Changes in three-dimensional nasal morphology according to the direction of maxillary movement during Le Fort I osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Le Fort I (LFI) osteotomy is commonly performed by orthognathic surgeons; however, postoperative changes in nasolabial morphology are of concern. Several factors influence such changes, but it is difficult to accurately predict the postoperative results. This study evaluated the three-dimensional (3D) morphological changes in the nasal region according to the different directions of maxillary movement during LFI osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent LFI osteotomies were included. All patients were divided into maxilla-up (Group U: 20 patients) and maxilla-forward (Group F: 21 patients) groups. Soft tissue morphologies were determined preoperatively and 3 or 6 months postoperatively using an optical 3D scanner. All datasets were evaluated in terms of volume changes in nine subregions and changes in linear measurements around the nasal area. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited increased nasal volumes after surgery in the order of the three upper, three central, and three lower subregions. The change in volume of the central nasal region tended to be greater in Group U than that in Group F. CONCLUSION: We evaluated 3D morphological changes in the nasal region according to the direction of maxillary movement during LFI osteotomy. Group U exhibited a large change in the volume of the central nasal region.

Comparison of three-dimensional soft tissue changes according to the split pattern after sagittal split osteotomy in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyse the changes in soft tissue and hard tissue stability associated with the split pattern, i.e. long split (LS) or short split (SS), after sagittal split osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy were classified into LS or SS groups according to postoperative computed tomography images. They were examined via lateral cephalography and three-dimensional (3D) optical scanning before surgery (T0) and 1 (T1), 3 (T2), and 12 (T3) months after surgery. Six standard angles (SNA, SNB, ANB, FMA, FMIA, and IMPA) were used as measures of hard tissue change. The two sets of 3D data were superimposed, and the volumetric differences were calculated as the soft tissue change. The areas evaluated were delimited by 10 × 20-mm rectangles in the frontal aspect and a 25 × 25-mm square in the lateral aspect. RESULTS: A total of 42 sides (26 patients) were analysed, including 20 (16 patients) in the SS group and 22 (16 patients) in the LS group. We found no significant differences in cephalographic angle or soft tissue changes in the frontal aspect between the SS and LS groups. We found significant differences in the subauricular region from T0-T1 (p = 0.02), T0-T2 (p = 0.03), and T0-T3 (p = 0.037) in terms of soft tissue changes in the lateral aspect. The volume increase associated with posterior mandibular movement was greater in the LS group. CONCLUSIONS: We found that LS patients with mandibular prognathism exhibited increased subauricular volumes following mandibular setback. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is essential to predict the postoperative facial profile before surgery. The split pattern after sagittal split osteotomy affects the postoperative profile of patients with mandibular prognathism.

A comparison of postoperative, three-dimensional soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusions treated via orthodontics-first and surgery-first approaches.

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) soft tissue and hard tissue changes between orthodontics-first approach (OFA) and surgery-first approach (SFA) after mandibular setback surgery. All patients underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and were examined by lateral cephalograms and 3D optical scanner before surgery (T0) and 1 (T1), 3 (T2), and 12 (T3) months after surgery. Three standard angles (FMA, U1 to FH, IMPA) were measured as hard tissue change and the 2 sets of 3D data were superimposed, and volumetric differences were calculated as soft tissue change. Statistical analyses were performed by using unpaired t-tests. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered significant. A total of 39 patients with mandibular prognathism were included in this study. The OFA group consisted of 24 patients and the SFA group of 15 patients. The SFA group exhibited more labial inclination from T1 to T2 (p = 0.008) and T2 to T3 (p = 0.003) than did the OFA group. There were no significant changes at maxilla and mandible at each term of T0, T1, T2 and T3 (p > 0.05), but compared to before surgery, mandibular volume in SFA group significant increased at 1year (p = 0.049) after surgery. We found that the soft tissue changes after the SFA differed significantly from those after the OFA; thus, soft tissue predictions require more care. An analysis of our data compared with OFA and SFA for the patient with mandibular prognathism confirm that the mandibular soft tissue changes by postoperative orthodontic treatment and occlusal relationship in SFA.