Retrospective analysis of 26 cases of pregnancy luteoma.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy luteoma is a rare hormone-dependent ovarian tumor-like lesion caused by increased androgenic activity during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical history, ultrasound manifestations, and differential diagnosis of pregnancy luteoma. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 26 cases of pregnancy luteoma diagnosed by postoperative pathology, from 2009 to 2022. All cases were from two hospitals: Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital and International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital. The clinical history data and ultrasound characteristics were analyzed and the relevant literature was reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 26 cases, five of them had preoperative ultrasound images. Among these five cases, three patients showed hyperechoic masses with less internal uniformity, while two demonstrated loculated anechoic zones, with clear boundary and regular morphology. Color Doppler showed no obvious internal blood flow signals, or that blood flow signals were visible within the cyst wall and hyperechoic mass. Among the cases, 16 had multiple gestations, while two visited the clinic due to sudden abdominal pain and a huge ovarian mass was found by ultrasonography. The ovarian lump was detected during routine obstetric ultrasound in three cases. The remaining were ovarian cysts found incidentally during caesarean section. Four patients presented with hairy manifestations and one patient had a deepened voice. CONCLUSION: There is no characteristic ultrasound of pregnancy luteoma, and its diagnosis is mainly based on clinical history data and laboratory tests.

[Application of fluorescent real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in detecting influenza viruses].

OBJECTIVE: To apply fluorescent real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting influenza viruses. METHODS: A total of 207 oral swab samples were obtained in 16 collections from SARS patients and suspected influenza outbreak cases. They were subjected to influenza virus detection by fluorescent real-time RT-PCR, MDCK cell culture, and hemagglutinin inhibition assay. RESULTS: Out of 207 samples, 79 (38.16%) were positive for influenza viruses when tested by fluorescent real-time PCR, and 62 (29.95%) positive when tested by MDCK cell culture. There was a statistically significant difference between them (chi square=8.64, P less than 0.005). From 104 cases in 9 collections dual serum samples were obtainable. When tested with hemagglutinin inhibition assay, 64 cases (61.54%) showed a 4-fold increase against H3N2 antigen. CONCLUSION: This study showed that fluorescent real-time PCR is a reliable, sensitive, and fast method for detecting influenza viruses.