RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Insurance reimbursement provisions in South Korea limit osteoporosis medication availability for patients with T-scores exceeding - 2.5. This study aimed to evaluate the financial impact and fracture prevention of continuous denosumab therapy until a T-score>-2.0 (Dmab-C strategy), versus discontinuation of denosumab after reaching T-score>-2.5 (Dmab-D strategy) in osteoporosis patients. METHODS: A cost-consequence analysis from a Korean healthcare system perspective was performed using a newly developed Markov model. The incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fracture, fracture-related deaths, drug costs, and fracture-treatment costs were estimated and compared between Dmab-C and Dmab-D strategy over a lifetime in eligible patients aged 55 years. RESULTS: Base-case analysis revealed that Dmab-C prevented 32.21 vertebral fracture (VF) and 12.43 non-VF events per 100 patients over a lifetime, while reducing 1.29 fracture-related deaths. Lifetime direct healthcare cost saving per patient was KRW 1,354,655 if Dmab-C replaces Dmab-D. When productivity losses were considered, Dmab-C saved KRW 29,025,949 per patient compared to Dmab-D. The additional treatment costs of Dmab-C could be offset by the higher subsequent treatment costs and fracture treatment costs of Dmab-D. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent patterns with results of the base-case analysis. CONCLUSION: Continuous treatment using denosumab until osteoporosis patients achieve and maintain a T-score of -2.0 would provide greater clinical and economic benefits in terms of fracture prevention and reduced mortality risks compared to outcomes from discontinuing treatment at a T-score of -2.5 or above. This new treatment strategy would effectively lower the risk of fractures and fracture-related mortality, ultimately leading to lower medical expenses.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Fracturas Óseas , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica , Osteoporosis , Humanos , Femenino , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Fracturas Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
We estimated the short-term impact of fragility fractures on community-dwelling women in five countries. Women with fragility fractures reported significantly more difficulties performing activities of daily living and significantly higher levels of lost productivity and caregiver support than those without fractures; results highlight the multi-country indirect burden of fragility fractures. INTRODUCTION: To estimate the impact of fragility fractures on activities of daily living (ADL), productivity loss and caregiver support in women with a recent fragility fracture. METHODS: This multi-centre cross-sectional study enrolled community-dwelling women aged ≥ 50 years in South Korea, Spain, Germany, Australia and the United States. The fragility fracture cohort consisted of women with an index fragility fracture in the past 12 months; the fracture free cohort consisted of women with no fracture in the 18 months prior to study enrolment. Study participants completed three validated questionnaires: Lawton Instrumental ADL (IADL), Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) and iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). RESULTS: In total, 1,253 participants from 41 sites across the five countries were included. Compared with the fracture free cohorts, fragility fracture cohorts had significantly lower function and were more dependent on support (p < 0.05 in all countries for Lawton IADL, and in South Korea, Spain, Australia and the United States for PSMS), significantly higher hours of paid absenteeism (p < 0.05, Spain, Germany, Australia), significantly higher unpaid lost productivity (p < 0.05, South Korea, Spain, Germany), significantly more days of paid help received in the home (p < 0.05 South Korea, Spain and the United States), and significantly more days of unpaid help from family members or friends (p < 0.05, all countries). CONCLUSION: In this multi-national study, fragility fractures in community-dwelling ≥ 50 years women were associated with several outcomes indicating higher indirect burden and lower quality of life, including more difficulties performing ADL and higher levels of lost productivity and caregiver support.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Femenino , Vida Independiente , Calidad de Vida , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Describe patient characteristics, health care resource utilization, costs, and humanistic burden of women with Medicare insurance with incident fragility fracture who were admitted to post-acute-care (PAC). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling female Medicare beneficiaries with incident fragility fracture January 1, 2017, to October 17, 2019, resulting in PAC admission to a skilled nursing facility (SNF), home-health care, inpatient-rehabilitation facility, or long-term acute-care hospital. METHODS: Patient demographic/clinical characteristics were measured during 1-year baseline. Resource utilization and costs were measured during baseline, PAC event, and PAC follow-up. Humanistic burden was measured among SNF patients with linked Minimum Data Set assessments. Multivariable regression examined predictors of PAC costs after discharge and changes in functional status during SNF stay. RESULTS: A total of 388,732 patients were included. Compared with baseline, hospitalization rates were 3.5, 2.4, 2.6, and 3.1 times higher and total costs 2.7, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.6 times higher for SNF, home-health, inpatient-rehabilitation, and long-term acute-care, respectively, following PAC discharge. Utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and osteoporosis medications remained low: 8.5% to 13.7% received DXA during baseline vs 5.2% to 15.6% following PAC; 10.2% to 12.0% received osteoporosis medication during baseline vs 11.4% to 22.3% following PAC. Dual eligibility for Medicaid (ie, low income) was associated with 12% higher costs; Black patients had 14% higher costs. Activities of daily living scores improved 3.5 points during SNF stay, but Black patients had 1.22-point lower improvement than White patients. Pain intensity scores showed small improvement (-0.8 points). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Women admitted to PAC with incident fracture had high humanistic burden with little improvement in pain and functional status and significantly higher economic burden after discharge compared with baseline. Disparities in outcomes related to social risk factors were observed, with consistently low utilization of DXA and osteoporosis medications even after fracture. Results indicate a need for improved early diagnosis and aggressive disease management to prevent and treat fragility fractures.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Osteoporosis , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alta del Paciente , Fracturas de Cadera/rehabilitación , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de EnfermeríaRESUMEN
Introduction: Clinical practice guidelines recommend initiating a high-intensity LLT and continued monitoring of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We used real-world data to describe LLT utilization after discharge and 1-year adherence. The reduction in LDL-C was also evaluated. Methods: Data were extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) from 12 hospitals in a large community healthcare system in midwestern United States between 2013 and 2019. Data on eligible patients recently discharged with an ACS event were linked to pharmacy claims data to describe LLT fill rates and 1-year post-discharge adherence. Adherence was reported as the proportion of days covered ≥80%. Results: Of the 10,589 eligible patients, 49% filled a high-intensity statin at discharge and only 36% were adherent at 1 year. The mean (SD) age was 66.1±13.3, 39.3% were females, 58.8% were Caucasian, and 53.0% had Medicare. There was a clear trend for greater fill rates at discharge among patients with higher LDL-C values than those with lower values (p<0.01). Key predictors of high-intensity (versus medium-intensity) LLT use within 21 days after an ACS event included ACS type (odds ratio [OR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.67 for NSTEMI versus STEMI), age group (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.48-0.72 for >75 years versus <65 years), and statin use before index ACS event (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.23-1.88). Conclusion: This real-world study found that despite recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, high-intensity LLT fill rates at discharge and 1-year adherence to LLT remain suboptimal. Clinical characteristics, including ACS type and LDL-C values, were strong predictors of filling and adherence to guideline-recommended therapy. Age, sex, and race/ethnicity disparities were observed in discharge fill rates and 1-year adherence. These results highlight the need for continued efforts at the patient and provider levels to improve LLT adherence among ACS patients.
RESUMEN
A population-level, cross-sectional model was developed to estimate the clinical and economic burden of osteoporosis among women (≥ 70 years) across eight European countries. Results demonstrated that interventions aimed at improving fracture risk assessment and adherence would save 15.2% of annual costs in 2040. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is associated with significant clinical and economic burden, expected to further increase with an ageing population. This modelling analysis assessed clinical and economic outcomes under different hypothetical disease management interventions to reduce this burden. METHODS: A population-level, cross-sectional cohort model was developed to estimate numbers of incident fractures and direct costs of care among women (≥ 70 years) in eight European countries under different hypothetical interventions: (1) an improvement in the risk assessment rate, (2) an improvement in the treatment adherence rate and (3) a combination of interventions 1 and 2. A 50% improvement from the status quo, based on existing disease management patterns, was evaluated in the main analysis; scenario analyses evaluated improvement of either 10 or 100%. RESULTS: Based on existing disease management patterns, a 44% increase in the annual number of fractures and costs was predicted from 2020 to 2040: from 1.2 million fractures and 12.8 billion in 2020 to 1.8 million fractures and 18.4 billion in 2040. Intervention 3 provided the greatest fracture reduction and cost savings (a decrease of 17.9% and 15.2% in fractures and cost, respectively) in 2040 compared with intervention 1 (decreases of 8.7% and 7.0% in fractures and cost, respectively) and intervention 2 (10.0% and 8.8% reductions in fracture and cost, respectively). Scenario analyses showed similar patterns. CONCLUSION: These analyses suggest that interventions which improve fracture risk assessment and adherence to treatments would relieve the burden of osteoporosis, and that a combination strategy would achieve greatest benefits.
Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica , Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Femenino , Humanos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Posmenopausia , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/terapia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/terapiaRESUMEN
Background/Objectives: We aimed to assess the incidence of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events after the first myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke (IS), or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and to estimate acute and follow-up medical costs. Methods: Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified patients with their first MI, IS, or ICH between 2011 and 2017. The cumulative incidence rates of second CV events (including events of the same type [recurrent] or of the other two types) were estimated. The costs for hospitalization and all-cause follow-up were calculated for the first and recurrent CV events and are presented as median (Q1~Q3) in 2017 US dollars. Results: We identified 70,428 patients with a first MI, 123,857 with a first IS, and 41,347 with a first ICH. The cumulative incidence rates of recurrence during the first year and after six years were 3.9% and 10.1% for MI, 5.3% and 13.8% for IS, and 3.9% and 8.9% for ICH, respectively. For first and recurrent nonfatal events, acute hospitalization costs were $4,729 (3,737~5,985) and $4,459 (2,887~6,026) for MI; $1,136 (756~2,183) and $1,224 (774~2,412) for IS; and $2,985 (1,264~8,831) and $2,170 (1,183~4,675) for ICH, respectively. Total annual costs for nonfatal first events in the first year and second year of follow-up were $2413 (1,393~6,120) and $1,293 (654~2,868) for MI, $2,174 (1,040~5,472) and $1,394 (602~3,265) for IS, and $2,963 (995~8,352) and $1,185 (405~3,937) for ICH, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with a first MI, IS, and ICH, recurrent CV events continue to substantially impact public health and escalate the economic burden.
RESUMEN
Aim: There is a need to understand the management status of hypertension, dyslipidemia/hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus in the Asia-Pacific region (APAC). Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to summarize the awareness, treatment, and/or control rates of these risk factors in adults across 11 APAC countries/regions. Results: We included 138 studies. Individuals with dyslipidemia had the lowest pooled rates compared with those with other risk factors. Levels of awareness with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia were comparable. Individuals with hypercholesterolemia had a statistically lower pooled treatment rate but a higher pooled control rate than those with hypertension. Conclusion: The management of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus was suboptimal in these 11 countries/regions.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Dislipidemias , Hipercolesterolemia , Hipertensión , Adulto , Humanos , Asia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Dislipidemias/epidemiología , Dislipidemias/terapia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Hipercolesterolemia/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
This study examined the clinical benefits of a collaborative pharmacist-physician inpatient diabetes management program that included daily blood glucose assessment and the recommendation and implementation of American Diabetes Association-recommended insulin regimens.