A customised fetal growth and birthweight standard for Qatar: a population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Customized birthweight centiles have improved the detection of small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) babies compared to existing population standards. This study used perinatal registry data to derive coefficients for developing customized growth charts for Qatar. METHODS: The PEARL registry data on women delivering in Qatar (2017-2018) was used to develop a multivariable linear regression model predicting optimal birthweight. Physiological variables included gestational age, maternal height, weight, ethnicity, parity, and sex of the baby. Pathological variables such as hypertension, preexisting and gestational diabetes and smoking were calculated and excluded to derive the optimal weight at term. RESULTS: The regression model found a term optimal birthweight of 3,235 g for a Qatari nationality mother with median height (159 cm), booking weight (72 kg), parity (1) and gestation at birth (276 days) at the end of an uncomplicated pregnancy. Constitutional coefficients significantly affecting birthweight were gestational age, height, weight, and parity. The main pathological factors were preexisting diabetes (increase by +175.7 g) and smoking (decrease by -190.9 g). The SGA and LGA rates in the entire cohort after applying the population-specific customized centiles were 11.1 and 12.2 %, respectively (contrasting with the Hadlock standard: SGA-26.3 % and LGA-1.8 %, and Fenton standard: SGA-12.9 % and LGA-4.0 %). CONCLUSIONS: Constitutional and pathological variations in fetal growth and birthweight apply in the maternity population in Qatar and have been quantified to allow the generation of customised charts for better identification of pregnancies with abnormal growth. Currently in-use population standards may misdiagnose many SGA and LGA babies.

The impact of abnormal maternal body mass index during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes: a registry-based study from Qatar.

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal body mass index (BMI) during pregnancy, a growing public health concern, increases maternal and neonatal complications. This study aimed to investigate the impact of abnormal BMI on perinatal outcomes compared to normal BMI. METHODS: A total of 14,624 women having singleton births were categorized as underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obesity class I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2), obesity class II (35.0-39.9 kg/m2), and obesity class III (≥40.0 kg/m2) and compared to those with normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2). Outcomes included gestational diabetes (GDM), gestational hypertension (GHT), postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), cesarean delivery (CD), preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), congenital anomalies and neonatal intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: Women with increasing BMI had increasingly higher odds of developing specific adverse outcomes, the highest being in the class III obesity group (GDM-aOR 2.71, 95 % CI 2.25-3.27, p<0.001, GHT-aOR 5.32 95 % CI 3.49-8.11, p<0.001, CD-aOR 2.33 95 % CI 1.85-2.94, p<0.001, PPH-aOR 1.77 95 % CI 1.35-2.33, p<0.001). On the other hand, being underweight during pregnancy was associated with increased odds of PTB (aOR 2.09, 95 % CI 1.37-3.20, p=0.001), LBW (OR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.27-2.79, p=0.002) and congenital anomalies (aOR 2.52 95 % CI 1.12-5.64, p=0.025). Majority in the underweight category gained less than expected gestational weight gain during the pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study have important implications for the clinical management of pregnant women with abnormal BMI. Interventions to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes must focus on enhancing pre-pregnancy BMI and maintaining adequate gestational weight gain.