Physiological roles of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors in regulating heart rate, body temperature, and locomotion as revealed using knockout mice and caffeine.

Heart rate (HR), body temperature (Temp), locomotor activity (LA), and oxygen consumption (O(2)C) were studied in awake mice lacking one or both of the adenosine A(1) or A(2A) receptors (A(1)R or A(2A)R, respectively) using telemetry and respirometry, before and after caffeine administration. All parameters were lower during day than night and higher in females than males. When compared with wild-type (WT) littermates, HR was higher in male A(1)R knockout (A(1)RKO) mice but lower in A(2A)RKO mice and intermediate in A(1)-A(2A)R double KO mice. A single dose of an unselective beta-blocker (timolol; 1 mg/kg) abolished the HR differences between these genotypes. Deletion of A(1)Rs had little effect on Temp, whereas deletion of A(2A)Rs increased it in females and decreased it in males. A(1)-A(2A)RKO mice had lower Temp than WT mice. LA was unaltered in A(1)RKO mice and lower in A(2A)RKO and A(1)-A(2A)RKO mice than in WT mice. Caffeine injection increased LA but only in mice expressing A(2A)R. Caffeine ingestion also increased LA in an A(2A)R-dependent manner in male mice. Caffeine ingestion significantly increased O(2)C in WT mice, but less in the different KO mice. Injection of 30 mg/kg caffeine decreased Temp, especially in KO mice, and hence in a manner unrelated to A(1)R or A(2A)R blockade. Selective A(2B) antagonism had little or no effect. Thus A(1)R and A(2A)R influence HR, Temp, LA, and O(2)C in mice in a sex-dependent manner, indicating effects of endogenous adenosine. The A(2A)R plays an important role in the modulation of O(2)C and LA by acute and chronic caffeine administration. There is also evidence for effects of higher doses of caffeine being independent of both A(1)R and A(2A)R.

Mice heterozygous for both A1 and A(2A) adenosine receptor genes show similarities to mice given long-term caffeine.

Caffeine is believed to exert its stimulant effects by blocking A(2A) and A(1) adenosine receptors (A(2A)R and A(1)R). Although a genetic knockout of A(2A)R eliminates effects of caffeine, the phenotype of the knockout animal does not resemble that of caffeine treatment. In this study we explored the possibility that a mere reduction of the number of A(1)Rs and A(2A)Rs, achieved by deleting one of the two copies of the A(1)R and A(2A)R genes, would mimic some aspects of long-term caffeine ingestion. The A(1)R and A(2A)R double heterozygous (A(1)R-A(2A)R dHz) mice indeed had approximately one-half the number of A(1)R and A(2A)R, and there were little compensatory changes in A(2B) or A(3) adenosine receptor (A(2B)R or A(3)R) expression. The ability of a stable adenosine analog to activate receptors was shifted to the right by caffeine and in A(1)R-A(2A)R dHz tissue. Caffeine (0.3 g/l in drinking water for 7-10 days) and A(1)R-A(2A)R dHz genotype increased locomotor activity (LA) and decreased heart rate without significantly influencing body temperature. The acute stimulatory effect of a single injection of caffeine was reduced in A(1)R-A(2A)R dHz mice and in mice treated long term with oral caffeine. Thus at least some aspects of long-term caffeine use can be mimicked by genetic manipulation of the A(1)R and A(2A)R.

Adenosine A1 receptors regulate lipolysis and lipogenesis in mouse adipose tissue-interactions with insulin.

Adenosine acting at adenosine A1 receptors is considered to be one major regulator of adipose tissue physiology. We have examined the role of adenosine and its interactions with insulin in adipose tissue by using A1R knock out (-/-) mice. Removal of endogenous adenosine with adenosine deaminase caused lipolysis in A1R (+/+), but not A1R (-/-) adipocytes. The adenosine analogue, 2-chloroadenosine, inhibited noradrenaline-stimulated lipolysis and cAMP accumulation in A1R (+/+), but not in A1R (-/-) adipocytes. Insulin reduces lipolysis and cAMP via another mechanism than adenosine and acted additively, but not synergistically, with adenosine. Plasma levels of free fatty acids, glycerol and triglycerides were significantly lower in A1R (+/+) than in A1R (-/-) mice after administration of an adenosine analogue. 2-chloroadenosine induced lipogenesis in presence of insulin in A1R (+/+), but not in A1R (-/-) adipocytes. There were no changes in mRNA levels for several genes involved in fat synthesis in adipose tissue between genotypes. Body weight was similar in young A1R (+/+) and A1R (-/-) mice, but old male A1R (-/-) mice were heavier than wild type controls. In conclusion, adenosine inhibits lipolysis via the adenosine A1 receptor and other adenosine receptors play no significant role. Adenosine and insulin mediate additive but not synergistic antilipolytic effects and 2-chloroadenosine stimulates lipogenesis via adenosine A1 receptors. Thus deletion of adenosine A1 receptors should increase lipolysis and decrease lipogenesis, but in fact an increased fat mass was observed, indicating that other actions of adenosine A1 receptors, possibly outside adipose tissue, are also important.

Effect of modulating cardiac A1 adenosine receptor expression on protection with ischemic preconditioning.

Activation of A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)ARs) may be a crucial step in protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury; however, the use of pharmacological A(1)AR antagonists to inhibit myocardial protection has yielded inconclusive results. In the current study, we have used mice with genetically modified A(1)AR expression to define the role of A(1)AR in intrinsic protection and ischemic preconditioning (IPC) against I/R injury. Normal wild-type (WT) mice, knockout mice with deleted (A(1)KO(-/-)) or single-copy (A(1)KO(+/-)) A(1)AR, and transgenic mice (A(1)TG) with increased cardiac A(1)AR expression underwent 45 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion, followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Subsets of each group were preconditioned with short durations of ischemia (3 cycles of 5 min of occlusion and 5 min of reperfusion) before index ischemia. Infarct size (IF) in WT, A(1)KO(+/-), and A(1)KO(-/-) mice was (in % of risk region) 58 +/- 3, 60 +/- 4, and 61 +/- 2, respectively, and was less in A(1)TG mice (39 +/- 4, P < 0.05). A strong correlation was observed between A(1)AR expression level and response to IPC. IF was significantly reduced by IPC in WT mice (35 +/- 3, P < 0.05 vs. WT), A(1)KO(+/-) + IPC (48 +/- 4, P < 0.05 vs. A(1)KO(+/-)), and A(1)TG + IPC mice (24 +/- 2, P < 0.05 vs. A(1)TG). However, IPC did not decrease IF in A(1)KO(-/-) + IPC mice (63 +/- 2). In addition, A(1)KO(-/-) hearts subjected to global I/R injury demonstrated diminished recovery of developed pressure and diastolic function compared with WT controls. These findings demonstrate that A(1)ARs are critical for protection from myocardial I/R injury and that cardioprotection with IPC is relative to the level of A(1)AR gene expression.