Effect of different surgical positions on the cerebral venous drainage: a pilot study using healthy volunteers.

Excessive neck flexion and rotation in certain surgical positions may cause kinking of the internal jugular vein that obstructs cerebral venous blood flow and results in elevated intracranial pressure. The objective of this study was to measure internal jugular vein flow and identify potential impediments to venous flow in supine, prone, and park bench positions using non-anaesthetised volunteers. Twenty-seven volunteers were recruited. Venous flow rate was derived from ultrasound measurements of the vessel cross-sectional area and flow velocity. Change from supine to prone position produced a significant increase in both jugular vein cross-sectional areas without affecting venous flows. In the right park bench position, the right internal jugular vein cross-sectional area decreased from 1.2 to 0.9 cm(2) (p = 0.027) without substantive changes in mean venous flow rate (p = 0.91) when compared with supine. In summary, the internal jugular vein flow was not compromised by either prone or park bench positions in non-anaesthetised volunteers, and careful positioning may prevent kinking of the jugular vein. Further studies in anaesthetised and ventilated patients are needed to validate these results for clinical practice.

Association between neuraxial analgesia, cancer progression, and mortality after radical prostatectomy: a large, retrospective matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic opioids are immunosuppressive, which could promote tumour recurrence. We, therefore, test the hypothesis that supplementing general anaesthesia with neuraxial analgesia improves long-term oncological outcomes in patients having radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients who had general anaesthesia with neuraxial analgesia (n=1642) were matched 1:1 based on age, surgical year, pathological stage, Gleason scores, and presence of lymph node disease with those who had general anaesthesia only. Medical records were reviewed. Outcomes of interest were systemic cancer progression, recurrence, prostate cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality. Data were analysed using stratified proportional hazards regression, the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests. The median follow-up was 9 yr. RESULTS: After adjusting for comorbidities, positive surgical margins, and adjuvant hormonal and radiation therapies within 90 postoperative days, general anaesthesia only was associated with increased risk for systemic progression [hazard ratio (HR)=2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-6.05; P=0.008] and higher overall mortality (HR=1.32, 95% CI 1.00-1.74; P=0.047). Although not statistically significant, similar findings were observed for the outcome of prostate cancer deaths (adjusted HR=2.2, 95% CI 0.88-5.60; P=0.091). CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective analysis suggests a possible beneficial effect of regional anaesthetic techniques on oncological outcomes after prostate surgery for cancer; however, these findings need to be confirmed (or refuted) in randomized trials.