Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Background: The objective was to determine whether an erector spinae plane (ESP) block could provide additional postoperative analgesic benefits compared with a transversus abdominis plane block. Methods: 78 patients were separated into two groups (n = 39 per group). Both groups received bilateral injections of 266 mg Exparel® (20 ml) and 60 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. Patients undergoing a transversus abdominis plane block received these injections intraoperatively, while patients undergoing an ESP block received these preoperatively. Outcomes were measured based on scores in opioid usage; pain (visual analog scale) at rest and with movement; nausea; sedation and patient satisfaction. Results: There were no significant intergroup differences in any category (all scores had p > 0.05). Conclusion: No additional analgesic benefits were found using the ESP block procedure.

The focus for this study was to determine whether there is an alternative method to reduce pain after a laparoscopic hysterectomy. The standard practice at our hospital is to use a method called transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block: injection of a local anesthetic into a region between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. The alternative method we studied is known as an erector spinae plane (ESP) block: injection of the same anesthetic into a different region, between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process of the vertebrae. Our study separated 78 women who met specific criteria into two groups: one using transversus abdominis plane block and the second using ESP block to decrease pain after the procedure. We primarily used a visual analog scale to measure pain levels after treatment. We also used additional parameters like opioid usage and side effects to measure the effects each treatment had on postoperative pain. We found that both methods were similarly effective in lowering pain. The ESP block did show a trend toward less opioid use, which is beneficial for patients following this procedure, but the data collected did not show a significant difference between the two approaches in alleviating pain. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04003987 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Real world utilization of nurse-driven urinary catheter removal protocol in patients with epidural pain catheters.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons use indwelling bladder catheters (IBCs) to avoid urinary retention in patients with epidural analgesic catheters. Reduction of IBC-days is associated with improved catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates (CAUTI). This study investigates real world application of a Nurse-Driven Catheter Removal Protocol (NDCRP) to reduce IBC-days in this patient population. METHODS: Patients with epidural catheters and IBC were targeted for IBC removal on post-operative day 1 (POD1). Patients were followed for application of the NDCRP, catheterization need, IBC re-anchoring, and complications. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients had IBCs removed on POD1 (Protocol Group) and 50 patients did not (Non-Protocol Group). There was a reduction in IBC-days in the Protocol Group despite incomplete adherence to the NDCRP (1.55 days vs 4.64 days; P < .001). Ninety-three patients (70%) were able to spontaneously void after early IBC removal. Fourteen patients (11%) were able to spontaneously void after serial in-and-out catheterization (I/O). No significant difference in re-anchoring was found between the protocol and non-protocol groups (26 vs 4 patients; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Early removal of IBCs (POD1) in patients with epidural catheters with the assistance of an NDCRP is a safe and successful strategy to reduce IBC-days in the hospital.

Effect of Prior Formal Education on Successful Thoracic Epidural Placement By Anesthesia Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter placement for thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is technically challenging; however, methods for teaching this technique to anesthesia residents have not been well-studied. The present study aimed to determine optimal teaching methods for proficient TEA catheter placement by comparing video-based formal resident education with traditional bedside training by attending physicians. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Large academic hospital, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 76 postgraduate year 3 and 4 anesthesiology residents (38 intervention, 38 control). INTERVENTIONS: Formal education included an instructional video on proper TEA technique. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measures of proficiency in TEA catheter placement included the time needed to complete the procedure successfully and the success of placement as indicated by patient confirmation. Residents who received formal video instruction had similar success in catheter placement and similar procedure times compared with the traditionally trained residents. The overall success rate was 99.2%, with faculty intervention required in only 17% of cases. More experienced residents (ie, having placed more epidural catheters) were faster at TEA catheter placement. CONCLUSIONS: Formal video education for TEA catheter placement provided no additional improvement of resident proficiency compared with traditional training at a high-volume academic center. The success rate was very high in this group of residents; however, experiences at other institutions may vary. Future studies are needed to determine optimum teaching strategies for TEA.

Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating Single-Injection Paravertebral Block, Paravertebral Catheter, and Thoracic Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Regional Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has improved patient outcomes; however, postoperative pain remains potentially severe. The objective of this study was to compare adjunct analgesic modalities for VATS, including paravertebral nerve blockade (PVB) and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: Large academic hospital, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing VATS. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided PVB catheter, ultrasound-guided single-injection PVB, or TEA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (at rest and with knee flexion) and opioid usage were recorded. Pain scores (with movement) for the TEA group were lower than those for either PVB group at 24 hours (p ≤ 0.008) and for the PVB catheter group at 48 hours (p = 0.002). Opioid use in TEA group was lower than that for either PVB group at 24 and 48 hours (p < 0.001) and 72 hours (p < 0.05). Single-injection PVB was faster compared with PVB catheter placement (6 min v 12 min; p < 0.001) but similar to TEA (5 min). Patient satisfaction, nausea, sedation, and 6-month postsurgical pain did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: TEA led to lower pain scores and opioid requirement for VATS procedures compared with PVB techniques. Single-injection PVB was faster and equally as effective as PVB catheter, and it led to similar patient satisfaction as TEA; therefore, it should be considered in patients who are not ideal candidates for TEA.

Prospective Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Palpation Techniques for Arterial Line Placement by Residents in a Teaching Institution.

BACKGROUND: Arterial line insertion is traditionally done by blind palpation. Residents may need multiple attempts for successful insertion, leading to longer procedure times and many failed attempts. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that ultrasound guidance (USG) would be faster and more successful than traditional blind palpation (TBP) for radial artery line placement by residents. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective surgery requiring a radial arterial line were randomized to either the USG or TBP groups. Exclusion criteria included a need for arterial line placement in an awake patient, emergent surgery, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class VI. After the induction of anesthesia, a postgraduate year 3 (PGY-3) or PGY-4 anesthesia resident placed an arterial line by either USG or TBP. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients and 85 of 106 residents (80%) in the training program were included. The 2 groups were similar with respect to sex, weight, height, ASA class, baseline systolic blood pressure, and baseline heart rate. USG was faster than TBP (mean times 171.1 ± 16.7 seconds versus 243.6 ± 23.5 seconds, P = .012), required fewer attempts (mean 1.78 ± 0.11 versus 2.48 ± 0.15, P = .035), and had an improved success rate (96% versus 90%, P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: We found that residents using USG in an academic institution resulted in significantly faster placement of the arterial lines, fewer attempts, and fewer catheters used.

Pain interventions for organ transplant patients undergoing incisional hernia repair: Is epidural or transversus abdominus plane block a better option?

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management in transplant recipients undergoing incisional herniorraphy is challenging. Historically limited to intravenous or oral opioids, alternatives including transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block catheters and thoracic epidural catheters have been introduced. The aim of this study was to determine whether TAP catheters and thoracic epidural analgesia significantly impacted on postoperative pain and opioid usage in transplant recipients undergoing incisional hernia repair. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 154 patients undergoing incisional hernia repair from January 2011 to June 2015. Of these, 56 received epidurals, 51 received TAP catheters, and 47 received no intervention. RESULTS: Demographic profiles were comparable among the three groups including type of previous transplant and type of hernia surgery. Thoracic epidural analgesia was associated with lower median, mean, and maximum pain scores (P < 0.001) and less opioid requirement (P < 0.001). There was no difference in pain scores and opioid usage among the TAP catheter and no intervention groups. There was no difference in time to first flatus or first bowel movement, length of hospital stay, individual opioid-related side effects, and adverse reactions among the three groups. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing hernia repair after transplant surgery.