Patient-Specific Factors Predicting Renal Denervation Response in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The accurate selection of patients likely to respond to renal denervation (RDN) is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes in patients with hypertension. This systematic review was designed to evaluate patient-specific factors predicting the RDN response. METHODS AND RESULTS: We focused on individuals with hypertension who underwent RDN. Patients were categorized based on their baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was blood pressure (BP) reduction after RDN. Both randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies were included. We assessed the risk of bias using corresponding tools and further employed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the overall quality of evidence. A total of 50 studies were ultimately included in this systematic review, among which 17 studies were for meta-analysis. Higher baseline heart rate and lower pulse wave velocity were shown to be associated with significant antihypertensive efficacy of RDN on 24-hour systolic BP reduction (weighted mean difference, -4.05 [95% CI, -7.33 to -0.77]; weighted mean difference, -7.20 [95% CI, -9.79 to -4.62], respectively). In addition, based on qualitative analysis, higher baseline BP, orthostatic hypertension, impaired baroreflex sensitivity, and several biomarkers are also reported to be associated with significant BP reduction after RDN. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hypertension treated with the RDN, higher heart rate, and lower pulse wave velocity were associated with significant BP reduction after RDN. Other factors, including higher baseline BP, hypertensive patients with orthostatic hypertension, BP variability, impaired cardiac baroreflex sensitivity, and some biomarkers are also reported to be associated with a better BP response to RDN.

Heterogeneous body compositions and all-cause mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients: a ten-year retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The association of different body components, including lean mass and body fat, with the risk of death in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are unclear. METHODS: We enrolled adults diagnosed with ACS at our center between January 2011 and December 2012 and obtained follow-up outcomes via telephone questionnaires. We used restricted cubic splines (RCS) with the Cox proportional hazards model to analyze the associations between body mass index (BMI), predicted lean mass index (LMI), predicted body fat percentage (BF), and the value of LMI/BF with 10-year mortality. We also examined the secondary outcome of death during hospitalization. RESULTS: During the maximum 10-year follow-up of 1398 patients, 331 deaths (23.6%) occurred, and a U-shaped relationship was found between BMI and death risk (P nonlinearity = 0.03). After adjusting for age and history of diabetes, the overweight group (24 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m2) had the lowest mortality (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.99). Predicted LMI and LMI/BF had an inverse linear relationship with a 10-year death risk (P nonlinearity = 0.24 and P nonlinearity = 0.38, respectively), while an increase in BF was associated with increased mortality (P nonlinearity = 0.64). During hospitalization, 31 deaths (2.2%) were recorded, and the associations of the indicators with in-hospital mortality were consistent with the long-term outcome analyses. CONCLUSION: Our study provides new insight into the "obesity paradox" in ACS patients, highlighting the importance of considering body composition heterogeneity. Predicted LMI and BF may serve as useful tools for assessing nutritional status and predicting the prognosis of ACS, based on their linear associations with all-cause mortality.

The management of non-culprit vessel(s) in patients with unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and chronic kidney dysfunction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The clinical effects of multivessel interventions in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI), multivessel disease (MVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of intervention in non-culprit lession(s) among this cohort. METHODS: We consecutively included patients diagnosed with UA/NSTEMI, MVD and CKD between January 2008 and December 2018 at our centre. After successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we compared 48-month overall mortality between those undergoing multivessel PCI (MV-PCI) through a single-procedure or staged-procedure approach and culprit vessel-only PCI (CV-PCI) after 1:1 propensity score matching. We conducted stratified analyses and tests for interaction to investigate the modifying effects of critical covariates. Additionally, we recorded the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) to assess the perioperative safety of the two treatment strategies. RESULTS: Of the 749 eligible patients, 271 pairs were successfully matched. Those undergoing MV-PCI had reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.67). Subgroup analysis showed that those with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) could not benefit from MV-PCI (P = 0.250), and the survival advantage also tended to diminish in diabetes (P interaction < 0.01; HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.65-1.45). Although the staged-procedure approach (N = 157) failed to bring additional survival benefits compared to single-procedure MV-PCI (N = 290) (P = 0.460), it showed a tendency to decrease the death risk. CIN risks in MV-PCI and CV-PCI groups were not significantly different (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.94-2.73). CONCLUSION: Among patients with UA/NSTEMI and non-diabetic CKD and an eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , MV-PCI was associated with a reduced risk of long-term death but did not increase the incidence of CIN during the management of MVD compared to CV-PCI. And staged procedures might be a preferable option over single-procedure MV-PCI.

Performance of the Risk Scores for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Chinese Cohort.

Background: The prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) varies greatly, and risk assessment models can help clinicians to identify and manage high-risk patients. While the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) model is widely used, the clinical pathways for acute coronary syndromes (CPACS), which was constructed based on the Chinese population, and acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network (ACTION) have not yet been validated in the Chinese population. Methods: Patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention from 2011 to 2020, were retrospectively recruited and the appropriate corresponding clinical indicators was obtained. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The performance of the GRACE, GRACE 2.0, ACTION, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) and CPACS risk models was evaluated and compared. Results: A total of 19,237 patients with ACS were included. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 2.2%. ACTION showed the highest accuracy in predicting discriminated risk (c-index 0.945, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.922-0.955), but the calibration was not satisfactory. GRACE and GRACE 2.0 did not significantly differ in discrimination (p = 0.1480). GRACE showed the most accurate calibration in all patients and in the subgroup analysis of all models. CPACS (c-index 0.841, 95% CI 0.821-0.861) and TIMI (c-index 0.811, 95% CI 0.787-0.835) did not outperform (c-index 0.926, 95% CI 0.911-0.940). Conclusions: In contemporary Chinese ACS patients, the ACTION risk model's calibration is not satisfactory, although outperformed the gold standard GRACE model in predicting hospital mortality. The CPACS model developed for Chinese patients did not show better predictive performance than the GRACE model.

Total Arterial Revascularization in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Total arterial revascularization (TAR) has gradually become accepted and recognized, but its effect and safety in diabetic patients are not clear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the safety and efficacy of TAR and additionally evaluated the clinical outcomes of arterial revascularization using different arterial deployments in patients with diabetes. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2022 for studies that studied the effect of arterial revascularization in diabetic patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were searched. The primary outcome was long-term ( ≥ 12 months of follow-up) death by any cause. The secondary efficacy endpoints were long-term ( ≥ 12 months) cardiovascular death, early sternal wound infection (SWI) and death ( ≤ 30 days or in hospital). Risk ratios (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to describe short-term results and long-term survival outcomes. Two different ways were used to analyze the effect of TAR and the impact of diabetes on the clinical outcomes of TAR. Results: Thirty-five studies were included in the study, covering 178,274 diabetic patients. Compared to conventional surgery with saphenous veins, TAR was not associated with increased early mortality (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48-1.23) and risk of SWI (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46-1.28). The overall Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on reconstructed patient data indicated a significant association between TAR and reduced late mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.48-0.67) and the curves based on the propensity-score matched (PSM) analyses suggested a similar result (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.85). TAR could also effectively decrease the risk of cardiovascular death (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.75). Through comparing the effect of TAR in patients with and without diabetes, we found that the presence of diabetes did not elevate the risk of early adverse events (death: RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.64-3.49; SWI: RR 2.52, 95% CI 0.91-7.00). Although diabetes increased long-term mortality (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.35-2.03), the cardiovascular death rate was similar in patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.49-2.45). Regarding the selection of arterial conduits, grafting via the bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) decreased the risk of overall death (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.87) without resulting in a significantly elevated rate of early death (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.11). However, the evidence from PSM studies indicated no difference between the long-term mortality of the BIMA group and that of the single internal mammary arteries (SIMA) groups (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.52-1.11), and the risk of SWI was significantly increased by BIMA in diabetes (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.42-1.91). The sub-analysis indicated the consistent benefit of the radial artery (RA) application in diabetic patients (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) compared to saphenous vein graft. In two propensity-score-matched studies, the evidence showed that the survival outcomes of the BIMA group were similar to that of the SIMA plus RA group but that grafting via the RA reduced the risk of sternal wound infection. Conclusions: Compared with conventional surgery using SVG, TAR was associated with an enhanced survival benefit in diabetes and this long-term gain did not increase the risk of early mortality or SWI. Given the increased infection risk and controversial long-term survival gains of grafting via the BIMA in diabetes, its wide use for grafting in this cohort should be seriously considered. Compared to using the right internal mammary artery (RIMA), RA might be a similarly effective but safer option for patients with diabetes.

Endoscopic transcortical expanded transforaminal transvenous transchoroidal approach to third ventricle lesion resection using an endoport.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical experience and application value of endoscopic resection of lesions in and around the third ventricle using a transcortical expanded transforaminal transvenous transchoroidal approach with an endoport. METHODS: Clinical data and follow-up results of seven patients who underwent the removal of lesions in the third ventricle and its adjacent area with an endoport-guided endoscopic system from January 2018 to December 2020 in the Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, were analyzed retrospectively. Two other patients from the Affiliated Pediatric Hospital of Fudan University and the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, respectively, were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of nine cases of third ventricle tumors were included in the study, including six women and three men, with an average age of 37.8 years (4-84 years old) and a follow-up time of 6-44 months. These nine tumor cases included two pilocytic astrocytomas, one diffuse midline glioma (H3 K27-altered), two craniopharyngiomas, two choroid plexus (CP) papillomas, one germinoma, and one pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation. Total resection was completed in eight cases, with one near-total resection. There were no complications related to the surgical approach, such as epilepsy, aphasia, or hemiplegia. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscope transcortical expanded transforaminal transvenous transchoroidal approach using an endoport can safely and effectively remove third ventricle lesions. This approach can reach a wide area, from the anterior to the posterior third ventricle.

Revascularization vs. Conservative Medical Treatment in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: As a strong risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) indicates higher mortality in patients with CAD. However, the optimal treatment for the patients with two coexisting diseases is still not well defined. METHODS: To conduct a meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for studies comparing medical treatment (MT) and revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] in adults with CAD and CKD. Long-term all-cause mortality was evaluated, and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 13 trials met our selection criteria. Long-term (with at least a 1-year follow-up) mortality was significantly lower in the revascularization arm [relative risk (RR) = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.60-0.72] by either PCI (RR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.55-0.68) or CABG (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.46-0.84). The results were consistent in dialysis patients (RR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.59-0.79), patients with stable CAD (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.92), patients with acute coronary syndrome (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.58-0.66), and geriatric patients (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.54-0.61). CONCLUSION: In patients with CKD and CAD, revascularization is more effective in reducing mortality than MT alone. This observed benefit is consistent in patients with stable CAD and elderly patients. However, future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to confirm these findings.