RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Surgery is the primary curative treatment for colorectal cancer; however, it remains a frightening procedure that can cause stress and pain in affected patients. Therefore, patients typically experience significant anxiety during the preoperative period, which has been associated with poorer outcome after surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an Internet-based informational video on preoperative anxiety level in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, observational study included patients scheduled to undergo elective colorectal cancer surgery, who did not have a history of previous surgery or major cognitive impairment. The primary outcome measure was the change in Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale - Anxiety (APAIS-A) before and after watching a 5-min informational video (https://youtu.be/VzhtOMPUe4Q) during the preoperative period. Secondary outcome measures were the change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), length of postoperative hospital day, and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Anxiety was significantly decreased after watching the video (APAIS-A score: from 10.8 ± 3.7 to 8.2 ± 3.2, P < 0.001, mean reduction: 22.2%). HADS score was also significantly decreased (from 5.8 ± 4.4 to 4.0 ± 3.3, P = 0.001, mean reduction: 26.5%). All preoperative anxiety level did not significantly differ between patients who developed postoperative complication and those who did not. CONCLUSION: The informational video was an effective tool to reduce preoperative anxiety. Viewing this video may confer a higher level of confidence and realistic expectations, as well as reducing patients' preoperative anxiety.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the extent of heterogeneity in medical terminology between South and North Korea by comparing medical terms related to the colorectal system. METHODS: North Korean medical terms were collected from the sections on diseases of the small intestine and colon in a surgery textbook from North Korea, and those terms were compared with their corresponding terms in a South Korean medical terminology textbook. The terms were categorized as either identical, similar, showing disparity, or not used in South Korea. In a subsection analysis, the terms were allocated to pathophysiology, diagnosis, symptoms and examination, drugs, testing, treatment, or others according to the categorization used in the textbook. RESULTS: We found 705 terms in the North Korean textbook, most of which were pathophysiological terms (206, 29.2%), followed by diagnostic terms (165, 23.4%) and symptom and examination terms (122, 17.3%). Treatment-, drug-, and testing-related terms constituted 15.5%, 5.8%, and 4.1% of the 705 terms, respectively. There were 331 identical terms (47.0%) and 146 similar terms (20.7%); 126 terms (17.9%) showed disparity. Another 102 terms (14.5%) were not used in South Korea. The pathophysiological terms were the least heterogeneous, with 61.2% being identical terms used in both countries. However, 26.8% of the terms in the drug category were not used in South Korea. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that less than 50% of the terms for the colorectal system used in South and North Korea were identical. As the division between South and North Korea persists, the heterogeneity of medical terminology is expected to increase.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to categorize surgery-related medical terminologies used in South and North Korea and to compare and analyze discrepancies observed in the terms. METHODS: This study collected medical terminology used in the North Korean medical book "Surgery" and compared it to medical terminology found in the medical glossary of South Korea. The order of the subtitle was described according to the Instruction to Authors. RESULTS: In total, there were 2,168 individual medical terms, of which only 1,004 words (46.3%) were identical to South Korean medical terms. There were 581 similar terms (26.8%), 265 different terms (12.2%), and 318 terms that are nonexistent in South Korea (14.7%). CONCLUSION: Less than half of the medical terms used in North Korea match those used in South Korea. It is expected that the prolongation of the current division of South and North Korea will only worsen this discrepancy. Further efforts to bridge the gap through academic exchange between South Korea and North Korea are required in preparation for an era of reunification.
