Evaluation of non-monoexponential diffusion models for hepatocellular carcinoma using b values up to 2000 s/mm2 : A short-term repeatability study.

BACKGROUND: Non-monoexponential diffusion models are being used increasingly for the characterization and curative effect evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). But the fitting quality of the models and the repeatability of their parameters have not been assessed for HCC. PURPOSE: To evaluate kurtosis, stretched exponential, and statistical models for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of HCC, using b-values up to 2000 s/mm2 , in terms of fitting quality and repeatability. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Eighteen patients with HCC. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Conventional and DW images (b = 0, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 s/mm2 ) were acquired at 3.0T. ASSESSMENT: The parameters of the kurtosis, stretched exponential, and statistical models were calculated on regions of interest (ROIs) of each lesion. STATISTICAL TESTS: The fitting quality was evaluated through comparing the fitting residuals produced on the average data of ROI between different models using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Repeatability of the fitted parameters at the median values on the voxelwise data of ROI was assessed using the within coefficient of variation (WCV), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreements (BA-LA). The repeatability was divided into four levels: excellent, good, acceptable, and poor, referring to the values of ICC and WCV. RESULTS: Among three models, the stretched exponential model provided the best fit to HCC (P < 0.05), whereas the statistical model produced the largest fitting residuals (P < 0.05). The repeatability of K from the kurtosis model was excellent (ICC 0.915; WCV 8.79%), while the distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) from the stretched model was just acceptable (ICC 0.477; WCV 27.83%). The repeatability was good for other diffusion-related parameters. DATA CONCLUSION: Considering the model fit and repeatability, the kurtosis and stretched exponential models are the preferred models for the description of the DW signals of HCC with respect to the statistical model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:297-304.

Determination of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Characterization of Hepatic Focal Lesions with Adaptive Multi-Exponential Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Model.

PURPOSE: To distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other types of hepatic lesions with the adaptive multi-exponential IVIM model. METHODS: 94 hepatic focal lesions, including 38 HCC, 16 metastasis, 12 focal nodular hyperplasia, 13 cholangiocarcinoma, and 15 hemangioma, were examined in this study. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with 13 b values (b = 0, 3, …, 500 s/mm2) to measure the adaptive multi-exponential IVIM parameters, namely, pure diffusion coefficient (D), diffusion fraction (fd), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (Di*) and perfusion-related diffusion fraction (fi) of the ith perfusion component. Comparison of the parameters of and their diagnostic performance was determined using Mann-Whitney U test, independent-sample t test, one-way analysis of variance, Z test and receiver-operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: D, D1* and D2* presented significantly difference between HCCs and other hepatic lesions, whereas fd, f1 and f2 did not show statistical differences. In the differential diagnosis of HCCs from other hepatic lesions, D2* (AUC, 0.927) provided best diagnostic performance among all parameters. Additionally, the number of exponential terms in the model was also an important indicator for distinguishing HCCs from other hepatic lesions. In the benign and malignant analysis, D gave the greatest AUC values, 0.895 or 0.853, for differentiation between malignant and benign lesions with three or two exponential terms. Most parameters were not significantly different between hypovascular and hypervascular lesions. For multiple comparisons, significant differences of D, D1* or D2* were found between certain lesion types. CONCLUSION: The adaptive multi-exponential IVIM model was useful and reliable to distinguish HCC from other hepatic lesions.