Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 771, 2023 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pleural effusion (PE) is a common clinical feature that presents a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess the biomarkers, ratios, and multiple indicators in serum and Pleural effusion for the differential diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) from non-tuberculosis effusion (non-TPE). METHODS: The participants, who were divided into two groups: TPE and non-TPE (MPE and PPE), from Ningbo First Hospital, were incorporated in this study. The clinical and laboratory features were collected and analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Twelve biomarkers and their ratios in serum and PE were investigated for TPE versus non-TPE. Additionally, the value of multiple indicators for joint diagnosis was estimated. RESULTS: Biomarkers and ratios showed good diagnostic performance. The five variables including Serum ADA, IGRA, Effusion ADA, Effusion ADA/Serum ADA and Effusion LDH/Effusion ADA were identified as valuable parameters for differential diagnosis of TPE from non-TPE. The combined diagnosis of the five indexes yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy for TPE with an AUC (0.919), sensitivity (90.30%), and specificity (94.50%). CONCLUSIONS: The biomarkers and ratios demonstrated strong diagnostic performance, and the utilization of multiple indicators for joint diagnosis can improve the diagnostic efficacy of tuberculous pleurisy.


Asunto(s)
Derrame Pleural , Tuberculosis Pleural , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adenosina Desaminasa/análisis , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Tuberculosis Pleural/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...