinib in PFS (HR, 1.953; p = 0.029). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the superiority of dacomitinib over afatinib in terms of PFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Toxicity profiling analysis suggested more G1 (p = 0.006), but fewer G3 (p = 0.036) AEs in the DC than in the AC. Progression patterns revealed that the incidence of intracranial progression in the AC was significantly higher than that in the DC (50 vs. 21.1%, p = 0.002). Drug resistance analysis indicated no significant difference in the occurrence of T790M between the AC and the DC (11.8 vs. 15.4%, p = 0.772). (4) Conclusions: Compared with afatinib, dacomitinib demonstrated a more favorable activity with manageable toxicity and different progression patterns in patients with NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations.

Dacomitinib for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring Major Uncommon EGFR Alterations: A Dual-Center, Single-Arm, Ambispective Cohort Study in China.

Objective: Dacomitinib has been approved for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring classical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations; however, clinical evidence of its activity on major uncommon EGFR mutations is currently limited. Materials and methods: This was a dual-center, single-arm, ambispective cohort study in China. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent NSCLC harboring major uncommon EGFR mutations were eligible for the study. The objective response rate and disease control rate were determined by RECIST 1.1 every 1-2 months. Adverse events were assessed by CTCAE 5.0. Results: In total, 32 NSCLC patients were enrolled between July 2020 and January 2022, and 18 (56.3%) patients received dacomitinib as first-line therapy. Median age was 64 years, and 20 (62.5%) were female. The mutations identified were G719X (n = 24; 75%), followed by L861X (n = 10; 31.3%), and S768I (n = 8; 25%). In the first-line setting, 72.2% of patients (13/18) had a confirmed partial response and 100% (18/18) had disease control, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were unreached. In the whole cohort, 56.3% of patients (18/32) had a confirmed partial response and 90.6% (29/32) had disease control, and the median PFS was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-14.5) and the median OS was 36.5 months. Except for one case not available for brain re-evaluation, control of the intracranial metastases was observed in 13 patients (13/14, 92.9%). No grade 4-5 adverse events (AEs) occurred, but all patients had grade 1-2 AEs, and 12.5% (4/32) patients required a dosage reduction due to intolerable AEs. Conclusions: Dacomitinib demonstrated favorable activity with manageable toxicity in patients with NSCLC harboring major uncommon EGFR mutations.

Case Report: Dacomitinib May Not Benefit Patients Who Develop Rare Compound Mutations After Later-Line Osimertinib Treatment.

The acquired EGFR C797X mutation has been identified as the most notable resistance to osimertinib, and novel secondary mutations of EGFR L718 and L792 residues have also been demonstrated to confer osimertinib resistance, making the choice of medication after osimertinib treatment a quandary. Dacomitinib has been reported to have potential impact on patients acquiring rare compound mutations after osimertinib resistance; however, little evidence is available to date. In five lung adenocarcinoma patients resistant to later-line osimertinib, recurrent mutations at EGFR L792 and/or L718 were identified using targeted next-generation sequencing of tissue or cell-free DNA from plasma or pleural effusion. Dacomitinib was initiated after osimertinib resistance; however, all patients progressed within 2 months. Molecular structural simulation revealed that L792H + T790M and L718Q mutations could interfere with the binding of dacomitinib to EGFR and potentially cause primary drug resistance. Our case series study, to our knowledge, is the first to report the clinical efficacy of dacomitinib in patients harboring rare complex mutations after later-line osimertinib resistance.

Osimertinib for Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring diverse EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations.

OBJECTIVES: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20 ins) mutations are generally associated with de novo resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real efficacy of osimertinib for this subset remains elusive. We performed this study to investigate the real efficacy of osimertinib for Chinese advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR ex20 ins mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of metastatic NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20 ins mutations who were treated with osimertinib 80 mg or 160 mg once daily in our center from June 2017 to May 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 62 cases with EGFR ex20 ins mutations were included, and the major insertion variant was D770_N771insSVD and V769_D770insASV (45.1 %). Concurrent TP53 mutation was most commonly observed (59.7 %). Four patients showed partial response, 29 cases with stable disease and 29 showed progressive disease as best response to osimertinib (ORR: 6.5 %, DCR: 53.2 %). The median PFS (mPFS) in total patients was 2.3 (95 %CI, 1.5-3.1) months. Patients harboring A763_Y764insFQEA/D770delinsGY variants showed numerically longer mPFS than those with other variants (4.2 vs. 2.2 months, P =  0.164). Patients who failed to osimertinib and occurred extracranial progression showed similar mPFS to those with intracranial progression (2.3 vs. 1.9 months, P =  0.142). Median PFS was not significantly different between patients who received osimertinib 80mg or 160mg once daily (2.5 vs. 1.3 months, P = 0.161), either with no significance when it used in fist-line setteing or bove (3.0 vs. 2.2 months, P =  0.639). CONCLUSION: The unique insertion variant A763_Y764insFQEA and D770delinsGY might better respond to osimertinib than other ex20 ins subtypes. Osimertinib either 80 mg or 160 mg once daily showed less activity in Chinese NSCLC patients harboring diverse EGFR ex20 ins mutations.

The Application of Supercritical Fluid Chromatography in Food Quality and Food Safety: An Overview.

Recently, supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) has attracted considerable attention for their application in food analysis. The use of supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2), as a mobile phase for SFC, with its low viscosity and high molecular diffusiveness, results in shorter analysis time and lower consumption of organic solvents as compared to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In addition, with recent improvements in its detection system, SFC has shown satisfactory selectivity and sensitivity. Thus, although the composition of food is complex, SFC remains a powerful tool in food analysis with some simple sample pretreatment techniques, such as liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase extraction, and QuEChERS. Here, we summarize the applications of SFC in food quality and safety from 2012 to 2018, and mainly focus on sample pretreatment strategies and analysis conditions.